Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Understanding the effects of contextual constraints on performative behaviour in interactive media installations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we describe three interactive media installations, each evaluated in a distinctive environment. By following a research in and through design approach and studying the installations in public settings, we were able to identify an effect of contextual constraints—such as location, prominence of spectacle, length of interaction and spatial distribution of focal points—on the types of interactions encouraged through the installations. More specifically, we were able to formulate distinct content strategies for individual and group interactions while observing specific design parameters conducive to performative behaviour. We associate such parameters to three different categories of interaction with public media installations: performative interaction, ubiquitous interaction and a third hybrid scenario falling between those two, immersive interactions. We then present a framework for assessment of public interactive installations and key aspects to be considered when designing proactive contextual interventions in the public realm. Finally, we discuss how such aspects point to further investigation on formal principles underlying interactive experiences designed to facilitate specific levels of performance and spectacle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alt F, Schneegaß S, Schmidt A, Müller J, Memarovic N (2012) How to evaluate public displays. In: Proceedings of PerDis 2012. ACM Press, New York

  2. Alt F, Müller J, Schmidt A (2012) Advertising on public display networks. IEEE Comput 45:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedwell B, Caruana T (2012) Encouraging spectacle to create self-sustaining interactions at public displays. In: Proceedings of PerDis 2012. ACM Press, New York

  4. Brignull H, Rogers Y (2003) Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In: Proceedings of INTERACT’03. Springer, New York, pp 17–24

  5. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalsgaard P (2010) Research in and through design: an interaction design research approach. Paper presented at the OzCHI 2010

  7. Goffman E (1973) The presentation of self in everyday life. The overlook press. Woodstock, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goffman E (1963) Behaviour in Public Places. The Free Press, New York, Notes on the Social Organisation of Gatherings

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenberg S, Marquardt N, Ballendat T, Diaz-Marino R, Wang M (2011) Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? ACM Interact 18(1):42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassenzahl M (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19:319–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hespanhol L, Tomitsch M (2012) Designing for collective participation with media installations in public spaces. MAB’12proceedings of the 4th media architecture biennale conference, 15—17 Nov 2012, Aarhus, Denmark

  12. Hespanhol L, Tomitsch M, Grace K, Collins A, Kay J (2012) Investigating intuitiveness and effectiveness of gestures for free spatial interaction with large displays. PerDis ‘12 Proc. 2012 International symposium on pervasive displays, 04–05 June 2012, Porto, Portugal

  13. Hespanhol L, Sogono MC, Wu G, Saunders R, Tomitsch M (2011) Elastic experiences: designing adaptive interaction for individuals and crowds in the public space. In Proceedings of OzCHI 2011. ACM Press, New York

  14. Huang EM, Koster A, Borchers J (2008) Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: when does the public really look at public displays? Paper presented at the Pervasive

  15. Ishii H, Ulmer B Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of CHI’97, Atlanta GA USA

  16. Jacucci G et al (2010) ParticipArt: exploring participation in interactive art installations. In: IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality 2010—arts, media, & humanities proceedings, Seoul, Korea

  17. Jacucci G (2004) Interaction as performance. Cases of configuring physical interfaces in mixed media. (Doctoral Thesis), University of Oulu. Oulu: Acta Universitatis

  18. Jacucci G, Wagner I (2005) Performative uses of space in mixed media environments. In: Davenport E, Turner P (eds) Spaces, spatiality and technologies. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacucci G et al (2010) Ubiquitous media for collocated interaction. In: Willis KS (ed) Shared encounters. Springer, New York, pp 23–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. José R, Pinto H, Silva B, Melro A, Rodrigues H (2012) Beyond interaction: tools and practices for situated publication in display networks. PerDis ‘12 proceedings of 2012 international symposium on pervasive displays, Porto, Portugal 04–05 June 2012

  21. Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W (1998) Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol 53:1017–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lino JA, Salem B, Rauterberg M (2010) Responsive environments: user experiences for ambient intelligence. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 2:347–367. doi:10.3233/AIS-2010-0080

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lozano-Hemmer R (2006) Homographies. Retrieved 01 Sep 2013, from http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/homographies.php

  24. Ludvigsen M (2005) Designing for social use in public places—a conceptual framework of social interaction. In: Proceedings of designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI’05), pp 389–408

  25. Margolis D (2009) The social impact of ‘everywhere’ technology. Certification magazine, July 2009. http://www.certmag.com/read.php?start=0&in=3840

  26. Mitchell B (2010) The immersive artistic experience and the exploitation of space. Paper presented at the CAT’10

  27. Müller J, Walter R, Bailly G, Nischt M, Alt F (2012) Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. In: Proceedings of CHI’12, ACM Press, New York

  28. Neville F, Reicher S (2011) The experience of collective participation: shared identity, relatedness and emotionality. Contemp Soc Sci 6(3):377–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Hara K, Glancy M, Robertshaw S (2008) Understanding collective play in an urban screen game. In: Proceedings of CSCW, ACM Press, New York, pp 67–76

  30. Olislagers V (2012) Thoughts on embodiment, tangibility and situated interaction in digital live art. Retrieved 15 Jul 2012, from http://vincentolislagers.com/portfolio/thoughts-on-embodiment-tangibility-and-situated-interaction-in-digital-live-art

  31. rAndom International (Producer) (2012) Rain room. Retrieved from http://random-international.com/work/rainroom. 01 Sep 2013

  32. Reeves S, Sherwood S, Brown B (2010) Designing for crowds. Proceedings NordiCHI 2010, October 16–20, 2010, Reykjavik, Iceland

  33. ten Bhömer M, Helmes J, O’Hara K, van den Hoven E (2010) 4Photos: a collaborative photo sharing experience. Proceedings of NordiCHI 2010, ACM Press, New York

  34. Vande Moere A, Woulters N (2012) The role of context in media architecture. In: Proceedings of PerDis 2012, ACM Press, New York

  35. Wessel G, Unruh E, Chang R, Sauda E (2010) Urban user interface: urban legibility reconsidered. In: Southwest Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA)

  36. Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Evenson S (2007) Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Design Lab, Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Luke Hespanhol & Martin Tomitsch

Authors
  1. Luke Hespanhol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Tomitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Hespanhol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hespanhol, L., Tomitsch, M. Understanding the effects of contextual constraints on performative behaviour in interactive media installations. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1651–1665 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0765-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0765-4

Keywords