Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An efficient hybrid-based charged system search algorithm for active filter design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active filter design is one of the complex real-world optimization problems for signal processing applications. Active filters contain essential parameters such as transistors, resistors, coils, and capacitors to calculate the output signal of the filter. These parameters can be estimated using optimization algorithms. Numerous algorithms are developed in the literature to solve optimization problems related to active filter design. Some well-known optimization algorithms are charged system search (CSS), local search (LS), and levy flight (LF) algorithms. Even though these optimization algorithms have their strengths, they still have weaknesses in stacking local minima, leading to less efficient results. Therefore, more efficient, and robust learning methods that get the most benefit from these optimization algorithms' strongest sides are required to improve the convergence ability of the optimization algorithms. This research implements LS, LF, and a Hybrid optimization method containing both LS and LF onto CSS algorithm to estimate active filter parameters. These optimization algorithms are applied to 20 different benchmark functions to compare and validate the significance of the methods. Some other common approaches such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are also included in the performance analysis to enhance the comparison of the methods. According to these 20 test functions' results, CSS-hybrid is the winner by overperforming in 12 functions, whereas CSS-LS and CSS-LF is the winner by overperforming in 7 and 1 function, respectively. In addition, GA and PSO couldn’t be winner in any of the 20 benchmark functions. The proposed and common algorithms are applied to the low-pass (LP) and high-pass (HP) active filter components, which are a real-world problem for improving their exploitation and exploration balance. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed methods have a remarkable improvement in predicting active filters parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Hadei S (2011) A family of adaptive filter algorithms in noise cancellation for speech enhancement. arXiv preprint arXiv

  2. Kuyu YC, Vatansever F (2016) A new intelligent decision making system combining classical methods, evolutionary algorithms and statistical techniques for optimal digital FIR filter design and their performance evaluation. AEU-Int J Electron C 70(12):1651–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Winder S (2002) Analog and digital filter design. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakshi UA, Godse AP, Bakshi AV (2010) Linear integrated circuits. Technical Publications, Pune

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eyceyurt E, Zec J (2020) Uplink throughput prediction in cellular mobile networks. Int J Electron Commun Eng 14(6):149–153

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuyu YÇ (2016) Filter designs with evolutionary algorithms [Msc Thesis]. Uludağ University, Bursa

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang WY, Kim J, Park KW, Baek D, Lim S, Joung J et al (2020) Electronic circuits with Matlab, PSpice, and Smith Chart. Wiley, Haboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beşkirli A, Özdemir D, Temurtaş H (2020) A comparison of modified tree–seed algorithm for high-dimensional numerical functions. Neural Comput Appl 32(11):6877–6911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beşkirli A, Dağ İ (2020) A new binary variant with transfer functions of Harris Hawks Optimization for binary wind turbine micrositing. Energy Rep 6:668–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beşkirli A, Beşkirli M, Hakli H, Uğuz H (2018) Comparing energy demand estimation using artificial algae algorithm: the case of Turkey. J Clean Energy Technol 6(4):349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beşkirli A, Dağ İ (2022) An efficient tree seed inspired algorithm for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models. Energy Rep 8:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beşkirli A, Temurtaş H, Özdemir D (2020) Determination with linear form of Turkey's energy demand forecasting by the tree seed algorithm and the modified tree seed algorithm. Adv Electr Comput Eng 20(2):7–34

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beşkirli A, Dağ İ (2023) Parameter extraction for photovoltaic models with tree seed algorithm. Energy Reports 9:174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuyu YC, Vatansever F (2018) Analog filter group delay optimization using Metaheuristic algorithms: a comparative study. In: Conference analog filter group delay optimization using Metaheuristic algorithms: a comparative study. p 1–5

  15. Thede L (2004) Practical analog and digital filter design. Artech House; Book and CD-ROM edition

  16. Tefek MF, Arslan M (2022) Highway accident number estimation in Turkey with Jaya algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 34(7):5367–5381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aggarwal A, Rawat TK, Upadhyay DK (2016) Design of optimal digital FIR filters using evolutionary and swarm optimization techniques. AEU-Int J Electron C 70(4):373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karaboga N, Cetinkaya B (2004) Performance comparison of genetic and differential evolution algorithms for digital FIR filter design. In: Conference performance comparison of genetic and differential evolution algorithms for digital FIR filter design. Springer, pp 482–8

  19. Saha SK, Kar R, Mandal D, Ghoshal SP (2013) A novel firefly algorithm for optimal linear phase FIR filter design. Int J Swarm Intell Res (IJSIR) 4(2):29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu G, Li Y, He G (2010) Design of digital FIR filters using differential evolution algorithm based on reserved genes. In: Conference design of digital FIR filters using differential evolution algorithm based on reserved genes. pp 1–7

  21. Kugelstadt T (2009) Active filter design techniques. In: Op amps for everyone. Elsevier, pp 365-438

  22. Gao Y, Xie Z, Yu X (2020) A hybrid algorithm for integrated scheduling problem of complex products with tree structure. Multimed Tools Appl 79(43):32285–32304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohapatra SK, Mishra AK, Prasad S (2020) Intelligent local search for test case minimization. J Inst Eng (India): Series B 101(5):585–595

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hu S, Wu X, Liu H, Li R, Yin M (2020) A novel two-model local search algorithm with a self-adaptive parameter for clique partitioning problem. Neural Comput Appl 33(10):4929–4944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koçer HG, Uymaz SA (2020) A novel local search method for LSGO with golden ratio and dynamic search step. Soft Comput 25(3):2115–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tubishat M, Idris N, Shuib L, Abushariah MAM, Mirjalili S (2020) Improved salp swarm algorithm based on opposition based learning and novel local search algorithm for feature selection. Exp Syst Appl 145:113122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2011) Hybrid charged system search and particle swarm optimization for engineering design problems. Eng Comput 28(4):423–440

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mech 213(3):267–289

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin-Yu T, Chun C (2008) Multiple trajectory search for large scale global optimization. In: Conference multiple trajectory search for large scale global optimization. pp 3052–9

  30. Haklı H, Uğuz H (2014) A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with Levy flight. Appl Soft Comput 23:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y, Cao B (2020) A novel ant colony optimization algorithm with Levy flight. IEEE Access 8:67205–67213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Iacca G, dos Santos Junior VC, Veloso de Melo V (2021) An improved Jaya optimization algorithm with Lévy flight. Exp Syst Appl 165:113902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin J-H, Chou C-W, Yang C-H, Tsai H-L (2012) A chaotic Levy flight bat algorithm for parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic biological systems. Comput Inf Technol 2(2):56–63

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kamaruzaman AF, Zain AM, Yusuf SM, Udin A (2013) Levy flight algorithm for optimization problems–a literature review. Appl Mech Mater 421:496–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma VP, Choudhary HR, Kumar S, Choudhary V (2015) A modified DE: Population or generation based levy flight differential evolution (PGLFDE). In: Conference a modified DE: population or generation based levy flight differential evolution (PGLFDE). pp 704–10

  36. Fuchs E, Masoum MA (2011) Power quality in power systems and electrical machines. Academic press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  37. Temurtaş H (2020) The estimation of low and high-pass active filter parameters with opposite charged system search algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 155:113474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Egi Y, Otero CE (2019) Machine-learning and 3D point-cloud based signal power path loss model for the deployment of wireless communication systems. IEEE Access 7:42507–42517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Andersson MP, Uvdal P (2005) New scale factors for harmonic vibrational frequencies using the B3LYP density functional method with the triple-ζ basis set 6–311+G(d, p). J Phys Chem A 109(12):2937–2941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hiçdurmaz B (2017) Determination of component values for Butterworth type active filter by differential evolution algorithm. Int J Innovative Sci Eng Technol 4(1):77–81

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Beşkirli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 626 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beşkirli, M., Egi, Y. An efficient hybrid-based charged system search algorithm for active filter design. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 7611–7633 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08057-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08057-9

Keywords