Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An optimized artificial intelligence based technique for identifying motor imagery from EEGs for advanced brain computer interface technology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor disability affects a person's ability to move and maintain balance. To remove this pain from the society, brain computer interface (BCI) system with the assistance of motor imagery (MI) tasks classification plays an important role. BCI translates human intension by brain activity into control signals to communicate with their external environment without direct physical movement. The current BCI system works with massive data through electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Traditional methods in BCI are limited in efficiency, accuracy, and speed. To overcome these limitations, this study aims to develop an optimized artificial Intelligence-based technique for identifying human intentions of physical movement through EEG data for an advanced BCI system. The proposed technique is designed involving Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) and Medium K Nearest Neighbour (MKNN) technique to achieve higher classifier accuracy, which was tested on a publicly available EEG dataset (IVa) of BCI Competition III. This study produces the highest accuracy score in the case of all subjects above 90%, and the average score is above 97% for our proposed model, which outperforms the existing methods. This study's findings will assist technologists in creating frontier medical science technology and significantly improve BCI systems in Australia and worldwide. This proposed technique will help to identify the intensions of motor disabled people rapidly, assisting patients’ rehabilitation and daily living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. WHO (2011) Summary: world report on disability 2011. World Health Organization, 099570705.

  2. AIHW (2020) People with disability in Australia 2020.

  3. Sadiq MT, Siuly S, Rehman AU (2022) Evaluation of power spectral and machine learning techniques for the development of subject-specific BCI. Artificial Intelligence-Based Brain-Computer Interface: Elsevier, P. 99-120

  4. Shih JJ, Krusienski DJ, Wolpaw JR, (eds) (2012) Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo clinic proceedings; Elsevier

  5. Wang H, Zhang Y (2016) Detection of motor imagery EEG signals employing Naïve Bayes based learning process. Measurement 86:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas KP, Guan C, Lau CT, Vinod AP, Ang KK (2009) A new discriminative common spatial pattern method for motor imagery brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:2730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siuly S, Li Y (2012) Improving the separability of motor imagery EEG signals using a cross correlation-based least square support vector machine for brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20(4):526–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siuly Li Y, Paul Wen P (2014) Modified CC-LR algorithm with three diverse feature sets for motor imagery tasks classification in EEG based brain-computer interface. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 113(3):767–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaudhary S, Taran S, Bajaj V, Siuly S (2020) A flexible analytic wavelet transform based approach for motor-imagery tasks classification in BCI applications.

  10. Siuly S, Li Y (2012) Improving the separability of motor imagery EEG signals using a cross correlation-based least square support vector machine for brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20(4):526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Siuly S, Li Y, Zhang Y (2016) EEG signal analysis and classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabilit Eng 11:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sadiq MT, Aziz MZ, Almogren A, Yousaf A, Siuly S, Rehman AU (2022) Exploiting pretrained CNN models for the development of an EEG-based robust BCI framework. Comput Biol Med 143:105242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Schlogl A, Lopes da Silva FH (2006) Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks. Neuroimage 31(1):153–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blankertz B, Dornhege G, Krauledat M, Muller KR, Curio G (2007) The non-invasive Berlin brain-computer interface: fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects. Neuroimage 37(2):539–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn M, Cho H, Ahn S, Jun SC (2013) High theta and low alpha powers may be indicative of BCI-illiteracy in motor imagery. PLoS One 8(11):e80886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin J, Liu C, Daly I, Miao Y, Li S, Wang X et al (2020) Bispectrum-based channel selection for motor imagery based brain-computer interfacing. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 28(10):2153–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaudhary P, Agrawal R, Gupta D, Castillo O, Khanna A (2021) Sensory motor imagery EEG classification based on non-dyadic wavelets using dynamic weighted majority ensemble classification. Int Decis Technol 15(1):33–43. https://doi.org/10.3233/idt-200005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miao Y, Jin J, Daly I, Zuo C, Wang X, Cichocki A et al (2021) Learning common time-frequency-spatial patterns for motor imagery classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabilitation Eng 29:699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tiwari A, Chaturvedi A (2021) A novel channel selection method for BCI classification using dynamic channel relevance. IEEE Access 9:126698–126716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cherloo MN, Amiri HK, Daliri MR (2021) Ensemble regularized common spatio-spectral pattern (ensemble RCSSP) model for motor imagery-based EEG signal classification. Comput Biol Med 135:104546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Renuga Devi K, Hannah IH (2021) Neighborhood based decision theoretic rough set under dynamic granulation for BCI motor imagery classification. J Multimodal User Inter 15(3):301–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Djamal EC, Putra RD (2020) Brain-computer interface of focus and motor imagery using wavelet and recurrent neural networks. Telkomnika (Telecommun Comput Electron Control) 18(5):2748–2756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J, Feng Z, Lu N (eds) (2017) Feature extraction by common spatial pattern in frequency domain for motor imagery tasks classification. In: 2017 29th Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC): IEEE.

  24. Jia H, Wang S, Zheng D, Qu X, Fan S (2019) Comparative study of motor imagery classification based on BP-NN and SVM. J Eng 2019(23):8646–8649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lotte F, Guan C (2011) Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(2):355–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. AlHinai N (2020) Introduction to biomedical signal processing and artificial intelligence. Biomedical signal processing and artificial intelligence in healthcare: Elsevier. pp 1–28.

  27. Hussain I, Park SJ (2021) Quantitative evaluation of task-induced neurological outcome after stroke. Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11070900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blankertz B, Tomioka R, Lemm S, Kawanabe M, Muller K-R (2007) Optimizing spatial filters for robust EEG single-trial analysis. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25(1):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramoser H, Muller-Gerking J, Pfurtscheller G (2000) Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8(4):441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ortner R, Scharinger J, Lechner A, Guger C (eds) (2015) How many people can control a motor imagery based BCI using common spatial patterns? In: 2015 7th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER): IEEE.

  31. Ortner R, Scharinger J, Lechne A (2015) How many people can control a motor imagery based BCI using common spatial patterns? In: 7th annual international IEEE EMBS conference on neural engineering montpellier.

  32. Nicolas-Alonso LF, Corralejo R, Gomez-Pilar J, Alvarez D, Hornero R (2015) Adaptive stacked generalization for multiclass motor imagery-based brain computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(4):702–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rathipriya N, Deepajothi S, Rajendran T (eds) (2013) Classification of motor imagery ecog signals using support vector machine for brain computer interface. In: 2013 fifth international conference on advanced computing (ICoAC): IEEE.

  34. Mondini V, Mangia AL, Cappello A (2016) EEG-based BCI system using adaptive features extraction and classification procedures. Computational intelligence and neuroscience.

  35. Milanés HD, Codorniú RT, Baracaldo RL, Zamora RS, Rodriguez DD, Albuern YL et al (2021) Shallow convolutional network excel for classifying motor imagery EEG in BCI applications. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abougharbia J, Attallah O, Tamazin M, Nasser A (2019) A novel BCI system based on hybrid features for classifying motor imagery tasks. In: 2019 Ninth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA): IEEE.

  37. Miao Y, Yin F, Zuo C, Wang X, Jin J (2019) Improved RCSP and AdaBoost-based classification for motor-imagery BCI. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA); 2019: IEEE.

  38. Park Y, Chung W (2019) Optimal channel selection using covariance matrix and cross-combining region in EEG-based BCI. In: 2019 7th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI): IEEE.

  39. Dai M, Zheng D, Liu S, Zhang P (2018) Transfer kernel common spatial patterns for motor imagery brain-computer interface classification. Computat Math Methods Med.

  40. Selim S, Tantawi MM, Shedeed HA, Badr A (2018) A csp\am-ba-svm approach for motor imagery bci system. IEEE Access 6:49192–49208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: SS, HW; Methodology: SS, TK; Formal analysis and investigation: TK, …; Writing—original draft preparation: TK; Writing—review and editing: SS, HW, TK; Funding acquisition: HW, SS; Supervision: SS, HW.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taslima Khanam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any kind of conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study applied secondary data which are publicly available online, on the following link: (http://www.bbci.de/competition/iii/desc_IVa.html). All the respondents engaged in this survey signed the consent paper and, they gave permission to use their personal details with confidentiality for research purpose. Our study project does not have any direct network with any participants. So, we do not need any ethical approval for conducting this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanam, T., Siuly, S. & Wang, H. An optimized artificial intelligence based technique for identifying motor imagery from EEGs for advanced brain computer interface technology. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 6623–6634 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08027-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08027-1

Keywords