Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling user context with applications to media retrieval

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Multimedia Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a theoretical understanding of multi-sensory knowledge and user context and their inter-relationships. This is used to develop a generic representation framework for multi-sensory knowledge and context. A representation framework for context can have a significant impact on media applications that dynamically adapt to user needs. There are three key contributions of this work: (a) theoretical analysis, (b) representation framework and (c) experimental validation. Knowledge is understood to be a dynamic set of multi-sensory facts with three key properties – multi-sensory, emergent and dynamic. Context is the dynamic subset of knowledge that affects the communication between entities. We develop a graph based, multi-relational representation framework for knowledge, and model its temporal dynamics using a linear dynamical system. Our approach results in a stable and convergent system. We applied our representation framework to a image retrieval system with a large collection of photographs from everyday events. Our experimental validation with the retrieval evaluated against two reference algorithms indicates that our context based approach provides significant gains in real-world usage scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ConceptNet. http://web.media.mit.edu/~hugo/conceptnet

  2. OpenCyc. http://www.opencyc.org

  3. Appan, P., Sundaram, H.: Networked multimedia event exploration. In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2004, also AME TR-2004-10, pp. 40–47, October 2004, New York (2004)

  4. Atkinson R., Shiffrin R. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence K., Spence J. (eds) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benitez, A.B., Smith, J.R., Chang, S.-F.: MediaNet: a multimedia information network for knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of the 2000 SPIE Conference on Internet Multimedia Management Systems (IS&T/SPIE-2000), November 6–8, 2000, Boston (2000)

  6. Chen C.-T. (1999). Linear Systems Theory and Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen W. (2004). Self-directedness, integration and higher cognition. Lang. Sci. 26(6):661–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox, I.J., Miller, M.L., Minka, T.P., Papathomas, T.V., Yianilos, P.N.: The bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: theory, implementation and psychophysical experiments. IEEE Trans. Image Processing – Special Issue on Digital Libraries (2000)

  9. Dey, A.K.: Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications. College of Computing. Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology, PhD Dissertation (2000)

  10. Dey A.K. (2001). Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. J. 5(1):4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D.: Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 21–28, October 20–21, 1999, San Francisco (1999)

  12. Dey, A.K., Futakawa, M., Salber, D., Abowd, G.D.: The conference assistant: combining context-awareness with wearable computing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 21–28, October 20–21, 1999, San Francisco (1999)

  13. Dourish P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 8(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg S. (2001). Context as a dynamic construct. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hyvonen, E., Saarela, S., Viljanen, K.: Ontogator: combining view- and ontology-based search with semantic browsing. In: Proceedings of XML, October 30–31, 2003, Kuopio (2003)

  16. Jakobson R. (1960). Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok T. (eds) Style in Language. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 350–377

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman H., Selker T. (2000). Out of context: computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context. IBM Syst. J. 39(3,4):617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Littman, M.L., Cassandra, A.R., Kaelbling, L.P.: Learning policies for partially observable environments: scaling up. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, July 1995, Lake Tahoe (1995)

  19. Liu H., Lieberman H. (2002). Robust Photo Retrieval Using World Semantics. LREC, Las Palmas, Canary Islands

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu H., Singh P. (2004). ConceptNet: a practical commonsense reasoning toolkit. BT Technol. J. 22(4):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Makarios, S., Guha, R.: A First Order Theory of Contexts, Context 2005, Paris (2005)

  22. Miller G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller G.A., Beckwith R., Fellbaum C. (1993). Introduction to WordNet: an on-line lexical database. Int. J. Lexicography 3(4):235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murphy, K., Freeman, W.: Contextual Models for Object Detection using Boosted Random Fields. NIPS’04 (2004)

  25. O’sullivan, D., McLoughlin, E., Bertolotto, M., Wilson, D.: Context-Oriented Image Retrieval. Context 2005, Paris (2005)

  26. Pomerol, J.-C., Brezillon, P.: About Some Relationships Between Knowledge and Context. Context-01, Dundee, Scotland (2001)

  27. Rui, Y., Huang, T.: A novel relevance feedback technique in image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia 1999, Orlando, FL (1999)

  28. Schilit B.N., Theimer M.M. (1994). Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Netw. 8(5):22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shevade, B., Sundaram, H.: Incentive Based Image Annotation. Arts Media and Engineering Program, Arizona State University, AME-TR-2004-02, January 2004 (2004)

  30. Smeulders A.W.M., Worring M., Santini S., Gupta A., Jain R. (2000). Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(12):1349–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Suchman L.A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Theocharous, G., Murphy, K., Kaelbling, L.P.: Representing hierarchical POMDPs as DBNs for multi-scale robot localization. Workshop on Reasoning about Uncertainty in Robotics, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico (2003)

  33. Veeramachaneni, S., Sarkar, P., Nagy, G.: Modeling Context as Statistical Dependence. Context 2005, Paris (2005)

  34. Winograd, T.: Architectures for Context. http://hci.stanford.edu/~winograd/papers/context/context.pdf (2001)

  35. Wu, G., Chang, E.Y., Panda, N.: Formulating context-dependent similarity functions. ACM Multimedia, pp. 725–734, Singapore (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur Mani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mani, A., Sundaram, H. Modeling user context with applications to media retrieval. Multimedia Systems 12, 339–353 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-006-0054-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-006-0054-9

Keywords

Navigation