Skip to main content
Log in

Predictor–corrector Obreshkov pairs

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of predictor–corrector (PEC) pairs of Adams methods can be generalized to high derivative methods using Obreshkov quadrature formulae. It is convenient to construct predictor–corrector pairs using a combination of explicit (Adams–Bashforth for traditional PEC methods) and implicit (Adams–Moulton for traditional PEC methods) forms of the methods. This paper will focus on one special case of a fourth order method consisting of a two-step predictor followed by a one-step corrector, each using second derivative formulae. There is always a choice in predictor–corrector pairs of the so-called mode of the method and we will consider both PEC and PECE modes. The Nordsieck representation of Adams methods, as developed by C. W. Gear and others, adapts well to the multiderivative situation and will be used to make variable stepsize convenient. In the first part of the paper we explain the basic approximations used in the predictor–corrector formula. Those can be written in terms of Obreshkov quadrature. Next section we discuss the equations in terms of Nordsieck vectors. This provides an opportunity to extend the Gear Nordsieck factorization to achieve a variable stepsize formulation. Numerical tests with the new method are also discussed. The paper will present Prothero–Robinson and Kepler problem to illustrate the power of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nordsieck A (1962) On numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. Math Comput 16(77):22–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Obreshkov N (1981) Sochineniya. Tom 2, Bŭlgar. Akad. Nauk, Sofia

  3. Hairer E, Nørsett SP, Wanner G (1993) Solving ordinary differential equations I. Nonstiff problems. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Butcher JC (2008) Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gear WC (1971) Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bashforth F, Adams JC (1883) An Attempt to test the Theories of Capillary Action by comparing the theoretical and measured forms of drops of fluid. In: Adams JC (ed) With an explanation of the method of integration employed in constructing the tables which give the theoretical forms of such drops. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hull TE, Enright WH, Fellen BM, Sedgwick AE (1972) Comparing numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 9(4):603–637

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Milne WE (1949) Numerical calculus. Princeton University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The second author acknowledges partial support from the Brno University of Technology, project no. FSI-S-11-3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavla Sehnalová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butcher, J.C., Sehnalová, P. Predictor–corrector Obreshkov pairs. Computing 95, 355–371 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0258-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0258-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation