Abstract
While there is agreement among both information system (IS) practitioners and IS researchers as to the value of user participation in IS development, the correlation between user participation and actual use or user satisfaction (surrogate measures of IS success) has been equivocal. A possible reason for the contradictory findings could be that user participation is being utilised, regardless of the levels of complexity of either the system or the task. This paper describes two exploratory case studies to test this hypothesis. Industrial hypermedia applications (IHA) were developed and qualitative data collected, through usability trials, to see the effect of user participation on user perception (extrinsic motivations of use) of the system, rather than IS success. The findings show that users should participate in the development when both the IS and the task are complex. On the other hand, when both the system and the task are not complex, user participation can be kept to a minimum. Furthermore, it is recommended that user participation should not be evaluated against IS success, but against system features.

Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Multiple regression is a means of establishing the relative importance of the independent variable to the dependent variable. Standard multiple regression implies that the researcher completely specifies the set of independent variables to be included in the model [27].
Cronbach’s alpha (0 ≤ alpha ≤ 1) is a measure of the extent to which item responses obtained at the same time correlate highly with each other.
References
Igbaria M, Guimarães T (1994) Empirically testing the outcomes of user involvement in DSS development. OMEGA: Int J Manage Sci 22(2):157–172
Jackson CM, Chow S, Leitch RA (1997) Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use an information system. Decision Sci 28(2):357–389
McKeen JD, Guimarães T, Wetherbe JC (1994) The relationship between user participation, user satisfaction: an investigation of four contingency factors. MIS Q 18(4):427–451
Baroudi JJ, Olson MH, Ives B (1986) An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Commun ACM 29(3):232–238
Hartwick J, Barki H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Manage Sci 40(4):440–465
Ives B, Olson MH (1984) User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manage Sci 30(5):586–603
Hwang MI, Thorn RG (1999) The effect of user engagement on system success: a meta-analytical integration of research findings. Inf Manage 35(4):229–236
McKeen JD, Guimarães T (1997) Successful strategies for user participation in systems development. J Manage Inf Syst 14(2):133–150
Hunton JE, Beeler JD (1997) Effects of user participation in systems development: a longitudinal field experiment. MIS Q 21(4):359–388
Lowe D, Hall W (1999) Hypermedia and the web: an engineering approach. Wiley, Chichester
Smith PA, Newman IA, Parks LM (1997) Virtual hierarchies and virtual networks: some lessons from hypermedia usability research applied to the world wide web. Int J Hum Comput Stud 47:67–95
Shneiderman B (1997) Designing information abundant web sites: issues and recommendations. Int J Hum Comput Stud 47:5–29
Smith PA (1996) Toward a practical measure of hypertext usability. Interact Comput 8(4):365–381
Koshy TT, Gramopadhye AK, Kennedy WJ, Ramu NV (1996) Application of hypertext technology to assist maintenance on the shop floor. Comput Ind Eng 30(2):283–295
Eason KD (1991) Ergonomic perspectives on advances in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics 34(6):721–741
Dillon A, McKnight C (1995) Never mind the theory, feel the data: observations on the design of hypertext-based user interfaces. In: Schuler W, Hannemann J, Streitz JN (eds) Designing user interfaces for hypermedia. Research reports ESPRIT project 6532 HIFI, vol 1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 117–125
Nanard J, Nanard M (1995) Hypertext design environments and the hypertext design process. Commun ACM 38(8):49–56
Kasvi JJJ, Nieminen M, Pulkkis A, Vartiainen M (1998) Knowledge management on the shop-floor, In: Karwowski W, Goonetilleke R (eds) Manufacturing agility and hybrid automation – II. IEA Press, Santa Monica, pp 168–171
Garzotto F, Mainetti L, Paolini P (1995) Hypermedia design, analysis and evaluation issues. Commun ACM 38(8):74–85
Isakowitz T, Stohr EA, Balasupramanian P (1995) RMM: a methodology for structured hypermedia design. Commun ACM 38(8):34–44
Schwabe D, Rossi G (1995) The object-oriented hypermedia model. Commun ACM 38(8):45–46
Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organ Behav Hum Decision Process 37(1):60–82
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 35(8):982–1003
Davis FD, Venkatesh V (1996) A critical assessment of potential biases in the technology acceptance model: 3 experiments. Int J Man Mach Stud 45:19–45
Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 38:475–487
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: a development and test. Decision Sci 27(3):451–481
Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Morris MG, Dillon A (1997) How user perceptions influence software use. IEEE Softw 14(4):58–65
Torkzadeh G, Dwyer DJ (1994) A path analytic study of determinants of information system usage. OMEGA: Int J Manage Sci 22(4):339–348
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: The post-usability questionnaire
Appendix: The post-usability questionnaire
Please circle the number that best reflects your feelings.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fakun, D., Greenough, R.M. An exploratory study into whether to or not to include users in the development of industrial hypermedia applications. Requirements Eng 9, 57–66 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-003-0180-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-003-0180-2