Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification and prediction of phubbing behavior: a data-driven approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on Phubbing has received a lot of attention in recent years from the research community. However, the studies conducted are mainly based on linear statistics, which is a very conservative method for data analysis. To overcome this limitation, we adopted a data mining and machine learning-based approach to identify the patterns related to Phubbing behavior. We developed several models on online survey data that we collected for our analysis purposes. The results highlighted that addiction measures fail to predict Phubbing fully. Indeed, Phubbing appeared to be linked in a nonlinear way to both Information and Communication Technology (ICT) measures that do not imply a dysfunctional use of technology and social anxiety. Moreover, the machine learning approach appeared more suitable than traditional linear statistics methods to predict Phubbing, as highlighted by a much higher explained variance. Phubbing is not solely attributable to addiction dynamics. Phubbing is indicated by a series of predictors that cannot be reduced to addiction (e.g., age, social anxiety, ICT services owned). Modeling procedures able to account for nonlinearity are also required to accurately assessing users’ Phubbing levels. The patterns produced by our modeling procedure may help scholars in accounting for phubbing definition, detection, and prediction more accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Areepattamannil S, Khine MS (2017) Early adolescents’ use of information and communication technologies (icts) for social communication in 20 countries: Examining the roles of ict-related behavioral and motivational characteristics. Comput Hum Behav 73:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., and Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “generation y” users.

  3. Ling R (2004) The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon E, and e Silva ADS (2011) Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Wiley, NY

  5. Sutko DM and de Souza e Silva A (2011) Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability. New Media & Society, 13(5):807–823

  6. Toch E and Levi I (2012) What can’peoplenearby’applications teach us about meeting new people? In UbiComp, pages 802–803. Citeseer

  7. Fernandez C, Vicente MA, Carrillo I, Guilabert M, Mira JJ (2020) Factors influencing the smartphone usage behavior of pedestrians: Observational study on “spanish smombies.” J Med Int Res 22(8):e19350

    Google Scholar 

  8. LeFebvre L (2017) Ghosting as a relationship dissolution strategy in the technological age. The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships, pp 219–235

  9. Moon J, Pu J, and Lawrence G (2006) The role of virtual social identity through blog use in social life. AMCIS 2006 Proceedings, p 490

  10. Chotpitayasunondh V, Douglas KM (2016) How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Comput Hum Behav 63:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erzen E, Odaci H, Yeniçeri İ (2021) Phubbing: Which personality traits are prone to phubbing? Soc Sci Comput Rev 39(1):56–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guazzini A, Duradoni M, Capelli A, Meringolo P (2019) An explorative model to assess individuals’ phubbing risk. Future Internet 11(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karadag E, Tosuntas SB, Erzen E, Duru P, Bostan N, Sahin BM, Culha I, Babadag B (2015) Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. J Behav Addict 4(2):60–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chotpitayasunondh V, Douglas KM (2018) Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the generic scale of phubbing (gsp) and the generic scale of being phubbed (gsbp). Comput Hum Behav 88:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Procentese F, Gatti F, Di Napoli I (2019) Families and social media use: The role of parents’ perceptions about social media impact on family systems in the relationship between family collective efficacy and open communication. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(24):5006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Saggaf Y, O’Donnell SB (2019) Phubbing: Perceptions, reasons behind, predictors, and impacts. Human Behav Emerg Technol 1(2):132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Afdal A, Alizamar A, Ifdil I, Ardi Z, Sukmawati I, Zikra Z, Ilyas A, Fikri M, Syahputra Y, and Hariyani H (2019) An analysis of phubbing behaviour: Preliminary research from counseling perspective. In International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018). Atlantis Press.

  18. Frost RL, Rickwood DJ (2017) A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with facebook use. Comput Hum Behav 76:576–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomee S, H´ arenstam A, and Hagberg M (2011) Mobile¨ phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults-a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 11(1):66

  20. T’ng ST, Ho KH, and Low SK (2018) Are you “phubbing” me? the determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement invariance across sex differences. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2):159–190

  21. Xie X, Tang X, Rapp H, Tong D, and Wang P (2020) Does forgiveness alleviate depression after being phubbed for emerging adults? the mediating role of self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 106362.

  22. Weinstein AM (2010) Computer and video game addiction—a comparison between game users and non-game users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 36(5):268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiu S-I (2014) The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on taiwanese university student: A mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social selfefficacy. Comput Hum Behav 34:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bai Q, Bai S, Dan Q, Lei L, Wang P (2020) Mother phubbing and adolescent academic burnout: The mediating role of mental health and the moderating role of agreeableness and neuroticism. Personal Individ Differ 155:109622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Davey S, Davey A, Raghav SK, Singh JV, Singh N, Blachnio A, Przepiorkaa A (2018) Predictors and´ consequences of “phubbing” among adolescents and youth in india: An impact evaluation study. J Fam Community Med 25(1):35

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts JA, David ME (2016) My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Comput Hum Behav 54:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stockdale LA, Coyne SM, Padilla-Walker LM (2018) Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10-to 20-year-old adolescents. Comput Hum Behav 88:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Gao L, Yang J, Zhao F, Wang P (2020) Parental phubbing and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: Self-esteem and perceived social support as moderators. J Youth Adolesc 49(2):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Xie X, Wang Y, Wang P, Lei L (2017) Partner phubbing and depression among married chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personali Ind Differ 110:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Saggaf Y, MacCulloch R, Wiener K (2019) Trait boredom is a predictor of phubbing frequency. J Technol Behav Sci 4(3):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Balta S, Emirtekin E, Kircaburun K, Griffiths MD (2020) Neuroticism, trait fear of missing out, and phubbing: The mediating role of state fear of missing out and problematic instagram use. Int J Ment Heal Addict 18(3):628–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Savci M, Tekin A, and Elhai JD (2020) Prediction of problematic social media use (psu) using machine learning approaches. Current Psychology

  33. Khanh NTH (2021) Classification of concepts using decision trees for inconsistent knowledge systems based on bisimulation. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Signal Process 12(1):22–30

    Google Scholar 

  34. Deshmukh J, Bhosle U (2018) A study of mammogram classification using AdaBoost with Decision Tree, KNN, SVM and Hybrid SVM-KNN as Component Classifiers. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Signal Process 9(3):548–557

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rahman MA, Al-Saggaf Y, and Zia T (2020) A data mining framework to predict cyber attack for cyber security. In 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), pp 207–212.

  36. Rahman MA, Ang LM, Seng KH (2021) Data Convexity and Parameter Independent Clustering for Biomedical Datasets. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 18(2):765–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rahman MA, Ang LM, Seng KH (2020) Clustering biomedical and gene expression datasets with kernel density and unique neighborhood set based vein detection. Inf Syst 91:101490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rahman MA, Honan B, Glanville T, Hough P, Walker K (2020) Using data mining to predict emergency department length of stay greater than 4 hours: Derivation and single-site validation of a decision tree algorithm. Emerg Med Australas 32(3):416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mullainathan S, Spiess J (2017) Machine learning: an applied econometric approach. J Econ Perspect 31(2):87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ (2016) Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 375(13):1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tezbaşaran E and Gelbal S (2018) Temel biles¸enler analizi ve yapay sinir agı modellerinin˘ olc¸ek gelis¸tirme¨ surecinde kullanılabilirli¨ ginin incelenmesi.˘ Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1): 225–252

  42. Chiorri C, Bracco F, Piccinno T, Modafferi C, and Battini V (2015) Psychometric properties of a revised version of the ten item personality inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

  43. Pedrabissi L and Santinello M (1989) Inventario per l’ansia di stato e di tratto: nuova versione italiana dello stai forma y: Manuale. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali, p 44

  44. Jerusalem M and Schwarzer R (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, 195213

  45. Rosenberg M (1965) Rosenberg self-esteem scale (rse). Accept Commit Therapy Measures Package 61(52):18

    Google Scholar 

  46. Blanchard AL (2007) Developing a sense of virtual community measure. Cyberpsychol Behav 10(6):827–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith HM, Betz NE (2000) Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy. J Career Assess 8(3):283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mattick RP, Clarke JC (1998) Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav Res Ther 36(4):455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Frank E, Hall MA, Holmes G, Kirkby R, Pfahringer B, Witten IH (2005) Weka: A machine learning workbench for data mining. Springer, Berlin, pp 1305–1314

    Google Scholar 

  50. Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.

  51. Quinlan JR (1996) Improved use of continuous attributes in c4.5. J Artif Int Res 4(1):77–90

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Fayazi M, Hasani J (2017) Structural relations between brain-behavioral systems, social anxiety, depression and internet addiction: With regard to revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-rst). Comput Hum Behav 72:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang J-L, Sheng J-R, Wang H-Z (2019) The association between mobile game addiction and depression, social anxiety, and loneliness. Front Public Health 7:247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mark G, Voida S, and Cardello A (2012). A pace not dictated by electrons an empirical study of work without email. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 555–564

  55. Pielot M, Church K, and De Oliveira R (2014) An in-situ study of mobile phone notifications. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services, pp 233–242

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing & Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia

    Md Anisur Rahman

  2. Department of Education, Languages, Interculture, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, via S. Salvi 12, 50135, Florence, Italy

    Mirko Duradoni & Andrea Guazzini

Authors
  1. Md Anisur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mirko Duradoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Guazzini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Anisur Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahman, M.A., Duradoni, M. & Guazzini, A. Identification and prediction of phubbing behavior: a data-driven approach. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 3885–3894 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06649-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06649-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation