Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Heap-based optimizer embedded with search strategies applied to high-order analog filter designs: a comparative study with up-to-date metaheuristics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heap-Based Optimizer (HBO) is one of the recently proposed metaheuristic algorithms inspired by the corporate rank hierarchy. In this study, opposition and Cauchy-based search mechanisms are integrated into HBO which is applied for the design of high-order Butterworth active filters, for the first time, comparing with six outstanding metaheuristics introduced for the last year (2020). In addition, the proposed algorithm has been adapted to solve the benchmark presented in the IEEE-CEC 2020 competition to demonstrate its effectiveness against numerical functions. The analog filter design is a challenging problem due to its discrete topology and complex search space. This study provides a comprehensive review for the design of these filters with the up-to-date algorithms: firstly, the performance of each metaheuristic is analyzed by its error value performance, the required number of iterations to achieve this error value; secondly, a statistical test is conducted to validate its performances; as the third, convergence abilities of algorithms are compared with respect to the total design process error values versus an iteration number graph. The passive component values of the Butterworth active filter are selected within the E24 and E96 industrial series so as to make the realization of designs easier to the real world. To demonstrate the suitability of the components obtained by the algorithms to the real world, the amplitude response of the associated design is given. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm over the contestant algorithms, and its capability of solving these case design problems. This extensive work can also provide guidelines to the researchers for future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Thede L (2004) Practical analog and digital filter design, 1st edn. Artech House Publishers, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winder S (2002) Analog and digital filter design, 2nd edn. Newnes, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horrocks DH, Spittle MC (1993) Component value selection for active filters using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of IEE/IEEE Workshop on Natural Algorithms in Signal Processing, pp 131–136

  4. Vural RA, Yildirim T (2010) Component value selection for analog active filter using particle swarm optimization. In: The 2nd International conference on computer and automation engineering, ICCAE, pp 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAE.2010.5452009

  5. Vural RA, Yildirim T, Kadioglu T, Basargan A (2012) Performance evaluation of evolutionary algorithms for optimal filter design. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16:135–147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2011.2112664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalinli A (2014) Optimal circuit design using immune algorithm. Lect Notes Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30220-9_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalinli A (2006) Component value selection for active filters using parallel tabu search algorithm. Int J Electron Commun 60:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2005.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Min J, Zhenkun Y, Zhaohui G (2007) Optimal components selection for analog active filters using clonal selection algorithms. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4681:950–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74171-8_96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vural RA, Bozkurt U, Yildirim T (2013) Analog active filter component selection with nature inspired metaheuristics. Int J Electron Commun 67:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2012.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dogan B, Olmez T (2015) Vortex search algorithm for the analog active filter component selection problem. Int J Electron Commun 69(9):1243–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2015.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. El BA, Bachir B, Izeddine Z (2020) Analog active filter component selection using genetic algorithm. Embed Syst Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sattar D, Salim R (2020) A smart metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering problems. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-00951-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De BP, Kar R, Mandal D, Ghoshal SP (2015) Optimal selection of components value for analog active filter design using simplex particle swarm optimization. Int J Mach Learn Cyber 6:621–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0299-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De BP, Kar R, Mandal D, Ghoshal SP (2015) Optimal analog active filter design using craziness-based particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Numer Model 28:593–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De BP, Kar R, Mandal D, Ghoshal SP (2015) Particle swarm optimization with aging leader and challengers for optimal design of analog active filters. Circuits Syst Signal Process 34:707–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-014-9872-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Durmuş B (2018) Optimal components selection for active filter design with average differential evolution algorithm. Int J Electron Commun 94:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaur M, Kaur R, Singh N, Dhiman G (2021) Schoa: a newly fusion of sine and cosine with chimp optimization algorithm for hls of datapaths in digital filters and engineering applications. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01233-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Talatahari S, Azizi M (2020) Chaos game optimization: a novel metaheuristic algorithm. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09867-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Konstantinos Z, Tsafarakis S (2020) A mayfly optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 145:106559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH (2020) Marine predators algorithm: a nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Syst Appl 152:113377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiguo Z, Zhang Z, Wang L (2020) Manta ray foraging optimization: an effective bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S, Chen H, Wang M, Heidari AA, Mirjalili S (2020) Slime mould algorithm: a new method for stochastic optimization. Future Gener Comput Syst 111:300–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Askari Q, Mehreen S, Irfan Y (2020) Heap-based optimizer inspired by corporate rank hierarchy for global optimization. Expert Syst Appl 161:113702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dib N, El-Asir B (2018) Optimal design of analog active filters using symbiotic organisms search. Int J Numer Model Electron Netw Dev Fields 31:e2323. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mancini R (2003) Op amps for everyone, 1st edn. Newnes, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shahryar R, Hamid RT, Magdy MAS (2008) Opposition versus randomness in soft computing techniques. Appl Soft Comput 8(2):906–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin J (2015) Oppositional backtracking search optimization algorithm for parameter identification of hyperchaotic systems. Nonlinear Dyn 80(1):209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1861-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta S, Deep K, Heidari AA, Moayedi H, Chen H (2019) Harmonized salp chain-built optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00871-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuyu YÇ, Vatansever F (2021) Modified forensic-based investigation algorithm for global optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01322-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang X, Huang Z (2011) Artificial bee colony with dynamic Cauchy mutation for numerical optimization. J Inf Comput Sci. 8(15):3371–3376

    Google Scholar 

  31. Paiva FAP, Silva CRM, Leite IVO, Marcone MHF, Costa JAF (2017) Modified bat algorithm with Cauchy mutation and elite opposition-based learning. In: 2017 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence, LA-CCI, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/la-cci.2017.8285715.

  32. Yue CT, Price KV, Suganthan PN, Liang JJ, Ali MZ, Qu BY, Awad NH, Partha PB (2019) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2020 special session and competition on single objective bound constrained numerical optimization. Technical Report, 201911.

  33. Wilcoxon F (1992) Individual comparisons by ranking methods, breakthroughs in statistics, vol 2. Springer, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University, Nilüfer/Bursa, Turkey

    Yiğit Çağatay Kuyu & Fahri Vatansever

Authors
  1. Yiğit Çağatay Kuyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fahri Vatansever
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahri Vatansever.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuyu, Y.Ç., Vatansever, F. Heap-based optimizer embedded with search strategies applied to high-order analog filter designs: a comparative study with up-to-date metaheuristics. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 1447–1467 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07835-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07835-9

Keywords