Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Five-dimensional evaluation system and perceptron intelligent computing performance measurement methods based on medical heterogeneous equipment health data

  • S.I.: Applications and Techniques in Cyber Intelligence (ATCI2022)
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article mainly focuses on the preprocessing method of medical heterogeneous equipment health data sources and the performance measurement of single-layer perceptron network intelligent computing. It structures a data quality evaluation system of medical heterogeneous equipment with five different dimensions: patient personal information, medical basic data, medical testing data, medical treatment data and medical device data. An innovative preprocessing algorithm of data sources is proposed to study the missing data, the error data, the repetition data and the validity data. By constructing a single-layer perceptron network, accuracy, misjudgment rate, precision, recall, true positive rate and false positive rate in intelligent computing are studied, and the corresponding mathematical calculation formulas are established. In the application research, this article collected 157 original data from a medical institution. The algorithm is applied and the models are tested. The research solved the problems of intelligent computing performance measurement of heterogeneous devices based on single-layer perceptron network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data in this paper are from the Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, China. However, because the patients are protected by law in China, the data cannot be provided to any third party.

References

  1. Kahn, M. G., Raebel, M. A., Glanz, J. M., Riedlinger, K., & Steiner, J. F. (2012). A Pragmatic Framework for Single-site and Multisite Data Quality Assessment in Electronic Health Record-based Clinical Research. Medical Care, 50. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/Fulltext/2012/07001/A_Pragmatic_Framework_for_Single_site_and.8.aspx

  2. Weiskopf NG, Hripcsak G, Swaminathan S, Weng C (2013) Defining and measuring completeness of electronic health records for secondary use. J Biomed Inform 46(5):830–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reimer AP, Milinovich A, Madigan EA (2016) Data quality assessment framework to assess electronic medical record data for use in research. Int J Med Inform 90:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Estiri H, Stephens KA, Klann JG, Murphy SN (2017) Exploring completeness in clinical data research networks with DQe-c. J Am Med Inform Assoc 25(1):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajan NS, Gouripeddi R, Mo P, Madsen RK, Facelli JC (2019) Towards a content agnostic computable knowledge repository for data quality assessment. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 177:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Naik S, Voong S, Bamford M, Smith K, Joyce A, Grinspun D (2020) Assessment of the nursing quality indicators for reporting and evaluation (NQuIRE) database using a data quality index. J Am Med Inform Assoc 27(5):776–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt CO, Struckmann S, Enzenbach C, Reineke A, Stausberg J, Damerow S, Richter A (2021) Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R. BMC Med Res Methodol 21(1):63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Ma K (2008) A statistical approach to volume data quality assessment. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 14(3):590–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Batini C, Cappiello C, Francalanci C, Maurino A (2009) Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput Surv 41(3):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodall P, Borek A, Parlikad AK (2013) Data quality assessment: the hybrid approach. Inf Manag 50(7):369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ardagna D, Cappiello C, Samá W, Vitali M (2018) Context-aware data quality assessment for big data. Futur Gener Comput Syst 89:548–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng M, Sundararajan V, Williamson T, Minty EP, Smith TC, Doktorchik CTA, Quan H (2018) Exploration of association rule mining for coding consistency and completeness assessment in inpatient administrative health data. J Biomed Inform 79:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cichy C, Rass S (2019) An overview of data quality frameworks. IEEE Access 7:24634–24648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bian J, Lyu T, Loiacono A, Viramontes TM, Lipori G, Guo Y, Hogan W (2020) Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 27(12):1999–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarwar MA, Chong I (2020) Web objects based contextual data quality assessment model for semantic data application. Appl Sci 10(6):2181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Urbaniak I, Wolter M (2021) Quality assessment of compressed and resized medical images based on pattern recognition using a convolutional neural network. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 95:105582

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarle B, Chintakindi S, Jena S (2020) Integrating multiple methods to enhance medical data classification. Evol Syst 11(1):133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma L, Yang T (2021) Construction and evaluation of intelligent medical diagnosis model based on integrated deep neural network. Comput Intell Neurosci 2021:7171816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen H, Chen J, Ding J (2021) Data evaluation and enhancement for quality improvement of machine learning. IEEE Trans Reliab 70(2):831–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi PY, Hou F, Zheng XW, Yuan F (2020) Analysis of electronic health records based on long short-term memory. Concurr Comput-Pract Exp 32(14):5684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan Q, Huang C, Chen D (2021) A method based on multi-standard active learning to recognize entities in electronic medical record. Math Biosci Eng 18(2):1000–1021

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang Y-P, Singh A, Liu S-I, Wu S-I, Quoc HA, Sereter A (2018) Developing transformed fuzzy neural networks to enhance medical data classification accuracy. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):1925–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pang S (2005) Credit scoring models and the predicting models in stock market––approach of statistics, neural network and support vector machine. Science Press, Beijing ((In Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zou Z. (2016) Machine learning. Tsinghua university press (In Chinese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The major science and technology project of Guangzhou’s R & D plan in key areas is “Guangzhou national new generation artificial intelligence innovation and development pilot zone artificial intelligence social experiment unveiling project” (Guangzhou 2022-06-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510317, People’s Republic of China

    Hongying Qu & Wanmin Lian

  2. School of Emergency Management/Institute of Finance Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, People’s Republic of China

    Sulin Pang, Zhiyong Wu, Ge You & Jiaqi Wang

  3. Guangdong Emergency Technology Research Center of Risk Evaluation and Prewarning On Public Network Security, Guangzhou, 510632, People’s Republic of China

    Sulin Pang, Zhiyong Wu, Ge You & Jiaqi Wang

Authors
  1. Hongying Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wanmin Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sulin Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiyong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ge You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiaqi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sulin Pang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qu, H., Lian, W., Pang, S. et al. Five-dimensional evaluation system and perceptron intelligent computing performance measurement methods based on medical heterogeneous equipment health data. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 24651–24664 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08316-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08316-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation