Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Archimedes optimization algorithm based approaches for solving energy demand estimation problem: a case study of Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy consumption is getting rising gradually around the planet. Therefore, the importance of energy management has increased for all nations worldwide, and long-term energy demand estimation is becoming a vital problem for all countries. In this study, linear, quadratic and exponential models based six different Archimedes optimization algorithms (AOA) such as AOA-Linear, AOA-Quadratic, AOA-Exponential, IAOA-Linear, IAOA-Quadratic and IAOA-Exponential have been proposed to make some future projections of Turkey for the years (2021–2050). The previous studies in the literature were used the data set of Turkey, such as observed energy demand (OED), population, gross domestic product (GDP), export and import data for the years (1979–2005) or (1979–2011) obtained from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) and the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR). However, in this study, a new data set is organized with the OED, population, GDP, export and import data of Turkey for the years (1997–2020) to make some long-term energy demand estimations of Turkey, and this dataset is used for the first time in this study. AOA-Linear, AOA-Quadratic and AOA-Exponential algorithms are based on linear, quadratic and exponential mathematical models and the basic AOA method. IAOA-Linear, IAOA-Quadratic and IAOA-Exponential algorithms are also based on linear, quadratic and exponential mathematical models and the improved AOA (For short, IAOA) proposed in this study. Once a sensitivity analysis is made for determining the effect of algorithmic parameters of AOA and IAOA, the proposed algorithms are realized for Turkey’s long-term energy demand estimation for the years (2021–2050) with three different future scenarios. According to the experimental results, the quadratic model-based proposed IAOA produces better or comparable performance on the problem dealt with in this study in terms of solution quality and robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

The dataset was taken from the data of Turkish statistical institute (TUIK) and the ministry of energy and natural resources (MENR). All data generated or analyzed during the experiments are included in this study.

References

  1. Anwar J (2016) Analysis of energy security, environmental emission and fuel import costs under energy import reduction targets: a case of Pakistan. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 65:1065–1078

    Google Scholar 

  2. Suganthi L, Samuel AA (2012) Energy models for demand forecasting—A review. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 16:1223–1240

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghalehkhondabi I, Ardjmand E, Weckman GR, Young WA (2017) An overview of energy demand forecasting methods published in 2005–2015. Energy Syst 8:411–447

    Google Scholar 

  4. McBeath B, Grackin A (2010) Demand management in the second decade: a structured view, part 1 ChainLink Brief

  5. Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, Ozturk I, Sinha A (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138

    Google Scholar 

  6. Özdemir D, Dörterler S, Aydın D (2022) A new modified artificial bee colony algorithm for energy demand forecasting problem. Neural Comput Appl 34:17455–17471

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ozcan B, Tzeremes PG, Tzeremes NG (2020) Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries. Econ Modell 84:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dowling P, Russ P (2012) The benefit from reduced energy import bills and the importance of energy prices in GHG reduction scenarios. Energy Econ 34:S429–S435

    Google Scholar 

  9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development-OECD In: Organ. Econ. Co-operation Dev. (2020) https://www.oecd.org/

  10. Balat M (2010) Security of energy supply in Turkey: challenges and solutions. Energy Convers Manage 51:1998–2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sadri A, Ardehali M, Amirnekooei K (2014) General procedure for long-term energy-environmental planning for transportation sector of developing countries with limited data based on LEAP (long-range energy alternative planning) and EnergyPLAN. Energy 77:831–843

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canyurt OE, Öztürk HK (2006) Three different applications of genetic algorithm (GA) search techniques on oil demand estimation. Energy Conv Manag 47:3138–3148

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sonmez M, Akgüngör AP, Bektaş S (2017) Estimating transportation energy demand in Turkey using the artificial bee colony algorithm. Energy 122:301–310

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aslan M, Beşkirli M (2022) Realization of Turkey’s energy demand forecast with the improved arithmetic optimization algorithm. Energy Rep 8:18–32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ediger VŞ, Tatlıdil H (2002) Forecasting the primary energy demand in Turkey and analysis of cyclic patterns. Energy Convers Manage 43:473–487

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erdogdu E (2007) Electricity demand analysis using cointegration and ARIMA modelling: a case study of Turkey. Energy Policy 35:1129–1146

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ünler A (2008) Improvement of energy demand forecasts using swarm intelligence: the case of Turkey with projections to 2025. Energy Policy 36:1937–1944

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dong B, Cao C, Lee SE (2005) Applying support vector machines to predict building energy consumption in tropical region. Energy Build 37:545–553

    Google Scholar 

  19. Azadeh A, Ghaderi SF, Tarverdian S, Saberi M (2007) Integration of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm to predict electrical energy consumption. Appl Math Comput 186:1731–1741

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Azadeh A, Saberi M, Ghaderi S, Gitiforouz A, Ebrahimipour V (2008) Improved estimation of electricity demand function by integration of fuzzy system and data mining approach. Energy Convers Manage 49:2165–2177

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar U, Jain VK (2010) Time series models (Grey-Markov, Grey Model with rolling mechanism and singular spectrum analysis) to forecast energy consumption in India. Energy 35:1709–1716

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kıran MS, Özceylan E, Gündüz M, Paksoy T (2012) A novel hybrid approach based on particle swarm optimization and ant colony algorithm to forecast energy demand of Turkey. Energy Conv Manag 53:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dilaver Z, Hunt LC (2011) Industrial electricity demand for Turkey: a structural time series analysis. Energy Econ 33:426–436

    Google Scholar 

  24. Braun M, Altan H, Beck S (2014) Using regression analysis to predict the future energy consumption of a supermarket in the UK. Appl Energy 130:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  25. de Oliveira EM, Oliveira FLC (2018) Forecasting mid-long term electric energy consumption through bagging ARIMA and exponential smoothing methods. Energy 144:776–788

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ozturk S, Ozturk F (2018) Forecasting energy consumption of Turkey by Arima model. J Asian Sci Res 8:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  27. Top S, Vapur H (2018) Evolution of energy strategies in Turkey: forecasts by time series. J Energy Res Rev 7:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mousavi MH, Ghavidel S (2019) Structural time series model for energy demand in Iran’s transportation sector Case Studies on. Transp Policy 7:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blázquez-García A, Conde A, Milo A, Sánchez R, Barrio I (2020) Short-term office building elevator energy consumption forecast using SARIMA. J Build Perform Simul 13:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gorucu F (2004) Artificial neural network modeling for forecasting gas consumption. Energy Sources 26:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ekonomou L (2010) Greek long-term energy consumption prediction using artificial neural networks. Energy 35:512–517

    Google Scholar 

  32. Es H, Kalender Öksüz F, Hamzacebi C (2014) Forecasting the net energy demand of Turkey by artificial neural networks. J Faculty Eng Arch Gazi Univ 29(3):495–504

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kankal M, Uzlu E (2017) Neural network approach with teaching–learning-based optimization for modeling and forecasting long-term electric energy demand in Turkey. Neural Comput Appl 28:737–747

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ağbulut Ü (2022) Forecasting of transportation-related energy demand and CO2 emissions in Turkey with different machine learning algorithms. Sustain Prod Consum 29:141–157

    Google Scholar 

  35. Toksarı MD (2007) Ant colony optimization approach to estimate energy demand of Turkey. Energy Policy 35:3984–3990

    Google Scholar 

  36. Toksarı MD (2009) Estimating the net electricity energy generation and demand using the ant colony optimization approach: case of Turkey. Energy Policy 37:1181–1187

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kıran MS, Gündüz M (2013) A recombination-based hybridization of particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony algorithm for continuous optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 13:2188–2203

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ghanbari A, Kazemi SM, Mehmanpazir F, Nakhostin MM (2013) A cooperative ant colony optimization-genetic algorithm approach for construction of energy demand forecasting knowledge-based expert systems. Knowl-Based Syst 39:194–206

    Google Scholar 

  39. Uguz H, Hakli H, Baykan ÖK (2015) A new algorithm based on artificial bee colony algorithm for energy demand forecasting in Turkey. In: 2015 4th International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies (ACSAT), 2015. IEEE, pp 56–61

  40. Nazari H, Kazemi A, Hashemi M-H, Sadat MM, Nazari M (2015) Evaluating the performance of genetic and particle swarm optimization algorithms to select an appropriate scenario for forecasting energy demand using economic indicators: residential and commercial sectors of Iran. Int J Energy Environ Eng 6:345–355

    Google Scholar 

  41. Beskirli M, Hakli H, Kodaz H (2017) The energy demand estimation for Turkey using differential evolution algorithm. Sādhanā 42:1705–1715

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gulcu S, Kodaz H (2017) The estimation of the electricity energy demand using particle swarm optimization algorithm: A case study of Turkey. Proc Comput Sci 111:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  43. Koc I, Kivrak H, Babaoglu I (2019) The estimation of the energy demand in Turkey using grey wolf optimizer algorithm. Ann Faculty Eng Hunedoara 17:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  44. Özkış A (2020) A new model based on vortex search algorithm for estimating energy demand of Turkey Pamukkale University. J Eng Sci 26:959–965

    Google Scholar 

  45. Aslan M, Gunduz M, Kiran MS (2019) JayaX: Jaya algorithm with xor operator for binary optimization. Appl Soft Comput 82:105576

    Google Scholar 

  46. Karaboğa D (2011) Yapay Zekâ Optimizasyon Algoritmaları. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım,

  47. Gunduz M, Aslan M (2021) DJAYA: a discrete Jaya algorithm for solving traveling salesman problem. Appl Soft Comput 105:107275

    Google Scholar 

  48. Akyol S, Alataş B (2012) Güncel Sürü Zekâsı Optimizasyon Algoritmaları. Nevşehir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitü Dergisi 1:36–50

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alataş B (2007) Kaotik Haritalı Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyon Algoritmaları Geliştirme. Fırat Üniversitesi

  50. Hashim FA, Hussain K, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W (2021) Archimedes optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Intell 51:1531–1551

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Beskirli A, Beskirli M, Hakli H, Uguz H (2018) Comparing energy demand estimation using artificial algae algorithm: the case of Turkey. J Clean Energy Technol 6:349–352

    Google Scholar 

  52. National Statistics (2016) http://www.tuik.gov.tr

  53. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR) (2020) https://enerji.gov.tr/

  54. Sahraei MA, Duman H, Çodur MY, Eyduran E (2021) Prediction of transportation energy demand: multivariate adaptive regression splines. Energy 224:120090

    Google Scholar 

  55. Assareh E, Behrang M, Assari M, Ghanbarzadeh A (2010) Application of PSO (particle swarm optimization) and GA (genetic algorithm) techniques on demand estimation of oil in Iran. Energy 35:5223–5229

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fathy A, Alharbi AG, Alshammari S, Hasanien HM (2022) Archimedes optimization algorithm based maximum power point tracker for wind energy generation system. Ain Shams Eng J 13:101548

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang L, Wang J, Niu X, Liu Z (2021) Ensemble wind speed forecasting with multi-objective Archimedes optimization algorithm and sub-model selection. Appl Energy 301:117449

    Google Scholar 

  58. Houssein EH, Helmy BE, Rezk H, Nassef AM (2021) An enhanced Archimedes optimization algorithm based on Local escaping operator and Orthogonal learning for PEM fuel cell parameter identification. Eng Appl Artif Intell 103:104309

    Google Scholar 

  59. Desuky AS, Hussain S, Kausar S, Islam MA, El Bakrawy LM (2021) EAOA: an enhanced archimedes optimization algorithm for feature selection in classification. IEEE Access 9:120795–120814

    Google Scholar 

  60. Akdag O (2022) A improved archimedes optimization algorithm for multi/single-objective optimal power flow. Electric Power Systems Research 206:107796

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jiang S-J, Chu S-C, Zou F-M, Shan J, Zheng S-G, Pan J-S (2023) A parallel Archimedes optimization algorithm based on Taguchi method for application in the control of variable pitch wind turbine. Math Comput Simul 203:306–327

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Singh R, Kaur R (2022) A novel archimedes optimization algorithm with levy flight for designing microstrip patch antenna. Arab J Sci Eng 47:3683–3706

    Google Scholar 

  63. Eid A, El-Kishky H (2021) Multi-objective Archimedes optimization algorithm for optimal allocation of renewable energy sources in distribution networks. In: International conference on digital technologies and applications. Springer, pp 65–75

  64. Yao Y, Xie D, Li Y, Wang C, Li Y (2022) Routing protocol for wireless sensor networks based on archimedes optimization algorithm. IEEE Sens J 22:15561–15573

    Google Scholar 

  65. Saglam M, Spataru C, Karaman OA (2022) Electricity demand forecasting with use of artificial intelligence: the case of Gokceada Island. Energies 15:5950

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Şırnak University, 73000, Şırnak, Turkey

    Murat Aslan

Authors
  1. Murat Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Aslan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No author associated with this paper has disclosed any potential or pertinent conflicts which may be perceived to have impending conflict with this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aslan, M. Archimedes optimization algorithm based approaches for solving energy demand estimation problem: a case study of Turkey. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 19627–19649 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08769-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08769-6

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Murat Aslan View author profile