Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fully automatic identification of post-treatment infarct lesions after endovascular therapy based on non-contrast computed tomography

  • S.i.: Deep Learning in Multimodal Medical Imaging for Cancer Detection
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) of the brain is critical to patients with acute ischemic stroke who receive thrombolysis and thrombectomy. It can help identify reperfusion-related hemorrhage, edema which need intervention. It also can guide the timing and intensity of antithrombotic therapy. Rapid, accurate, and automated detection and segmentation of acute ischemic lesions after endovascular therapy (EVT) are highly needed. In this work, we propose a novel encoder-decoder network for fully automatic segmentation of acute ischemic lesions after EVT on NCCT, which is named ISCT-EDN. NCCT images of AIS (acute ischemic stroke) patients who underwent EVT in a multicenter cohort study were collected in this study. ISCT-EDN takes hierarchical network as backbone. Feature pyramid network (FPN) is designed to aggregate features from multi stages of backbone. Reasonable feature fusion strategy is considered in FPN to enhance multi-level propagation. In addition, to overcome the limitation of fixed geometric structure of convolution for multi-range dependency exploitation, non-local parallel decoder is introduced with deformable convolution and self-attention. The proposed model was compared with 7 segmentation models which are commonly used in the medical domain and the performance was superior to other models in in the segmentation of post-treatment infarct lesions on NCCT images of AIS patients after EVT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei DF, Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA, Choe H, Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Linares G, Mandzia JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD, Investigators ET (2015) Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(11):1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dankbaar JW, Horsch AD, van den Hoven AF, Kappelle LJ, van der Schaaf IC, van Seeters T, Velthuis BK, Investigators D (2017) Prediction of clinical outcome after acute ischemic stroke: the value of repeated noncontrast computed tomography, computed tomographic angiography, and computed tomographic perfusion. Stroke 48(9):2593–2596. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu W, Kuang H, Teleg E, Ospel JM, Sohn SI, Almekhlafi M, Goyal M, Hill MD, Demchuk AM, Menon BK (2020) Machine learning for detecting early infarction in acute stroke with non-contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 294(3):638–644. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL (2019) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/American stroke association. Stroke 50(12):e344–e418. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell BC, Parsons MW (2018) Imaging selection for acute stroke intervention. Int J Stroke 13(6):554–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018765235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rekik I, Allassonniere S, Carpenter TK, Wardlaw JM (2012) Medical image analysis methods in MR/CT-imaged acute-subacute ischemic stroke lesion: segmentation, prediction and insights into dynamic evolution simulation models critical appraisal. Neuroimage Clin 1(1):164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2012.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vijh S, Saraswat M, Kumar S (2022) Automatic multilevel image thresholding segmentation using hybrid bio-inspired algorithm and artificial neural network for histopathology images. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12168-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McBee MP, Awan OA, Colucci AT, Ghobadi CW, Kadom N, Kansagra AP, Tridandapani S, Auffermann WF (2018) Deep learning in radiology. Acad Radiol 25(11):1472–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaharchuk G, Gong E, Wintermark M, Rubin D, Langlotz CP (2018) Deep learning in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(10):1776–1784. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuang H, Menon BK, Qiu W (2019) Semi-automated infarct segmentation from follow-up noncontrast CT scans in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Med Phys 46(9):4037–4045. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuang H, Menon BK, Qiu W (2019) Segmenting hemorrhagic and ischemic infarct simultaneously from follow-up non-contrast CT images in patients with acute ischemic stroke. IEEE Access 7(2019):39842–39851. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Latchaw RE, Alberts MJ, Lev MH, Connors JJ, Harbaugh RE, Higashida RT, Hobson R, Kidwell CS, Koroshetz WJ, Mathews V, Villablanca P, Warach S, Walters B, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular R, Intervention SC, The Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular D (2009) Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 40(11):3646–3678. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.192616

  13. McArthur KS, Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR (2011) Diagnosis and management of transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke in the acute phase. BMJ 342:d1938. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Koussy M, Schroth G, Brekenfeld C, Arnold M (2014) Imaging of acute ischemic stroke. Eur Neurol 72(5–6):309–316. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schriger DL, Kalafut M, Starkman S, Krueger M, Saver JL (1998) Cranial computed tomography interpretation in acute stroke: physician accuracy in determining eligibility for thrombolytic therapy. JAMA 279(16):1293–1297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.16.1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simard JM, Kent TA, Chen M, Tarasov KV, Gerzanich V (2007) Brain oedema in focal ischaemia: molecular pathophysiology and theoretical implications. Lancet Neurol 6(3):258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70055-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Truwit CL, Barkovich AJ, Gean-Marton A, Hibri N, Norman D (1990) Loss of the insular ribbon: another early CT sign of acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Radiology 176(3):801–806. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.176.3.2389039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marks MP, Holmgren EB, Fox AJ, Patel S, von Kummer R, Froehlich J (1999) Evaluation of early computed tomographic findings in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 30(2):389–392. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.2.389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel SC, Levine SR, Tilley BC, Grotta JC, Lu M, Frankel M, Haley EC, Jr., Brott TG, Broderick JP, Horowitz S, Lyden PD, Lewandowski CA, Marler JR, Welch KM, National Institute of Neurological D, Stroke rt PASSG (2001) Lack of clinical significance of early ischemic changes on computed tomography in acute stroke. JAMA 286(22):2830–2838. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.22.2830

  20. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM (2000) Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS study group. Alberta stroke programme early CT score. Lancet 355(9216):1670–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Young JY, Schaefer PW (2016) Acute ischemic stroke imaging: a practical approach for diagnosis and triage. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0757-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Na DG, Kim EY, Ryoo JW, Lee KH, Roh HG, Kim SS, Song IC, Chang KH (2005) CT sign of brain swelling without concomitant parenchymal hypoattenuation: comparison with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 235(3):992–998. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu S, Mair G, Cohen G, Morris Z, von Heijne A, Bradey N, Cala L, Peeters A, Farrall AJ, Adami A, Potter G, Liu M, Lindley RI, Sandercock PAG, Wardlaw JM, Group I S T C (2021) Hyperdense artery sign, symptomatic infarct swelling and effect of alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol 6(2):238–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2020-000569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahajan U, Raina S, Sharma R (2019) Hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign. J Assoc Physicians India 67(4):75

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tan X, Guo Y (2010) Hyperdense basilar artery sign diagnoses acute posterior circulation stroke and predicts short-term outcome. Neuroradiology 52(12):1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0682-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Merino JG, Warach S (2010) Imaging of acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 6(10):560–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2010.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leys D, Pruvo JP, Godefroy O, Rondepierre P, Leclerc X (1992) Prevalence and significance of hyperdense middle cerebral artery in acute stroke. Stroke 23(3):317–324. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.23.3.317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. von Kummer R, Meyding-Lamade U, Forsting M, Rosin L, Rieke K, Hacke W, Sartor K (1994) Sensitivity and prognostic value of early CT in occlusion of the middle cerebral artery trunk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15(1):9–15, discussion 16–18

  29. Elofuke P, Reid JM, Rana A, Macleod MJ (2016) Disappearance of the hyperdense MCA sign after stroke thrombolysis: implications for prognosis and early patient selection for clot retrieval. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 46(2):81–86. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2016.203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun H, Liu Y, Gong P, Zhang S, Zhou F, Zhou J (2020) Intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke with hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign: a meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand 141(3):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Deo RC (2015) Machine learning in medicine. Circulation 132(20):1920–1930. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McKinley R, Hani L, Gralla J, El-Koussy M, Bauer S, Arnold M, Fischer U, Jung S, Mattmann K, Reyes M, Wiest R (2017) Fully automated stroke tissue estimation using random forest classifiers (FASTER). J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37(8):2728–2741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16674221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nielsen A, Hansen MB, Tietze A, Mouridsen K (2018) Prediction of tissue outcome and assessment of treatment effect in acute ischemic stroke using deep learning. Stroke 49(6):1394–1401. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anwar SM, Majid M, Qayyum A, Awais M, Alnowami M, Khan MK (2018) Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: a review. J Med Syst 42(11):226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1088-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, Biviji M, Campeau NG, Venugopal VK, Mahajan V, Rao P, Warier P (2018) Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet 392(10162):2388–2396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Park A, Chute C, Rajpurkar P, Lou J, Ball RL, Shpanskaya K, Jabarkheel R, Kim LH, McKenna E, Tseng J, Ni J, Wishah F, Wittber F, Hong DS, Wilson TJ, Halabi S, Basu S, Patel BN, Lungren MP, Ng AY, Yeom KW (2019) Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms using the HeadXNet model. JAMA Netw Open 2(6):e195600. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Zhu K, Yang B, Mehta H, Duan T, Ding D, Bagul A, Langlotz C,Shpanskaya K (2017) CheXNet: radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05225

  38. Winzeck S, Hakim A, McKinley R, Pinto J, Alves V, Silva C, Pisov M, Krivov E, Belyaev M, Monteiro M, Oliveira A, Choi Y, Paik MC, Kwon Y, Lee H, Kim BJ, Won JH, Islam M, Ren H, Robben D, Suetens P, Gong E, Niu Y, Xu J, Pauly JM, Lucas C, Heinrich MP, Rivera LC, Castillo LS, Daza LA, Beers AL, Arbelaezs P, Maier O, Chang K, Brown JM, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Zaharchuk G, Wiest R, Reyes M (2018) ISLES 2016 and 2017-benchmarking ischemic stroke lesion outcome prediction based on multispectral MRI. Front Neurol 9:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robben D, Boers AMM, Marquering HA, Langezaal L, Roos Y, van Oostenbrugge RJ, van Zwam WH, Dippel DWJ, Majoie C, van der Lugt A, Lemmens R, Suetens P (2020) Prediction of final infarct volume from native CT perfusion and treatment parameters using deep learning. Med Image Anal 59:101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.101589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wei Y, Pu Y, Pan Y, Nie X, Duan W, Liu D, Yan H, Lu Q, Zhang Z, Yang Z, Wen M, Gu W, Hou X, Ma N, Leng X, Miao Z, Liu L, Co I (2020) Cortical microinfarcts associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular treatment. Stroke 51(9):2742–2751. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Woo I, Lee A, Jung SC, Lee H, Kim N, Cho SJ, Kim D, Lee J, Sunwoo L, Kang DW (2019) Fully automatic segmentation of acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging using convolutional neural networks: comparison with conventional algorithms. Korean J Radiol 20(8):1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin TY, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S (2017) Feature pyramid networks for object detection. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vision Pattern Recog 2017:2117–2125. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.03144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dai J, Qi H, Xiong Y, Li Y, Zhang G, Hu H, Wei Y (2017) Deformable convolutional networks. Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vision. 2017:764–773. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.06211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

  45. Lin TY, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S (2017) Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In: 2017 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)

  46. Li X, You A, Zhu Z, Zhao H, Yang M, Yang K, Tong Y (2020) Semantic flow for fast and accurate scene parsing. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, pp 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang X, Girshick R, Gupta A, He K (2017) Non-local neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7794–7803. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.07971

  48. Zhu X, Hu H, Lin S,Dai J (2018) Deformable ConvNets v2: more deformable, Better results

  49. Khan S, Naseer M, Hayat M, Zamir SW, Shah M (2021) Transformers in vision: a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54(10s):1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Musulin J, Stifanic D, Zulijani A, Cabov T, Dekanic A, Car Z (2021) An enhanced histopathology analysis: an AI-based system for multiclass grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma and segmenting of epithelial and stromal tissue. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hiasa Y, Otake Y, Takao M, Ogawa T, Sugano N, Sato Y (2020) Automated muscle segmentation from clinical CT using Bayesian U-net for personalized musculoskeletal modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(4):1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2940555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhou Z, Siddiquee MMR, Tajbakhsh N, Liang J (2018) UNet++: a nested U-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In: Deep learn med image anal multimodal learn clin decis support, 11045, p 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_1

  53. Yuan Y,Wang J (2018) OCNet: object context network for scene parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00916

  54. Zhang Z, Gao S, Huang Z (2021) An automatic glioma segmentation system using a multilevel attention pyramid scene parsing network. Curr Med Imaging 17(6):751–761. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201231100623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jiang J, Wang R, Lin S,Wang F (2019) SFSegNet: parse freehand sketches using deep fully convolutional networks. In: 2019 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851974

  56. Fan DP, Zhou T, Ji GP, Zhou Y, Chen G, Fu H, Shen J, Shao L (2020) Inf-Net: automatic COVID-19 lung infection segmentation from CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(8):2626–2637. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.2996645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ernst M, Boers AMM, Aigner A, Berkhemer OA, Yoo AJ, Roos YB, Dippel DWJ, Aad VDL, Van Oostenbrugge RJ, Van Zwam WH (2017) Association of computed tomography ischemic lesion location with functional outcome in acute large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke. Stroke 48(9):2426–2433. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bivard A, Levi C, Lin L, Cheng X, Aviv R, Spratt NJ, Lou M, Kleinig T, O’Brien B, Butcher K (2017) Validating a predictive model of acute advanced imaging biomarkers in ischemic stroke. Stroke 48(3):645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Barros RS, Tolhuisen ML, Boers AM, Jansen I, Marquering HA (2019) Automatic segmentation of cerebral infarcts in follow-up computed tomography images with convolutional neural networks. J Neurointerv Surg 12,9(2020):848–852. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Phan CM, Yoo AJ, Hirsch JA, Nogueira RG, Gupta R (2012) Differentiation of hemorrhage from iodinated contrast in different intracranial compartments using dual-energy head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(6):1088–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Balami JS, White PM, Mcmeekin PJ, Ford GA, Buchan AM (2017) Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: prevention and management. Int J Stroke 13(4):174749301774305

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang R, Zhao L, Lou W, Abrigo JM, Mok VC, Chu WC, Wang D, Shi L (2018) Automatic segmentation of acute ischemic stroke from DWI using 3-D fully convolutional densenets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:2149–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Clèrigues A, Valverde S, Bernal J, Freixenet J, Oliver A, Lladó X (2019) Acute ischemic stroke lesion core segmentation in CT perfusion images using fully convolutional neural networks. Comput Biol Med 115:103487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sah RG, d’Esterre CD, Hill MD, Moiz H (2017) Diffusion-weighted MRI stroke volume following recanalization treatment is threshold-dependent. Clin Neuroradiol 29:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kranz PG, Eastwood JD (2009) Does diffusion-weighted imaging represent the ischemic core? An evidence-based systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(6):1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rekik I, Allassonnière S, Carpenter TK, Wardlaw JM (2012) Medical image analysis methods in MR/CT-imaged acute-subacute ischemic stroke lesion: segmentation, prediction and insights into dynamic evolution simulation models. A critical appraisal. Neuroimage Clin 1:164–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Soffer S, Ben-Cohen A, Shimon O, Amitai MM, Greenspan H, Klang E (2019) Convolutional neural networks for radiologic images: A radiologist’s guide. Radiology 290(3):590–606. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Boers AM, Marquering HA, Jochem JJ, Besselink NJ, Majoi CB (2013) Automated cerebral infarct volume measurement in follow-up noncontrast CT scans of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 34(8):1522–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vos PC, Novak CL, Aylward S, Biesbroek JM, Weaver NA, Velthuis BK, Viergever MA (2013) Automatic detection and segmentation of ischemic lesions in computed tomography images of stroke patients. Proce SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 8670:13

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yoon W, Jung MY, Jung SH, Park MS, Kim JT, Kang HK (2013) Subarachnoid hemorrhage in a multimodal approach heavily weighted toward mechanical thrombectomy with solitaire stent in acute stroke. Stroke 44(2):414–419. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.675546

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ximing Nie and Xiran Liu are co-first authors. The authors thank Yanyan Ma, Xiaoyu Cui, Lei Yu and other study quality control coordinators for their meticulous work on data quality control, and are grateful for the participation and engagement of all the subjects and investigators of the RESCUE-RE trial.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D program of China (2016YFC1307301), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82001920) and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Programme (QML20210503), National Nature Science and Foundation of China (62202044), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515110431), Scientific and Technological Innovation Foundation of Foshan (BK22BF009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XN: Conceptualization, Writing—Review and Editing, Project administration XL: Conceptualization, Writing—Original Draft, Project administration HY: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis FS: Validation WG: Investigation, Formal analysis XH: Investigation, Formal analysis YW: Investigation, Data Curation QL: Investigation, Data Curation HB: Investigation JC: Investigation TL: Investigation HY: Formal analysis ZY: Supervision MW: Supervision YP: Formal analysis CH: Methodology, Supervision LW: Methodology, Supervision LL: Conceptualization, Writing—Review and Editing, Resources, Project administration.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chao Huang or Liping Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nie, X., Liu, X., Yang, H. et al. Fully automatic identification of post-treatment infarct lesions after endovascular therapy based on non-contrast computed tomography. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 22101–22114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08094-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08094-4

Keywords

Navigation