Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Localization algorithm for anisotropic wireless sensor networks based on the adaptive chaotic slime mold algorithm

  • S.I.: Evolutionary Computation based Methods and Applications for Data Processing
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the poor localization accuracy of anisotropic localization algorithms, an adaptive chaotic slime mold algorithm called TSMA is proposed to optimize node localization in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). The adaptive chaos mechanism is first applied to the slime mold algorithm (SMA) to initialize the population using the tent map of the chaotic map with the goal of increasing the diversity of the population. Then, global and local search capabilities can be combined by setting an adaptive chaotic oscillation factor during the iterative algorithm optimization. A new localization algorithm combining PDM and TSMA is proposed in the anisotropic localization environment of WSNs. The localization performance of PDM–TSMA is further improved due to the use of anchor node screening and a feasible domain-limiting strategy. According to the simulation results, the proposed algorithm improves the localization performance by 28% and 46% on average in three different environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y et al (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bebortta S, Senapati D, Rajput KN et al (2020) Evidence of power-law behavior in cognitive IoT applications. Neural Comput Appl 32(20):16043–16055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu Y, Zhao CC, Dai GL, Hu CJ (2008) Research on node location technology in wireless sensor networks. Comput Sci 35(05):47–50

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peng Y, Wang D (2011) Survey of localization technology in wireless sensor networks. J Electron Meas Instrum 25(05):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo Q, Yan X, Li J et al (2016) DEDF: lightweight WSN distance estimation using RSSI data distribution-based fingerprinting. Neural Comput Appl 27(6):1567–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang H, Song ZX, Shi Y, Li N, Zhang FW (2008) Research on TOA positioning technology based on UWB. J Jilin Univ (Inf Sci Ed) 01:106–110

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xiong JY, Wang W, Zhu ZL (2004) Cellular TDOA localization algorithm based on Taylor series expansion. J Commun 04:144–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mao YY, Li MY, Zhang BJ (2009) A TOA/AOA localization algorithm in NLOS environment. J Electron Inf Technol 31(01):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu XW, Yu H et al (2019) APIT localization algorithm based on weighted hybrid filtering and gravity center method. J Beijing Univ Posts Telecommun 42(04):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma SL, Zhao JP (2016) DV-Hop localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks with multiple communication radius. J Sens Technol 29(04):593–600

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lim H, Hou JC (2005) Localization for anisotropic sensor networks. In: Infocom joint conference of the IEEE computer & communications societies IEEE. IEEE

  12. Gong ZJ (2006) Research on self-localization algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Ocean University of China

  13. Lu Z, Zhang Y (2014) Research on hybrid optimization of node localization algorithm in WSN. Appl Comput Syst 23(07):121–125

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu ZZ, Cheng LL, Li QJ (2018) Anisotropic MDS-MAP(PDM) localization algorithm based on distance estimation modification. Ind Control Comput 31(04):87–89

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li S, Chen H, Wang M et al (2020) Slime mold algorithm: a new method for stochastic optimization. Futur Gener Comput Syst 111:300–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo YX, Liu S, Zhang L, Huang Q (2021) Improved slime mold algorithm based on elite reverse and quadratic interpolation. Appl Res Comput 38(12):3651–3656

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fan J, Zhang X (2009) Analysis of piecewise logistic chaotic map and its performance. Acta Electron Sin 37(04):720–725

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J, Qin JT (2022) Improved seagull optimization algorithm based on chaotic mapping and T-distribution mutation strategy. Comput Appl Res 39(01):170–176

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tong BB, He Q, Chen J (2021) Adaptive Salp swarm algorithm based on chaotic Map. J Sens Technol 34(01):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dong LF, Chen Y, Wu G (2019) Dynamic learning of chaotic mapping particle swarm optimization algorithm. Comput Appl Res 36(05):1319–1322

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang (2012) Comparative study on optimization performance of different 1d chaotic maps. Comput Appl Res 29(03):913–915

    Google Scholar 

  22. Teng ZJ, Lu JL, Guo L et al (2018) An improved algorithm of hybrid gray wolf optimization based on tent mapping. J Harbin Inst Technol 50(11):40–49

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao YN, Sun X, Li SP et al (2021) Speed control of brushless DC motor based on chaotic elite slime mold algorithm. Sci Technol Eng 21(28):12130–12138

    Google Scholar 

  24. Qiu ZR, Miao H et al (2023) Improved slime mould algorithm with multi-strategy fusion. J Comput Appl 43(3):812–819

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu CH, H Q (2023) Adaptive artificial bee colony slime mold algorithm with improved crossover operator. J Chin Comput Syst 44(2):263–268

  26. Yang X (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: Gonzalez JR, Pelta DA, Cruz C et al (eds) Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Xue JK, Shen B (2020) A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Control Eng 8(1):22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu X, Mu XD et al (2021) Chaotic sparrow search optimization algorithm. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 47(08):1712–1720

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Surya V, Senthilselvi A et al (2022) Identification of oil authenticity and adulteration using deep long short-term memory-based neural network with seagull optimization algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 34(10):7611–7625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pandey A, Rajan A, Nandi A et al (2021) Lifetime enhancement of sensor networks by the moth flame optimization. Wirel Pers Commun 118(4):2807–2820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu K, Zhao LL, Wang H (2020) A whale optimization algorithm based on elite inverse and longitudinal crossover. Small Microcomput Syst 41(10):2092–2097

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peng D, Gao YW (2022) Proximity-distance mapping and Jaya optimization algorithm based on localization for wireless sensor network. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 36:06

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62265010; 62061024), Supported by Gansu University Innovation Fund Project (No. 2020A-021) for financial support.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China

    Duo Peng & Yuwei Gao

Authors
  1. Duo Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuwei Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DP was contributed to conception or design of the work, critical revision of the article, drafting the article. YG was contributed to conception or design of the work, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duo Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All coauthors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript, and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Consent for publication

The authors give full permission for the publication of the article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, D., Gao, Y. Localization algorithm for anisotropic wireless sensor networks based on the adaptive chaotic slime mold algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 25291–25306 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09026-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09026-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation