Abstract
Although user participation has become a standard ingredient of modern product design, in most cases users participate only for a moment, e.g. one afternoon. In this poster we report a case where we had users, who had participated in a generative study, return after 4 months to evaluate the resulting concept design. Our experience in this study suggests that the ‘returning participants’ had retained the sensitivity for the product context that was built up during the first study.








Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stappers PJ (2005) Creative connections: user, designers, context, and tools. J Pers Ubiquitous Comput (this issue)
Gaver W, Dunne T, Pacenti E (1999) Cultural probes. ACM Interact 6(1):21–29
Sanders EB-N (2000) Generative tools for codesigning. Collaborative design. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Sleeswijk Visser F, Stappers PJ, van der Lugt R, Sander EB-N (2005) Contextmapping: experiences from practice. J CoDesign 1(2):119–149
Sleeswijk Visser F, van der Lugt R, Stappers PJ (2004) The personal cardset—a designer-centred tool for sharing insights from user studies. In: Proceedings of second international conference on appliance design, Bristol, pp 157–158
Visser V (2005) Experiencing entrance admittance. Master’s Thesis, Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology (unpublished)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is part of the 3AD design colloquium creative connections.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sleeswijk Visser, F., Visser, V. Re-using users: co-create and co-evaluate. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10, 148–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0023-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0023-x