Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Secure sharing of industrial IoT data based on distributed trust management and trusted execution environments: a federated learning approach

  • S.I.: Technologies of the 4th Industrial Revolution
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial Internet of Things (I-IoT) has become an emerging driver to operate industrial systems and a primary empowerer to future industries. With the advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning widely used in IoT, the Industrial IoT is also witnessing changes driven by new technologies. Generally, AI technologies require centralized data collection and processing to learn from the data to obtain viable models for application. In industrial IoT, data security and privacy problems associated with reliable and interconnected end devices are being faced and reliable solutions are urgently needed. A trusted execution environment in IoT devices is gradually becoming a feasible approach, and a distributed solution is a natural choice for artificial intelligence technologies in I-IoT. Moreover, Federated Learning as a distributed machine learning paradigm with privacy-preserving properties can be used in I-IoT. This paper introduces a feasible secure data circulation and sharing scheme for I-IoT devices in a trusted implementation platform by employing federated learning. The suggested framework has proved to be efficient, reliable, and accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data implemented in the research can be presented when requested.

References

  1. Yunlong Lu, Huang X, Zhang Ke, Maharjan S, Zhang Y (2020) Communication-efficient federated learning for digital twin edge networks in industrial IoT. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 17(8):5709–5718

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeghi AR, Wachsmann C, Waidner M (2015) Security and privacy challenges in the industrial internet of things. In: 2015 52nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). pp 1–6

  3. Sabt M, Achemlal M, Bouabdallah AM (2015) Trusted execution environment: what it is, and what it is not. In: 2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA. 1: 57–64

  4. Ayoade G, Karande V, Khan L, Hamlen K (2018) Decentralized IoT data management using blockchain and trusted execution environment. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on information reuse and integration (IRI). pp 15–22

  5. McMahan B, Moore E, Ramage D, Hampson S, y Arcas BA (2017) Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial intelligence and statistics. pp 1273–1282

  6. Nguyen DC, Ding M, Pathirana PN et al (2021) Federated learning for the industrial internet of things in future industries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14659

  7. Yang Q, Liu Y, Chen T, Tong Y (2019) Federated machine learning: concept and applications. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 10(2):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mothukuri V, Parizi RM, Pouriyeh S et al (2021) A survey on security and privacy of federated learning. Future Gener Comput Syst 115:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li T, Sahu AK, Talwalkar A, Smith V (2020) Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Process Mag 37(3):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang T, Andrew G, Eichner H, et al (2018) Applied federated learning: improving google keyboard query suggestions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02903

  11. Jie Xu, Glicksberg BS, Chang Su et al (2021) Federated learning for healthcare informatics. J Healthc Inform Res 5(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang JC, Kantarci B, Oktug S, Soyata T (2020) Federated learning in smart city sensing: challenges and opportunities. Sensors 20(21):6230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheller MJ, Brandon Edwards G, Reina A et al (2020) Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Sci rep 10(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Niknam S, Dhillon HS, Reed JH (2020) Federated learning for wireless communications: motivation, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 58(6):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pham Q-V, Fang Fang Vu, Ha N et al (2020) A survey of multi-access edge computing in 5g and beyond: fundamentals, technology integration, and state-of-the-art. IEEE Access 8:116974–117017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yunlong Lu, Huang X, Dai Y, Maharjan S, Zhang Y (2019) Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial IoT. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 16(6):4177–4186

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang W, Qinghua Lu, Qiuyu Yu et al (2020) Blockchain-based federated learning for device failure detection in industrial IoT. IEEE Internet Things J 8(7):5926–5937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Yi, Garg S, Nie J et al (2020) Deep anomaly detection for time-series data in industrial IoT: a communication-efficient on-device federated learning approach. IEEE Internet Things J 8(8):6348–6358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pham QV, Dev K, Reddy PK, Maddikunta, et al (2021) Fusion of federated learning and industrial internet of things: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00798

  20. Anciaux N, Bonnet P, Bouganim L, et al (2013) Trusted cells: a sea change for personnal data services. In: Proceedings of the 6th biennal conference on innovative database research (CIDR 2013). Pp 4

  21. Kinney SL (2006) Trusted platform module basics: using TPM in embedded systems. Elsevier

  22. Asokan N, Ekberg JE, Kostiainen K et al (2014) Mobile trusted computing. Proc IEEE 102(8):1189–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arfaoui G, Gharout S, Traoré J (2014) Trusted execution environments: a look under the hood. In: 2014 2nd IEEE international conference on mobile cloud computing, services, and Engineering. pp 259–266

  24. Anati I, Gueron S, Johnson S, Scarlata V (2013) Innovative technology for CPU-based attestation and sealing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on hardware and architectural support for security and privacy. 13: 7

  25. Ruan X (2014) Platform embedded security technology revealed. Springer Nature

  26. Part Guide (2011) Intel® 64 and ia-32 architectures software developer’s manual. Volume 3B: system programming guide, Part. 2(11)

  27. Kaplan D, Powell J, Woller T (2016) AMD memory encryption. White paper

  28. Lai R (2013) Amd security and server innovation. UEFI PlugFest-March 2013:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  29. Architecture Arm (2009) Security technology-building a secure system using trust-zone technology. ARM technical white paper

  30. Wilensky U, Rand W (2015) An introduction to agent-based modeling: modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. MIT Press

  31. Liang U, Zhang M, Leung VCM (2020) A reliable trust computing mechanism based on multisource feedback and fog computing in social sensor cloud. IEEE Internet Things J 7(6):5481–5490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Demertzis K, Iliadis L, Pimenidis E et al (2022) Variational restricted Boltzmann machines to automated anomaly detection. Neural Comput Appl 34:15207–15220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07060-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mo F, Haddadi H, Katevas K et al (2021) PPFL: privacy-preserving federated learning with trusted execution environments. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. pp 94–108

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was patronized by the General Program of Science and Technology Development Project of the Beijing Municipal Education Commission of China (Nos. KM202110037002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

    Wei Zheng

  2. School of Information, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China

    Yang Cao

  3. Shenzhen High-Tech Industrial Park Information Network Co. Ltd, Shenzhen, China

    Haining Tan

Authors
  1. Wei Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haining Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Cao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, W., Cao, Y. & Tan, H. Secure sharing of industrial IoT data based on distributed trust management and trusted execution environments: a federated learning approach. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 21499–21509 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08375-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08375-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation