Abstract
Public health machinery learning platform based on cloud-native is a system platform that combines machine learning frameworks and cloud-native technology for public health services. The problem of how its flexible value is realized has been widely concerned by all public health network intelligent researchers. Thus, this article examines the relationship between cloud-native architecture flexibility and cloud provider value and the processes and the boundary condition by which cloud-native architecture flexibility affects cloud provider value based on innovation theory and dynamic capability theory. The results of a survey of 509 platform-related respondents in China show that cloud-native architecture flexibility is positively related to cloud provider value, and both absorptive capacity and supply chain agility mediate the above-mentioned effect. Moreover, R&D subsidies strengthen both the positive relationship between absorptive capacity and cloud provider value and the relationship between supply chain agility and cloud provider value. In this study, cloud-native architecture flexibility, unit absorptive capacity, supply chain agility and R&D subsidies are considered into a flexible value generation mechanism model that extend the relevant research on the value generation mechanism of information system under the background of network intelligence, and to provide relevant enterprises with suggestions on upgrade strategies.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Boudi A, Bagaa M, Poyhonen P et al. (2021) AI-Based resource management in beyond 5G Cloud Native Environment[J]. IEEE Netw, PP(99):1–8
Kratzke N, Quint PC (2018) Understanding cloud-native applications after 10 years of cloud computing—a systematic mapping study[J]. Oper Res 58(5–6):541–544
Manvi S, Shyam GK (2021) SLA Management in Cloud Computing[M]
Kakhki MK, Zarqi M, Harati H et al. (2021) Innovation in using IT: understanding the impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on academic librarians[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2021, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)
Ye P, Liu L, Tan J (2021) Influence of knowledge sharing, innovation passion and absorptive capacity on innovation behaviour in China[J]. J Org Change Manag, 2021, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)
Crain-Dorough M, Elder AC (2021) Absorptive capacity as a means of understanding and addressing the disconnects between research and practice[J]. Rev Res Educ 45(1):67–100
Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms[J]. MIS Q 27(2):237–263
Guzmán JG, Olivo J, Palacios RC et al. (2018) IT innovation strategy: managing the implementation communication and its generated knowledge through the use of an ICT Tool[J]. J Knowledge Manag, 30(3)
Ha ST, Lo MC, Suaidi MK et al. (2021) Knowledge management process, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance in SMEs: evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Sustainability, 13
Un CA, Rodríguez A (2018) Local and global knowledge complementarity: R&D Collaborations and Innovation of Foreign and Domestic Firms[J]. Journal of International Management, 2018, 24.
Zhu M , Gao H (2021) The antecedents of supply chain agility and their effect on business performance: an organizational strategy perspective[J]. Oper Manag Res, 14
Abdelilah B, Korchi AE, Balambo MA (2021) Agility as a combination of lean and supply chain integration: How to achieve a better performance[J]. Int J Logistics
Wei S, Ke W, Liu H, et al. (2019) Supply chain information integration and firm performance: Are explorative and exploitative IT capabilities complementary or substitutive?[J]. Decision Sci
Aslam H, Blome C, Roscoe S, et al. (2018) Dynamic supply chain capabilities: How market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity[J]. Int J Oper Prod Manag
Dube R, Altay N et al. (2018) Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment[J]. Int J Oper Prod Manag, 38(1).
Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ (2019) Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility[J]. Manag Decision 57(8):2092–2112
Um J (2017) Improving supply chain flexibility and agility through variety management[J]. Int J Logist Manag 28(2):464–487
Amin-Tahmasbi H, Omidvari O (2018) Investigating the mutual effects of factors affecting supply chain agility in steel companies using grey dematel, case study of guilan steel company[J]. J Supply Chain Manag 59:29–39
Engelman RM, Fracasso EM, Schmidt S et al (2017) Intellectual capital, absorptive capacity and product innovation[J]. Manag Decis 55(3):474–490
Knoppen D, Saris W, Moncagatta P (2022) Absorptive capacity dimensions and the measurement of cumulativeness[J]. J Bus Res, 139
Oliveira-Dias D, Garcia-Buendia N, Maqueira-Marín JM et al. (2021) Information technologies and lean and agile supply chain strategies: a bibliometric study through science mapping[J]. Int J Bus Environ, 12
Purvis L, Gosling J, Naim MM (2014) The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility[J]. Int J Prod Econ 151:100–111
Gunarathne A, Lee K, Kaluarachchilage P (2021). Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: the role of environmental management accounting[J]. Bus Strategy Environ, 30
Battleson DA, West BC, Kim J et al (2016) Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: an empirical investigation[J]. Eur J Inf Syst 25(3):209–230
Deng P, Lu H, Hong J et al (2019) Government R&D subsidies, intellectual property rights protection and innovation[J]. Chin Manag Stud 13(2):363–378
Jessica M, Giuseppina T, Miguel SM et al (2020) Tax incentives for R&D: supporting innovative scale-ups?[J]. Res Eval 2:2
Mlster GS, Alfonso I (2021) R&D Heterogeneity and the Impact of R&D Subsidies*[J]. Econ J
Van Bruggen GH, Lilien GL, Kacker M (2002) Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses[J]. J Mark Res 39(4):469–478
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach[J]. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423
Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis[J]. MIS Q 29(4):625–652
Saraf N, Langdon CS, Gosain S (2007) IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships[J]. Inf Syst Res 18(3):320–339
Sridharan R, Simatupang TM (2005) The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration[J]. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(1):44–62
Lee HL, Whang S (2001) e-Business and Supply Chain Integration[J]. Proc Sgscmf 62(3):123–138
Li S, Lin B (2007) Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management[J]. Decis Support Syst 42(3):1641–1656
Pavlou PA, Sawy OAE (2011) Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Decis Sci 42(1):239–273
Jansen JJP, Bosch FAJVD, Volberda HW (2005) managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? [J]. Acad Manag J 48(6):999–1015
Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry[J]. Inf Syst Res 16(1):61–84
Luo X, Zhang W, Li H et al (2018) Cloud computing capability: its technological root and business impact[J]. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 28(3):193–213
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models [J]. J Acad Mark Sci 40(1):8–34
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error [J]. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173
Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach[M]. Guilford Publications, 2017
Acknowledgements
This study was acknowledged by Fujian Provincial Social Science Planning Project in 2020 (No. FJ2020B038), Scientific Research Foundation of Fujian University of Technology (GY-S20042,GY-S21036), and Innovation think tank project of Fujian Association for Science and Technology in 2021 (FJKX-A2113).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, M., Wu, L., Lin, L. et al. Cloud-native-based flexible value generation mechanism of public health platform using machine learning. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 2103–2117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07221-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07221-5