Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social relation-based dynamic team organization by context-aware matchmaking

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Team is a group of people who share the common object. However, in the dynamically changing situation, the existing members may be excluded, and new members may be included. This change is one of the most critical problems, which cause the failure of the team. In this paper, we propose a way of maintaining team in spite of the member’s modification. In order to achieve this object, we employ an abstract layer between team and member. This layer provides roles to the team by hiding the members. Therefore, a team can be free from the actual members, and members can be free from binding to a specific team. The roles binding, which connects member to the team, is provided in the proposed model according to the situation by matchmaking the best suitable member for a given role. By this, even the team’s members are changed, the role, which is required in the team, can be bound to other suitable member. In the matchmaking process, it is not sufficient to find a member, who has ability to perform the required role, because a team needs a fellowship among the members. For this, a social relation is used as criteria for calculating the suitability of role binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James P. Lewis (1997) Team-based project management. AMACOM ISBN-10: 0814403646

  2. WordNet 3.0 Princeton University. Wordnetweb.princeton.edu

  3. Jacobson I, Christerson M, Jonsson P, Overgaard G (1996) Object-oriented software engineering—a use case driven approach. Addison-Wesley ISBN-10: 0201544350

  4. Kendall E (1998) Agent roles and role models: new abstraction for MAS analysis and design. In: Intelligent agents in information and process, Workshop at the 22nd German annual conference on artificial intelligence pp 35–46

  5. Becht M, Gurzki T, Klarmann J, Muscholl M (1999) ROPE: role oriented programming environment for multiagent systems. In: The fourth IFCIS conference on cooperative information systems (CoopIS’99)

  6. Nwana HS (1996) Software agents: an overview. Knowl Eng Rev 11(3):205–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wooldridge M, Jennings N (1995) Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowl Eng Rev 10(2):115–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wooldridge M, Jennings NR, Kinny D (2000) The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. J Auton Agent Multi Agent Syst 3(3):285–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ranganathan A, Chetan S, Al-Muhtadi J, Campbell R, Mickunas M (2005) Olympus: a high-level programming model for pervasive computing environment. In: Proceedings IEEE PerCom pp 7–16

  10. Roman M, Hess C, Cerqueira R, Ranganathan A, Campbell R, Nahrstedt K (2002) A middleware infrastructure for active spaces. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(4):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schilit BN, Adams N, Want R (1994) Context-aware computing applications. In: Proceedings of the workshop on mobile computing systems and applications, pp 85–90

  12. Dey A, Abowd G (2000) Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: Proceedings of the CHI workshop on the what, who, where, when, and how of context-awareness

  13. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/245115 Using early binding and late binding in Automation

  14. Sycara K, Klusch M, Widoff S (1999) Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments. SIGMOD Rec 28(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Juokka D, Harada L (1995) Matchmaking for information agents. In: Proceedings of 14th IJCAI, pp 672–678

  16. Good N, Schafer B, Konstan J, Borchers A, Sarwar B, Herlocker J, Riedl J (1999) Combining collaborative filtering with personal agents for better recommendations. In: Proceedings of AAAI-99 conference, pp 439–446

  17. Schafer B, Konstan J, Riedl J (1999) Recommender systems in E-commerce. In: Proceedings of ACM E-commerce 1999 conference

  18. Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (1984) Rule-based expert systems: the MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, Addison-Wesley

  19. Brachman RJ, Khabaza T, Kloesgen W, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Simoudis E (1996) Mining business database. Commun ACM 39(11):42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wisepole Research and Development Division, Incline B/D Deachi-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea

    Keonsoo Lee & Jaehoon Kim

  2. Division of Information and Communication, Baekseok University, Cheonan-city, Korea

    Seungmin Rho

  3. Department of Business Administration, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea

    Hangbae Chang

Authors
  1. Keonsoo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaehoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seungmin Rho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hangbae Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hangbae Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, K., Kim, J., Rho, S. et al. Social relation-based dynamic team organization by context-aware matchmaking. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17, 1753–1760 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0608-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0608-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation