Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

They do! How the explicit motive-structure predicts user behavior in (business-) social network sites like Xing or LinkedIn

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the massive influence of business related social network sites (SBNSs) like Xing or LinkedIn regarding our professional networking-behavior, little is known about how motivational components (especially considering the ‘Big Three Motives’ affiliation, achievement and power motive) affect user behavior in SNSs. The study’s findings indicate that the explicit conscious affiliation, achievement and power motive were related to different networking outcomes. While the explicit affiliation motive predicted the percentage of colleagues in the contact list, the total amount of SBNS contacts was predicted by the explicit power motive. Also, people with high explicit achievement motivation networked significantly more often with persons of lower hierarchical status unlike people with less achievement motivated characteristics. This presents us with new research results and closes an empirical gap in motive research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enders A, Hungenberg H, Denker H, Mauch S (2008) The long tail of social networking.: revenue models of social networking sites. Eur Manag J 26(3):199–211. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter A, Koch M (2008) Functions of social networking services. In: 8th International conference on the design of cooperative systems, COOP 2008, Carry-le-rouet, France, pp 87–98

  3. Schaefer C (2008) Motivations and usage patterns on social network sites. In: 16th European conference on information systems, Galway, Ireland

  4. Katz E, Gurevitch M, Haas H (1973) On the use of the mass media for important things. Am Sociol Rev 38(2):164–181. doi:10.2307/2094393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Janneck M, Bayerl PS, Dietel J-E (2013) The minimal group paradigm in virtual teams. In: Holzinger A, Ziefle M, Hitz M, Debevc M (eds) Human factors in computing and informatics, first international conference, SouthCHI 2013, Maribor, Slovenia, July 1–3, 2013. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 457–476. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_29

  6. Heser K, Banse R, Imhoff R (2015) Affiliation or power: What motivates behavior on social networking sites? Swiss J Psychol 74(1):37–47. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross C, Orr ES, Sisic M, Arseneault JM, Simmering MG, Orr RR (2009) Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav 25(2):578–586. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lallez R (1980) The elements of motivation: the psychologist’s viewpoint. Eur J Eng Educ 5(1):53–68. doi:10.1080/03043798008903502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Köhler A (2009) Zur Validität reaktionszeitbasierter Motivmessung im Kontext der Personalauswahl. Dissertation, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Hamburg, Germany

  10. Sokolowski K, Schmalt H-D (2010) MMG-C. Das Multi-Motiv-Gitterfür Anschluss, Leistung und Macht in der Computerdarbietung. Handanweisung, Schuhfried, Mödling

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schultheiss OC, Campbell KL, McClelland DC (1999) Implicit power motivation moderates men’s testosterone responses to imagined and real dominance success. Horm Behav 36(3):234–241. doi:10.1006/hbeh.1999.1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winter DG (1992) Power motivation revisited. In: Smith CP (ed) Motivation and personality. Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York Victoria, pp 301–310. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527937.022

  13. Bräuer H (2005) Interaktionsprozesse in Lerngruppen—Empirische Analyse des dynamischen Zusammenwirkens von Verhalten, sozialen Motiven und emotionalem Erleben. Dissertation, University Lüneburg, Germany

  14. Winter DG, John OP, Stewart AJ, Klohnen EC, Duncan LE (1998) Traits and motives: toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychol Rev 105(2):230–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spangler WD, House RJ, Palrecha R (2004) Personality and leadership. In: Schneider B, Smith B (eds) Personality and organizations. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 251–290

    Google Scholar 

  16. McClelland DC, Koestner R, Weinberger J (1989) How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychol Rev 96(4):690–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McClelland DC (1985) How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. Am Psychol 40(7):812–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stumpf H, Angleitner A, Wieck T, Jackson DN, Beloch-Till H (1985) Deutsche personality research form. Handanweisung, Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sokolowski K, Schmalt H-D, Langens TA, Puca RM (2000) Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). J Personal Assess 74(1):126–145. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA740109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Langens TA, Schmalt H-D, Sokolowski K (2005) Motivmessung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. In: Vollmeyer R, Brunstein JC (eds) Motivationspsychologie und ihre Anwendung. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 70–89

    Google Scholar 

  21. McClelland MC, Koestner R (1992) The achievement motive. In: Smith CP (ed) Motivation and personality. Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, Victoria, pp 143–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Schultheiss OC (2008) Implicit motives. In: John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 603–633

    Google Scholar 

  23. Winter DG (1992) A revised scoring system for the power motive. In: Smith CP (ed) Motivation and personality. Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York Victoria, pp 311–418

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietel J-E (2015) Do They? About the possible motive-related influence on user behavior in (business-) Social Network Sites. A theoretical state of research. In: International conference on web information systems and technologies, SCITEPRESS Digital Library—Science and Technology Publications, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 662–669

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Work- and Organizational Psychology, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 11, 20146, Hamburg, Germany

    Jana-Eva Dietel

Authors
  1. Jana-Eva Dietel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana-Eva Dietel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dietel, JE. They do! How the explicit motive-structure predicts user behavior in (business-) social network sites like Xing or LinkedIn. Computing 99, 537–550 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-017-0545-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-017-0545-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation