Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A novel bio-inspired hybrid multi-filter wrapper gene selection method with ensemble classifier for microarray data

  • S.I. : ‘Babel Fish’ for Feature-driven Machine Learning to Maximise Societal Value
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microarray technology is known as one of the most important tools for collecting DNA expression data. This technology allows researchers to investigate and examine types of diseases and their origins. However, microarray data are often associated with a small sample size, a significant number of genes, imbalanced data, etc., making classification models inefficient. Thus, a new hybrid solution based on a multi-filter and adaptive chaotic multi-objective forest optimization algorithm (AC-MOFOA) is presented to solve the gene selection problem and construct the Ensemble Classifier. In the proposed solution, a multi-filter model (i.e., ensemble filter) is proposed as preprocessing step to reduce the dataset's dimensions, using a combination of five filter methods to remove redundant and irrelevant genes. Accordingly, the results of the five filter methods are combined using a voting-based function. Additionally, the results of the proposed multi-filter indicate that it has good capability in reducing the gene subset size and selecting relevant genes. Then, an AC-MOFOA based on the concepts of non-dominated sorting, crowding distance, chaos theory, and adaptive operators is presented. AC-MOFOA as a wrapper method aimed at reducing dataset dimensions, optimizing KELM, and increasing the accuracy of the classification, simultaneously. Next, in this method, an ensemble classifier model is presented using AC-MOFOA results to classify microarray data. The performance of the proposed algorithm was evaluated on nine public microarray datasets, and its results were compared in terms of the number of selected genes, classification efficiency, execution time, time complexity, hypervolume indicator, and spacing metric with five hybrid multi-objective methods, and three hybrid single-objective methods. According to the results, the proposed hybrid method could increase the accuracy of the KELM in most datasets by reducing the dataset's dimensions and achieve similar or superior performance compared to other multi-objective methods. Furthermore, the proposed Ensemble Classifier model could provide better classification accuracy and generalizability in the seven of nine microarray datasets compared to conventional ensemble methods. Moreover, the comparison results of the Ensemble Classifier model with three state-of-the-art ensemble generation methods indicate its competitive performance in which the proposed ensemble model achieved better results in the five of nine datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig.11
Fig.12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Tyagi V, Mishra A (2013) A survey on different feature selection methods for microarray data analysis. Int J Comput Appl 67:36–40. https://doi.org/10.5120/11482-7181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolón-Canedo V, Sánchez-Maroño N, Alonso-Betanzos A et al (2014) A review of microarray datasets and applied feature selection methods. Inf Sci (Ny) 282:111–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almugren N, Alshamlan H (2019) A survey on hybrid feature selection methods in microarray gene expression data for cancer classification. IEEE Access 7:78533–78548. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khalid S, Khalil T, Nasreen S (2014) A survey of feature selection and feature extraction techniques in machine learning. Proc 2014 Sci Inf Conf SAI 2014 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2014.6918213

  5. Remeseiro B, Bolon-Canedo V (2019) A review of feature selection methods in medical applications. Comput Biol Med 112:103375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen BH, Xue B, Zhang M (2020) A survey on swarm intelligence approaches to feature selection in data mining. Swarm Evol Comput 54:100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amaldi E, Kann V (1998) On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theor Comput Sci 209:237–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00115-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohavi R, John GH (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 97:273–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chandrashekar G, Sahin F (2014) A survey on feature selection methods. Comput Electr Eng 40:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai CM (2018) Multi-objective simplified swarm optimization with weighting scheme for gene selection. Appl Soft Comput J 65:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dash R, Misra BB (2018) A multi-objective feature selection and classifier ensemble technique for microarray data analysis. Int J Data Min Bioinform 20:123–160. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDMB.2018.093683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Osanaiye O, Cai H, Choo K-KR et al (2016) Ensemble-based multi-filter feature selection method for DDoS detection in cloud computing. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2016:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-016-0623-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balogun AO, Basri S, Abdulkadir SJ, Sobri AH (2019) A hybrid multi-filter wrapper feature selection method for software defect predictors

  14. Miao J, Niu L (2016) A survey on feature selection. Procedia Comput Sci 91:919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu H, Chen J, Yan K et al (2017) A hybrid feature selection algorithm for gene expression data classification. Neurocomputing 256:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.07.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuang LY, Yang CH, Wu KC, Yang CH (2011) A hybrid feature selection method for DNA microarray data. Comput Biol Med 41:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang CH, Chuang LY, Yang CH (2010) IG-GA: a hybrid filter/wrapper method for feature selection of microarray data. J Med Biol Eng 30:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shukla AK, Singh P, Vardhan M (2018) A hybrid gene selection method for microarray recognition. Biocybern Biomed Eng 38:975–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen T, Khosravi A, Creighton D, Nahavandi S (2015) A novel aggregate gene selection method for microarray data classification. Pattern Recognit Lett 60–61:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dashtban M, Balafar M (2017) Gene selection for microarray cancer classification using a new evolutionary method employing artificial intelligence concepts. Genomics 109:91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee CP, Leu Y (2011) A novel hybrid feature selection method for microarray data analysis. Appl Soft Comput J 11:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jansi Rani M, Devaraj D (2019) Two-stage hybrid gene selection using mutual information and genetic algorithm for cancer data classification. J Med Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1372-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghosh M, Adhikary S, Ghosh KK et al (2019) Genetic algorithm based cancerous gene identification from microarray data using ensemble of filter methods. Med Biol Eng Comput 57:159–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1874-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shukla AK, Singh P, Vardhan M (2018) A two-stage gene selection method for biomarker discovery from microarray data for cancer classification. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 183:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sayed S, Nassef M, Badr A, Farag I (2019) A nested genetic algorithm for feature selection in high-dimensional cancer microarray datasets. Expert Syst Appl 121:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jain I, Jain VK, Jain R (2018) Correlation feature selection based improved-binary particle swarm optimization for gene selection and cancer classification. Appl Soft Comput J 62:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen Q, Shi WM, Kong W (2008) Hybrid particle swarm optimization and tabu search approach for selecting genes for tumor classification using gene expression data. Comput Biol Chem 32:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2007.10.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Baliarsingh SK, Vipsita S, Dash B (2020) A new optimal gene selection approach for cancer classification using enhanced Jaya-based forest optimization algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 32:8599–8616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04355-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Apolloni J, Leguizamón G, Alba E (2016) Two hybrid wrapper-filter feature selection algorithms applied to high-dimensional microarray experiments. Appl Soft Comput 38:922–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bir-Jmel A, Douiri SM, Elbernoussi S (2019) Gene selection via a new hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for cancer classification in high-dimensional data. Comput Math Methods Med 2019:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7828590

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Vafaee Sharbaf F, Mosafer S, Moattar MH (2016) A hybrid gene selection approach for microarray data classification using cellular learning automata and ant colony optimization. Genomics 107:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dash R, Dash R, Rautray R (2019) An evolutionary framework based microarray gene selection and classification approach using binary shuffled frog leaping algorithm J. King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shukla AK, Singh P, Vardhan M (2020) Gene selection for cancer types classification using novel hybrid metaheuristics approach. Swarm Evol Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Elyasigomari V, Lee DA, Screen HRC, Shaheed MH (2017) Development of a two-stage gene selection method that incorporates a novel hybrid approach using the cuckoo optimization algorithm and harmony search for cancer classification. J Biomed Inform 67:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fei L, Juan L (2008) Optimal genes selection with a new multi-objective evolutional algorithm hybriding NSGA-II with EDA. Biomed Eng Informatics New Dev Futur - Proc 1st Int Conf Biomed Eng Informatics, BMEI 2008 1:327–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2008.313

  36. Hasnat A, Molla AU (2017) Feature selection in cancer microarray data using multi-objective genetic algorithm combined with correlation coefficient. Proc IEEE Int Conf Emerg Technol Trends Comput Commun Electr Eng ICETT. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETT.2016.7873741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Banerjee M, Mitra S, Banka H (2007) Evolutionary rough feature selection in gene expression data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 37:622–632. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.897498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohamad MS, Omatu S, Deris S, Yoshioka M (2008) Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithm for gene selection from microarray data. Proc Int Conf Comput Commun Eng 2008, ICCCE08 Glob Links Hum Dev 1331–1334. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2008.4580821

  39. Annavarapu CSR, Dara S, Banka H (2016) Cancer microarray data feature selection using multi-objective binary particle swarm optimization algorithm. Excli J 15:460–473. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2016-481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chakraborty G, Chakraborty B (2013) Multi-objective optimization using pareto GA for gene-selection from microarray data for disease classification. Proc - 2013 IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern SMC 2013:2629–2634. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2013.449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Divya S, Kiran ELN, Rao MS, Vemulapati P (2020) Prediction of Gene Selection Features Using Improved Multi-objective Spotted Hyena Optimization Algorithm. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. pp 59–67

  42. Sharma A, Rani R (2019) C-HMOSHSSA: gene selection for cancer classification using multi-objective meta-heuristic and machine learning methods. Comput Method Progr Biomed 178:219–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ratnoo S, Ahuja J (2017) Dimension reduction for microarray data using multi-objective ant colony optimisation. Int J Comput Syst Eng 3:58. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcsyse.2017.10004024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang P, Hwa Yang Y, B Zhou B, Y Zomaya A (2010) A review of ensemble methods in bioinformatics. Curr Bioinform 5:296–308. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489310794072508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lan K, Tong WD, Fong S et al (2018) A survey of data mining and deep learning in bioinformatics. J Med Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1003-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Khoshgoftaar TM, Dittman DJ, Wald R, Awada W (2013) A review of ensemble classification for DNA microarrays data. Proc Int Conf Tools with Artif Intell ICTAI. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2013.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Amaratunga D, Cabrera J, Lee Y-S (2008) Enriched random forests. Bioinformatics 24:2010–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Polikar R (2012) Ensemble learning. In: Zhang C, Ma Y (eds) Ensemble machine learning. Springer, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xue X, Yao M, Wu Z (2018) A novel ensemble-based wrapper method for feature selection using extreme learning machine and genetic algorithm. Knowl Inf Syst 57:389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1131-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huda S, Yearwood J, Jelinek HF et al (2016) A hybrid feature selection with ensemble classification for imbalanced healthcare data: a case study for brain tumor diagnosis. IEEE Access 4:9145–9154. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2647238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fallahpour S, Lakvan EN, Zadeh MH (2017) Using an ensemble classifier based on sequential floating forward selection for financial distress prediction problem J. Retail Consum Serv 34:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Franken H, Lehmann R, Häring HU, et al (2011) Wrapper- and ensemble-based feature subset selection methods for biomarker discovery in targeted metabolomics. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics) 7036 LNBI:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24855-9_11

  53. Panthong R, Srivihok A (2015) Wrapper feature subset selection for dimension reduction based on ensemble learning algorithm. Procedia Comput Sci 72:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang P, Liu W, Zhou BB, et al (2013) Ensemble-based wrapper methods for feature selection and class imbalance learning. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics) 7818 LNAI:544–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37453-1_45

  55. Yu E, Cho S (2006) Ensemble based on GA wrapper feature selection. Comput Ind Eng 51:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2006.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Idris A, Khan A (2017) Churn prediction system for telecom using filter-wrapper and ensemble classification. Comput J 60:410–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxv123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhou Y, Cheng G, Jiang S, Dai M (2020) Building an efficient intrusion detection system based on feature selection and ensemble classifier. Comput Networks 174:107247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mukhopadhyay A, Member S, Maulik U, Member S (2014) A survey of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for data mining: Part I. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18:4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Baliarsingh SK, Vipsita S, Muhammad K, Bakshi S (2019) Analysis of high-dimensional biomedical data using an evolutionary multi-objective emperor penguin optimizer. Swarm Evol Comput 48:262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2019.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Li X, Yin M (2013) Multiobjective binary biogeography based optimization for feature selection using gene expression data. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 12:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2013.2294716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ghaemi M, Feizi-Derakhshi M-R (2014) Forest optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 41:6676–6687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ghaemi M, Feizi-Derakhshi M-R (2016) Feature selection using forest optimization algorithm. Pattern Recognit 60:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bin HG, Wang DH, Lan Y (2011) Extreme learning machines: a survey. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0019-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:369–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Coello CAC, Lamont GB, Van Veldhuizen DA (2007) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Springer, US, Boston, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Hall MA (1999) Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning

  68. Kira K, Rendell LA (1992) A Practical Approach to Feature Selection. In: Machine Learning Proceedings 1992. Elsevier, pp 249–256

  69. Shreem SS, Abdullah S, Nazri MZA (2014) Hybridising harmony search with a Markov blanket for gene selection problems. Inf Sci (Ny) 258:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.10.012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. Gangavarapu T, Patil N (2019) A novel filter–wrapper hybrid greedy ensemble approach optimized using the genetic algorithm to reduce the dimensionality of high-dimensional biomedical datasets. Appl Soft Comput J 81:105538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ozger ZB, Bolat B, Diri B (2019) A probabilistic multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm for gene selection. J Univers Comput Sci 25:418–443

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. Abo-Hammour Z, Alsmadi O, Momani S, Abu Arqub O (2013) A genetic algorithm approach for prediction of linear dynamical systems. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/831657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Abo-Hammour Z, Abu Arqub O, Alsmadi O et al (2014) An optimization algorithm for solving systems of singular boundary value problems. Appl Math Inf Sci 8:2809–2821. https://doi.org/10.12785/amis/080617

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. Momani S, Abo-Hammou ZS, Alsmad OM (2016) Solution of inverse kinematics problem using genetic algorithms. Appl Math Inf Sci 10:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Abu Arqub O, Abo-Hammour Z, Momani S, Shawagfeh N (2012) Solving singular two-point boundary value problems using continuous genetic algorithm. Abstr Appl Anal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/205391

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Hammad M, Iliyasu AM, Subasi A et al (2021) A multitier deep learning model for arrhythmia detection. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3033072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sedik A, Hammad M, Abd El-Samie FE et al (2021) Efficient deep learning approach for augmented detection of coronavirus disease. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05410-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Alghamdi AS, Polat K, Alghoson A et al (2020) A novel blood pressure estimation method based on the classification of oscillometric waveforms using machine-learning methods. Appl Acoust 164:107279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Hammad M, Alkinani MH, Gupta BB, Abd El-Latif AA (2021) Myocardial infarction detection based on deep neural network on imbalanced data. Multimed Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-020-00728-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hancer E, Xue B, Zhang M et al (2018) Pareto front feature selection based on artificial bee colony optimization. Inf Sci (Ny) 422:462–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Agarwalla P, Mukhopadhyay S (2018) Feature selection using multi-objective optimization technique for supervised cancer classification. In: Mandal JK, Mukhopadhyay S, Dutta P (eds) Multi-objective optimization. Springer, pp 195–213

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Nouri-Moghaddam B, Ghazanfari M, Fathian M (2020) A novel filter-wrapper hybrid gene selection approach for microarray data based on multi-objective forest optimization algorithm. Decis Sci Lett 9:271–290. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2020.5.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Shahbeig S, Rahideh A, Helfroush MS, Kazemi K (2018) Gene selection from large-scale gene expression data based on fuzzy interactive multi-objective binary optimization for medical diagnosis. Biocybern Biomed Eng 38:313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mishra S, Shaw K, Mishra D (2012) A new meta-heuristic bat inspired classification approach for microarray data. Procedia Technol 4:802–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.05.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Dashtban M, Balafar M, Suravajhala P (2018) Gene selection for tumor classification using a novel bio-inspired multi-objective approach. Genomics 110:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Nouri-Moghaddam B, Ghazanfari M, Fathian M (2021) A novel multi-objective forest optimization algorithm for wrapper feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 175:114737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Javidi M, Hosseinpourfard R (2015) Chaos genetic algorithm instead genetic algorithm. Int Arab J Inf Technol 12:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  88. Gharooni-fard G, Moein-darbari F, Deldari H, Morvaridi A (2010) Scheduling of scientific workflows using a chaos-genetic algorithm. Procedia Comput Sci 1:1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.04.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Snaselova P, Zboril F (2015) Genetic algorithm using theory of chaos. Procedia Comput Sci 51:316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Baliarsingh SK, Vipsita S, Muhammad K et al (2019) Analysis of high-dimensional genomic data employing a novel bio-inspired algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 77:520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Zhu Z, Ong YS, Dash M (2007) Markov blanket-embedded genetic algorithm for gene selection. Pattern Recognit 40:3236–3248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2007.02.007

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. OpenML. https://www.openml.org/

  94. Singh N, Singh P (2020) Stacking-based multi-objective evolutionary ensemble framework for prediction of diabetes mellitus. Biocybern Biomed Eng 40:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Asadi S, Roshan SE (2021) A bi-objective optimization method to produce a near-optimal number of classifiers and increase diversity in Bagging. Knowl Based Syst 213:106656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ribeiro VHA, Reynoso-Meza G (2020) Ensemble learning by means of a multi-objective optimization design approach for dealing with imbalanced data sets. Expert Syst Appl 147:113232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Wu Y (2005) Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. Wiley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Xue B, Zhang M, Browne WN (2013) Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach. IEEE Trans Cybern 43:1656–1671. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2227469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Xue B, Fu W, Zhang M (2014) Multi-objective feature selection in classification: a differential evolution approach. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learnin. pp 516–528

  100. Hancer E, Xue B, Zhang M, et al (2015) A multi-objective artificial bee colony approach to feature selection using fuzzy mutual information. 2015 IEEE Congr Evol Comput CEC 2015 Proc 2420–2427. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7257185

  101. Xue B, Zhang M, Browne WN (2012) Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation (PSO) for feature selection. Proc fourteenth Int Conf Genet Evol Comput Conf GECCO ’12 81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330163.2330175

  102. Amoozegar M, Minaei-Bidgoli B (2018) Optimizing multi-objective PSO based feature selection method using a feature elitism mechanism. Expert Syst Appl 113:499–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Auger A, Bader J, Brockhoff D, Zitzler E (2009) Theory of the hypervolume indicator: Optimal μ-distributions and the choice of the reference point. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGEVO Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, FOGA’09. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 87–102

  104. Brockhoff D, Friedrich T, Neumann F (2008) Analyzing hypervolume indicator based algorithms. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). pp 651–660

  105. Sierra MR, Coello Coello CA (2005) Improving PSO-Based Multi-objective Optimization Using Crowding, Mutation and ∈-Dominance. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, pp 505–519

  106. Jensen MT (2003) Reducing the run-time complexity of multiobjective EAs: the NSGA-II and other algorithms. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7:503–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2003.817234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Lv J, Peng Q, Chen X, Sun Z (2016) A multi-objective heuristic algorithm for gene expression microarray data classification. Expert Syst Appl 59:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Wang Y, Sun X (2018) A many-objective optimization algorithm based on weight vector adjustment. Comput Intell Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4527968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Chand S, Wagner M (2015) Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a quick-start guide. Surv Oper Res Manag Sci 20:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sorms.2015.08.001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  110. Khan B, Wang Z, Han F et al (2017) Fabric weave pattern and yarn color recognition and classification using a deep ELM network. Algorithms. https://doi.org/10.3390/a10040117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Tissera MD, McDonnell MD (2016) Deep extreme learning machines: supervised autoencoding architecture for classification. Neurocomputing 174:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Jiang XW, Yan TH, Zhu JJ et al (2020) Densely connected deep extreme learning machine algorithm. Cognit Comput 12:979–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09752-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 1684613114, Tehran, Iran

    Babak Nouri-Moghaddam, Mehdi Ghazanfari & Mohammad Fathian

Authors
  1. Babak Nouri-Moghaddam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehdi Ghazanfari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Fathian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Ghazanfari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 848 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nouri-Moghaddam, B., Ghazanfari, M. & Fathian, M. A novel bio-inspired hybrid multi-filter wrapper gene selection method with ensemble classifier for microarray data. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 11531–11561 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06459-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06459-9

Keywords