Skip to main content
Log in

How to manage IS requirements in complex public sector structures: toward an action design research approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Requirements Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information systems (IS) are a key enabler to improve effectiveness and efficiency in the public sector. The realization of large IS projects, however, still remains a challenge in public administrations. One reason is that the complex task of IT governance in federal structures requires contributions from a large number of stakeholders. To address this challenge, we conducted Action Design Research in cooperation with different institutions of the German labor market and developed a requirements engineering process with a corresponding IT governance in the public sector that takes complex federal structures into account. The process was successfully implemented at the German Federal Employment Agency and proved valuable to deal with 146 municipal requirements regarding an IS in the context of unemployment benefits. Moreover, we derived four general success factors with a special attention on the interleaving of requirements engineering process and IT governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The structured literature search encompasses the databases ACM Digital Library, AISeL, EBSCO Host, IEEE Xplore, Palgrave, Science Direct, Wiley, and INFORMS.

References

  1. Ali S, Green P (2006) Effective information technology governance mechanisms in public sectors: an australian case. In: Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Asia conference on informational system, Kuala Lumpur

  2. Berkovich M, Krcmar H, Leimeister JM (2011) Requirements engineering for product service systems—a state of the art analysis. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(6):369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bitkom (2013) Öffentliche Hand gibt über 20 Milliarden Euro für ITK aus. http://www.bitkom.org/de/themen/37244_78084.aspx. Accessed 28 October 2014

  4. Bloch M, Blumberg S, Laartz J (2012) Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value. McKinsey & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown AE (2005) Framing the frameworks: a review of IT governance research. Commun AIS 15:696–712

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown CV (1997) Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: evidence from a single case site. Inf Syst Res 8(1):69–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell J, McDonald C, Sethibe T (2010) Public and private sector IT governance: identifying contextual differences. Aust J Inf Syst 16(2):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cleland-Huang J (2005) Software Requirements. In: Thayer RH, Christensen MJ (eds) Software engineering—the development process, vol 1. Wiley, Chicester, pp 113–123

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn M (2004) User stories applied: for agile software development. Addison-Wesley, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coughlan J, Macredie RD (2002) Effective communication in requirements elicitation: a comparison of methodologies. Requ Eng 7(2):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun ACM 31(11):1268–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis AM (1993) Software requirements: objects, functions, and states. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. De Haes S, Van Grembergen W (2008) An exploratory study into the design of an IT governance minimum baseline through Delphi research. Communications of the AIS 22(24):443–458

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denford JS, Dawson GS, Desouza KC (2015) An argument for centralization of IT governance in the public sector. In: Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai

  15. Dufner D, Holley LM, Reed BJ (2003) Strategic information systems planning and U.S. County Government. Commun AIS 11(13):219–244

  16. European Commission (2013) ICT PSP running projects. http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/ict-psp-running-projects. Accessed 28 Oct 2014

  17. Gartner (2013) Gartner survey shows 75 percent of government CIO budgets flat or increasing in 2013. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2572815. Accessed 28 Oct 2014

  18. Goeken M, Patas DKJ (2010) Evidence-based structuring and evaluation of empirical research in requirements engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(3):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gregor S, Jones D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. J AIS 8(5):312–335

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Grembergen W (2007) Introduction to the Minitrack: IT governance and its mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa

  21. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hull E, Jackson K, Dick J (2004) Requirements engineering. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Iivari J (2003) The IS core—VII: towards information systems as a science of meta-artifacts. Commun AIS 12(37):568–581

    Google Scholar 

  24. IT Governance Institute (2003) Board briefing on IT governance. http://www.isaca.org/restricted/Documents/26904_Board_Briefing_final.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2014

  25. Jansen A, Tranvik T (2011) The state of IT governance: patterns of variation at the central government level in Norway. Proc EGOV LNCS 6846:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jarke M, Lyytinen K (2010) High impact requirements engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(3):123–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jørgensen M, Moløkken-Østvold K (2006) How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS Report. Inf Softw Techn 48(4):297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jurisch MC, Ikas C, Palka W, Wolf P, Krcmar H (2012) A review of success factors and challenges of public sector BPR implementations. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii international conference on system science, Maui

  29. Juristo N, Moreno AM, Silva A (2002) Is the European industry moving toward solving requirements engineering problems? IEEE Softw 19(6):70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karten N (1994) Managing expectations. Dorset House Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaur J, Bahri AHS (2014) Implementation of information technology governance in the malaysian public sector practice. In: Proceedings of the 18th Pacific Asia conference on information systems, Chengdu

  32. Köbler F, Fähling J, Krcmar H, Leimeister JM (2010) IT governance and types of IT decision makers in German Hospitals—an Empirical Study Among IT decision makers. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(6):359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kovitz BL (1999) Practical software requirements: a manual of content and style. Manning, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krishnan S, Teo TSH (2012) Does governance matter? Investigating the impact of governance on E-government maturity. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on information systems, Orlando

  35. Van Lamsweerde A (2009) Requirements engineering: from system goals to UML models to software specifications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Loucopoulos P, Karakostas V (1995) System requirements engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Macaulay LA (1996) Requirements engineering. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. March ST, Smith G (1995) Design and natural science research on information technologies. Dec Support Syst 15(4):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Martin S, Aurum A, Jeffery R, Paech B (2002) Requirements engineering process models in practice. In: Proceedings of the 7th Austrian workshop in requirements engineerings, Melbourne

  40. Marzullo FP, Moreira de Souza J (2009) New directions for IT Governance in the Brazilian government. Int J Electron Govern Res 5(4):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nfuka EN, Rusu L, Johannesson P, Mutagahywa B (2009) The state of IT governance in organizations from the public sector in a developing country. In: Proceedings of the 42th Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Big Island

  42. Nfuka EN, Rusu L (2010) Critical success factors for effective IT governance in the public sector organizations in a developing country: the case of Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems, Pretoria

  43. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) Requirements engineering—a roadmap. Proceedings of the conference on the future of software engineerings, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf Syst Res 12(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pang MS (2014) IT governance and business value in the public sector organizations—the role of elected representatives in IT governance and its impact on IT value in U.S. State Governments. Decis Support Syst 59:274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Piccinini E, Gregory R (2013) The nature of complexity in IS projects and programmes. In: Proceedings of the 21st European conference on information systems, Utrecht

  47. Pohl K (1993) The three dimensions of requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on advance information systems engineering, Paris

  48. Rahman AA, Haron A, Sahibuddin S, Harun M (2014) An empirical study of the software project requirements engineering practice in Malaysia public sector—a perspective from the Stakeholders’ Challenges. Int J Comp Theory Eng 6(1):52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Renzel D, Behrendt M, Klamma R, Jarke M (2013) Requirements Bazaar: social requirements engineering for community-driven innovation. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international requirements engineering conference, Rio de Janeiro

  50. Robertson S, Robertson J (2006) Mastering the requirements process. Addison-Wesley, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  51. Saiediana H, Dale R (2000) Requirements engineering: making the connection between the software developer and customer. Inf Softw Technol 42:419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Schwertsik A, Wolf P, Krcmar H (2009) IT-controlling in federal organizations. In: Proceedings of the 17th European conference on information system, Verona

  53. Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Q 35(1):37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sethibe T, Campbell J, McDonald C (2007) IT governance in public and private sector organisations: examining the differences and defining future research directions. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australasian conference on information systems, Toowoomba

  55. Sommerville I (2004) Software engineering. Pearson, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Van Velsen L, van der Geest T, ter Hedde M, Derks W (2009) Requirements engineering for e-government services: a citizen-centric approach and case study. Gov Inf Quart 26(3):477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Verner J, Cox K, Blerstein S, Cerpa N (2004) Requirements engineering and software project success: an industrial survey in Australia and the U.S. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian workshop on requirements engineering, Adelaide

  58. Weill P (2004) Don’t just lead, govern: how top performing firms govern IT. MIS Quart Exec 3(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  59. Weill P, Ross JW (2005) A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. Sloan Manag Rev 48(2):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  60. Winkler TJ (2013) IT governance mechanisms and administration/IT alignment in the public sector: a conceptual model and case validation. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig

  61. Xia W, Lee G (2005) Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development. J Manag Inf Syst 22(1):45–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zakaria NH, Haron A, Sahibuddin S, Harun M (2011) Requirement engineering critical issues in public sector software project success factor. Int J Inf Electr Eng 1(3):200–209

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Klier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klier, J., Klier, M. & Muschter, S. How to manage IS requirements in complex public sector structures: toward an action design research approach. Requirements Eng 22, 419–432 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0245-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0245-7

Keywords

Navigation