Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic sensor event segmentation for real-time activity recognition in a smart home context

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Activity recognition is fundamental to many of the services envisaged in pervasive computing and ambient intelligence scenarios. However, delivering sufficiently robust activity recognition systems that could be deployed with confidence in an arbitrary real-world setting remains an outstanding challenge. Developments in wireless, inexpensive and unobtrusive sensing devices have enabled the capture of large data volumes, upon which a variety of machine learning techniques have been applied in order to facilitate interpretation of and inference upon such data. Much of the documented research in this area has in the main focused on recognition across pre-segmented sensor data. Such approaches are insufficient for near real-time analysis as is required for many services, such as those envisaged by ambient assisted living. This paper presents a novel near real-time sensor segmentation approach that incorporates the notions of both sensor and time correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CASAS is the Center for Advanced Studies in Adaptive Systems, within Washington State University.

  2. WSU CASAS datasets are available for academic use and can be downloaded from http://ailab.wsu.edu/casas/datasets/.

References

  1. Chen L, Hoey J, Nugent C, Cook D, Yu Z (2012) Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 42(6):790–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen L, Nugent C, Wang H (2012) A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 24(6):961–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choudhury T, Consolvo S, Harrison B, Hightower J, LaMarca A, Legrand L, Rahimi A, Rea A, Bordello G, Hemingway B, Klasnja P, Koscher K, Landay J, Lester J, Wyatt D, Haehnel D (2008) The mobile sensing platform: an embedded activity recognition system. IEEE Pervasive Comput 7(2):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook D (2012) Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE Intell Syst 27(1):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook D, Crandall A, Thomas B, Krishnan N (2013) CASAS: a smart home in a box. Computer 46(7):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook D, Krishnan N, Rashidi P (2013) Activity discovery and activity recognition: a new partnership. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 43(3):820–828

  7. Fleury A, Vacher M, Noury N (2010) SVM-based multimodal classification of activities of daily living in health smart homes: sensors, algorithms, and first experimental results. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14(2):274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao L, Bourke A, Nelson J (2014) Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. Med Eng Phys 36(6):779–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong X, Nugent C, Mulvenna M, McClean S, Scotney B, Devlin S (2009) Evidential fusion of sensor data for activity recognition in smart homes. Pervasive Mob Comput 5(3):236–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karantonis D, Narayanan M, Mathie M, Lovell N, Celler B (2006) Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10(1):156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kastere T, Englebienne G, Krse B (2010) Activity recognition using semi-Markov models on real world smart home datasets. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 2:311–325

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kasteren T, Noulas A, Englebienne G, Kröse B (2008) Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In: 10th international conference on ubiquitous computing, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–9

  13. Kim SC, Jeong YS, Park SO (2013) RFID-based indoor location tracking to ensure the safety of the elderly in smart home environments. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(8):1699–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnan N, Cook D (2014) Activity recognition on streaming sensor data. Pervasive Mob Comput Part B 10(1):138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwapisz JR, Weiss G, Moore S (2011) Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 12(2):74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lara O, Labrador M (2012) A mobile platform for real-time human activity recognition. In: 2012 IEEE consumer communications and networking conference, pp 667–671

  17. Leppanen J, Eronen A (2013) Accelerometer-based activity recognition on a mobile phone using cepstral features and quantized gmms. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 3487–3491

  18. Okeyo G, Chen L, Wang H, Sterritt R (2014) Dynamic sensor data segmentation for real-time knowledge-driven activity recognition. Pervasive Mob Comput 10:155–172

  19. Pham C, Pltz T, Olivier P (2010) A dynamic time warping approach to real-time activity recognition for food preparation. In: Ruyter B, Wichert R, Keyson D, Markopoulos P, Streitz N, Divitini M, Georgantas N, Mana G (eds) Ambient intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6439. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–30

  20. Poppe R (2010) A survey on vision-based human action recognition. Image Vis Comput 28(6):976–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Portet F, Vacher M, Golanski C, Roux C, Meillon B (2013) Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(1):127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rashidi P, Cook D, Holder L, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2011) Discovering activities to recognize and track in a smart environment. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 23(4):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruyier BD, Pelgrim E (2007) Ambient assisted-living research in carelab. Interactions 14(4):30–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva LCD, Morikawa C, Petra IM (2012) State of the art of smart homes. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(7):1313–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suryadevara N, Mukhopadhyay S (2012) Wireless sensor network based home monitoring system for wellness determination of elderly. IEEE Sens J 12(6):1965–1972

  26. Wade D, Collin C (1988) The barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Disabil Rehabil 10(2):64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wan J, O'Grady M, O'Hare G (2013) Bootstrapping activity modeling for ambient assisted living. In: Zeng D, Yang C, Tseng V, Xing, C, Chen H, Wang FY, Zheng X (eds) Smart health. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8040. Springer, Berlin, pp 96–106

  28. Wang L, Gu T, Tao X, Chen H, Lu J (2011) Recognizing multi-user activities using wearable sensors in a smart home. Pervasive Mob Comput 7(3):287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant 07/CE/I1147, within CLARITY Centre for Sensor Web Technologies, at University College Dublin (UCD), Ireland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Wan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, J., O’Grady, M.J. & O’Hare, G.M.P. Dynamic sensor event segmentation for real-time activity recognition in a smart home context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19, 287–301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0824-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0824-x

Keywords

Navigation