Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Challenges and opportunities of deep learning-based process fault detection and diagnosis: a review

  • Review
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) is a predominant task to ensure product quality and process reliability in modern industrial systems. Those traditional FDD techniques are largely based on diagnostic experience. These methods have met significant challenges with immense expansion of plant scale and large numbers of process variables. Recently, deep learning has become the newest trends in process control. The upsurge of deep neural networks (DNNs) in leaning highly discriminative features from complicated process data has provided practitioners with effective process monitoring tools. This paper is to present a review and full developing route of deep learning-based FDD in complex process industries. Firstly, the nature of traditional data projection-based and machine learning-based FDD methods is discussed in process FDD. Secondly, the characteristics of deep learning and their applications in process FDD are illustrated. Thirdly, these typical deep learning techniques, e.g., transfer learning, generative adversarial network, capsule network, graph neural network, are presented for process FDD. These DNNs will effectively solve these problems of fault detection, fault classification, and fault isolation in process. Finally, the developing route of DNN-based process FDD techniques is highlighted for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gao RX, Wu D (2018) Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J Manuf Syst 48:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge Z, Song Z, Gao F (2013) Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:3543–3562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rathinasabapathy R, Elsass MJ, Josephson JR, Davis JF (2016) A smart manufacturing methodology for real time chemical process diagnosis using causal link assessment. Aiche J 62:3420–3431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Montmain J, Labreuche C, Imoussaten A, Trousset F (2015) Multi-criteria improvement of complex systems. Inform Sci 291:61–84

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Butte VK, Tang LC (2010) Multivariate charting techniques: a review and a line-column approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 26:443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang JH, Kim SB (2015) False alarm classification for multivariate manufacturing processes of thin film transistor-liquid crystal displays. J Process Contr 35:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peres FAP, Fogliatto FS (2018) Variable selection methods in multivariate statistical process control: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind Eng 115:603–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang QC, Huang B (2016) Distributed monitoring for large-scale processes based on multivariate statistical analysis and Bayesian method. J Process Contr 46:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakshi BR (1998) Multiscale PCA with application to multivariate statistical process monitoring. Aiche J 44:1596–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JM, Yoo CK, Lee IB (2004) Statistical process monitoring with independent component analysis. J Process Contr 14:467–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang QC, Yan XF, Lv ZM, Guo MJ (2014) Independent component analysis-based non-Gaussian process monitoring with preselecting optimal components and support vector data description. Int J Prod Res 52:3273–3286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nomikos P, MacGregor JF (1995) Multi-way partial least squares in monitoring batch processes. Chemometr Intell Lab 30:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He QP, Qin SJ, Wang J (2005) A new fault diagnosis method using fault directions in fisher discriminant analysis. Aiche J 51:555–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding SX, Zhang P, Naik A, Ding EL, Huang B (2009) Subspace method aided data-driven design of fault detection and isolation systems. J Process Contr 19:1496–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong D, McAvoy TJ (1996) Nonlinear principal component analysis - Based on principal curves and neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 20:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JM, Yoo CK, Choi SW, Vanrolleghem PA, Lee IB (2004) Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem Eng Sci 59:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xi Z, Weiwu Y, Xu Z, Huihe S (2007) Nonlinear biological batch process monitoring and fault identification based on kernel fisher discriminant analysis. Process Biochem 42:1200–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng XG, Tian XM, Chen S, Harris CJ (2017) Fault discriminant enhanced kernel principal component analysis incorporating prior fault information for monitoring nonlinear processes. Chemometr Intell Lab 162:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiang LH, Russell EL, Braatz RD (2000) Fault diagnosis in chemical processes using Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 50:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ding SX, Zhang P, Jeinsch T, Ding EL, Gui W (2011) A Survey of the Application of Basic Data-Driven and Model-Based Methods in Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis. IFAC Proc 44:12380–12388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin S, Ding SX, Haghani A, Hao HY, Zhang P (2012) A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. J Process Contr 22:1567–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin S, Ding SX, Xie XC, Luo H (2014) A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. Ieee T Ind Electron 61:6418–6428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. He XF, Cai D, Shao YL, Bao HJ, Han JW (2011) Laplacian regularized Gaussian mixture model for data clustering. IEEE Trans Knowl Data En 23:1406–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tenenbaum JB, de Silva V, Langford JC (2000) A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290:2319–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290:2323–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Belkin M, Niyogi P (2003) Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Comput 15:1373–1396

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang ZY, Zha HY (2004) Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via tangent space alignment, Siam. J Sci Comput 26:313–338

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng X, Tang Y, Du WL, Qian F (2017) Multimode Process Monitoring and Fault Detection: A Sparse Modeling and Dictionary Learning Method. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64:4866–4875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou YJ, Xu K, He F, He D (2020) Nonlinear fault detection for batch processes via improved chordal kernel tensor locality preserving projections. Control Eng Pract 101:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu JB (2010) Hidden Markov models combining local and global information for nonlinear and multimodal process monitoring. J Process Contr 20:344–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu JB (2012) Local and global principal component analysis for process monitoring. J Process Contr 22:1358–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu JB (2016) Process monitoring through manifold regularization-based GMM with global/local information. J Process Contr 45:84–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li N, Yan WW, Yang YP (2015) Spatial-statistical local approach for improved manifold-based process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:8509–8519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lunga D, Prasad S, Crawford MM, Ersoy O (2014) Manifold-learning-based feature extraction for classification of hyperspectral data. Ieee Signal Proc Mag 31:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tong CD, Shi XH, Lan T (2016) Statistical process monitoring based on orthogonal multi-manifold projections and a novel variable contribution analysis. ISA Trans 65:407–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Zhang MS, Shi HB, Tan S (2017) Dynamic learning on the manifold with constrained time information and its application for dynamic process monitoring. Chemometr Intell Lab 167:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharifian S, Sotudeh-Gharebagh R, Zarghami R, Tanguy P, Mostoufi N (2021) Uncertainty in chemical process systems engineering: a critical review. Rev Chem Eng 37:687–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vincent P, Larochelle H, Lajoie I, Bengio Y, Manzagol PA (2010) Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. J Mach Learn Res 11:3371–3408

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun Acm 60:84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313:504–507

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Lipton ZC, Berkowitz J, Elkan C (2015) A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. Comput Sci 1:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  42. Boroumand M, Chen M, Fridrich J (2019) Deep residual network for steganalysis of digital images. IEEE Trans Inf Foren Sec 14:1181–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Das A, Maiti J, Banerjee RN (2012) Process monitoring and fault detection strategies: a review. Int J Qual Reliabil Manag 29:720–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Qin SJ (2012) Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis. Annu Rev Control 36:220–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ge ZQ, Song ZH, Deng SX, Huang B (2017) Data mining and analytics in the process industry: the role of machine learning. IEEE Access 5:20590–20616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nor NM, Hassan CRC, Hussain MA (2020) A review of data-driven fault detection and diagnosis methods: applications in chemical process systems. Rev Chem Eng 36:513–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Taqvi SAA, Zabiri H, Tufa LD, Uddin F, Fatima SA, Maulud AS (2021) A review on data-driven learning approaches for fault detection and diagnosis in chemical processes. Chembioeng Rev 8:239–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lei YG, Yang B, Jiang XW, Jia F, Li NP, Nandi AK (2020) Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: a review and roadmap. Mech Syst Signal Pr 138:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Onel M, Kieslich CA, Guzman YA, Pistikopoulos EN (2018) Simultaneous fault detection and identification in continuous processes via nonlinear support vector machine based feature selection. Comput Aided Chem Eng 44:2077–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yao Y, Gao FR (2009) A survey on multistage/multiphase statistical modeling methods for batch processes. Annu Rev Control 33:172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tong CD, Palazoglu A, Yan XF (2013) An adaptive multimode process monitoring strategy based on mode clustering and mode unfolding. J Process Contr 23:1497–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang F, Zhu HL, Tan S, Shi HB (2016) Orthogonal nonnegative matrix factorization based local hidden Markov model for multimode process monitoring. Chin J Chem Eng 24:856–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Afzal MS, Tan W, Chen TW (2017) Process monitoring for multimodal processes with mode-reachability constraints. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64:4325–4335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lou Z, Wang Y (2017) Hidden semi-Markov model based monitoring algorithm for multimode processes. In: 2017 6th Data driven control and learning systems (DDCLS), pp 66–71.

  55. Yang CM, Hou J (2016) Fed-batch fermentation penicillin process fault diagnosis and detection based on support vector machine. Neurocomputing 190:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yu J, Qin SJ (2008) Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference-based finite Gaussian mixture models. Aiche J 54:1811–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. He QP, Wang J (2007) Fault detection using the k-nearest neighbor rule for semiconductor manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 20:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sun K, Liu JL, Kang JL, Jang SS, Wong DSH, Chen DS (2014) Development of a variable selection method for soft sensor using artificial neural network and nonnegative garrote. J Process Contr 24:1068–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pani AK, Mohanta HK (2015) Online monitoring and control of particle size in the grinding process using least square support vector regression and resilient back propagation neural network. Isa T 56:206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu TI, Jolley B (2015) Tool condition monitoring (TCM) using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 78:1999–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pian JX, Zhu YL (2015) A hybrid soft sensor for measuring hot-rolled strip temperature in the laminar cooling process. Neurocomputing 169:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Du SC, Xi LF (2011) Fault diagnosis in assembly processes based on engineering-driven rules and PSOSAEN algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 60:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Majid N, Young BR, Taylor MP, Chen J (2012) K-means clustering pre-analysis for fault diagnosis in an aluminium smelting process. In: 2012 4th Conference on Data Mining and Optimization (DMO), 2012, pp 43–46

  64. Ku WF, Storer RH, Georgakis C (1995) Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 30:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Luo RF, Misra M, Himmelblau DM (1999) Sensor fault detection via multiscale analysis and dynamic PCA. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:1489–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Russell EL, Chiang LH, Braatz RD (2000) Fault detection in industrial processes using canonical variate analysis and dynamic principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 51:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Mina J, Verde C (2005) Fault detection using dynamic principal component analysis by average estimation. In: 2005 2nd International conference on electrical and electronics engineering, 2005, pp 374–377

  68. Choi SW, Lee IB (2005) Multiblock PLS-based localized process diagnosis. J Process Contr 15:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ding SX, Yin S, Peng KX, Hao HY, Shen B (2013) A novel scheme for key performance indicator prediction and diagnosis with application to an industrial hot strip mill. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 9:2239–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shen Y, Wei Z, Gao H, Peng K (2012) Data-driven quality related prediction and monitoring. Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2012, pp 3874–3879

  71. Peng K, Zhang K, You B, Dong JJCT, Iet A (2015) Quality-relevant fault monitoring based on efficient projection to latent structures with application to hot strip mill process 9:1135–1145

    Google Scholar 

  72. He QP, Wang J (2010) Large-scale semiconductor process fault detection using a fast pattern recognition-based method. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 23:194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Guo XP, Jie Y, Yuan L (2013) KPCS-kNN based fault detection for batch processes. In: International conference on machine learning and cybernetics (ICMLC), pp 698–703

  74. Li Y, Zhang XM (2014) Diffusion maps based k-nearest-neighbor rule technique for semiconductor manufacturing process fault detection. Chemometr Intell Lab 136:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhang C, Gao XW, Li Y, Feng LW (2019) Fault detection strategy based on weighted distance of k nearest neighbors for semiconductor manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Semiconduct Manuf 32:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Chen Y, Du R (1998) An improved artificial neural network method for monitoring and diagnosis of engineering processes with applications. J Vib Control 4:635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Iliyas SA, Elshafei M, Habib MA, Adeniran AA (2013) RBF neural network inferential sensor for process emission monitoring. Control Eng Pract 21:962–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Yu JB, Xi LF, Zhou XJ (2009) Identifying source(s) of out-of-control signals in multivariate manufacturing processes using selective neural network ensemble. Eng Appl Artif Intel 22:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yu JB, Xi LF (2007) A Neural Network ensemble for classifying source(s) in multivariate manufacturing processes. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, pp 1246–1250

  80. Maleki MR, Sahraeian R (2015) Online monitoring and fault diagnosis of multivariate-attribute process mean using neural networks and discriminant analysis technique. Int J Eng 28:1634–1643

    Google Scholar 

  81. Liu X, Kang L, Li S, Fei M (2012) Input selection for dynamic RBF models in process monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 10th world congress on intelligent control and automation, pp 3037–3042

  82. Bo C, Li J, Lu A, Zhuang G (2007) Nonlinear process monitors method based on kernel function and PNN. Chinese control conference, pp 511–515

  83. Wu SX (2012) Simultaneous process mean and variance monitoring using wavelet transform and probabilistic neural network. Appl Mech Mater 157–158:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Simon L, Karim MN (2001) Probabilistic neural networks using Bayesian decision strategies and a modified Gompertz model for growth phase classification in the batch culture of Bacillus subtilis. Biochem Eng J 7:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Peng Y, Chen XG, Ye QX, Jiao JB (2014) Fault detection and classification in chemical processes using NMFSC and structural SVMs. Can J Chem Eng 92:1016–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Yin Z, Hou J (2016) Recent advances on SVM based fault diagnosis and process monitoring in complicated industrial processes. Neurocomputing 174:643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Onel M, Kieslich CA, Guzman YA, Floudas CA, Pistikopoulos EN (2018) Big data approach to batch process monitoring: simultaneous fault detection and diagnosis using nonlinear support vector machine-based feature selection(Reprinted from Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol 115, pg 46–63. Comput Chem Eng 116(2018):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Yu J (2011) Localized fisher discriminant analysis based complex chemical process monitoring. Aiche J 57:1817–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Yu J (2011) Nonlinear bioprocess monitoring using multiway kernel localized Fisher discriminant analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:3390–3402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhao Z, Zhang J, Sun YG, Tian HX (2016) Fault detection and diagnosis method for batch process based on ELM-based fault feature phase identification. Neural Comput Appl 27:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Nor NM, Hussain MA, Hassan CRC (2017) Fault diagnosis and classification framework using multiscale classification based on kernel fisher discriminant analysis for chemical process system. Appl Soft Comput 61:959–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Tang Q, Chai Y, Qu JF, Fang XY (2019) Industrial process monitoring based on Fisher discriminant global-local preserving projection. J Process Contr 81:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Yang XH, Rui SH, Zhang XL, Xu SP, Yang CS, Liu PX (2019) Fault diagnosis in chemical processes based on class-incremental FDA and PCA. IEEE Access 7:18164–18171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Nor NM, Hussain MA, Hassan CRC (2020) Multi-scale kernel Fisher discriminant analysis with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in fault detection and diagnosis framework for chemical process systems. Neural Comput Appl 32:9283–9297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Ren SJ, Song ZH, Yang MY, Ren JG (2015) A novel multimode process monitoring method integrating LCGMM with modified LFDA. Chin J Chem Eng 23:1970–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Nomikos P, Macgregor JF (1994) Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis. Aiche J 40:1361–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Dong D, McAvoy TJ (1996) Batch tracking via nonlinear principal component analysis. Aiche J 42:2199–2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Macgregor JF, Kourti T (1995) Statistical process-control of multivariate processes. Control Eng Pract 3:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Dunia R, Qin SJ (1998) Joint diagnosis of process and sensor faults using principal component analysis. Control Eng Pract 6:457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Raich A, Cinar A (1996) Statistical process monitoring and disturbance diagnosis in multivariable continuous processes. Aiche J 42:995–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Mujica LE, Vehi J, Ruiz M, Verleysen M, Staszewski W, Worden K (2008) Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment. Mech Syst Signal Pr 22:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ivosev G, Burton L, Bonner R (2008) Dimensionality reduction and visualization in principal component analysis. Anal Chem 80:4933–4944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Dunia R, Edgar TF, Nixon M (2013) Process monitoring using principal components in parallel coordinates. Aiche J 59:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang RC, Edgar TF, Baldea M, Nixon M, Wojsznis W, Dunia R (2015) Process fault detection using time-explicit Kiviat diagrams. Aiche J 61:4277–4293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Jiang QC, Yan XF (2019) Quality-driven kernel projection to latent structure model for nonlinear process monitoring. IEEE Access 7:74450–74458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Li Z, Yan Z, Jiang L (2009) Fault detection and diagnosis based on KPCA-LSSVM Model. Int Conf Measur Technol Mechat Autom 2009:634–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Xu J, Hu S, Shen Z (2010) Fault detection and diagnosis of chemical process based on an improved multi-scale KPCA. Chin J Sci Instrum 31:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lee JM, Qin SJ, Lee IB (2006) Fault detection and diagnosis based on modified independent component analysis. Aiche J 52:3501–3514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang YW, Zhang Y (2010) Fault detection of non-Gaussian processes based on modified independent component analysis. Chem Eng Sci 65:4630–4639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Hsu CC, Chen MC, Chen LS (2010) Integrating independent component analysis and support vector machine for multivariate process monitoring. Comput Ind Eng 59:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Zhang X, Wang X, Fan Y, Wu J (2014) Fault diagnosis of industrial process based on KICA and LSSVM. In: The 26th Chinese control and decision conference, pp 3802–3807

  112. Li S, Zhou XF, Pan FC, Shi HB, Li KT, Wang ZW (2017) Correlated and weakly correlated fault detection based on variable division and ICA. Comput Ind Eng 112:320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Wang B, Yan XF, Jiang QC (2016) Independent component analysis model utilizing de-mixing information for improved non-Gaussian process monitoring. Comput Ind Eng 94:188–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Yu JB (2011) Fault detection using principal components-based gaussian mixture model for semiconductor manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 24:432–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Yu JB (2012) Semiconductor manufacturing process monitoring using Gaussian Mixture model and Bayesian method with local and nonlocal information. Ieee T Semiconduct M 25:480–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Yu JB (2011) Pattern recognition of manufacturing process signals using Gaussian mixture models-based recognition systems. Comput Ind Eng 61:881–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Jie Y (2012) A nonlinear kernel Gaussian mixture model based inferential monitoring approach for fault detection and diagnosis of chemical processes. Chem Eng Sci 68:506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Peng P, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Zhang H (2019) Hidden Markov model combined with kernel principal component analysis for nonlinear multimode process fault detection. In: 2019 IEEE 15th International conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), pp 1586–1591

  119. Ge ZQ, Xie L, Kruger U, Lamont L, Song ZH, Wang SQ (2009) Sensor fault identification and isolation for multivariate non-Gaussian processes. J Process Contr 19:1707–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Yao M, Wang HG, Xu WL (2014) Batch process monitoring based on functional data analysis and support vector data description. J Process Contr 24:1085–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Chen MC, Hsu CC, Malhotra B, Tiwari MK (2016) An efficient ICA-DW-SVDD fault detection and diagnosis method for non-Gaussian processes. Int J Prod Res 54:5208–5218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Lv ZM, Yan XF, Jiang QC (2014) Batch process monitoring based on just-in-time learning and multiple-subspace principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 137:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Zhou J, Guo AH, Celler B, Su S (2014) Fault detection and identification spanning multiple processes by integrating PCA with neural network. Appl Soft Comput 14:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Yu JB, Xi LF (2008) Using an MQE chart based on a self-organizing map NN to monitor out-of-control signals in manufacturing processes. Int J Prod Res 46:5907–5933

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  125. Corona F, Mulas M, Baratti R, Romagnoli JA (2010) On the topological modeling and analysis of industrial process data using the SOM. Comput Chem Eng 34:2022–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Yu HY, Khan F, Garaniya V, Ahmad A (2014) Self-organizing map based fault diagnosis technique for non-Gaussian processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:8831–8843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Song Y, Jiang QC, Yan XF, Guo MJ (2014) A multi-SOM with canonical variate analysis for chemical process monitoring and fault diagnosis. J Chem Eng Jpn 47:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Chen XY, Yan XF (2012) Using improved self-organizing map for fault diagnosis in chemical industry process. Chem Eng Res Des 90:2262–2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Bolon-Canedo V, Sanchez-Marono N, Alonso-Betanzos A (2013) A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data. Knowl Inf Syst 34:483–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Geladi P, Kowalski BR (1986) Partial least-squares regression—a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Höskuldsson A (1988) PLS regression methods. J Chemometr 2:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Dejong S (1993) Simpls—an alternative approach to partial least-squares regression. Chemometr Intell Lab 18:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Zhou DH, Li G, Qin SJ (2010) Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring. Aiche J 56:168–178

    Google Scholar 

  134. Qin SJ, Zheng YY (2013) Quality-relevant and process-relevant fault monitoring with concurrent projection to latent structures. Aiche J 59:496–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Das A, Maiti J, Banerjee RN (2010) A hierarchical process monitoring strategy for a serial multi-stage manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 48:2459–2479

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  136. Cover TM, Hart PE (1953) Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 13:21–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  137. Ghosh A, Wang GN, Lee J (2020) A novel automata and neural network based fault diagnosis system for PLC controlled manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 139:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Taqvi SA, Tufa LD, Zabiri H, Maulud AS, Uddin F (2020) Fault detection in distillation column using NARX neural network. Neural Comput Appl 32:3503–3519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Bienkowski M, Gasieniec L, Klonowski M, Korzeniowski M, Mans B, Schmid S, Wattenhofer R (2005) Handbook of neural network signal processing. Ieee T Neural Networ 16:780–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Meireles MRG, Almeida PEM, Simoes MG (2003) A comprehensive review for industrial applicability of artificial neural networks. Ieee T Ind Electron 50:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Specht DF (1990) Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw 3:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Shin HJ, Eom DH, Kim SS (2005) One-class support vector machines - an application in machine fault detection and classification. Comput Ind Eng 48:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Ma MD, Wong DSH, Jang SS, Tseng ST (2010) Fault detection based on statistical multivariate analysis and microarray visualization. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 6:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. MacGregor JF, Marlin TE, Kresta J, Skagerberg B (1991) Multivariate statistical methods in process analysis and control. Chemical process control 1:79–100

    Google Scholar 

  145. Qin SJ, Mcavoy TJ (1992) Nonlinear Pls modeling using neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 16:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Chaouch H, Charfedine S, Ouni K, Jerbi H, Nabli L (2019) Intelligent supervision approach based on multilayer neural PCA and nonlinear gain scheduling. Neural Comput Appl 31:1153–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Qiang G, Wang G, Hao X (2012) A hybrid fault detection and diagnosis system based on KPCA and DDAG. Adv Intell Soft Comput 125:549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Hsu CC, Chen LS, Liu CH (2010) A process monitoring scheme based on independent component analysis and adjusted outliers. Int J Prod Res 48:1727–1743

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  149. Cho HW (2009) Data description and noise filtering based detection with its application and performance comparison. Expert Syst Appl 36:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Abid A, Khan MT, Iqbal J (2021) A review on fault detection and diagnosis techniques: basics and beyond. Artif Intell Rev 54:3639–3664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Issa NT, Byers SW, Dakshanamurthy S (2014) Big data: the next frontier for innovation in therapeutics and healthcare. Expert Rev Clin Phar 7:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Hoyt D (2015) Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Res Technol Manag 58:66–67

    Google Scholar 

  154. Lavasani MS, Ardali NR, Sotudeh-Gharebagh R, Zarghami R, Abonyi J, Mostoufi N (2021) Big data analytics opportunities for applications in process engineering. Rev Chem Eng 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  155. Shu YD, Ming L, Cheng FF, Zhang ZP, Zhao JS (2016) Abnormal situation management: challenges and opportunities in the big data era. Comput Chem Eng 91:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Yao L, Ge ZQ (2021) Industrial big data modeling and monitoring framework for plant-wide processes. IEEE T Ind Inform 17:6399–6408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Jiang QC, Yan SF, Cheng H, Yan XF (2021) Local-global modeling and distributed computing framework for nonlinear plant-wide process monitoring with industrial big data. IEEE Trans Neur Net Lear 32:3355–3365

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  158. Guo JY, Wang X, Li Y (2019) Fault detection based on improved local entropy locality preserving projections in multimodal processes. J Chemometr 33:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Geng ZQ, Duan XY, Han YM, Liu FF, Xu W (2021) Novel variation mode decomposition integrated adaptive sparse principal component analysis and it application in fault diagnosis. ISA Trans 1:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  160. Alrifaey M, Lim WH, Ang CK, Natarajan E, Solihin MI, Juhari MRM, Tiang SS (2022) Hybrid deep learning model for fault detection and classification of grid-connected photovoltaic system. IEEE Access 10:13852–13869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Xu S, Lu B, Baldea M, Edgar TF, Wojsznis W, Blevins T, Nixon M (2015) Data cleaning in the process industries. Rev Chem Eng 31:453–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Allison PD (2012) Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Glob Forum Stat Data Anal 1:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  163. Ding XO, Wang HZ, Su JX, Li ZJ, Li JZ, Gao H (2019) Cleanits: a data cleaning system for industrial time series. Proc Vldb Endow 12:1786–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Wang X, Wang C (2020) Time series data cleaning: a survey. IEEE Access 8:1866–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  166. Chadha GS, Schwung A (2017) Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in tennessee eastman process. In: IEEE international conference on emerging technologies & factory automation, 2017, pp 1–8

  167. Yan SF, Yan XF (2019) Design teacher and supervised dual stacked auto-encoders for quality-relevant fault detection in industrial process. Appl Soft Comput 81:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Yu JB, Zheng XY, Wang SJ (2019) A deep autoencoder feature learning method for process pattern recognition. J Process Contr 79:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Yu JB, Zheng XY, Wang SJ (2019) Stacked denoising autoencoder-based feature learning for out-of-control source recognition in multivariate manufacturing process. Qual Reliab Eng Int 35:204–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Zhang CY, Yu JB, Wang SJ (2021) Fault detection and recognition of multivariate process based on feature learning of one-dimensional convolutional neural network and stacked denoised autoencoder. Int J Prod Res 59:2426–2449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Li ZC, Tian L, Jiang QC, Yan XF (2021) Distributed-ensemble stacked autoencoder model for nonlinear process monitoring. Inform Sciences 542:302–316

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  172. Liu X, Yu J, Ye L (2021) Residual attention convolutional autoencoder for feature learning and fault detection in nonlinear industrial processes. Neural Comput Appl 33:3085–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Yu JB, Liu X (2021) One-dimensional residual convolutional auto-encoder for fault detection in complex industrial processes. Int J Prod Res 1:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  174. Li SP, Luo JX, Hu YM (2022) Toward interpretable process monitoring: slow feature analysis-aided autoencoder for spatiotemporal process feature learning. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 71:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Yu JB, Zhang CY (2020) Manifold regularized stacked autoencoders-based feature learning for fault detection in industrial processes. J Process Contr 92:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Gu JX, Wang ZH, Kuen J, Ma LY, Shahroudy A, Shuai B, Liu T, Wang XX, Wang G, Cai JF, Chen T (2018) Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recogn 77:354–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Zhang HL, Wang P, Gao XJ, Qi YS, Gao HH (2019) Amplitude-frequency images-based ConvNet: applications of fault detection and diagnosis in chemical processes. J Chemometr 33:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Kim E, Cho S, Lee B, Cho M (2019) Fault detection and diagnosis using self-attentive convolutional neural networks for variable-length sensor data in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Trans Semiconduct Manuf 32:302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Chen S, Yu J (2020) Convolution neural network multivariable process feature learning and fault diagnosis. J Harb Inst Technol 52:1

    Google Scholar 

  180. Lee KB, Cheon S, Kim CO (2017) A convolutional neural network for fault classification and diagnosis in semiconductor manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 30:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Wu H, Zhao JS (2018) Deep convolutional neural network model based chemical process fault diagnosis. Comput Chem Eng 115:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Chen S, Yu J, Wang S (2020) One-dimensional convolutional auto-encoder-based feature learning for fault diagnosis of multivariate processes. J Process Contr 87:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Zheng X, Yu J (2019) Multivariate process monitoring and fault identification using convolutional neural networks. In: 24th International conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, proceeding of the 24th international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management 2018, 2019, pp 197–208

  184. Yu J, Liu X (2020) A fault detection method based on convolutional gated recurrent unit auto-encoder for tennessee eastman process. Chin Autom Cong (CAC) 2020:1234–1238

    Google Scholar 

  185. Hsu CY, Liu WC (2021) Multiple time-series convolutional neural network for fault detection and diagnosis and empirical study in semiconductor manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 32:823–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Yu WK, Zhao CH (2020) Broad convolutional neural network based industrial process fault diagnosis with incremental learning capability. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 67:5081–5091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  187. Yu JB, Zhang CY, Wang SJ (2021) Multichannel one-dimensional convolutional neural network-based feature learning for fault diagnosis of industrial processes. Neural Comput Appl 33:3085–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Bengio Y, Simard P, Frasconi P (1994) Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Trans Neural Networ 5:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Chadha GS, Panambilly A, Schwung A, Ding SX (2020) Bidirectional deep recurrent neural networks for process fault classification. Isa T 106:330–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Cheng FF, He EE, Zhao JS (2019) A novel process monitoring approach based on variational recurrent autoencoder. Comput Chem Eng 129:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Ouyang H, Zeng JS, Li YF, Luo SH (2020) Fault Detection and Identification of Blast Furnace Ironmaking Process Using the Gated Recurrent Unit Network. Processes 8:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. Wang Q, Luo L (2021) Sequential fault detection and classification in chemical process using a deep convolutional encoder–decoder architecture based on system dynamics. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 696:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Chen SM, Yu JB (2019) Deep recurrent neural network-based residual control chart for autocorrelated processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int 35:2687–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Zhang SY, Bi KX, Qiu T (2020) Bidirectional recurrent neural network-based chemical process fault diagnosis. Ind Eng Chem Res 59:824–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Liu F, Wang P, Cai Z, Zhou Z, Yang Z (2019) Batch process fault diagnosis based on the combination of deep belief network and long short-term memory network. In: 2019 CAA symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (SAFEPROCESS), pp 208-214

  197. Yu J, Liu X, Ye L (2020) Convolutional long short-term memory autoencoder-based feature learning for fault detection in industrial processes. IEEE Trans Instrum Measur 70:3505615

    Google Scholar 

  198. Hinton GE (2002) Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Comput 14:1771–1800

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  199. Zhang ZP, Zhao JS (2017) A deep belief network based fault diagnosis model for complex chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 107:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. Peng T, Peng K, Kai Z, Chen Z, Yang X, Li L (2018) A deep belief network-based fault detection method for nonlinear processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. Kim JK, Lee JS, Han YS (2019) Fault detection prediction using a deep belief network-based multi-classifier in the semiconductor manufacturing process. Int J Softw Eng Know 29:1125–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Yu JB, Yan XF (2019) Active features extracted by deep belief network for process monitoring. Isa T 84:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. Yu JB, Yan XF (2020) Whole process monitoring based on unstable neuron output information in hidden layers of deep belief network. IEEE Trans Cybern 50:3998–4007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Wang YL, Pan ZF, Yuan XF, Yang CH, Gui WH (2020) A novel deep learning based fault diagnosis approach for chemical process with extended deep belief network. ISA Trans 96:457–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. Yu JB, Yan XF (2020) Modeling large-scale industrial processes by multiple deep belief networks with lower-pressure and higher-precision for status monitoring. IEEE Access 8:20439–20448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Zhang LW, Lin J, Liu B, Zhang ZC, Yan XH, Wei MH (2019) A Review on deep learning applications in prognostics and health management. IEEE Access 7:162415–162438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Zhu JL, Yao Y, Gao FR (2018) Transfer of qualitative and quantitative knowledge for similar batch process monitoring. Ieee Access 6:73856–73870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Wu H, Zhao JS (2020) Fault detection and diagnosis based on transfer learning for multimode chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 135:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Chai Z, Zhao CH, Huang B (2021) Multisource-refined transfer network for industrial fault diagnosis under domain and category inconsistencies. IEEE Trans Cybern 1–13

  210. Gao X, Deng F, Yue XH (2020) Data augmentation in fault diagnosis based on the Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty. Neurocomputing 396:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  211. Yang X, Feng D (2019) Generative adversarial network based anomaly detection on the benchmark tennessee eastman process. In: 2019 5th International conference on control, automation and robotics (ICCAR), pp 644–648

  212. Huang YF, Chen X, Xu L, Li KY (2021) Single image desmoking via attentive generative adversarial network for smoke detection process. Fire Technol 57:3021–3040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. Yan K (2021) Chiller fault detection and diagnosis with anomaly detective generative adversarial network. Build Environ 201:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. Feng L, Zhao C, Li YL, Zhou M, Fu C (2020) Multichannel diffusion graph convolutional network for the prediction of end-point composition in the converter steelmaking process. IEEE Trans Instrum Measur 1:1

  215. Zhao MH, Zhong SS, Fu XY, Tang BP, Pecht M (2020) Deep Residual Shrinkage Networks for Fault Diagnosis, Ieee T Ind. Inform 16:4681–4690

    Google Scholar 

  216. Li S, Li W, Cook C, Zhu C, Gao Y (2018) Independently recurrent neural network (IndRNN): building a longer and deeper rnN. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018:5457–5467

    Google Scholar 

  217. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L (2017) Attention is All You Need. Comput Lang 1:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  218. Xu GW, Liu M, Jiang ZF, Shen WM, Huang CX (2020) Online Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Transfer Convolutional Neural Networks. Ieee T Instrum Meas 69:509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  219. Wang ZJ, Zheng LK, Du WH, Cai WN, Zhou J, Wang JT, Han XF, He GF (2019) A novel method for intelligent fault diagnosis of bearing based on capsule neural network. Complexity 2019:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  220. Chen TY, Wang ZH, Yang X, Jiang K (2019) A deep capsule neural network with stochastic delta rule for bearing fault diagnosis on raw vibration signals. Measurement 148:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. Chen LL, Qin N, Dai X, Huang DQ (2020) Fault diagnosis of high-speed train bogie based on capsule network. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69:6203–6211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. Kipf TN, Welling M (2017) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In: International conference on learning representations, pp 1–14

  223. Henaff M, Bruna J, Lecun Y (2015) Deep convolutional networks on graph-structured data. Comput Sci 1–10

  224. Damianou AC, Lawrence ND (2012) Deep Gaussian processes. Comput Sci 207–215

  225. Havasi M, Hernández-Lobato J, Murillo-Fuentes JJ (2018) Inference in deep Gaussian processes using stochastic gradient hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv e-prints 7517–7527

  226. Santiago TC, Melissa DL, Oscar P, Fabio GA (2020) Hybrid deep learning gaussian process for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and uncertainty quantification. Ophthalmic Med Image Anal 12069:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  227. Tagade P, Hariharan KS, Ramachandran S, Khandelwal A, Naha A, Kolake SM, Han SH (2020) Deep Gaussian process regression for lithium-ion battery health prognosis and degradation mode diagnosis. J Power Sources 445:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  228. Viroli C, McLachlan GJ (2019) Deep Gaussian mixture models. Stat Comput 29:43–51

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  229. Purohit H, Tanabe R, Endo T, Suefusa K, Nikaido Y, Kawaguchi Y (2020) Deep autoencoding GMM-based unsupervised anomaly detection in acoustic signals and its hyper-parameter optimization. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1806.01551.

  230. Ji R, Lin S, Chao F, Wu Y, Huang F (2018) Deep neural network compression and acceleration: a review. J Comput Res Dev 55:1871–1888

    Google Scholar 

  231. Deng XG, Tian XM, Chen S, Harris CJ (2017) Deep learning based nonlinear principal component analysis for industrial process fault detection. IEEE Int Jt Conf Neural Netw (IJCNN) 1237–1243

  232. Deng XG, Zhang Z (2020) Nonlinear chemical process fault diagnosis using ensemble deep support vector data description. Sensors 20:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  233. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2015) Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision, pp 1026–1034

  234. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv e-prints (2015) arXiv:1502.03167v03163.

  235. Sun C, Ma M, Zhao ZB, Tian SH, Yan RD, Chen XF (2019) Deep transfer learning based on sparse autoencoder for remaining useful life prediction of tool in manufacturing. IEEE T Ind Inform 15:2416–2425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  236. Yu J, Xi L (2008) Intelligent monitoring and diagnosis of manufacturing process using an integrated approach of neural network ensemble and genetic algorithm. Int J Comput Appl Technol 33:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  237. Yu JB, Xi LF, Zhou XJ (2008) Intelligent monitoring and diagnosis of manufacturing processes using an integrated approach of KBANN and GA. Comput Ind 59:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. Liu G, Yu J (2019) Machining roughness prediction based on knowledge-based deep belief network. J Mech Eng 55:94–106

    Google Scholar 

  239. Liu G, Yu J (2020) Application of neural-symbol model based on stacked denoising auto-encoders in wafer map defect recognition. J Autom 1–18

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2022YFF0605702, 2022YFF0605704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (92167107, 71771173), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China

    Jianbo Yu & Yue Zhang

Authors
  1. Jianbo Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianbo Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Zhang, Y. Challenges and opportunities of deep learning-based process fault detection and diagnosis: a review. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 211–252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08017-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08017-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation