Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A framework for virtual organization requirements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Requirements Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual organizations (VOs) are formed by an alliance of organizations linked by a partnership for dealing with emerging challenges. Information and communication technologies play a fundamental role facilitating cooperation, communication and collaboration among the VO members. The formal identification and representation of Requirements Engineering (RE) for one organization have been researched to a large extent along with several elicitation techniques. However, these techniques are not adequate for covering the major challenges of RE for VO. We explore the work done in the management and RE fields to propose a model-based framework for eliciting VOs’ requirements. The goal is to analyze the VO from two points of view: border (intra-organizational, inter-organizational and extra-organizational) and abstract (intentional, organizational and operational). This article includes the framework validation with a case study and a transformation process to develop partial Business Process Diagram from the intentional models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://smecollaborate.com/.

  2. http://ecolead.vtt.fi/.

  3. http://www.ugrtabasco.com/.

  4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

  5. Yaoqiang BPMN Editor http://sourceforge.net/projects/bpmn/.

References

  1. Atkinson RD, Stackpole LE, Yokley J (1994) Developing the scientific-technical digital library at a national laboratory. In: Adam Nabil R, Bhargava Bharat K, Yesha Y (eds) Digital libraries workshop DL ’94. Springer, Berlin, pp 265–279

  2. OUSD AT&L (2008) Systems engineering guide for systems of systems. In: Technical Report 66, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. Washington, DC, Pentagon

  3. Barnett W, Presley A, Johnson M, Liles DH (1994) An architecture for the virtual enterprise. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, humans, information and technology, vol 1, pp 506–511

  4. Barthelemy JAD (2003) The seven deadly sins of outsourcing. Acad Manag Exec 17(2):87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Basole RC, Rouse WB (2008) Complexity of service value networks: conceptualisation and empirical investigation. IBM Syst J 47(1):53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bastien JM, Scapin DL (1993) Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human–computer interfaces. Technical Report

  7. Benaben F, Lauras M, Truptil S, Lamothe J (2012) Mise 3.0: an agile support for collaborative situation. Collaborative networks in the internet of services, pp 645–654

  8. Berthier N (2000) Les techniques d’enquête en sciences sociales. Méthode et exercices corrigés. Armand Colin/HER, Paris, France

  9. Bodey KL (2008) Contrasting the four franchising imperatives across hybridised governance models. PhD thesis, Griffith Business School

  10. Bouarfa H, Abed M (2005) Acquisition of tacit knowledge in virtual organizations. In: CIMCA/IAWTIC, pp 383–388. IEEE Computer Society

  11. Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1996) Inside intel. Harv Bus Rev 74:168–175

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks FP Jr (1986) No silver bullet essence and accidents of software engineering. International Federation of Information Processing (Invited Paper), pp 1069–1076

  13. Burn J, Marshall P, Wild M (1999) Managing knowledge for strategic advantage in the virtual organisation. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPR conference on computer personnel research, New Orleans, USA 8–10 April 1999, pp 19–26

  14. Camarinha-Matos L, Afsarmanesh H (2005) Brief historical perspective for virtual organizations, Springer, US, pp 3–10

  15. Camarinha-Matos LM, Afsarmanesh H (1999) The virtual enterprise concept. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC5 WG5. 3/PRODNET working conference on infrastructures for virtual enterprises: networking industrial enterprises, p 14. Kluwer, BV

  16. Camarinha-Matos LM, Afsarmanesh H (2003) A roadmap for strategic research on virtual organizations. In: Proceedings of IFIP working conference on virtual enterprises—PRO-VE’03, Lugano, Switzerland, pp 33–46

  17. Charalabidis Y, Lampathaki F, Koussouris S, Mouzakitis S (2012) Envisioning future internet enterprise systems: visionary scenarios and new research areas. In: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences. Enterprise Interoperability V, vol 5. Springer, London, pp 259–269

  18. Cheng Betty HC, Atlee Joanne M (2007) Research directions in requirements engineering. In: FOSE ’07: 2007 future of software engineering, pp 285–303, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society

  19. Cheng S, Xu X, Wang G, Li Q (2005) An agile method of modeling business process simulation for virtual enterprises. In: IEEE international conference on e-business engineering

  20. Cortes-Cornax M, Matei A, Letier E, Dupuy-Chessa S, Rieu D (2012) Intentional fragments: bridging the gap between organizational and intentional levels in business processes. In: On the move to meaningful internet systems, OTM 2012. pp 110–127

  21. Dardenne A, Lamsweerde AV, Fickas S (1993) Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci Comput Progr 20(1):3–50

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Davidow ZH, Malone MS (1992) The virtual corporation: structuring and revitalizing the corporation for the 21st century. T. Harper Business, NY

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dimitrakos T (2012) A perspective on the evolution of the international trust management research community in the last decade. In: Dimitrakos T, Moona R, Patel D, Harrison McKnight D (eds) Trust management VI, vol 374 of IFIP advances in information and communication technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 267–280

  24. Elmuti D, Kathawala Y (2001) An overview of strategic alliance. Manag Decis 39(3):205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Essig M (2000) Purchasing consortia as symbiotic relationships: developing the concept of consortium sourcing. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 6(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldman SL, Nagel RN, Preiss K (1995) Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gordijn J (2002) Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

  28. Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strateg Manag J 19(4):293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am J Sociol 104(5):1439–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Handy C (1995) Trust and the virtual organization: How do you manage people whom you do not see? Harv Bus Rev 73(3):40–50

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hoffman DL, Novak TP (2000) How to acquire customers on the web. Harv Bus Rev 78(3):179–188

    Google Scholar 

  32. Inkpen AC, Currall SC (2004) The coevolution of trust, control and learning in joint ventures. Organ Sci 15(5):586–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jureta I, Faulkner S, Kolp M (2006) Formalizing agent-oriented enterprise models, vol 3529. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kanter RM (1994) Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances. Harv Bus Rev 72(4):96–108

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kogut B (1988) Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strateg Manag J 9:319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kovacs B, Gaunet F, Briffault X (2004) Les techniques d’analyse de l’activité pour l’IHM. Hermes Science, Lavoisier

  37. Lawler EE, Worley CG (2006) Built to change: how to achieve sustained organizational effectiveness. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  38. Longépé C (2003) The enterprise architecture IT project: the urbanisation paradigm. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maguire M (2001) Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Human Comput Stud 55(4):587–634

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Maiden NAM (1998) Crews-savre: scenarios for acquiring and validating requirements. J Autom Softw Eng 5(4):419–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marshall P, McKay J, Burn J (1999) The three S’s of virtual organisations: structure, strategy and success factors. Edith Cowan University, School of Management Information Systems

  42. Mazzeschi M (2001) The virtual organisation. In: 7th international conference on concurrent enterprising, pp 331–335

  43. Mich L, Franch M, Novi Inverardi P (2002) Market research for requirements analysis using linguistic tools. Technical Report 66, University of Trento

  44. Moody DL (2009) The “Physics” of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 35(6):756–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Morley C, Hugues J, Leblanc B, Hugues O (2005) Processus Métiers et systèmes d’information: Evaluation, modélisation, mise en oeuvre

  46. Mowshowitz A (1986) Social dimensions of office automation. Adv Comput 25:335–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nurcan S, Barrios J, Rolland C (2002) Une methode pour la definition de l’impact organisationnel du changement. In: XXème Congrès INFORSID, Nantes, pp 4–7

  48. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In: ICSE ’00: Proceedings of the conference on the future of software engineering, pp 35–46, New York, NY, USA. ACM

  49. OMG (2010) Bpmn 2.0 by example version 1.0 (non-normative). Technical Report 2, Object Management Group

  50. OMG (2010) Business process model and notation (BPMN). Technical Report 2, Object Management Group

  51. Parung J, Bititci US (2006) A conceptual metric for managing collaborative networks. J Model Manag 1(2):116–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Porter ME (2001) Strategy and the internet. Harv Bus Rev 79(3):62–79

    Google Scholar 

  53. Priego-Roche L, Thom L, Front A, Rieu D, Mendling J (2012) Business process design from virtual organization intentional models. In: Advanced information systems engineering (CAISE 2012), pp 549–564. Springer

  54. Priego-Roche LM, Rieu D, Front A (2009) A \(360^{\circ }\) vision for virtual organizations characterization and modelling: two intentional level aspects. In: 9th IFIP conference on software services for e-business, e-services, and e-society (I3E2009), pp 427–442

  55. Priego-Roche LM (2011) Intentional and organizational information systems modelling for virtual organizations. PhD thesis, University of Grenoble

  56. Robinson P, Karabulut Y Haller J (2005) Dynamic virtual organization management service oriented enterprise applications. In: IEEE international conference on collaborative computing: networking, applications and worksharing

  57. Rolland C, Prakash N (2000) Bridging the gap between organisational needs and ERP functionality. Requir Eng J 5:180–193

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Roseman M, Greenberg S (1992) Groupkit: a groupware toolkit for building real-time. Conferencing applications. In: CSCW’92

  59. Rubin PH (1978) The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract. J Law Econ 21(1):223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Salvador T, Scholtz J, Larson J (1996) The denver model for groupware design 5Yeeeeee Haaaaaa! conferencing applications. In: CSCW, vol 92, pp 52–58

  61. Schuman H, Presser S (1996) Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, wording, and context. Sage Publications Inc, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  62. Suarez-Villa L (1998) The structures of cooperation: downscaling, outsourcing and the networked alliance. J Small Bus Econ 10(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Travica B (1997) The design of the virtual organisation: a research model. In: Associations of information systems conference, Indianapolis, pp 15–17

  64. van Lamsweerde A, Darimont R, Letier E (1998) Managing conflicts in goal-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24(11):908–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Weigand H, Johannesson P, Andersson B, Bergholtz M, Edirisuriya A, Ilayperuma T (2007) Value object analysis and the transformation from value model to process model. In: Enterprise Interoperability, Springer, London, pp 55–65

  66. Weitzenboeck EM (2011) Dynamic networks: a brief review of literature with legal relevance. In: Schartum DW, Bekken AGB (eds) Yulex, pp 31–42

  67. WFMC (1999) Terminology & glossary. Technical Report 3, Workflow Management Coalition, UK

  68. Winter R, Fischer R (2006) Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. In: Enterprise distributed object computing conference workshops, 2006. EDOCW’06. 10th IEEE international, p 30. IEEE

  69. Woolfe R, Blosch M, Sampler J (2002) 20 smart strategies. Exp Club Reports. Gartner, Inc

  70. Xu X, Ye D, Li Q, Zhan D (2000) Dynamic organization and methodology for agile virtual enterprises. J Comput Sci Technol 15(4):368–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Yang Z, Zhang JB, Low CP (2006) Towards dynamic integration on collaborative virtual enterprise using semantic web services. In: IEEE international conference on industrial informatics

  72. Yu ESK (1997) Towards modeling and reasoning support from early-phase requirements engineering. In: IEEE 3th international symposium on requirements engineering, Annapolis MD, pp 226–235

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire LIG, Equipe SIGMA BP 72, 38402, Saint Martin d’Hères, France

    Luz María Priego-Roche, Agnès Front & Dominique Rieu

Authors
  1. Luz María Priego-Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agnès Front
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dominique Rieu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz María Priego-Roche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priego-Roche, L.M., Front, A. & Rieu, D. A framework for virtual organization requirements. Requirements Eng 21, 439–460 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-015-0223-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-015-0223-5

Keywords