Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Estimation of thermophysical property of hybrid nanofluids for solar Thermal applications: Implementation of novel Optimizable Gaussian Process regression (O-GPR) approach for Viscosity prediction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solar energy technologies represent a viable alternative to fossil fuels for meeting increasing global energy demands. However, to increase the production of solar technologies in the global energy mix, the cost of production should be as competitive as other sources. This study focuses on the implementation of machine learning for estimating the thermophysical properties of nanofluids for nanofluid-based solar energy technologies as this would make the synthesis of nanofluids cost-effective. The prediction of thermal conductivity has gained a lot of research attention, whereas, the viscosity of nanofluids has less concentration of studies. The accurate prediction of the viscosity of hybrid nanofluids is important in estimating the heat transfer performance of nanofluids as regards their pump power requirements and convective heat transfer coefficient in several applications. The rigor of experimentations of hybrid nanofluids has necessitated the need for developing efficient and robust machine learning models for accurately estimating the viscosity of hybrid nanofluids for solar applications. Several studies were aimed at developing a predictive model for the viscosity of nanofluids; however, these models are limited to specific types of nanofluids. This study is aimed at developing a robust machine learning algorithm for predicting the viscosity of several hybrid nanofluids from reliable experimental data (700 datasets) culled from literature. This study implements a novel optimizable Gaussian process regression (O-GPR), which have not been previously used in this area, and compares the result with other commonly used machine learning algorithms like, Boosted tree regression (BTR), Artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), to accurately predict the viscosity of a wide range of Newtonian-based hybrid nanofluid. The input parameters used in training the machine learning models were temperature (T), volume fraction (VF), the acentric factor of the base fluid (ACF), nanoparticle size (NS), and nanoparticle density (ND). The prediction performance of the machine learning algorithms was tested using statistical metrics and was compared with theoretical models. The O-GPR model showed superior predictive performance with an R2 of 0.999998 and an MSE of 0.0002552. The study conclusively states that the high accuracy prediction of thermophysical properties of nanofluid using robust machine learning models makes the design of nanofluid-based solar energy technologies more cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Che Sidik NA, Mahmud Jamil M, Aziz Japar WMA, Muhammad Adamu I (2017) A review on preparation methods, stability and applications of hybrid nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:1112–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Salari A, Kazemian A, Ma T, Hakkaki-Fard A, Peng J (2020) Nanofluid based photovoltaic thermal systems integrated with phase change materials: numerical simulation and thermodynamic analysis. Energy Convers Manag 205:112384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das L, Habib K, Saidur R, Aslfattahi N, Yahya SM, Rubbi F (2020) Improved thermophysical properties and energy efficiency of aqueous ionic liquid/mxene nanofluid in a hybrid pv/t solar system. Nanomaterials 10(7):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asadi M, Asadi A (2016) Dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/ZnO-engine oil hybrid nanofluid: an experimental investigation and new correlation in different temperatures and solid concentrations. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 76:41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarafraz M, Safaei MR, Leon A, Tlili I, Alkanhal T, Tian Z, Goodarzi M, Arjomandi M (2019) Experimental investigation on thermal performance of a PV/T-PCM (photovoltaic/thermal) system cooling with a PCM and nanofluid. Energies 12:2572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekiciler R, Arslan K, Turgut O, Kurşun B (2020) Effect of hybrid nanofluid on heat transfer performance of parabolic trough solar collector receiver. J Therm Anal Calorim 143(2):1637–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murshed SMS, Estellé P (2017) A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:1134–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bashirnezhad K, Bazri S, Safaei MR, Goodarzi M, Dahari M, Mahian O, Dalkiliça AS, Wongwises S (2016) Viscosity of nanofluids: a review of recent experimental studies. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 73:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2009) Measurement of temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of TiO2-water nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 33(4):706–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandrasekar M, Suresh S, Chandra Bose A (2010) Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3/water nanofluid. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 34(2):210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Amalina MA (2012) Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55(4):874–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corcione M (2011) Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Convers Manag 52(1):789–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okonkwo EC, Wole-Osho I, Almanassra IW, Abdullatif YM, Al-Ansari T (2020) An updated review of nanofluids in various heat transfer devices. J Therm Anal Calorim 145(6):2817–2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Almanassra IW, Okonkwo EC, Alhassan O, Ali M, Kochkodan V, Al-ansari T (2021) Stability and thermophysical properties test of carbide-derived carbon thermal fluid; a comparison between functionalized and emulsified suspensions. Powder Technol 377:415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Afrand M, Nazari Najafabadi K, Akbari M (2016) Effects of temperature and solid volume fraction on viscosity of SiO2-MWCNTs/SAE40 hybrid nanofluid as a coolant and lubricant in heat engines. Appl Therm Eng 102:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giwa SO, Sharifpur M, Goodarzi M, Alsulami H, Meyer JP (2021) Influence of base fluid, temperature, and concentration on the thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluids of alumina–ferrofluid: experimental data, modeling through enhanced ANN, ANFIS, and curve fitting. J Therm Anal Calorim 143(6):4149–4167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodarzi M, Toghraie D, Reiszadeh M, Afrand M (2019) Experimental evaluation of dynamic viscosity of ZnO–MWCNTs/engine oil hybrid nanolubricant based on changes in temperature and concentration. J Therm Anal Calorim 136(2):513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Einstein A (1906) Eine neue Bestimmung der Molekuldimensionen. Ann Phys 19:289–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen H, Ding Y, Tan C (2007) Rheological behaviour of nanofluids. New J Phys 9:367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Okonkwo EC, Wole-Osho I, Kavaz D, Abid M, Al-Ansari T (2020) Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of a flat plate collector operating with alumina and iron mono and hybrid nanofluids. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 37:100636

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wole-Osho I, Okonkwo EC, Kavaz D, Abbasoglu S (2020) An experimental investigation into the effect of particle mixture ratio on specific heat capacity and dynamic viscosity of Al2O3-ZnO hybrid nanofluids. Powder Technol 363:699–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eshgarf H, Sina N, Esfe MH, Izadi F, Afrand M (2018) Prediction of rheological behavior of MWCNTs–SiO2/EG–water non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid by designing new correlations and optimal artificial neural networks. J Therm Anal Calorim 132(2):1029–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alarifi IM, Nguyen HM, Bakhtiyari AN, Asadi A (2019) Feasibility of ANFIS-PSO and ANFIS-GA models in predicting thermophysical properties of Al2O3-MWCNT/Oil hybrid nanofluid. Materials (Basel) 12(21):3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karimipour A, Bagherzadeh SA, Taghipour A, Abdollahi A, Safaei MR (2019) A novel nonlinear regression model of SVR as a substitute for ANN to predict conductivity of MWCNT-CuO/water hybrid nanofluid based on empirical data. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 521:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tian Z, Arasteh H, Parsian A, Karimipour A, Safaei MR, Nguyen TK (2019) Estimate the shear rate & apparent viscosity of multi-phased non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluids via new developed support vector machine method coupled with sensitivity analysis. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 535:122456

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Alrashed AAAA, Gharibdousti MS, Goodarzi M, de Oliveira LR, Safaei MR, Bandarra Filho EP (2018) Effects on thermophysical properties of carbon based nanofluids: Experimental data, modelling using regression, ANFIS and ANN. Int J Heat Mass Transf 125:920–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahrami M, Akbari M, Bagherzadeh SA, Karimipour A, Afrand M, Goodarzi M (2019) Develop 24 dissimilar ANNs by suitable architectures & training algorithms via sensitivity analysis to better statistical presentation: measure MSEs between targets & ANN for Fe–CuO/Eg–water nanofluid. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 519:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmadi MH, Mohseni-Gharyehsafa B, Ghazvini M, Goodarzi M, Jilte RD, Kumar R (2020) Comparing various machine learning approaches in modeling the dynamic viscosity of CuO/water nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim 139(4):2585–2599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boyle, P. (2007) Gaussian processes for regression and optimisation. 190

  30. Khalifeh A, Vaferi B (2019) Intelligent assessment of effect of aggregation on thermal conductivity of nanofluids—comparison by experimental data and empirical correlations. Thermochim Acta 681:1783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wole-Osho I, Okonkwo EC, Adun H, Kavaz D, Abbasoglu S (2020) An intelligent approach to predicting the effect of nanoparticle mixture ratio, concentration and temperature on thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim 144(3):671–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Xu X, Choi SUS (1999) Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture. J Thermophys Heat Transf 13:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Okonkwo EC, Wole-Osho I, Kavaz D, Abid M (2019) Comparison of experimental and theoretical methods of obtaining the thermal properties of alumina/iron mono and hybrid nanofluids. J Mol Liq 292:111377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Afshari A, Akbari M, Toghraie D, Yazdi ME (2018) Experimental investigation of rheological behavior of the hybrid nanofluid of MWCNT–alumina/water (80%)–ethylene-glycol (20%): new correlation and margin of deviation. J Therm Anal Calorim 132(2):1001–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hemmat Esfe M, Reiszadeh M, Esfandeh S, Afrand M (2018) Optimization of MWCNTs (10%) – Al2O3 (90%)/5W50 nanofluid viscosity using experimental data and artificial neural network. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 512:731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Soltani O, Akbari M (2016) Effects of temperature and particles concentration on the dynamic viscosity of MgO-MWCNT/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid: experimental study. Phys E Low-Dimens Syst Nanostruct 84:564–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dardan E, Afrand M, Meghdadi Isfahani AH (2016) Effect of suspending hybrid nano-additives on rheological behavior of engine oil and pumping power. Appl Therm Eng 109:524–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nabil MF, Azmi WH, Abdul Hamid K, Mamat R, Hagos FY (2017) An experimental study on the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of TiO2-SiO2 nanofluids in water: ethylene glycol mixture. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 86:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruhani B, Toghraie D, Hekmatifar M, Hadian M (2019) Statistical investigation for developing a new model for rheological behavior of ZnO–Ag (50%–50%)/Water hybrid Newtonian nanofluid using experimental data. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 525:741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hemmat Esfe M, Afrand M, Yan WM, Yarmand H, Toghraie D, Dahari M (2016) Effects of temperature and concentration on rheological behavior of MWCNTs/SiO2(20–80)-SAE40 hybrid nano-lubricant. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 76:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hemmat Esfe M, Rostamian H, Reza Sarlak M (2018) A novel study on rheological behavior of ZnO-MWCNT/10w40 nanofluid for automotive engines. J Mol Liq 254:406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Afrand M, Nazari Najafabadi K, Sina N, Safaei MR, Kherbeet AS, Wongwises S, Dahari M (2016) Prediction of dynamic viscosity of a hybrid nano-lubricant by an optimal artificial neural network. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 76:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hemmat Esfe M, Afrand M, Rostamian SH, Toghraie D (2017) Examination of rheological behavior of MWCNTs/ZnO-SAE40 hybrid nano-lubricants under various temperatures and solid volume fractions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 80:384–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ramezanizadeh M, Ahmadi MH, Nazari MA, Sadeghzadeh M, Chen L (2019) A review on the utilized machine learning approaches for modeling the dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 114:109345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hamid KA, Azmi WH, Nabil MF, Mamat R, Sharma KV (2018) Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity on nanoparticle mixture ratios of TiO2-SiO2 nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 116:1143–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wanatasanapan VV, Abdullah MZ, Gunnasegaran P (2020) Effect of TiO2-Al2O3nanoparticle mixing ratio on the thermal conductivity, rheological properties, and dynamic viscosity of water-based hybrid nanofluid. J Mater Res Technol 9(6):13781–13792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wole-Osho I, Adun H, Adedeji M, Okonkwo EC, Kavaz D, Dagbasi M (2020) Effect of hybrid nanofluids mixture ratio on the performance of a photovoltaic thermal collector. Int J Energy Res 44(11):9064–9081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mohammed A, Burhan L, Ghafor K, Sarwar W, Mahmood W (2021) Artificial neural network (ANN), M5P-tree, and regression analyses to predict the early age compression strength of concrete modified with DBC-21 and VK-98 polymers. Neural Comput Appl 33(13):7851–7873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jamei M, Ahmadianfar I, Olumegbon IA, Karbasi M, Asadi A (2021) On the assessment of specific heat capacity of nanofluids for solar energy applications: application of Gaussian process regression (GPR) approach. J Energy Storage 33:102067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cao C, Liao J, Hou Z, Wang G, Feng W, Fang Y (2020) Parametric uncertainty analysis for CO2 sequestration based on distance correlation and support vector regression. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 77:103237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Daneshfar R, Bemani A, Hadipoor M, Sharifpur M, Ali HM, Mahariq I, Abdeljawad T (2020) Estimating the heat capacity of non-Newtonian ionanofluid systems using ANN, ANFIS, and SGB tree algorithms. Appl Sci 10(18):6432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wu H, Bagherzadeh SA, D’Orazio A, Habibollahi N, Karimipour A, Goodarzi M, Bach QV (2019) Present a new multi objective optimization statistical Pareto frontier method composed of artificial neural network and multi objective genetic algorithm to improve the pipe flow hydrodynamic and thermal properties such as pressure drop and heat transfer. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 535:122409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheng K, Lu Z, Zhou Y, Shi Y, Wei Y (2017) Global sensitivity analysis using support vector regression. Appl Math Model 49:587–598

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Alade IO, Rahman MAA, Saleh TA (2020) An approach to predict the isobaric specific heat capacity of nitrides/ethylene glycol-based nanofluids using support vector regression. J. Energy Storage 29:101313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen H, Ding Y, Tan C (2007) Rheological behaviour of nanofluids. New J Phys 9(10):367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Meybodi MK, Naseri S, Shokrollahi A, Daryasafar A (2015) Prediction of viscosity of water-based Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2, and CuO nanofluids using a reliable approach. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 149:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Friedman JH, Meulman JJ (2003) Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology. Stat Med 22(9):1365–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Landwehr N, Hall M, Frank E (2005) Logistic model trees. Mach Learn 59(1–2):161–205

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Hemmat Esfe M, Abbasian Arani AA, Rezaie M, Yan WM, Karimipour A (2015) Experimental determination of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Ag-MgO/water hybrid nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 66:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yan, S.R., Kalbasi, R., Nguyen, Q., and Karimipour, A. (2020) Rheological behavior of hybrid MWCNTs-TiO2/EG nanofluid: A comprehensive modeling and experimental study. J. Mol. Liq., 308, 113058.

  61. Brinkman HC (1952) The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J Chem Phys 20(4):571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lundgren T (1972) Slow flow through stationary random beds and suspensions of spheres. J Fluid Mech 51:273–299

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Li L, Zhai Y, Jin Y, Wang J, Wang H, Ma M (2020) Stability, thermal performance and artificial neural network modeling of viscosity and thermal conductivity of Al2O3-ethylene glycol nanofluids. Powder Technol 363:360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ma M, Zhai Y, Wang J, Yao P, Wang H (2020) Statistical image analysis of uniformity of hybrid nanofluids and prediction models of thermophysical parameters based on artificial neural network (ANN). Powder Technol 362:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Varamesh A, Husein MM, Karan K (2017) (2018) On the evaluation of the viscosity of nanofluid systems: modeling and data assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gholizadeh M, Jamei M, Ahmadianfar I, Pourrajab R (2020) Prediction of nanofluids viscosity using random forest (RF) approach. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 201:104010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Jamei M, Ahmadianfar I (2020) A rigorous model for prediction of viscosity of oil-based hybrid nanofluids. Physica A 556:124827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Doan CHID, Liong S (2004) Generalization for multilayer neural network Bayesian regularization or early stopping. Network 119260:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  69. Alade IO, Abd Rahman MA, Saleh TA (2019) Modeling and prediction of the specific heat capacity of Al2O3/water nanofluids using hybrid genetic algorithm/support vector regression model. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects 17:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77(4):802–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Heidari E, Sobati MA, Movahedirad S (2016) Accurate prediction of nanofluid viscosity using a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN). Chemom Intell Lab Syst 155:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Kayri M (2016) Predictive abilities of Bayesian regularization and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithms in artificial neural networks: a comparative empirical study on social data. Math Comput Appl 21(2):20

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. Chaipimonplin T (2016) The efficiency of using different of learning algorithms in artificial neural network model for flood forecasting at Upper River Ping catchment. J Civi Eng 20(1):478–484

    Google Scholar 

  74. Karimi H, Yousefi F, Rahimi MR (2011) Correlation of viscosity in nanofluids using genetic algorithm-neural network (GA-NN). Heat Mass Transf und Stoffuebertragung 47(11):1417–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Energy Systems Engineering Department, Cyprus International University, Mersin 10, Haspolat-Lefkosa, Turkey

    Humphrey Adun, Ifeoluwa Wole-Osho, Tonderai Ruwa & Mustafa Dagbasi

  2. Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar

    Eric C. Okonkwo

  3. Civil Engineering Department, Cyprus International University, Mersin 10, Haspolat-Lefkosa, Turkey

    Terfa Agwa & Kenechi Onochie

  4. Computer Engineering Department, Cyprus International University, Haspolat-Lefkosa, Mersin 10, Turkey

    Henry Ukwu

  5. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Olusola Bamisile

Authors
  1. Humphrey Adun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ifeoluwa Wole-Osho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric C. Okonkwo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tonderai Ruwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Terfa Agwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kenechi Onochie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Henry Ukwu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Olusola Bamisile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mustafa Dagbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Humphrey Adun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adun, H., Wole-Osho, I., Okonkwo, E.C. et al. Estimation of thermophysical property of hybrid nanofluids for solar Thermal applications: Implementation of novel Optimizable Gaussian Process regression (O-GPR) approach for Viscosity prediction. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 11233–11254 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07038-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07038-2

Keywords