Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A novel multi-objective optimization model for sustainable supply chain network design problem in closed-loop supply chains

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing and modeling a supply chain network are the important steps in determining the costs and time associated with bringing goods to market by evaluating alternate scenarios in light of available resources and locations in the chain. In closed-loop supply chains, the network is extended to include backward chain members and thereby sustainable supply chains are achieved. A network that is optimized can reduce carbon footprint, assist with meeting sustainability goals, improve delivery quality, and ultimately result in an improved customer experience, added value, and differentiation. In this study, a closed-loop supply chain network model is considered to simultaneously optimize the three dimensions of sustainability: economical, environmental, and social. The proposed model is developed using a goal programming technique in supply chain processes with the aim of minimizing costs and environmental damage and maximizing the social benefit. The developed model is integrated with the decision variables regarding the number of workers so as to increase employment, especially regarding the social effects of sustainability. A new model is obtained by weighting the three main dimensions of sustainability with the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process technique. A scenario analysis is conducted to show the impact of the parameters such as capacity, demand, costs, and carbon emissions. According to the scenario analysis results, the parameter having the greatest impact on the decision variables is demand; moreover, where there is an increase of 30% in demand, it has been determined that there is an increase of more than 100% in the number of workers and purchasing costs compared to the base case scenario. In addition, the increase in demand naturally increases transportation costs more than 50% as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anand Jayakumar A, Krishnaraj C, Raghunayagan P (2017) A review of mathematical models for supply chain network design. Int J Innov Res Adv Eng 4(12)

  2. Melo T, Nickel S, Saldanha-da-Gama F (2008) Network design decisions in supply chain planning

  3. Xanthopoulos A, Iakovou E (2010) Design of reverse supply chains in support of agile closed-loop logistics networks. In: Lihui Wang SC, Koh L (eds) Enterprise networks and logistics for agile manufacturing. Springer, London, pp 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-244-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhalechian M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Zahiri B, Mohammadi M (2016) Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 89:182–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuvvetli Y, Erol R (2020) Coordination of production planning and distribution in closed-loop supply chains. Neural Comput Appl 32(17):13605–13623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04770-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gholizadeh H, Tajdin A, Javadian N (2020) A closed-loop supply chain robust optimization for disposable appliances. Neural Comput Appl 32(8):3967–3985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Govindan K, Fattahi M, Keyvanshokooh E (2017) Supply chain network design under uncertainty: a comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 263(1):108–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.009

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tautenhain CPS, Barbosa-Povoa AP, Nascimento MCV (2019) A multi-objective matheuristic for designing and planning sustainable supply chains. Comput Ind Eng 135:1203–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soleimani H, Govindan K, Saghafi H, Jafari H (2017) Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Comput Ind Eng 109:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pourjavad E, Mayorga RV (2019) A comparative study on fuzzy programming approaches to design a sustainable supply chain under uncertainty. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(3):2947–2961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asgharizadeh E, Torabi SA, Mohaghar A, Zare-Shourijeh MA (2019) Sustainable supply chain network design: a review on quantitative models using content analysis. Environ Energy Econ Res 3(2):143–176. https://doi.org/10.22097/EEER.2019.184458.1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gülsün B, Tuzkaya G, Bildik E (2008) Reverse logistics network design: a simulated annealing approach. J Eng Nat Sci 26(1):68–80

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fragoso R, Figueira JR (2020) Sustainable supply chain network design: an application to the wine industry in Southern Portugal. J Oper Res Soc 72(6):1236–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1718015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammadi M, Jämsä-Jounela SL, Harjunkoski I (2018) Sustainable supply chain network design for the optimal utilization of municipal solid waste. AIChE J 65(7):e16464. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rezaei S, Kheirkhah A (2017) A comprehensive approach in designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network using cross-docking operations. Comput Math Organ Theory 24(1):51–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9247-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nobari A, Kheirkhah A (2018) Integrated and dynamic design of sustainable closed-loop supply chain network considering pricing. Trans Ind Eng (E) 25(1):410–430. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mari S, Lee Y, Memon M (2014) Sustainable and resilient supply chain network design under disruption risks. Sustainability 6(10):6666–6686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherafati M, Bashiri M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Pishvaee MS (2019) Supply chain network design considering sustainable development paradigm: a case study in cable industry. J Clean Prod 234:366–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo Y, Hu F, Allaoui H, Boulaksil Y (2018) A distributed approximation approach for solving the sustainable supply chain network design problem. Int J Prod Res 57(11):3695–3718. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1556412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu Z, Bostel N (2007) A facility location model for logistics systems including reverse flows: the case of remanufacturing activities. Comput Oper Res 34(2):299–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2005.03.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Yang J, Wang Y (2022) Optimization and system implementation of fuzzy integrated algorithm model for logistics supply chain under supply and demand uncertainty background. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07135-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiao Z, Ran L, Zhang Y, Li Z, Zhang W (2018) Data-driven approaches to integrated closed-loop sustainable supply chain design under multi-uncertainties. J Clean Prod 185:105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trappey AJ, Trappey CV, Fan C-Y, Hsu AP, Li X-K, Lee IJ (2017) IoT patent roadmap for smart logistic service provision in the context of Industry 4.0. J Chin Inst Eng 40(7):593–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2017.1362325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B (2019) The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. Int J Prod Res 57(3):829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hahn GJ (2020) Industry 4.0: a supply chain innovation perspective. Int J Prod Res 58(5):1425–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1641642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaboli Chalmardi M, Camacho-Vallejo J-F (2019) A bi-level programming model for sustainable supply chain network design that considers incentives for using cleaner technologies. J Clean Prod 213:1035–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alkahtani M, Ziout A (2019) Design of a sustainable reverse supply chain in a remanufacturing environment: a case study of proton-exchange membrane fuel cell battery in Riyadh. Adv Mech Eng 11(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019842997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yılmaz E, Bilgin E (2019) Çok kademeli bir tedarik zinciri aği için üretim-dağitim ve tersine lojistik planlaması. R&S Res Stud Anatolia J 2(4):55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rahimi M, Ghezavati V, Asadi F (2019) A stochastic risk-averse sustainable supply chain network design problem with quantity discount considering multiple sources of uncertainty. Comput Ind Eng 130:430–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ochoa Robles J, Giraud Billoud M, Azzaro-Pantel C, Aguilar-Lasserre AA (2019) Optimal Design of a sustainable hydrogen supply chain network: application in an airport ecosystem. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(21):17587–17597. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mari SI, Lee YH, Memon MS (2016) Sustainable and resilient garment supply chain network design with fuzzy multi-objectives under uncertainty. Sustainability 8(10):1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eskandarpour M, Dejax P, Péton O (2021) Multi-directional local search for sustainable supply chain network design. Int J Prod Res 59(2):412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1696488

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. John ST, Sridharan R (2015) Modelling and analysis of network design for a reverse supply chain. J Manuf Technol Manag 26(6):853–867. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-03-2014-0035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rohmer SUK, Gerdessen JC, Claassen GDH (2019) Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: a multi-objective analysis. Eur J Oper Res 273(3):1149–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.006

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Ene S, Öztürk N (2014) Open loop reverse supply chain network design. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 109:1110–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yadav VS, Tripathi S, Singh A (2019) Bi-objective optimization for sustainable supply chain network design in omnichannel. J Manuf Technol Manag 30(6):972–986. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pishvaee MS, Jolai F, Razmi J (2009) A stochastic optimization model for integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. J Manuf Syst 28(4):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2010.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eskandari-Khanghahi M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Taleizadeh AA, Amin SH (2018) Designing and optimizing a sustainable supply chain network for a blood platelet bank under uncertainty. Eng Appl Artif Intell 71:236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dehghanian F, Mansour S (2009) Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(10):559–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fattahi M, Govindan K (2018) A multi-stage stochastic program for the sustainable design of biofuel supply chain networks under biomass supply uncertainty and disruption risk: a real-life case study. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 118:534–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Govindan K, Jafarian A, Nourbakhsh V (2019) Designing a sustainable supply chain network integrated with vehicle routing: a comparison of hybrid swarm intelligence metaheuristics. Comput Oper Res 110:220–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.11.013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Ko HJ, Evans GW (2007) A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward/reverse logistics network for 3PLs. Comput Oper Res 34(2):346–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2005.03.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang X, Adamatzky A, Chan FT, Mahadevan S, Deng Y (2017) Physarum solver: a bio-inspired method for sustainable supply chain network design problem. Ann Oper Res 254(1):533–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2410-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Arampantzi C, Minis I (2017) A new model for designing sustainable supply chain networks and its application to a global manufacturer. J Clean Prod 156:276–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Dong M, Han S (2019) Sustainable supply chain network design with carbon footprint consideration: a case study in China. Math Probl Eng 2019:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3162471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gao J, You F (2017) Modeling framework and computational algorithm for hedging against uncertainty in sustainable supply chain design using functional-unit-based life cycle optimization. Comput Chem Eng 107:221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhen L, Huang L, Wang W (2019) Green and sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 227:1195–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tsao Y-C, Thanh V-V, Lu J-C, Yu V (2018) Designing sustainable supply chain networks under uncertain environments: fuzzy multi-objective programming. J Clean Prod 174:1550–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pourjavad E, Mayorga R (2018) Optimization of a sustainable closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Adv Prod Eng Manag 13(2):216–228. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2018.2.286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ghaderi H, Moini A, Pishvaee MS (2018) A multi-objective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable switchgrass-based bioethanol supply chain network design. J Clean Prod 179:368–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Devika K, Jafarian A, Nourbakhsh V (2014) Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: a comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques. Eur J Oper Res 235(3):594–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.032

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Jafari H, Seifbarghy M, Omidvari M (2017) Sustainable supply chain design with water environmental impacts and justice-oriented employment considerations: a case study in textile industry. Trans Ind Eng (E) 24(4):2119–2137. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2017.4299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, Fathollahi Fard AM (2019) Sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design with discount supposition. Neural Comput Appl 31(9):5343–5377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3369-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang S, Lee CKM, Wu K, Choy KL (2016) Multi-objective optimization for sustainable supply chain network design considering multiple distribution channels. Expert Syst Appl 65:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Varsei M, Polyakovskiy S (2017) Sustainable supply chain network design: a case of the wine industry in Australia. Omega 66:236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bairamzadeh S, Pishvaee MS, Saidi-Mehrabad M (2016) Multiobjective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable bioethanol supply chain design under multiple uncertainties. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(1):237–256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mirmohammadi SH, Sahraeian R (2018) A novel sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design by considering routing and quality of products. Int J Eng 31(11):1918–1928. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2018.31.11b.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Babazadeh R, Razmi J, Pishvaee MS, Rabbani M (2017) A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk. Omega 66:258–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Govindan K, Jafarian A, Nourbakhsh V (2015) Bi-objective integrating sustainable order allocation and sustainable supply chain network strategic design with stochastic demand using a novel robust hybrid multi-objective metaheuristic. Comput Oper Res 62:112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2014.12.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Pop PC, Pintea C-M, Sitar CP, Hajdu-Măcelaru M (2015) An efficient Reverse Distribution System for solving sustainable supply chain network design problem. J Appl Log 13(2):105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2014.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Samadi A, Mehranfar N, Fathollahi Fard A, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M (2018) Heuristic-based metaheuristics to address a sustainable supply chain network design problem. J Ind Prod Eng 35(2):102–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2017.1422039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yue D, Slivinsky M, Sumpter J, You F (2014) Sustainable design and operation of cellulosic bioelectricity supply chain networks with life cycle economic, environmental, and social optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(10):4008–4029. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403882v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sahebjamnia N, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M (2018) Sustainable tire closed-loop supply chain network design: hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for large-scale networks. J Clean Prod 196:273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pishvaee MS, Razmi J, Torabi SA (2014) An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: a case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 67:14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yue D, Kim MA, You F (2013) Design of sustainable product systems and supply chains with life cycle optimization based on functional unit: general modeling framework, mixed-integer nonlinear programming algorithms and case study on hydrocarbon biofuels. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1(8):1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400080x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Longo F (2012) Sustainable supply chain design: an application example in local business retail. SIMULATION 88(12):1484–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549712458983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Corsano G, Vecchietti AR, Montagna JM (2011) Optimal design for sustainable bioethanol supply chain considering detailed plant performance model. Comput Chem Eng 35(8):1384–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Byrne PJ, Heavey C, Ryan P, Liston P (2010) Sustainable supply chain design: capturing dynamic input factors. J Simul 4(4):213–221. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2010.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Chiu M-C, Teng L-W (2013) Sustainable product and supply chain design decisions under uncertainties. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(11):1953–1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0265-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Guillén-Gosálbez G, Grossmann IE (2009) Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AIChE J 55(1):99–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Metta H, Badurdeen F (2013) Integrating sustainable product and supply chain design: modeling issues and challenges. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 60(2):438–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2012.2206392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M (2012) Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Abdallah T, Diabat A, Simchi-Levi D (2011) Sustainable supply chain design: a closed-loop formulation and sensitivity analysis. Prod Plan Control 23(2–3):120–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.591622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Calabrese A, Costa R, Menichini T (2013) Using fuzzy AHP to manage intellectual capital assets: an application to the ICT service industry. Expert Syst Appl 40(9):3747–3755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Çalik A, Pehlivan NY, Kahraman C (2018) An integrated fuzzy Ahp/Dea approach for performance evaluation of territorial units in Turkey. Technol Econ Dev Econ 24(4):1280–1302. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1230563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Chang D-Y (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process. Int Ser Oper Res Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Kaptanoğlu D, Özok AF (2010) Akademik performans değerlendirmesi için bir bulanık model. İTÜDERGİSİ/d 5(1)

  79. Kwong C-K, Bai H (2003) Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Trans 35(7):619–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170304355

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Scientific Research Project Unit of Çukurova University (CUBAP) (Grant Number: FDK-2019-112228).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Çukurova University, Sarıçam, 01330, Adana, Turkey

    Kafiye Salçuk & Cenk Şahin

Authors
  1. Kafiye Salçuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cenk Şahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cenk Şahin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table

Table 6 The brief statistics of the dataset used in this study
Full size table

6.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salçuk, K., Şahin, C. A novel multi-objective optimization model for sustainable supply chain network design problem in closed-loop supply chains. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 22157–22175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07668-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07668-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation