Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Rough Fermatean fuzzy decision-based approach for modelling IDS classifiers in the federated learning of IoMT applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) are commonly employed to mitigate network security threats in various fields, including federated learning applications within the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). However, IDSs face challenges owing to the sheer volume of network traffic, high-dimensional datasets and the necessity for real-time detection. Although machine learning integration assists IDSs in overcoming these challenges, modelling difficulties persist due to varied evaluation criteria and levels of conflict and importance. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) solutions have been utilised in IoMT and IDS, yet they fall short in capturing the subjective judgements of experts and rely on normalisation approaches, which can impact results. This study seeks to address these issues through the integration of robust MCDM methodologies, namely fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) and fuzzy decision by opinion score method (FDOSM). Utilising rough Fermatean fuzzy sets (RFFSs), this integration produces precise solutions with reduced uncertainty. Our methodology involves adopting a decision matrix for IDS classifiers based on integrated evaluation criteria, followed by deriving new formulations and developments for RFFSs-based FDOSM and FWZIC for the modelling and weighting of criteria, respectively. Evaluations using datasets involving 125,973 records and 41 features across 17 evaluation criteria revealed that accuracy–security and training time–performance weights yielded the highest scores, whereas false negative rate–security and CPU time–performance criteria received the lowest weights. The random forest emerged as the optimal IDS classifier. Systematic modelling, sensitivity analysis and comparative studies confirmed the robustness of our results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Liu D, Zhang Y, Wang W, Dev K, Khowaja SA (2021) Flexible data integrity checking with original data recovery in IoT-enabled maritime transportation systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3125070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang W, Xu H, Alazab M, Gadekallu TR, Han Z, Su C (2021) Blockchain-based reliable and efficient certificateless signature for IIoT devices. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 18(10):7059–7067

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou X, Yang X, Ma J, Kevin I, Wang K (2021) Energy efficient smart routing based on link correlation mining for wireless edge computing in IoT. IEEE Internet Things J 9(16):14988–14997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haughey J, Taylor K, Dohrmann M, Snyder G (2018) Medtech and the internet of medical things: how connected medical devices are transforming health care. Ed: Deloitte. pp 112

  5. Qureshi F, Krishnan S (2018) Wearable hardware design for the internet of medical things (IoMT). Sensors 18(11):3812

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pham Q-V, Dev K, Maddikunta PKR, Gadekallu TR, Huynh-The T (2022) Fusion of federated learning and industrial internet of things: a survey. 212: 109048

  7. Lian Z, Wang W, Su C (2021) COFEL: Communication-efficient and optimized federated learning with local differential privacy. In: ICC 2021-IEEE international conference on communications, pp 1–6: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC42927.2021.9500632

  8. Song J, Wang W, Gadekallu TR, Cao J, Liu Y (2022) EPPDA: An efficient privacy-preserving data aggregation federated learning scheme. IEEE transactions on network science and engineering. pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2022.3153519

  9. Taheri R, Shojafar M, Alazab M, Tafazolli R (2020) FED-IIoT: a robust federated malware detection architecture in industrial IoT. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 17(12):8442–8452

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang C, Xie Y, Bai H, Yu B, Li W, Gao Y (2021) A survey on federated learning. Knowl-Based Syst 216:106775

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mothukuri V, Khare P, Parizi RM, Pouriyeh S, Dehghantanha A, Srivastava G (2021) Federated learning-based anomaly detection for IOT security attacks. IEEE Internet Things J 9(4):2545–2554

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gong M, Xie Y, Pan K, Feng K, Qin AK (2020) A survey on differentially private machine learning. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 15(2):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  13. Powell K (2019) Nvidia clara federated learning to deliver ai to hospitals while protecting patient data. Nvidia Blog. pp 512

  14. Agrawal S, et al (2021) Federated learning for intrusion detection system: Concepts, challenges and future directions. computer communications, vol 195, pp 346–361, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09527

  15. Alamleh A et al (2023) Federated learning for IoMT applications: a standardisation and benchmarking framework of intrusion detection systems. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 27(2):878–887

    Google Scholar 

  16. Papadopoulos P, Abramson W, Hall AJ, Pitropakis N, Buchanan WJ (2021) Privacy and trust redefined in federated machine learning. Mach Learn Knowl Extract 3(2):333–356

    Google Scholar 

  17. Base R, Mell P (2019) Special publication on intrusion detection systems. NIST Infidel, Inc., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Scotts Valley, CA. pp 120

  18. Tang Z et al (2020) A multilayer neural network merging image preprocessing and pattern recognition by integrating diffusion and drift memristors. IEEE Trans Cognit Dev Syst 13(3):645–656

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hodo E, Bellekens X, Hamilton A, Tachtatzis C, Atkinson R (2020) Shallow and deep networks intrusion detection system: a taxonomy and survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02145. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.02145

  20. Tang Z et al (2019) A hardware friendly unsupervised memristive neural network with weight sharing mechanism. Neurocomputing 332:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmad I, Basheri M, Iqbal MJ, Rahim A (2020) Performance comparison of support vector machine, random forest, and extreme learning machine for intrusion detection. IEEE access 6:33789–33795

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghaznavi M, Shahriar N, Kamali S, Ahmed R, Boutaba R (2021) Distributed service function chaining. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 35(11):2479–2489

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aleesa AM et al (2020) Review of intrusion detection systems based on deep learning techniques: coherent taxonomy, challenges, motivations, recommendations, substantial analysis and future directions. Neural Comput Appl 32:9827–9858

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmad I, Abdullah A, Alghamdi A (2010) Towards the selection of best neural network system for intrusion detection. Int J Phys Sci 5(12):1830–1839

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peng Y, Kou G, Wang G, Shi Y (2019) FAMCDM: a fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms. Omega 39(6):677–689

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson RR, Thomas C (2020) Ranking of machine learning algorithms based on the performance in classifying DDoS attacks. ieee recent advances in intelligent computational systems (RAICS), pp 185–190: IEEE

  27. Panigrahi R, Borah S (2019) Rank allocation to J48 group of decision tree classifiers using binary and multiclass intrusion detection datasets. Proc Comput Sci 132:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patsariya P, Singh RR (2019) Classifier rank identification using multi-criteria decision making method for intrusion detection dataset. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 9(1):1732–1738

    Google Scholar 

  29. Albahri A et al (2019) Based multiple heterogeneous wearable sensors: a smart real-time health monitoring structured for hospitals distributor. IEEE Access 7:37269–37323

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alsalem M et al (2019) Multiclass benchmarking framework for automated acute Leukaemia detection and classification based on BWM and group-VIKOR. J Med Syst 43(7):212

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohammed K et al (2019) Real-time remote-health monitoring systems: a review on patients prioritisation for multiple-chronic diseases, taxonomy analysis, concerns and solution procedure. J Med Syst 43(7):223

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibrahim N et al (2019) Multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking for young learners’ English language mobile applications in terms of LSRW skills. IEEE Access 7(7):146620–146651

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mohammed K et al (2020) Novel technique for reorganisation of opinion order to interval levels for solving several instances representing prioritisation in patients with multiple chronic diseases. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 185:105151

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mohammed K et al (2020) A uniform intelligent prioritisation for solving diverse and big data generated from multiple chronic diseases patients based on hybrid decision-making and voting method. IEEE Access 8:91521–91530

    Google Scholar 

  35. Albahri O et al (2020) Helping doctors hasten COVID-19 treatment: towards a rescue framework for the transfusion of best convalescent plasma to the most critical patients based on biological requirements via ml and novel MCDM methods. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 196:105617

    Google Scholar 

  36. Abdulkareem KH et al (2020) A new standardisation and selection framework for real-time image dehazing algorithms from multi-foggy scenes based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods. Neural Comput Appl 33:1029–1054

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mohammed TJ et al (2021) Convalescent-plasma-transfusion intelligent framework for rescuing COVID-19 patients across centralised/decentralised telemedicine hospitals based on AHP-group TOPSIS and matching component. Appl Intell 51:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  38. Albahri AS et al (2021) Development of IoT-based mhealth framework for various cases of heart disease patients. Health Technol 11:1013–1033

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alamleh A et al (2023) Multi-attribute decision-making for intrusion detection systems: a systematic review. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 22(1):589–636

    Google Scholar 

  40. Albahri O et al (2019) Fault-tolerant mHealth framework in the context of IoT-based real-time wearable health data sensors. IEEE Access 7:50052–50080

    Google Scholar 

  41. Almahdi E et al (2019) Mobile patient monitoring systems from a benchmarking aspect: challenges, open issues and recommended solutions. J Med Syst 43(7):207

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zaidan A et al (2020) Novel multiperspective hiring framework for the selection of software programmer applicants based on AHP and group TOPSIS techniques. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 18(4):1–73

    Google Scholar 

  43. Abdulkareem KH et al (2020) A novel multi-perspective benchmarking framework for selecting image dehazing intelligent algorithms based on BWM and group VIKOR techniques. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 19(3):909–957

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Albahri A et al (2020) Multi-biological laboratory examination framework for the prioritization of patients with COVID-19 based on integrated AHP and group VIKOR methods. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 19(05):1247–1269

    Google Scholar 

  45. Albahri O et al (2020) Systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in the detection and classification of COVID-19 medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking: taxonomy analysis, challenges, future solutions and methodological aspects. J Infect Publ Health 13(10):1381–1396

    Google Scholar 

  46. Albahri A, Hamid RA (2020) Detection-based prioritisation: framework of multi-laboratory characteristics for asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers based on integrated entropy–TOPSIS methods. Artif Intell Med 111:101983

    Google Scholar 

  47. Almahdi E et al (2019) Mobile-based patient monitoring systems: a prioritisation framework using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. J Med Syst 43(7):219

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zughoul O (2020) Novel triplex procedure for ranking the ability of software engineering students based on two levels of AHP and group TOPSIS techniques. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 20(1):67–135

    Google Scholar 

  49. Khatari M (2020) Multidimensional Benchmarking framework for AQMs of network congestion control based on AHP and group-TOPSIS. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 20(05):1409–1446

    Google Scholar 

  50. Alsalem MA et al (2022) Rise of multiattribute decision-making in combating COVID-19: a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature. Int J Intell Syst 19(3):700–957

    Google Scholar 

  51. Alsalem M et al (2022) Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review. Artif Intell Rev 55:1–84

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mohammed RT et al (2022) Determining importance of many-objective optimisation competitive algorithms evaluation criteria based on a novel fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency method. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 21(01):195–241

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibrahim HA et al (2023) Sustainability assessment of palm oil industry 4.0 technologies in a circular economy applications based on interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy rough set-FWZIC and EDAS methods. Appl Soft Comput 136:110073

    Google Scholar 

  54. Salih MM et al (2021) Benchmarking of AQM methods of network congestion control based on extension of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy decision by opinion score method. Telecommun Syst 77:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  55. Al-Samarraay MS et al (2022) A new extension of FDOSM based on Pythagorean fuzzy environment for evaluating and benchmarking sign language recognition systems. Neural Comput Appl 34:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  56. Al-Humairi S et al (2023) Towards sustainable transportation: a pavement strategy selection based on the extension of dual-hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 31(2):380–393

    Google Scholar 

  57. Albahri O et al (2022) Combination of fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency and fuzzy decision by opinion score methods in pythagorean m-polar fuzzy environment: a case study of sing language recognition systems. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 20(3):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  58. Alnoor A et al (2023) Toward a sustainable transportation industry: oil company benchmarking based on the extension of linear diophantine fuzzy rough sets and multicriteria decision-making methods. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 31(2):449–459

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mahmoud U et al (2022) DAS benchmarking methodology based on FWZIC II and FDOSM II to support industrial community characteristics in the design and implementation of advanced driver assistance systems in vehicles. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 19(7):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  60. AlSattar H et al (2022) Integration of FDOSM and FWZIC under homogeneous Fermatean fuzzy environment: a prioritisation of Covid-19 patients for mesenchymal stem cell transfusion. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 18(5):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  61. AlSereidi A et al (2022) Novel federated decision making for distribution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody to eligible high-risk patients. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 14(7):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  62. Alamoodi AH et al (2023) Intelligent emotion and sensory remote prioritisation for patients with multiple chronic diseases. Sensors 23(4):1854

    Google Scholar 

  63. Al-Samarraay MS et al (2021) Extension of interval-valued Pythagorean FDOSM for evaluating and benchmarking real-time SLRSs based on multidimensional criteria of hand gesture recognition and sensor glove perspectives. Appl Soft Comput 116:108284

    Google Scholar 

  64. Alsalem M et al (2021) Based on T-spherical fuzzy environment: a combination of FWZIC and FDOSM for prioritising COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients. J Infect Publ Health 14(10):1513–1559

    Google Scholar 

  65. Albahri A et al (2022) Integration of fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency and fuzzy decision by opinion score methods under a q-rung orthopair environment: a distribution case study of COVID-19 vaccine doses. Comput Standards Interfaces 80:103572

    Google Scholar 

  66. Alamoodi A et al (2022) Based on neutrosophic fuzzy environment: a new development of FWZIC and FDOSM for benchmarking smart e-tourism applications. Complex Intell Syst 8:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  67. Alamoodi A et al (2022) New extension of fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency and fuzzy decision by opinion score method based on cubic pythagorean fuzzy environment: a benchmarking case study of sign language recognition systems. Int J Fuzzy Syst 24:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  68. Khan FM, Bibi N, Xin XL, Alam A (2022) Rough Fermatean fuzzy ideals in semigroups. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 42(6):5741–5752

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pawlak Z (2019) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11(5):341–356

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Nguyen HS (2020) Discretization methods in data mining. Rough sets in knowledge discovery, pp 451–482

  71. Lin TY, Yao YY, Zadeh LA (2020) Data mining, rough sets and granular computing. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, Springer, p 123

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ziarko WP (2020) Rough sets, fuzzy sets and knowledge discovery: proceedings of the international workshop on rough sets and knowledge discovery (RSKD’20), Banff, Alberta, Canada, Springer, Verlag. pp. 220

  73. Dai J, Xu Q (2020) Attribute selection based on information gain ratio in fuzzy rough set theory with application to tumor classification. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):211–221

    Google Scholar 

  74. Dai J, Chen J (2020) Feature selection via normative fuzzy information weight with application into tumor classification. Appl Soft Comput 92:106299

    Google Scholar 

  75. Senapati T, Yager RR (2020) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11(2):663–674

    Google Scholar 

  76. Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica 30(2):391–412

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Garg H, Shahzadi G, Akram M (2020) Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Math Probl Eng 2020:220–234

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Akram M, Shahzadi G, Ahmadini AAH (2020) Decision-making framework for an effective sanitizer to reduce COVID-19 under Fermatean fuzzy environment. J Math 2020:1–19

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Alamoodi AH, Zaidan BB, Albahri OS, Garfan S, Ahmaro IY, Mohammed RT, Malik RQ (2023) Systematic review of MCDM approach applied to the medical case studies of COVID-19: trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, motivations, recommendations, and future directions. Complex Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-00972-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Simic V, Gokasar I, Deveci M, Isik M (2021) Fermatean fuzzy group decision-making based CODAS approach for taxation of public transit investments. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3109038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Arqub OA (2017) Adaptation of reproducing kernel algorithm for solving fuzzy Fredholm-Volterra integrodifferential equations. Neural Comput Appl 28(7):1591–1610

    Google Scholar 

  82. Arqub OA, Al-Smadi M, Momani S, Hayat T (2020) Application of reproducing kernel algorithm for solving second-order, two-point fuzzy boundary value problems. Soft Comput 21(23):7191–7206

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Arqub OA, Mohammed A-S, Momani S, Hayat T (2016) Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations using reproducing kernel Hilbert space method. Soft Comput 20(8):3283–3302

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Mahmood T, Ullah K, Khan Q, Jan N (2019) An approach toward decision-making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets. Neural Comput Appl 31(11):7041–7053

    Google Scholar 

  85. Mahmood T, Warraich MS, Ali Z, Pamucar D (2021) Generalized MULTIMOORA method and Dombi prioritized weighted aggregation operators based on T-spherical fuzzy sets and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 36(9):4659–4692

    Google Scholar 

  86. Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:112–121

    Google Scholar 

  87. Salih MM et al (2020) Fuzzy decision by opinion score method. Appl Soft Comput 96:106595

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rani P, Mishra AR (2021) Fermatean fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators-based MULTIMOORA method for electric vehicle charging station selection. Expert Syst Appl 182:115267

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kalid N et al (2018) Based on real time remote health monitoring systems: a new approach for prioritization “large scales data” patients with chronic heart diseases using body sensors and communication technology. J Med Syst 42(4):69

    Google Scholar 

  90. Alsalem M et al (2022) Rescuing emergency cases of COVID-19 patients: an intelligent real-time MSC transfusion framework based on multicriteria decision-making methods. Appl Intell 52:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  91. Albahri OS et al (2021) Multidimensional benchmarking of the active queue management methods of network congestion control based on extension of fuzzy decision by opinion score method. Int J Intell Syst 36(2):330–351

    Google Scholar 

  92. Qahtan S et al (2023) A novel fuel supply system modelling approach for electric vehicles under Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets. Inform Sci 622:1014–1032

    Google Scholar 

  93. Qader M et al (2021) A methodology for football players selection problem based on multi-measurements criteria analysis. Measurement 111:38–50

    Google Scholar 

  94. Jumaah F et al (2020) Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers. Telecommun Syst 68(3):425–443

    Google Scholar 

  95. Rahmatullah B, et al, (2020) Multi-complex attributes analysis for optimum GPS baseband receiver tracking channels selection. In: 4th international conference on control, decision and information technologies IEEE. (CoDIT), pp 1084–1088

  96. Salman OH et al (2017) Novel methodology for triage and prioritizing using “big data” patients with chronic heart diseases through telemedicine environmental. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 16(05):1211–1245

    Google Scholar 

  97. Albahri AS, et al (2021) Based on the multi-assessment model: towards a new context of combining the artificial neural network and structural equation modelling: a review, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol 153, Part 1, pp 1–17

  98. Zaidan BB, et al. (2021) A new digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking methodology using an external group of evaluators and multi-criteria analysis based on ‘large-scale data’, software: practice and experiences, Vol 47, pp 1365–1392

  99. Zaidan A et al (2020) Multi-agent learning neural network and Bayesian model for real-time IoT skin detectors: a new evaluation and benchmarking methodology. Neural Comput Appl 32(12):8315–8366

    Google Scholar 

  100. Tariq I et al (2020) MOGSABAT: a metaheuristic hybrid algorithm for solving multi-objective optimisation problems. Neural Comput Appl 32:3101–3115

    Google Scholar 

  101. Malik R et al (2021) Novel roadside unit positioning framework in the context of the vehicle-to-infrastructure communication system based on AHP—entropy for weighting and borda—VIKOR for uniform ranking. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 21(04):1233–1266

    Google Scholar 

  102. Hamid RA, Albahri AS, Albahri OS, Zaidan AA (2022) Dempster-Shafer theory for classification and hybridised models of multi-criteria decision analysis for prioritisation: a telemedicine framework for patients with heart diseases. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 13(9):4333–4367

    Google Scholar 

  103. Albahri OS (2021) New mHealth hospital selection framework supporting decentralised telemedicine architecture for outpatient cardiovascular disease-based integrated techniques: Haversine-GPS and AHP-VIKOR. Ambient Int Human Comput 13:219–239

    Google Scholar 

  104. Albahri AS (2021) Novel dynamic fuzzy decision-making framework for COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients. J Adv Res 37:147–168

    Google Scholar 

  105. Qahtan S et al (2022) Novel multi security and privacy benchmarking framework for blockchain-based IoT Healthcare industry 4.0 systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 18(9):440–466

    Google Scholar 

  106. Pamucar D, Yazdani M, Obradovic R, Kumar A, Torres-Jiménez M (2020) A novel fuzzy hybrid neutrosophic decision-making approach for the resilient supplier selection problem. Int J Intell Syst 35(12):1934–1986

    Google Scholar 

  107. Dawood KA et al (2022) Novel multi-perspective usability evaluation framework for selection of open source software based on BWM and group VIKOR techniques. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 20(07):1–91

    Google Scholar 

  108. Krishnan E et al (2021) Interval type 2 trapezoidal-fuzzy weighted with zero inconsistency combined with VIKOR for evaluating smart e-tourism applications. Int J Intell Syst 36(9):4723–4774

    Google Scholar 

  109. Shuwandy ML et al (2020) Sensor-based Health authentication for real-time remote healthcare monitoring system a multilayer systematic review. J Med System 43(33):1–31

    Google Scholar 

  110. Mat Kiah ML et al (2020) An enhanced security solution for electronic medical records based on AES hybrid technique with SOAP/XML and SHA-1. J Med Syst 37:71–99

    Google Scholar 

  111. Alanazi HO et al (2019) Meeting the security requirements of electronic medical records in the ERA of high-speed computing. J Med Syst 39(1):150–165

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  112. Noor BS et al (2022) Indoor air quality pollutants predicting approach using unified labelling process-based multi-criteria decision making and machine learning techniques. Telecommun Syst 81(4):591–613

    Google Scholar 

  113. Salih MM et al (2019) Survey on fuzzy topsis state-of-the-art between 2007–2017. Comput Oper Res 104:207–227

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. Naser K et al (2020) Based real time remote health monitoring systems: a review on patients prioritization and related “big data” using body sensors information and communication technology. J Med Syst 42(2):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  115. Zaidan BB et al (2020) A new approach based on multi-dimensional evaluation and benchmarking for data hiding techniques. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 13(6):102–120

    Google Scholar 

  116. Yas QM (2020) Towards on develop a framework for the evaluation and benchmarking of skin detectors based on artificial intelligent models using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 31(03):1759002

    Google Scholar 

  117. Zaidan AA et al (2015) Multi-criteria analysis for OS-EMR software selection problem a comparative study. Decis Support Syst 78:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  118. Yas QM (2020) Comprehensive insights into evaluation and benchmarking of real-time skin detectors: review open issues & challenges, and recommended solutions. Measurement 114:243–260

    Google Scholar 

  119. Albahri OS et al (2018) Real-time remote health-monitoring systems in a medical centre: a review of the provision of healthcare services-based body sensor information, open challenges and methodological aspects. J Med Syst 42:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  120. Odai E et al (2020) Electronic medical record systems: decision support examination framework for individual, security and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Heal Technol 10:795–822

    Google Scholar 

  121. Alsalem MA (2021) Systematic review of an automated multiclass detection and classification system for acute leukaemia in terms of evaluation and benchmarking, open challenges, issues and methodological aspects. J Med Syst 42(11):180–204

    Google Scholar 

  122. Zaidan AA et al (2018) A review on smartphone skin cancer diagnosis apps in evaluation and benchmarking: coherent taxonomy, open issues and recommendation pathway solution. Health Technol 8:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  123. Abdullateef BN et al (2020) An evaluation and selection problems of OSS-LMS packages. Springerplus 5:230–248

    Google Scholar 

  124. Napi NM et al (2020) Medical emergency triage and patient prioritisation in a telemedicine environment: a systematic review. Heal Technol 12(5):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  125. Zaidan BB et al (2019) Software and hardware FPGA-based digital watermarking and steganography approaches: toward new methodology for evaluation and benchmarking using multi-criteria decision-making. J Circuits, Syst Comput 26(07):1750116

    Google Scholar 

  126. zaidan BB et al (2020) Comparative study on the evaluation and benchmarking information hiding approaches based multi-measurement analysis using topsis method with different normalisation. Sep Meas 117:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  127. Alaa M et al (2020) Assessment and ranking framework for the English skills of pre-service teachers based on fuzzy Delphi and TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access 7:126201–126223

    Google Scholar 

  128. Khatari M et al (2019) Multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking for active queue management methods: open issues, challenges and recommended pathway solutions. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 18(04):1187–1242

    Google Scholar 

  129. Jumaah FM, Zadain AA, Zaidan BB, Hamzah AK, Bahbibi R (2018) Decision-making solution based multi-measurement design parameter for optimization of gps receiver tracking channels in static and dynamic real-time positioning multipath environment. Measurement 118:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  130. Alamoodi AH et al (2022) Hospital selection framework for remote MCD patients based on fuzzy q-rung orthopair environment. Neural Comput Appl 10(15):23–33

    Google Scholar 

  131. Albahri AS et al (2022) Towards physician’s experience: Development of machine learning model for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders based on complex T-spherical fuzzy-weighted zero. Comput Intell 15(13):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  132. Qahtan S, Alsattar HA, Zaidan AA, Pamucar D, Deveci M (2022) Integrated sustainable transportation modelling approaches for electronic passenger vehicle in the context of industry 5.0. J Innov Knowl 7(4):100277

    Google Scholar 

  133. Qahtan S et al (2023) Review of healthcare industry 4.0 application-based blockchain in terms of security and privacy development attributes: comprehensive taxonomy, open issues and challenges and recommended solution. J Netw Comput Appl 209:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  134. Alamoodi AH et al (2021) Machine learning-based imputation soft computing approach for large missing scale and non-reference data imputation. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 151:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  135. Mohammed RT et al (2020) Review of the research landscape of multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking processes for many-objective optimisation methods: coherent taxonomy, challenges and recommended. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 19(06):1619–1693

    Google Scholar 

  136. Abdulnab M et al (2020) A distributed framework for health information exchange using smartphone technologies. J Biomed Inform 69:230–250

    Google Scholar 

  137. Mohsin AH et al (2020) Real-time remote health monitoring systems using body sensor information and finger vein biometric verification: a multi-layer systematic review. J Med Syst 42(12):220–238

    Google Scholar 

  138. Talal M et al (2020) Smart home-based IoT for real-time and secure remote health monitoring of triage and priority system using body sensors: multi-driven systematic review. J Med Syst 43(42):23–44

    Google Scholar 

  139. Albahri AS et al (2021) IoT-based telemedicine for disease prevention and health promotion: state-of-the-Art. J Netw Comput Appl 173:102–130

    Google Scholar 

  140. Gokasar I et al (2023) Evaluation of the alternatives of introducing electric vehicles in developing countries using Type-2 neutrosophic numbers based RAFSI model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 192:122589

    Google Scholar 

  141. Deveci M et al (2023) Evaluation of cooperative intelligent transportation system scenarios for resilience in transportation using type-2 neutrosophic fuzzy VIKOR. Trans Res Part A Policy Pract 172:103666

    Google Scholar 

  142. Mohammed RT et al (2023) A decision modelling approach for smart e-tourism data management applications based on spherical fuzzy rough environment. Appl Soft Comput 126:110297

    Google Scholar 

  143. Zain A et al (2023) Uncertainty decision modeling approach for control engineering tools to support industrial cyber-physical metaverse smart manufacturing systems. IEEE Syst 120:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  144. Baqer MJ (2023) A decision modeling approach for data acquisition systems of the vehicle industry based on interval-valued linear diophantine fuzzy set. Int J Inform Technol Decis Mak 24(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  145. Qahtan S et al (2023) A decision modeling approach for smart training environment with motor imagery-based brain computer interface under neutrosophic cubic fuzzy set. Expert Syst Appl 224:119991

    Google Scholar 

  146. Qahtan S, Alsattar HA, Zaidan AA, Deveci M, Pamucar D, Martinez L (2023) A comparative study of evaluating and benchmarking sign language recognition system-based wearable sensory devices using a single fuzzy set. Knowl-Based Syst 269:110519

    Google Scholar 

  147. Qahtan S et al (2023) Performance assessment of sustainable transportation in the shipping industry using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough sets-based decisioning. Methodology 223:119958

    Google Scholar 

  148. Qahtan S et al (2023) Evaluation of agriculture-food 4.0 supply chain approaches using Fermatean probabilistic hesitant-fuzzy sets based decision making model. Appl Soft Comput 138:110170

    Google Scholar 

  149. Ansaef AA et al (2023) Review of artificial neural networks-contribution methods integrated with structural equation modelling and multi-criteria decision analysis for selection customization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 124:106643

    Google Scholar 

  150. Mohammed ZK et al (2023) Bitcoin network-based anonymity and privacy model for metaverse implementation in Industry 5.0 using linear Diophantine fuzzy sets. Ann Oper Res 327:1–41

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Techniques Engineering Department, Mazaya University College, Nassiriya, Thi-Qar, 12733, Iraq

    O. S. Albahri

  2. Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

    Mohammed S. Al-Samarraay & A. H. Alamoodi

  3. Department of Business Administration, College of Administrative Science, The University of Mashreq, Baghdad, 10021, Iraq

    H. A. AlSattar

  4. SP Jain School of Global Management, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 2141, Australia

    A. A. Zaidan

  5. Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics, Baghdad, 10022, Iraq

    A. S. Albahri

  6. Future Technology Research Center, College of Future, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin, 64002, Taiwan

    B. B. Zaidan

  7. Foundation of Alshuhda, Baghdad, Iraq

    Ali Najm Jasim

  8. MEU Research Unit, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan

    H. A. AlSattar

Authors
  1. O. S. Albahri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammed S. Al-Samarraay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. A. AlSattar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. H. Alamoodi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. A. Zaidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. S. Albahri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. B. Zaidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ali Najm Jasim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Zaidan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albahri, O.S., Al-Samarraay, M.S., AlSattar, H.A. et al. Rough Fermatean fuzzy decision-based approach for modelling IDS classifiers in the federated learning of IoMT applications. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 22531–22549 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08933-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08933-y

Keywords