Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feature extraction and neural network-based fatigue damage detection and classification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology for detection and classification of fatigue damage in mechanical structures in the framework of neural networks (NN). The proposed methodology has been tested and validated with polycrystalline-alloy (AL7075-T6) specimens on a laboratory-scale experimental apparatus. Signal processing tools (e.g., discrete wavelet transform and Hilbert transform) have been applied on time series of ultrasonic test signals to extract features that are derived from: (i) Signal envelope, (ii) Low-frequency and high-frequency signal spectra, and (iii) Signal energy. The performance of the neural network, combined with each one of these features, is compared with the ground truth, generated from the original ultrasonic test signals and microscope images. The results show that the NN model, combined with the signal-energy feature, yields the best performance and that it is capable of detecting and classifying the fatigue damage with (up to) 98.5% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Manufacturer: MTS®, Berlin, New Jersey, USA.

  2. Manufacturer: OLYMPUS®, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

  3. Manufacturer: QUESTAR®, New Hope, Pennsylvania, USA.

  4. The reason for using five (apparently) identical specimens is to build both consistency and credibility of experimental results. The rationale is that, due to the uncertainties accruing from internal defects and the machining process, the fatigue life of similar test specimens may significantly duffer.

References

  1. Suresh S (1998) Fatigue of materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell FC (2008) Elements of metallurgy and engineering alloys. ASM International, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Worden K, Farrar CR, Manson G, Park G (2007) The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proc Royal Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 463(2082):1639–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar P, Prashant K (2009) Elements of fracture mechanics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, US

    Google Scholar 

  5. See JE, Drury CG, Speed A, Williams A, Khalandi N (2017) The role of visual inspection in the 21st century, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 61, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, , pp. 262–266

  6. Poor H (1994) An introduction to signal detection and estimation. Spriger-Verlag, New York, NY, USA

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chicco D, Jurman G (2020) The advantages of the matthews correlation coefficient (mcc) over f1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics 21(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boughorbel S, Jarray F, El-Anbari M (2017) Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using matthews correlation coefficient metric. PloS one 12(6):e0177678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaiser G (1994) A friendly guide to wavelets. Birkhauser, Boston, MA, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallat S (2009) A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way, 3rd edn. Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Alqahtani H, Ray A (2021) Forecasting and detection of fatigue cracks in polycrystalline alloys with ultrasonic testing via discrete wavelet transform. J Nondest Eval Diagn Prognostics Eng Syst 4:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  12. D’Angelo G, Rampone S (2016) Feature extraction and soft computing methods for aerospace structure defect classification. Measurement 85:192–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paolanti M, Romeo L, Felicetti A, Mancini A, Frontoni E, Loncarski J (2018) Machine learning approach for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0, in: 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA), IEEE, , pp. 1–6

  14. Susto GA, Schirru A, Pampuri S, McLoone S, Beghi A (2014) Machine learning for predictive maintenance: a multiple classifier approach. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 11(3):812–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alqahtani H, Bharadwaj S, Ray A (2021) Classification of fatigue crack damage in polycrystalline alloy structures using convolutional neural networks. Eng Fail Anal 119:104908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gholizadeh S (2016) A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Proc Struct Integr 1:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garnier C, Pastor M-L, Eyma F, Lorrain B (2011) The detection of aeronautical defects in situ on composite structures using non destructive testing. Compos Struct 93(5):1328–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shull PJ (2002) Nondestructive evaluation: theory, techniques, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghojogh B, Samad MN, Mashhadi S A, Kapoor T, Ali W, Karray F, Crowley M Feature selection and feature extraction in pattern analysis: A literature review, arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.02845

  20. Vithlani P, Kumbharana C (2015) Structural and statistical feature extraction methods for character and digit recognition. Int J Comput Appl 120(24):0975–8887

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alonso GA, Gutiérrez JM, Marty J-L, Muñoz R, Implementation of the discrete wavelet transform used in the calibration of the enzymatic biosensors, Discrete Wavelet Transforms-Biomedical Applications

  22. Rioul O, Vetterli M (1991) Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 8(4):14–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliveira MO, Bretas AS (2009) Application of discrete wavelet transform for differential protection of power transformers, in. IEEE Buchat PowerTech IEEE 2009:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mane AR, Biradar P, Shastri P (2015) Review paper on feature extraction methods for eeg signal analysis. Department of electronics and telecommunication engineering. VPCOE/Savitribi Phule University, IJEEBS, pp 2349–6967

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen L (1995) Time-frequency analysis. Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klingspor M(2015) Hilbert transform: Mathematical theory and applications to signal processing

  27. Kschischang FR (2006) The Hilbert transform. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 83:277

  28. Alqahtani H, Ray A (2020) Neural network-based automated assessment of fatigue damage in mechanical structures. Machines 8(4):85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Coolen AC (1998) A beginner’s guide to the mathematics of neural networks. Concepts for neural networks. Springer, NY, pp 13–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Zakaria M, Al-Shebany M, Sarhan S (2014) Artificial neural network: a brief overview. Int J Eng Res Appl 4:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Islam M, Chen G, Jin S (2019) An overview of neural network. Am J Neural Netw Appl 5(1):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Zayegh, N. Al Bassam (2018) Neural network principles and applications, in: Digital Systems, IntechOpen

  33. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Møller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6(4):525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dkhichi F, Oukarfi B (2014) Neural network training by gradient descent algorithms: application on the solar cell. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3:15696–15702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghorpade S, Ghorpade J, Mantri S (2010) Pattern recognition using neural networks. Int J Comput Sci Inform Technol (IJCSIT) 2(6):92

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ghotkar VN, Indurkar P, Chilke B (2015) The pattern recognition using spiking neural network and neural network. Int J 5:ISO 690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission (SACM). The work reported in this paper has been supported in part by U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under Grant No. FA9550-15-1-0400.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Alqahtani.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alqahtani, H., Ray, A. Feature extraction and neural network-based fatigue damage detection and classification. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 21253–21273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07609-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07609-3

Keywords

Navigation