Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cloud-native-based flexible value generation mechanism of public health platform using machine learning

  • S.I.: Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics for IoT Security and Privacy (SPIOT 2021)
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public health machinery learning platform based on cloud-native is a system platform that combines machine learning frameworks and cloud-native technology for public health services. The problem of how its flexible value is realized has been widely concerned by all public health network intelligent researchers. Thus, this article examines the relationship between cloud-native architecture flexibility and cloud provider value and the processes and the boundary condition by which cloud-native architecture flexibility affects cloud provider value based on innovation theory and dynamic capability theory. The results of a survey of 509 platform-related respondents in China show that cloud-native architecture flexibility is positively related to cloud provider value, and both absorptive capacity and supply chain agility mediate the above-mentioned effect. Moreover, R&D subsidies strengthen both the positive relationship between absorptive capacity and cloud provider value and the relationship between supply chain agility and cloud provider value. In this study, cloud-native architecture flexibility, unit absorptive capacity, supply chain agility and R&D subsidies are considered into a flexible value generation mechanism model that extend the relevant research on the value generation mechanism of information system under the background of network intelligence, and to provide relevant enterprises with suggestions on upgrade strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Boudi A, Bagaa M, Poyhonen P et al. (2021) AI-Based resource management in beyond 5G Cloud Native Environment[J]. IEEE Netw, PP(99):1–8

  2. Kratzke N, Quint PC (2018) Understanding cloud-native applications after 10 years of cloud computing—a systematic mapping study[J]. Oper Res 58(5–6):541–544

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manvi S, Shyam GK (2021) SLA Management in Cloud Computing[M]

  4. Kakhki MK, Zarqi M, Harati H et al. (2021) Innovation in using IT: understanding the impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on academic librarians[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2021, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)

  5. Ye P, Liu L, Tan J (2021) Influence of knowledge sharing, innovation passion and absorptive capacity on innovation behaviour in China[J]. J Org Change Manag, 2021, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)

  6. Crain-Dorough M, Elder AC (2021) Absorptive capacity as a means of understanding and addressing the disconnects between research and practice[J]. Rev Res Educ 45(1):67–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms[J]. MIS Q 27(2):237–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guzmán JG, Olivo J, Palacios RC et al. (2018) IT innovation strategy: managing the implementation communication and its generated knowledge through the use of an ICT Tool[J]. J Knowledge Manag, 30(3)

  9. Ha ST, Lo MC, Suaidi MK et al. (2021) Knowledge management process, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance in SMEs: evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Sustainability, 13

  10. Un CA, Rodríguez A (2018) Local and global knowledge complementarity: R&D Collaborations and Innovation of Foreign and Domestic Firms[J]. Journal of International Management, 2018, 24.

  11. Zhu M , Gao H (2021) The antecedents of supply chain agility and their effect on business performance: an organizational strategy perspective[J]. Oper Manag Res, 14

  12. Abdelilah B, Korchi AE, Balambo MA (2021) Agility as a combination of lean and supply chain integration: How to achieve a better performance[J]. Int J Logistics

  13. Wei S, Ke W, Liu H, et al. (2019) Supply chain information integration and firm performance: Are explorative and exploitative IT capabilities complementary or substitutive?[J]. Decision Sci

  14. Aslam H, Blome C, Roscoe S, et al. (2018) Dynamic supply chain capabilities: How market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity[J]. Int J Oper Prod Manag

  15. Dube R, Altay N et al. (2018) Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment[J]. Int J Oper Prod Manag, 38(1).

  16. Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ (2019) Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility[J]. Manag Decision 57(8):2092–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Um J (2017) Improving supply chain flexibility and agility through variety management[J]. Int J Logist Manag 28(2):464–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amin-Tahmasbi H, Omidvari O (2018) Investigating the mutual effects of factors affecting supply chain agility in steel companies using grey dematel, case study of guilan steel company[J]. J Supply Chain Manag 59:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  19. Engelman RM, Fracasso EM, Schmidt S et al (2017) Intellectual capital, absorptive capacity and product innovation[J]. Manag Decis 55(3):474–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knoppen D, Saris W, Moncagatta P (2022) Absorptive capacity dimensions and the measurement of cumulativeness[J]. J Bus Res, 139

  21. Oliveira-Dias D, Garcia-Buendia N, Maqueira-Marín JM et al. (2021) Information technologies and lean and agile supply chain strategies: a bibliometric study through science mapping[J]. Int J Bus Environ, 12

  22. Purvis L, Gosling J, Naim MM (2014) The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility[J]. Int J Prod Econ 151:100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunarathne A, Lee K, Kaluarachchilage P (2021). Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: the role of environmental management accounting[J]. Bus Strategy Environ, 30

  24. Battleson DA, West BC, Kim J et al (2016) Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: an empirical investigation[J]. Eur J Inf Syst 25(3):209–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng P, Lu H, Hong J et al (2019) Government R&D subsidies, intellectual property rights protection and innovation[J]. Chin Manag Stud 13(2):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jessica M, Giuseppina T, Miguel SM et al (2020) Tax incentives for R&D: supporting innovative scale-ups?[J]. Res Eval 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mlster GS, Alfonso I (2021) R&D Heterogeneity and the Impact of R&D Subsidies*[J]. Econ J

  28. Van Bruggen GH, Lilien GL, Kacker M (2002) Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses[J]. J Mark Res 39(4):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach[J]. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis[J]. MIS Q 29(4):625–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saraf N, Langdon CS, Gosain S (2007) IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships[J]. Inf Syst Res 18(3):320–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sridharan R, Simatupang TM (2005) The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration[J]. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(1):44–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee HL, Whang S (2001) e-Business and Supply Chain Integration[J]. Proc Sgscmf 62(3):123–138

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li S, Lin B (2007) Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management[J]. Decis Support Syst 42(3):1641–1656

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Pavlou PA, Sawy OAE (2011) Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Decis Sci 42(1):239–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jansen JJP, Bosch FAJVD, Volberda HW (2005) managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? [J]. Acad Manag J 48(6):999–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry[J]. Inf Syst Res 16(1):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Luo X, Zhang W, Li H et al (2018) Cloud computing capability: its technological root and business impact[J]. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 28(3):193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models [J]. J Acad Mark Sci 40(1):8–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error [J]. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach[M]. Guilford Publications, 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was acknowledged by Fujian Provincial Social Science Planning Project in 2020 (No. FJ2020B038), Scientific Research Foundation of Fujian University of Technology (GY-S20042,GY-S21036), and Innovation think tank project of Fujian Association for Science and Technology in 2021 (FJKX-A2113).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, M., Wu, L., Lin, L. et al. Cloud-native-based flexible value generation mechanism of public health platform using machine learning. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 2103–2117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07221-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07221-5

Keywords