Skip to main content
Log in

Fault diagnosis of air handling unit via combining probabilistic slow feature analysis and attention residual network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, the fault diagnosis of the air handling unit (AHU) is critical to ensure the proper operation of the whole system. The AHU system with complex feature variables is susceptible to noise in operation, which influences the diagnostic performance of the fault diagnosis approach. To further improve the fault diagnosis accuracy, this paper proposes an AHU fault diagnosis model based on probabilistic slow feature analysis (PSFA) and attention residual network (AResNet). Firstly, to suppress the influence of noise on fault diagnosis while dealing with the AHU dynamic temporal characteristics, the PSFA-based feature extraction method is proposed. Further, in order to focus on significant features and suppress unnecessary regional responses of the observed data, the AResNet is utilized to construct the fault diagnosis classifier. Before building the AResNet classifier, we adopt the data spatialization method to convert the process data into spatial grayscale images to achieve spatial placement of key features and enhance the spatial correlation characteristics between multiple features. Finally, detailed experiments and comparisons are made, in which three different intensities of noise are added to the experimental data provided by ASHRAE research project RP-1312. Experimental results show that the proposed PSFA-AResNet model has the best fault diagnosis performance at all three noise levels compared with other deep and shallow popular methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elnour M, Meskin N, Al-Naemi M (2020) Sensor data validation and fault diagnosis using auto-associative neural network for hvac systems. J Build Eng 27:100935

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fan C, Liu X, Xue P, Wang J (2021) Statistical characterization of semi-supervised neural networks for fault detection and diagnosis of air handling units. Energy Build 234:110733

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yan K, Ji Z, Huijuan L, Huang J, Shen W, Xue Yu (2017) Fast and accurate classification of time series data using extended elm: application in fault diagnosis of air handling units. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 49(7):1349–1356

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shen C, Zhang H, Meng S, Li C (2023) Augmented data driven self-attention deep learning method for imbalanced fault diagnosis of the hvac chiller. Eng Appl Artif Intell 117:105540

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Z, Huang Z, Wang J, Yue C, Yoon S (2021) A novel fault diagnosis and self-calibration method for air-handling units using bayesian inference and virtual sensing. Energy Build 250:111293

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan C, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang J (2021) Quantitative assessments on advanced data synthesis strategies for enhancing imbalanced ahu fault diagnosis performance. Energy Build 252:111423

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao Y, Jin Wen F, Xiao XY, Wang S (2017) Diagnostic bayesian networks for diagnosing air handling units faults-part i: faults in dampers, fans, filters and sensors. Appl Therm Eng 111:1272–1286

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li G, Yao Q, Fan C, Zhou C, Guanghai W, Zhou Z, Fang X (2021) An explainable one-dimensional convolutional neural networks based fault diagnosis method for building heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. Build Environ 203:108057

    Google Scholar 

  9. Torabi N, Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Barton T (2022) Common human errors in design, installation, and operation of vav ahu control systems-a review and a practitioner interview. Build Environ 5:109333

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang H, Li C, Li D, Zhang Y, Peng W (2021) Fault detection and diagnosis of the air handling unit via an enhanced kernel slow feature analysis approach considering the time-wise and batch-wise dynamics. Energy Build 253:111467

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Li C, Wei Q, Zhang Y (2022) Fault detection and diagnosis of the air handling unit via combining the feature sparse representation based dynamic sfa and the lstm network. Energy Build 269:112241

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yulong Yu, Zhang H, Peng W, Wang R, Li C (2022) Images based fault diagnosis of air handling unit via combining kernel slow feature analysis and deep learning method. J Build Eng 56:104718

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ying Yan, Luh Peter B, Pattipati Krishna R (2017) Fault diagnosis of hvac air-handling systems considering fault propagation impacts among components. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 14(2):705–717

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sun L, Li Y, Jia H, Ying Yu (2019) Research on fault detection method for air handling units system. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(3):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li S, Wen J (2014) A model-based fault detection and diagnostic methodology based on pca method and wavelet transform. Energy Build 68:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shang C, Huang B, Yang F, Huang D (2016) Slow feature analysis for monitoring and diagnosis of control performance. J Process Control 39:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shang C, Yang F, Gao X, Huang X, Suykens JAK, Huang D (2015) Concurrent monitoring of operating condition deviations and process dynamics anomalies with slow feature analysis. AIChE J 61(11):3666–3682

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang S, Zhao C (2018) Slow-feature-analysis-based batch process monitoring with comprehensive interpretation of operation condition deviation and dynamic anomaly. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 66(5):3773–3783

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang H, Tian X, Deng X, Cao Y (2018) Multiphase batch process with transitions monitoring based on global preserving statistics slow feature analysis. Neurocomputing 293:64–86

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shang C, Yang F, Huang B, Huang D (2018) Recursive slow feature analysis for adaptive monitoring of industrial processes. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 65(11):8895–8905

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wanke Yu, Zhao C (2018) Recursive exponential slow feature analysis for fine-scale adaptive processes monitoring with comprehensive operation status identification. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 15(6):3311–3323

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang J, Zhou D, Chen M, Hong X (2022) Continual learning-based probabilistic slow feature analysis for multimode dynamic process monitoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11295

  23. Puli VK, Raveendran R, Huang B (2021) Complex probabilistic slow feature extraction with applications in process data analytics. Comput Chem Eng 154:107456

    Google Scholar 

  24. Omori T, Sekiguchi T, Okada M (2017) Belief propagation for probabilistic slow feature analysis. J Phys Soc Jpn 86(8):084802

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guo F, Shang C, Huang B, Wang K, Yang F, Huang D (2016) Monitoring of operating point and process dynamics via probabilistic slow feature analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 151:115–125

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shang C, Huang B, Yang F, Huang D (2015) Probabilistic slow feature analysis-based representation learning from massive process data for soft sensor modeling. AIChE J 61(12):4126–4139

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fan L, Kodamana H, Huang B (2019) Semi-supervised dynamic latent variable modeling: I/o probabilistic slow feature analysis approach. AIChE J 65(3):964–979

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fan L, Kodamana H, Huang B (2018) Identification of robust probabilistic slow feature regression model for process data contaminated with outliers. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 173:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tang Z, Li C, Sun S (2017) Single-trial eeg classification of motor imagery using deep convolutional neural networks. Optik 130:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  30. Athiwaratkun B, Kang K (2015) Feature representation in convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.02313

  31. Gao J, Han H, Ren Z, Fan Y (2021) Fault diagnosis for building chillers based on data self-production and deep convolutional neural network. J Build Eng 34:102043

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J, Yi S, Liang G, Hongli G, Xin H, Hongliang S (2020) A new bearing fault diagnosis method based on modified convolutional neural networks. Chin J Aeron 33(2):439–447

    Google Scholar 

  33. Riaz N, Shah S, Irtiza A, Rehman F, Gilani SO, Udin E (2020) A novel 2-d current signal-based residual learning with optimized softmax to identify faults in ball screw actuators. IEEE Access 8:115299–115313

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eom YH, Yoo JW, Hong SB, Kim MS (2019) Refrigerant charge fault detection method of air source heat pump system using convolutional neural network for energy saving. Energy 187:115877

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wen L, Li X, Gao L, Zhang Y (2017) A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 65(7):5990–5998

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, Xiaoqiang D, Wang X, Si S (2022) Industrial gearbox fault diagnosis based on multi-scale convolutional neural networks and thermal imaging. ISA Trans 129:309–320

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khan RU, Zhang X, Kumar R, Aboagye EO (2018) Evaluating the performance of resnet model based on image recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2018 international conference on computing and artificial intelligence, pp. 86–90

  38. Yu X, Kang C, Guttery DS, Kadry S, Chen Y, Zhang Y-D (2020) Resnet-scda-50 for breast abnormality classification. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 18(1):94–102

    Google Scholar 

  39. Farooq M, Hafeez A (2020) Covid-resnet: a deep learning framework for screening of covid19 from radiographs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.14395

  40. Wen L, Li X, Gao L (2020) A transfer convolutional neural network for fault diagnosis based on resnet-50. Neural Comput Appl 32:6111–6124

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wightman R, Touvron H, Jégou H (2021) Resnet strikes back: an improved training procedure in timm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00476

  42. Woo S, Park J, Lee J-Yg (2018) In So Kweon. Cbam: convolutional block attention module. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp 3–19

  43. Wang S-H, Fernandes SL, Zhu Z, Zhang Y-D (2021) Avnc: attention-based vgg-style network for covid-19 diagnosis by cbam. IEEE Sens J 22(18):17431–17438

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sharma A, Vans E, Shigemizu D, Boroevich KA, Tsunoda T (2019) Deepinsight: a methodology to transform a non-image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture. Sci Rep 9(1):11399

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chou J-S, Truong D-N, Kuo C-C (2021) Imaging time-series with features to enable visual recognition of regional energy consumption by bio-inspired optimization of deep learning. Energy 224:120100

    Google Scholar 

  46. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV 14, pp 630–645. Springer

  47. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  48. Huo T, Fan J, Li X, Chen H, Gao B, Li X (2020) Traffic sign recognition based on resnet-20 and deep mutual learning. In: 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp 4770–4774. IEEE

  49. Chen B, Zhang Z, Liu N, Tan Y, Liu X, Chen T (2020) Spatiotemporal convolutional neural network with convolutional block attention module for micro-expression recognition. Information 11(8):380

    Google Scholar 

  50. Minzhe Yu, Duan Y, Li Z, Zhang Y (2021) Prediction of peptide detectability based on capsnet and convolutional block attention module. Int J Mol Sci 22(21):12080

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62003191), the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province (No. TSQN201812092), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020QF072), the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (Nos. 2021CXGC011205, 2021TSGC1053), and the Youth Innovation Technology Project of Higher School in Shandong Province (Nos. 2019KJN005, 2022KJ204).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengdong Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Yu, Y., Shang, L. et al. Fault diagnosis of air handling unit via combining probabilistic slow feature analysis and attention residual network. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 22449–22467 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08910-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08910-5

Keywords

Navigation