Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Enabling topic-level trust for collaborative information sharing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a consequence of the exponential growth of Internet and its services, including social applications fostering collaboration on the Web, information sharing had become pervasive. This caused a crescent need of more powerful tools to help users with the task of selecting interesting resources. Recommender systems have emerged as a solution to evaluate the quality of massively user-generated contents in open environments and provide recommendations based not only on the user interests but also on the opinions of people with similar tastes. In addition to interest similarity, however, trustworthiness is a factor that recommenders have to consider in the selection of reliable peers for collaboration. Most approaches in this regard estimates trust base on global user profile similarity or history of exchanged opinions. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for agent-based recommendation in which trust is independently learned and evolved for each pair of interest topics two users have in common. Experimental results show that agents learning who to trust about certain topics reach better levels of precision than considering interest similarity exclusively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://klout.com/.

  2. http://www.peerindex.net/.

  3. http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/databases/SyskillWebert/SyskillWebert.html.

References

  1. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chua FCT, Lim E-P (2010) Trust network inference for online rating data using generative models. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD ’10), pp 889–898

  3. Giménez-Lugo GA, Amandi A, Sichman J, Godoy D (2002) Enriching information agents’ knowledge by ontology comparison: a case study. In: Advances in artificial intelligence, vol 2527 of LNCS, Springer, Berlin, pp 546–555

  4. Godoy D, Amandi A (2005) User profiling for Web page filtering. IEEE Internet Comput 9(4):56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Godoy D, Amandi A (2006) A conceptual clustering approach for user profiling in personal information agents. AI Commun 19(3):207–227

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Godoy D, Amandi A (2008) Collaborative Web search based on user interest similarity. Int J Cooperat Inf Syst Spec Issue Des Implement Groupw 17(4):495–521

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golbeck J (2005) Computing and applying trust in Web-based social networks. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park

  8. Golbeck J (2006) FilmTrust: movie recommendations from semantic Web-based social networks. In: IEEE consumer communications and networking conference, pp 1314–1315

  9. Hang C-W, Singh MP (2010) Trust-based recommendation based on graph similarity. In: Proceedings of the 13th AAMAS workshop on trust in agent societies (Trust)

  10. Heckmann D (2001) Ubiquitous user modeling for situated interaction. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on user modeling (UM’2001), Sonthofen, pp 280–282

  11. Jamali M, Ester M (2009) TrustWalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD ’09), pp 397–406

  12. Jonker CM, Treur J (1999) Formal analysis of models for the dynamics of trust based on experiences. In: Proceedings of the 9th European workshop on modelling autonomous agents in a multi-agent world, pp 221–231

  13. Kim HR, Chan PK (2003) Learning implicit user interest hierarchy for context in personalization. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp 101–108

  14. Lee DH, Brusilovsky P (2009) Does trust influence information similarity?. In: ACM RecSys’09 workshop on recommender systems & the social Web

  15. Li Y, Zhong N (2006) Mining ontology for automatically acquiring Web user information needs. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 18(4):554–568

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenz A (2005) A specification for agent-based distributed user modelling in ubiquitous computing. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on decentralized, agent based and social approaches to user modelling (DASUM 2005), Edinburgh, pp 31–40

  17. Massa P, Avesani P (2007) Trust-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on recommender systems, pp 17–24

  18. Middleton S, Shadbolt N, Roure D (2004) Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):54–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Montaner M, López B, de la Rosa JL (2002) Opinion-based filtering through trust. In Springer, editor, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on cooperative information agents (CIA 2002), vol 2446 of LNCS, pp 164–178

  21. Nanas N, Uren V, De Roeck A (2003) Building and applying a concept hierarchy representation of a user profile. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 198–204

  22. O’Donovan J, Smyth B (2005) Trust in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp 167–174

  23. O’Donovan J, Smyth B (2005) Trust no one: evaluating trust-based filtering for recommenders. In: Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI’05), pp 1663–1665

  24. Papagelis M, Plexousakis D, Kutsuras T (2005) Alleviating the sparsity problem of collaborative filtering using trust inferences. In: Trust management, vol 3477 of LNCS, pp 224–239

  25. Pitsilis G, Knapskog SJ (2009) Social trust as a solution to address sparsity-inherent problems of recommender systems. In: ACM RecSys’09 workshop on recommender systems & the social Web

  26. Rodríguez MA, Egenhofer MJ (2003) Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15(2):442–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weng J, Miao C, Goh A (2006) Improving collaborative filtering with trust-based metrics. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC ’06), pp 1860–1864

  28. Zhang F, Xu S (2007) Topic-level trust in recommender systems. In: International conference on management science and engineering (ICMSE 2007), pp 156–161

  29. Ziegler C, Golbeck J (2007) Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decis Support Syst 43(2):460–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) under grant PIP No. 114-200901-00381.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ISISTAN Research Institute, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Daniela Godoy & Analía Amandi

  2. CONICET, National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Daniela Godoy & Analía Amandi

Authors
  1. Daniela Godoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Analía Amandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Godoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godoy, D., Amandi, A. Enabling topic-level trust for collaborative information sharing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16, 1065–1077 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0440-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0440-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation