Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing of research patterns based on a temporal tracking and assessing model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific research works conducted by researchers spread all over the world in every research field, which are hard to be tracked and quantified. Although there are many research works focused on scientific community discovery and researcher profiling, it is still a big challenge to track the research patterns and assess the research development for an individual researcher or a research group over time. In this study, we seek to model researchers’ scientific activities and quantify their outcome during their research career. A temporal tracking and assessing model is introduced to represent the research development and quantify the scientific outcome for both an individual and a group along the time. Based on our model, a research topic analyzing approach is developed to extract the topics covered by a research group for the research pattern analysis. Furthermore, a latent research pattern discovering approach is proposed to depict how a research group’s research works contributed by its members are discovered and visualized. The effectiveness of our approach is evaluated based on a real academic dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/.

  2. http://doc.scrapy.org/en/0.14/faq.html#does-scrapy-crawl-in-breath-first-or-depth-first-order.

References

  1. Xia F, Hsu CH, Liu X, Liu H, Ding F, Zhang W (2015) The power of smartphones. Multimed Syst 21(1):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang W, Lu ZX, Jin Q, et al (2015) A temporal model of research work tracking and assessing for an individual and a group. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on social computing and networking, Chengdu, China, 2015

  3. Xu DD, Wu SB (2014) An improved TFIDF algorithm in text classification. Appl Mech Mater 651:2258–3226

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(1):993–1022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bassiou NK, Kotropoulos CL (2014) Online PLSA: batch updating techniques including out-of-vocabulary words. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25(11):1953–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan SL, Li Y, Sun H et al (2014) Interpreting the public sentiment variations on twitter. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(5):1158–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan DS, Li YH, Li RX (2014) LIMTopic: a framework of incorporating link based importance into topic modeling. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(10):2493–2506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He Q, Chang KY, Lim EP (2010) Keep it simple with time: a reexamination of probabilistic topic detection models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(10):1795–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mörchen F, Dejori M, Fradkin D (2008) Anticipating annotations and emerging trends in biomedical literature. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Las Vegas, USA, pp 954–962, 2008

  10. Duan DS, Li YH, Li RX et al (2014) LIMTopic: a framework of incorporating link based importance into topic modeling. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(10):2493–2506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Habibi M, Popescu-Belis A (2015) Keyword extraction and clustering for document recommendation in conversations. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 23(4):746–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fong S, Wong R, Vasilakos AV (2016) Accelerated PSO swarm search feature selection for data stream mining big data. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 9(1):33–45

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ali D, Li JZ, Zhou LZ et al (2010) Knowledge discovery through directed probabilistic topic models: a survey. Front Comput Sci China 4(2):280–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daud A, Li J, Zhu L, et al Conference mining via generalized topic modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2009 European conference on machine learning and principles and practices of knowledge discovery in databases, Bled, Slovenia, pp 244–259, 2009

  15. Daud A, Li J, Zhu L, et al (2009) Exploiting temporal authors interests via temporal-author-topic modeling. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on advance data mining and applications, Beijing, China, pp 435–443, 2009

  16. Tang J, Yao L, Zhang D et al (2010) A combination approach to web user profiling. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 5(1):2–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye N, Zhao YL, Dong LL et al (2013) User identification based on multiple attribute decision making in social networks. Communications 10(12):37–49

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rebollo-Monedero D, Forné J, Domingo-Ferrer J (2012) Query profile obfuscation by means of optimal query exchange between users. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput 9(5):641–654

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Zhou T, Zhixin Q (2016) The research on e-mail Users’ behavior of participating in Subjects based on social network analysis. China Commun 13(4):70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Folino F, Pizzuti C (2014) An evolutionary multiobjective approach for community discovery in dynamic networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(8):1838–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazienko P, Musial K, Kajdanowicz T (2011) Multidimensional social network in the social recommender system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 41(4):746–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun YZ, Tang J, Han JW (2014) Co-evolution of multi-typed objects in dynamic star networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(12):2942–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dingli A, Seychell D (2012) taking social networks to the next level. Int J Distrib Syst Technol 3(4):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lima C, Antunes M, Gomes D (2014) A context-aware framework for collaborative activities in pervasive communities. Int J Distrib Syst Technol 5(2):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang D, Zhang D, Xiong H, Hsu CH, Vasilakos AV (2014) BASA: building mobile Ad-Hoc social networks on top of android. IEEE Netw 28(1):4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Payne ME, Ngo LB, Villanustre F, et al (2014) Managing the academic data lifecycle: a case study of HPCC. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on big data, Washington, USA, pp 22–30, 2014

  27. Spenassato D, Bornia AC, Tezza R (2015) Computerized adaptive testing: a review of research and technical characteristics. IEEE Lat Am Trans 13(12):3890–3898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. He D, Zhu XQ, et al (2011) How does research evolve? Pattern mining for research meme cycles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th international conference on data mining (ICDM), pp 1068–1073, Dec 2011

  29. Liu WL, Zheng XL, Wang T et al (2014) Collaboration pattern and topic analysis on intelligence and security informatics research. Intell Syst 29(3):39–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Payer M, Huang L, Gong NZ et al (2015) What you submit is who you are: a multimodal approach for deanonymizing scientific publications. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 10(1):200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ikbal S, Tamhane A, Sengupta B et al (2015) On early prediction of risks in academic performance for students. IBM J Res Dev 59(6):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Carpendale S (2014) Ontologies in biological data visualization. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 34(2):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. López Guarín CE, Guzmán EL, González FA (2015) A model to predict low academic performance at a specific enrollment using data mining. IEEE Rev Iberoam Tecnol Aprendiz 10(3):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liang W, Lu ZX, Jin Q, et al (2015) Modeling of research topic evolution associated with social networks of researchers. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE international conference on internet of people, Beijing, China, pp 1169–1174, 2015

  35. Gang Q, Sural S, Gu YL, et al (2004) Similarity between Euclidean and cosine angle distance for nearest neighbor queries. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp 1232–1237, 2004

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work has been partly supported by Waseda University Grants for Special Research Projects Nos. 2014K-6214, 2015B-381 and 2016B-233, the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 2015CFA010, the National Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61273232, and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University under NCET-13-0785.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qun Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, W., Jin, Q., Lu, Z. et al. Analyzing of research patterns based on a temporal tracking and assessing model. Pers Ubiquit Comput 20, 933–946 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0965-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0965-1

Keywords

Navigation