Skip to main content
Log in

FMNSICS: Fractional Meyer neuro-swarm intelligent computing solver for nonlinear fractional Lane–Emden systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fractional neuro-evolution-based intelligent computing has substantial potential to solve fractional order systems represented with Lane–Emden equation arising in astrophysics including Newtonian self-gravitating, spherically symmetric and polytropic fluid. The present study aimed to present a neuro-swarm-based intelligent computing solver for the solution of nonlinear fractional Lane–Emden system (NFLES) using by exploitation of fractional Meyer wavelet artificial neural networks (FMW-ANNs) and global optimization mechanism of particle swarm optimization (PSO) combined with rapid local search of sequential quadratic programming (SQP), i.e., FMW-ANN-PSO-SQP. The motivation for the design of FMW-ANN-PSO-SQP intelligent computing comes with an objective of presenting an accurate, reliable, and viable framworks to deal with stiff nonlinear singular models represented with NFLES involving both fractional and integer derivative terms. The designed algorithm is tested for six different variants of NFLESs. The obtained numerical outcomes obtained by the proposed FMW-ANN-PSO-SQP are compared with the exact results to authenticate the correctness, efficacy, and viability, and these aspects are further endorsed statistical observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo B, Pu X, Huang F (2015) Fractional partial differential equations and their numerical solutions. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 336–336

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baleanu D, Machado JAT, Luo AC (eds) (2011) Fractional dynamics and control. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Sabatier J, Agrawal OP, Machado JAT (2007) Advances in fractional calculus, vol 4, no 9. Springer, Dordrecht

  4. Podlubny I (1998) Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kilbas AA, Trujillo Srivastava HM, JJ, (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, vol 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kilbas AA, Marzan SA (2005) Nonlinear differential equations with the Caputo fractional derivative in the space of continuously differentiable functions. Differ Equ 41(1):84–89

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jumarie G (2006) Modified Riemann-Liouville derivative and fractional Taylor series of nondifferentiable functions further results. Comput Math Appl 51(9–10):1367–1376

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelouahab MS, Hamri NE (2016) The Grünwald-Letnikov fractional-order derivative with fixed memory length. Mediterr J Math 13(2):557–572

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Luchko Y, Trujillo J (2007) Caputo-type modification of the Erdélyi-Kober fractional derivative. Fract Calc Appl Anal 10(3):249–267

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Momani S, Ibrahim RW (2008) On a fractional integral equation of periodic functions involving Weyl-Riesz operator in Banach algebras. J Math Anal Appl 339(2):1210–1219

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Masood Z et al (2020) Design of fractional order epidemic model for future generation tiny hardware implants. Futur Gener Comput Syst 106:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ionescu C, Lopes A, Copot D, Machado JT, Bates JHT (2017) The role of fractional calculus in modeling biological phenomena: a review. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 51:141–159

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Muresan CI, Ostalczyk P, Ortigueira MD (2017) Fractional calculus applications in modelling and design of control systems. J Appl Nonlinear Dyn 6(2):131–134

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Sun H, Stowell HH, Zayernouri M, Hansen SE (2017) A review of applications of fractional calculus in Earth system dynamics. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 102:29–46

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Torvik PJ, Bagley RL (1984) On the appearance of the fractional derivative in the behavior of real materials. J Appl Mech 51(2):294–298

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun Y, Indraratna B, Carter JP, Marchant T, Nimbalkar S (2017) Application of fractional calculus in modelling ballast deformation under cyclic loading. Comput Geotech 82:16–30

    Google Scholar 

  17. He JH, Ji FY (2019) Two-scale mathematics and fractional calculus for thermodynamics. Therm Sci 23(4):2131–2133

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engheia N (1997) On the role of fractional calculus in electromagnetic theory. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 39(4):35–46

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muhammad Y, Khan R, Ullah F et al (2020) Design of fractional swarming strategy for solution of optimal reactive power dispatch. Neural Comput Appl 32:10501–10518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04589-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar D, Baleanu D (2019) Fractional calculus and its applications in physics. Front Phys 7:81

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tarasov VE (2019) On history of mathematical economics: application of fractional calculus. Mathematics 7(6):509

    Google Scholar 

  22. El-Dessoky MM, Khan MA (2019) Application of fractional calculus to combined modified function projective synchronization of different systems. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 29(1):013107

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Alves C, Rădulescu V (2020) The Lane-Emden equation with variable double-phase and multiple regime. Proc Am Math Soc 148(7):2937–2952

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen H, Huang X, Zhou F (2020) Fast and slow decaying solutions of Lane-Emden equations involving nonhomogeneous potential. Adv Nonlinear Stud 20(2):339–359

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kycia RA (2020) Perturbed Lane-Emden equations as a boundary value problem with singular endpoints. J Dyn Control Syst 26(2):333–347

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Cassani D, Schiera D (2020) Uniqueness results for higher order Lane-Emden systems. Nonlinear Anal 198:111871

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Malik AM, Mohammed OH (2020) Two efficient methods for solving fractional Lane-Emden equations with conformable fractional derivative. J Egypt Math Soc 28(1):1–11

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma WX, Mousa MM, Ali MR (2020) Application of a new hybrid method for solving singular fractional Lane–Emden-type equations in astrophysics. Mod Phys Lett B 34(03):2050049

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdel-Salam AB, Nouh MI, Elkholy EA (2020) Analytical solution to the conformable fractional Lane-Emden type equations arising in astrophysics. Scientific Afr 8:e00386

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mechee MS, Senu N (2012) Numerical study of fractional differential equations of Lane-Emden type by method of collocation. Appl Math 3(08):851

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Parand K, Pirkhedri A (2010) Sinc-collocation method for solving astrophysics equations. New Astron 15(6):533–537

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gümgüm S (2020) Taylor wavelet solution of linear and nonlinear Lane-Emden equations. Appl Numer Math 158:44–53

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar M (2020) Numerical solution of Lane-Emden type equations using Adomian decomposition method with unequal step-size partitions. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-02-2020-0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yıldırım A, Öziş T (2007) Solutions of singular IVPs of Lane-Emden type by homotopy perturbation method. Phys Lett A 369(1–2):70–76

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. KarimiDizicheh A, Salahshour S, Ahmadian A, Baleanu D (2020) A novel algorithm based on the Legendre wavelets spectral technique for solving the Lane-Emden equations. Appl Numer Math 153:443–456

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Yıldırım A, Öziş T (2009) Solutions of singular IVPs of Lane-Emden type by the variational iteration method. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 70(6):2480–2484

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Parand K, Dehghan M, Rezaei AR, Ghaderi SM (2010) An approximation algorithm for the solution of the nonlinear Lane-Emden type equations arising in astrophysics using Hermite functions collocation method. Comput Phys Commun 181(6):1096–1108

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Singh R (2020) Solving coupled Lane-Emden equations by green’s function and decomposition technique. Int J Appl Comput Math 6:80

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Shahni J, Singh R (2020) An efficient numerical technique for Lane–Emden–Fowler boundary value problems: Bernstein collocation method. Eur Phys J Plus 135(6):475

    Google Scholar 

  40. He JH, Ji FY (2019) Taylor series solution for Lane-Emden equation. J Math Chem 57(8):1932–1934

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Masood Z et al (2017) Design of Mexican Hat Wavelet neural networks for solving Bratu type nonlinear systems. Neurocomputing 221:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  42. Raja MAZ, Niazi SA, Butt SA (2017) An intelligent computing technique to analyze the vibrational dynamics of rotating electrical machine. Neurocomputing 219:280–299

    Google Scholar 

  43. Berg J, Nyström K (2018) A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometries. Neurocomputing 317:28–41

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pakdaman M, Ahmadian A, Effati S, Salahshour S, Baleanu D (2017) Solving differential equations of fractional order using an optimization technique based on training artificial neural network. Appl Math Comput 293:81–95

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Jafarian A, Nia SM, Golmankhaneh AK, Baleanu D (2018) On artificial neural networks approach with new cost functions. Appl Math Comput 339:546–555

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Umar M et al (2019) Intelligent computing for numerical treatment of nonlinear prey–predator models. Appl Soft Comput 80:506–524

    Google Scholar 

  47. Khan WU et al (2018) Backtracking search integrated with sequential quadratic programming for nonlinear active noise control systems. Appl Soft Comput 73:666–683

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ahmad I et al (2019) Novel applications of intelligent computing paradigms for the analysis of nonlinear reactive transport model of the fluid in soft tissues and microvessels. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04203-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sabir Z, Wahab HA, Umar M, Erdoğan F (2019) Stochastic numerical approach for solving second order nonlinear singular functional differential equation. Appl Math Comput 363:124605

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Raja MAZ, Mehmood J, Sabir Z, Nasab AK, Manzar MA (2019) Numerical solution of doubly singular nonlinear systems using neural networks-based integrated intelligent computing. Neural Comput Appl 31(3):793–812

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sabir Z et al (2018) Neuro-heuristics for nonlinear singular Thomas-Fermi systems. Appl Soft Comput 65:152–169

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mehmood A et al (2019) Integrated intelligent computing paradigm for the dynamics of micropolar fluid flow with heat transfer in a permeable walled channel. Appl Soft Comput 79:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  53. Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Alaidarous ES, Syam MI (2017) Design of bio-inspired heuristic technique integrated with interior-point algorithm to analyze the dynamics of heartbeat model. Appl Soft Comput 52:605–629

    Google Scholar 

  54. Raja MAZ, Umar M, Sabir Z, Khan JA, Baleanu D (2018) A new stochastic computing paradigm for the dynamics of nonlinear singular heat conduction model of the human head. Eur Phys J Plus 133(9):364

    Google Scholar 

  55. Umar M, Amin F, Wahab HA, Baleanu D (2019) Unsupervised constrained neural network modeling of boundary value corneal model for eye surgery. Appl Soft Comput 85:105826

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ara A et al (2018) Wavelets optimization method for evaluation of fractional partial differential equations: an application to financial modelling. Adv Differ Equ 2018(1):8

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Ahmad I et al (2017) Neural network methods to solve the Lane-Emden type equations arising in thermodynamic studies of the spherical gas cloud model. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):929–944

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sabir Z et al (2020) Novel design of Morlet wavelet neural network for solving second order Lane-Emden equation. Math Comput Simul 172:1–14

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmad I et al (2016) Bio-inspired computational heuristics to study Lane-Emden systems arising in astrophysics model. Springerplus 5(1):1866

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sabir Z et al (2020) Heuristic computing technique for numerical solutions of nonlinear fourth order Emden-Fowler equation. Math Comput Simul 178:534–548

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Khan JA et al (2015) Nature-inspired computing approach for solving non-linear singular Emden-Fowler problem arising in electromagnetic theory. Connect Sci 27(4):377–396

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sabir Z et al (2020) Design of neuro-swarming-based heuristics to solve the third-order nonlinear multi-singular Emden-Fowler equation. Eur Phys J Plus 135(6):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sabir Z, Umar M, Guirao JLG et al (2021) Integrated intelligent computing paradigm for nonlinear multi-singular third-order Emden-Fowler equation. Neural Comput Appl 33:3417–3436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05187-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hadian-Rasanan AH, Rahmati D, Gorgin S, Parand K (2020) A single layer fractional orthogonal neural network for solving various types of Lane-Emden equation. New Astron 75:101307

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mall S, Chakraverty S (2016) Application of Legendre neural network for solving ordinary differential equations. Appl Soft Comput 43:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  66. Nouh MI, Azzam YA, Emad AB (2021) Modeling fractional polytropic gas spheres using artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 33(9):4533–4546

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lodhi S et al (2019) Fractional neural network models for nonlinear Riccati systems. Neural Comput Appl 31(1):359–378

    Google Scholar 

  68. Raja MAZ, Samar R, Manzar MA, Shah SM (2017) Design of unsupervised fractional neural network model optimized with interior point algorithm for solving Bagley-Torvik equation. Math Comput Simul 132:139–158

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Shi Y, Eberhart RC (1999) Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406) vol 3, pp 1945–1950. IEEE

  70. Engelbrecht AP (2007) Computational intelligence: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  71. Shi Y (2001) Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In: Proceedings of the 2001 congress on evolutionary computation (IEEE Cat. No. 01TH8546) vol 1, pp 81–86. IEEE

  72. Liang H, Zou J, Li Z, Khan MJ, Lu Y (2019) Dynamic evaluation of drilling leakage risk based on fuzzy theory and PSO-SVR algorithm. Futur Gener Comput Syst 95:454–466

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mehmood A et al (2019) Nature-inspired heuristic paradigms for parameter estimation of control autoregressive moving average systems. Neural Comput Appl 31(10):5819–5842

    Google Scholar 

  74. Esmin AA, Coelho RA, Matwin S (2015) A review on particle swarm optimization algorithm and its variants to clustering high-dimensional data. Artif Intell Rev 44(1):23–45

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sánchez-García J, Reina DG, Toral SL (2019) A distributed PSO-based exploration algorithm for a UAV network assisting a disaster scenario. Future Gener Comput Syst 90:129–148

    Google Scholar 

  76. Asadi M, Jamali MAJ, Parsa S, Majidnezhad V (2020) Detecting botnet by using particle swarm optimization algorithm based on voting system. Future Gener Comput Syst 107:95–111

    Google Scholar 

  77. Raja MAZ, Zameer A, Kiani AK, Shehzad A, Khan MAR (2018) Nature-inspired computational intelligence integration with Nelder-Mead method to solve nonlinear benchmark models. Neural Comput Appl 29(4):1169–1193

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ghomeshi H, Gaber MM, Kovalchuk Y (2020) A non-canonical hybrid metaheuristic approach to adaptive data stream classification. Future Gener Comput Syst 102:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  79. Xu X, Rong H, Pereira E, Trovati M (2018) Predatory search-based chaos turbo particle swarm optimisation (PS-CTPSO): a new particle swarm optimisation algorithm for web service combination problems. Future Gener Comput Syst 89:375–386

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mehmood A, Zameer A, Ling SH, ur Rehman A, Raja MAZ (2020) Integrated computational intelligent paradigm for nonlinear electric circuit models using neural networks, genetic algorithms and sequential quadratic programming. Neural Comput Appl 32(14):10337–10357

    Google Scholar 

  81. Raja MAZ, Ahmed U, Zameer A, Kiani AK, Chaudhary NI (2019) Bio-inspired heuristics hybrid with sequential quadratic programming and interior-point methods for reliable treatment of economic load dispatch problem. Neural Comput Appl 31(1):447–475

    Google Scholar 

  82. Akbar S et al (2017) Design of bio-inspired heuristic techniques hybridized with sequential quadratic programming for joint parameters estimation of electromagnetic plane waves. Wireless Pers Commun 96(1):1475–1494

    Google Scholar 

  83. Chaudhry FA, Amin M, Iqbal M, Khan RD, Khan JA (2018) A novel chaotic differential evolution hybridized with quadratic programming for short-term hydrothermal coordination. Neural Comput Appl 30(11):3533–3544

    Google Scholar 

  84. Xiao CL, Huang HX (2018) Optimal design of heating system in rapid thermal cycling blow mold by a two-step method based on sequential quadratic programming. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 96:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  85. Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Tariq M, Ahmad I (2018) Design of artificial neural network models optimized with sequential quadratic programming to study the dynamics of nonlinear Troesch’s problem arising in plasma physics. Neural Comput Appl 29(6):83–109

    Google Scholar 

  86. Yin KL, Pu YF, Lu L (2020) Combination of fractional FLANN filters for solving the Van der Pol-Duffing oscillator. Neurocomputing 399:183–192

    Google Scholar 

  87. Raja MAZ, Manzar MA, Samar R (2015) An efficient computational intelligence approach for solving fractional order Riccati equations using ANN and SQP. Appl Math Model 39(10–11):3075–3093

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Tabi CB (2018) Dynamical analysis of the FitzHugh–Nagumo oscillations through a modified Van der Pol equation with fractional-order derivative term. Int J Non-Linear Mech 105:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  89. Arqub OA, Al-Smadi M (2018) Atangana-Baleanu fractional approach to the solutions of Bagley-Torvik and Painlevé equations in Hilbert space. Chaos Solitons Fractals 117:161–167

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Arqub OA, Maayah B (2018) Solutions of Bagley-Torvik and Painlevé equations of fractional order using iterative reproducing kernel algorithm with error estimates. Neural Comput Appl 29(5):1465–1479

    Google Scholar 

  91. Mall S, Chakraverty S (2020) Artificial neural network based solution of fractional vibration model. In: Chakraverty S, Biswas P (eds) Recent trends in wave mechanics and vibrations. Springer, Singapore, pp 393–406

    Google Scholar 

  92. Raja MAZ, Manzar MA, Shah SM, Chen Y (2020) Integrated intelligence of fractional neural networks and sequential quadratic programming for Bagley-Torvik systems arising in fluid mechanics. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046496

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dumitru Baleanu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors of the manuscript declared that there is no any potential conflict of interest between them and the journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabir, Z., Raja, M.A.Z., Umar, M. et al. FMNSICS: Fractional Meyer neuro-swarm intelligent computing solver for nonlinear fractional Lane–Emden systems. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 4193–4206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06452-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06452-2

Keywords

Navigation