Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Robust amplitude-limited interval type-3 neuro-fuzzy controller for robot manipulators with prescribed performance by output feedback

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new observer-based bounded adaptive fuzzy controller for robotic manipulators with a prescribed performance subjected to uncertainties. To this end, interval type-3 fuzzy logic systems are introduced, and the system uncertainties are roughly modeled by an interval type-3 fuzzy neural network. The proposed controller is designed based on a robust adaptive command-filtered backstepping control scheme. Projection-type adaptive laws and saturation functions are effectively utilized to guarantee that actuator limitations are not violated by calculating the maximum required control signals a priori. The actuator disturbances and external perturbations are compensated by the designed robust control scheme. Furthermore, a high-gain observer is applied to estimate unmeasurable states. To improve the transient performance and to achieve better steady-state tracking errors, the prescribed performance control is suggested. The stability of the suggested closed-loop control system is studied by the Lyapunov theorem, and system signals are proved to be uniformly ultimately bounded. Lastly, simulation results show the potency of the proposed control method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of data and material

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Hu Y, Dian S, Guo R, Li S, Zhao T (2021) Observer-based dynamic surface control for flexible-joint manipulator system with input saturation and unknown disturbance using type-2 fuzzy neural network. Neurocomputing 436:162–173

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ma Y, Nie Z, Yu Y, Hu S, Peng Z (2020) Event-triggered fuzzy control of networked nonlinear underactuated unmanned surface vehicle. Ocean Eng 213:107540

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ben Jabeur C, Seddik H (2021) Design of a pid optimized neural networks and pd fuzzy logic controllers for a two-wheeled mobile robot. Asian J Control 23(1):23–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nekoukar V, Dehkordi NM (2021) Robust path tracking of a quadrotor using adaptive fuzzy terminal sliding mode control. Control Eng Pract 110:104763

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang F, Jiang D, Wang Z, Lv Z, Mumtaz S (2022) Fuzzy-cnn based multi-task routing for integrated satellite-terrestrial networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 71(2):1913–1926

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oyelade ON, Ezugwu AE, Adewuyi SA (2022) Enhancing reasoning through reduction of vagueness using fuzzy owl-2 for representation of breast cancer ontologies. Neural Comput Appl 34:3053–3078

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silva-Ramirez EL, Cabrera-Sánchez JF (2022) Co-active neuro-fuzzy inference system model as single imputation approach for non-monotone pattern of missing data. Neural Comput Appl 34:2495–2496

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mahapatra T, Pal M (2022) An investigation on m-polar fuzzy tolerance graph and its application. Neural Comput Appl 34:3007–3017

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talpur N, Abdulkadir SJ, Alhussian H, Aziz N, Bamhdi A et al (2022) A comprehensive review of deep neuro-fuzzy system architectures and their optimization methods. Neural Comput Appl 34:1837–1875

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gamel SA, Saleh AI, Ali HA (2022) A fog-based traffic light management strategy (tlms) based on fuzzy inference engine. Neural Comput Appl 34:2187–2205

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parsajoo M, Armaghani DJ, Asteris PG (2022) A precise neuro-fuzzy model enhanced by artificial bee colony techniques for assessment of rock brittleness index. Neural Comput Appl 34:3263–3281

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simos TE, Katsikis VN, Mourtas SD (2022) A fuzzy wasd neuronet with application in breast cancer prediction. Neural Comput Appl 34:3019–3031

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gómez-Caicedo MI, Gaitán-Angulo M, Quintero A, Danna-Buitrago JP (2022) Endogenous growth factors and their empirical verification in the Colombian business context by applying fuzzy measurement techniques. Neural Comput Appl 34:3249–3261

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rahmati Aidinlou H, Nikbakht AM (2022) Fuzzy-based modeling of thermohydraulic aspect of solar air heater roughened with inclined broken roughness. Neural Comput Appl 34:2393–2412

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirişci M, Demir Şimşek N, Topaç N, Bardak M (2022) The novel Vikor methods for generalized pythagorean fuzzy soft sets and its application to children of early childhood in covid-19 quarantine. Neural Comput Appl 34:1877–1903

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh LA (1965) Information and control. Fuzzy Sets 8(3):338–353

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-i. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang Q, Mendel JM (2000) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(5):535–550

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammadzadeh A, Sabzalian MH, Zhang W (2020) An interval type-3 fuzzy system and a new online fractional-order learning algorithm: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28(9):1940–1950

    Google Scholar 

  20. Balootaki MA, Rahmani H, Moeinkhah H, Mohammadzadeh A (2021) Non-singleton fuzzy control for multi-synchronization of chaotic systems. Appl Soft Comput 99:106924

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohammadzadeh A, Castillo O, Band SS, Mosavi A (2021) A novel fractional-order multiple-model type-3 fuzzy control for nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics. Int J Fuzzy Syst 23(6):1633–1651

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Z, Mohammadzadeh A, Turabieh H, Mafarja M, Band SS, Mosavi A (2021) A new online learned interval type-3 fuzzy control system for solar energy management systems. IEEE Access 9:10498–10508

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carvajal O, Melin P, Miramontes I, Prado-Arechiga G (2021) Optimal design of a general type-2 fuzzy classifier for the pulse level and its hardware implementation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 97:104069

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sabzalian MH, Mohammadzadeh A, Zhang W, Jermsittiparsert K (2021) General type-2 fuzzy multi-switching synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 100:104163

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu J, Zhao T, Dian S (2021) General type-2 fuzzy sliding mode control for motion balance adjusting of power-line inspection robot. Soft Comput 25(2):1033–1047

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qasem SN, Ahmadian A, Mohammadzadeh A, Rathinasamy S, Pahlevanzadeh B (2021) A type-3 logic fuzzy system: optimized by a correntropy based Kalman filter with adaptive fuzzy kernel size. Inf Sci 572:424–443

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S, Han R, Hong Y, Hao Q, Wen M, Musavian L, Mumtaz S, Kwan Ng DW (2022) Robotic wireless energy transfer in dynamic environments: system design and experimental validation. IEEE Commun Mag 60(3):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  28. Su H, Qi W, Chen J, Zhang D (2022) Fuzzy approximation-based task-space control of robot manipulators with remote center of motion constraint. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(6):1564–1573

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shi L, Yao H, Shan M, Gao Q, Jin X (2022) Robust control of a space robot based on an optimized adaptive variable structure control method. Aerosp Sci Technol 120:107267

    Google Scholar 

  30. García A, Ernesto Solanes J, Gracia L, Muñoz-Benavent P, Girbés-Juan V, Tornero J (2022) Bimanual robot control for surface treatment tasks. Int J Syst Sci 53(1):74–107

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Park BS, Yoo SJ, Park JB, Choi YH (2009) A simple adaptive control approach for trajectory tracking of electrically driven nonholonomic mobile robots. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 18(5):1199–1206

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ge SS, Zhang J (2003) Neural-network control of nonaffine nonlinear system with zero dynamics by state and output feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(4):900–918

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang B, Karimi HR, Yang S, Gao C, Kao Y (2021) Observer-based adaptive sliding mode control for nonlinear stochastic Markov jump systems via t-s fuzzy modeling: applications to robot arm model. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 68(1):466–477

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xu Y, Wang C, Cai X, Li Y, Xu L (2020) Output-feedback formation tracking control of networked nonholonomic multi-robots with connectivity preservation and collision avoidance. Neurocomputing 414:267–277

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huang Y, Su J (2020) Output feedback stabilization of uncertain nonholonomic systems with external disturbances via active disturbance rejection control. ISA Trans 104:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rascón R, Moreno-Valenzuela J (2020) Output feedback controller for trajectory tracking of robot manipulators without velocity measurements nor observers. IET Control Theory Appl 14(14):1819–1827

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang J, Peng C (2020) Adaptive neural impedance control with extended state observer for human-robot interactions by output feedback through tracking differentiator. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 234(7):820–833

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bechlioulis CP, Rovithakis GA (2008) Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable MIMO nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(9):2090–2099

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Elhaki O, Shojaei K (2020) Observer-based neural adaptive control of a platoon of autonomous tractor-trailer vehicles with uncertain dynamics. IET Control Theory Appl 14(14):1898–1911

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Bechlioulis CP, Rovithakis GA (2011) Robust partial-state feedback prescribed performance control of cascade systems with unknown nonlinearities. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(9):2224–2230

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao K, Song Y, Ma T, He L (2018) Prescribed performance control of uncertain Euler–Lagrange systems subject to full-state constraints. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(8):3478–3489

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Y, Tong S (2018) Adaptive neural networks prescribed performance control design for switched interconnected uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(7):3059–3068

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Elhaki O, Shojaei K (2022) Output-feedback robust saturated actor-critic multi-layer neural network controller for multi-body electrically driven tractors with n-trailer guaranteeing prescribed output constraints. Robot Autonom Syst 154:104106

    Google Scholar 

  44. Elhaki O, Shojaei K (2018) Neural network-based target tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with a prescribed performance. Ocean Eng 167:239–256

    Google Scholar 

  45. Elhaki O, Shojaei K (2020) A robust neural network approximation-based prescribed performance output-feedback controller for autonomous underwater vehicles with actuators saturation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 88:103382

    Google Scholar 

  46. Elhaki O, Shojaei K (2021) Robust prescribed performance-based control of autonomous tractor-trailers convoy with limited communication range. Int J Syst Sci 52(3):555–582

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Shojaei K, Kazemy A, Chatraei A (2021) An observer-based neural adaptive pid\(^2\) controller for robot manipulators including motor dynamics with a prescribed performance. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 26(3):1689–1699

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mohammadzadeh A, Sabzalian MH, Zhang W (2020) An interval type-3 fuzzy system and a new online fractional-order learning algorithm: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28(9):1940–1950

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ge SS, Hang CC, Lee TH, Zhang T (2013) Stable adaptive neural network control, vol 13. Springer

  50. Chen M (2017) Disturbance attenuation tracking control for wheeled mobile robots with skidding and slipping. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(4):3359–3368

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang Y, Li S, Liu X (2018) Neural network-based model-free adaptive near-optimal tracking control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(12):6227–6241

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang Y, Li S, Liu X (2018) Adaptive near-optimal control of uncertain systems with application to underactuated surface vessels. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 26(4):1204–1218

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ioannou PA, Sun J (2012) Robust adaptive control. Courier Corporation

  54. Farrell JA, Polycarpou M, Sharma M, Dong W (2009) Command filtered backstepping. IEEE Trans Autom Control 54(6):1391–1395

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Hu J, Zhang H (2013) Immersion and invariance based command-filtered adaptive backstepping control of vtol vehicles. Automatica 49(7):2160–2167

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Tee KP, Ge SS, Tay FE (2008) Adaptive neural network control for helicopters in vertical flight. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 16(4):753–762

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang Y, Li S, Gui J, Luo X (2018) Velocity-level control with compliance to acceleration-level constraints: a novel scheme for manipulator redundancy resolution. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 14(3):921–930

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yu J, Shi P, Dong W, Yu H (2015) Observer and command-filter-based adaptive fuzzy output feedback control of uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(9):5962–5970

    Google Scholar 

  59. Polycarpou MM (1996) Stable adaptive neural control scheme for nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 41(3):447–451

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Du J, Hu X, Liu H, Chen CLP (2015) Adaptive robust output feedback control for a marine dynamic positioning system based on a high-gain observer. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(11):2775–2786

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Loria A, Nijmeijer H (1998) Bounded output feedback tracking control of fully actuated Euler–Lagrange systems. Syst Control Lett 33(3):151–161

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Li S, Zhang Y, Jin L (2017) Kinematic control of redundant manipulators using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(10):2243–2254

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. Li S, He J, Li Y, Rafique MU (2017) Distributed recurrent neural networks for cooperative control of manipulators: a game-theoretic perspective. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(2):415–426

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. Chang YH, Chan WS (2014) Adaptive dynamic surface control for uncertain nonlinear systems with interval type-2 fuzzy neural networks. IEEE Trans Cybernet 44(2):293–304

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wang M, Wang C, Shi P, Liu X (2016) Dynamic learning from neural control for strict-feedback systems with guaranteed predefined performance. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 27(12):2564–2576

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. Xu L, Yao B (2001) Output feedback adaptive robust precision motion control of linear motors. Automatica 37(7):1029–1039

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

    Omid Elhaki & Khoshnam Shojaei

  2. Digital Processing and Machine Vision Research Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

    Khoshnam Shojaei

  3. Multidisciplinary Center for Infrastructure Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, 110870, China

    Ardashir Mohammadzadeh

  4. Department of Applied Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641046, India

    Sakthivel Rathinasamy

Authors
  1. Omid Elhaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khoshnam Shojaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ardashir Mohammadzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sakthivel Rathinasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khoshnam Shojaei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors verify that all the materials of this paper are in compliance with ethical standards.

Informed consent

Since no human participants have been involved in this study, informed consent is not required for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elhaki, O., Shojaei, K., Mohammadzadeh, A. et al. Robust amplitude-limited interval type-3 neuro-fuzzy controller for robot manipulators with prescribed performance by output feedback. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 9115–9130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08174-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08174-5

Keywords