Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Geographic forwarding rules to reduce broadcast redundancy in mobile ad hoc wireless networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are self-organizing networks. They use the mechanism of broadcasting to discover the links between nodes, to share the topology information, and to maintain the routing tables. However, the broadcasting suffers from redundant retransmissions causing radio resources waste and packet loss, especially in large networks. In this paper, we propose a new decentralized technique, called geographic forwarding rules (GFRs), to reduce the number of broadcast messages in mobile ad hoc networks. We use the location information of nodes to divide the network into virtual zones. Then we try to avoid duplicate retransmissions between the zones. Our proposition reduces the amount of overhead while it achieves a successful dissemination. We focused our research on the optimized link state routing (OLSR) protocol, the most known proactive routing protocol in the MANETs. We demonstrate, by simulations, that our geographic forwarding rules keep the number of disseminated topology control (TC) messages less than that of the default forwarding rules (DFRs) of OLSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Tseng Y-C et al (2002) The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network. Wirel Netw 8(2–3):153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clementi A, Monti A, Silvestri R (2013) Fast flooding over Manhattan. Distrib Comput 26:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-012-0182-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang X, Wang S, Liang W, Bie R, Zhao F (2015) The dissemination distance of mobile opportunistic networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(7):1011–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perkins CE, Royer EM (1999) Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: Second IEEE workshop on mobile computing systems and applications, 1999. Proceedings. WMCSA ’99, New Orleans, pp 90–100

  5. van Glabbeek R, Höfner P, Portmann M et al (2016) Modelling and verifying the AODV routing protocol. Distrib Comput 29:279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-015-0262-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Park VD, Corson MS (1997) A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. In: INFOCOM ’97. Sixteenth annual joint conference of the ieee computer and communications societies. driving the information revolution., Proceedings IEEE, Kobe, vol 1403, pp 1405–1413

  7. Jacquet P, Muhlethaler P, Clausen T, Laouiti A, Qayyum A, Viennot L (2001) Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In: Multi Topic Conference, 2001. IEEE INMIC 2001. Technology for the 21st Century. Proceedings. IEEE International, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan, 2001, pp 62–68

  8. Perkins CE, Bhagwat P (1994) Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 24(4):234–244. https://doi.org/10.1145/190809.190336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haas ZJ, Pearlman MR (2001) The performance of query control schemes for the zone routing protocol. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 9(4):427–438. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.944341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Souidi M, Habbani A, Berradi H, Essaid B (2017) Node localization to optimize the MPR selection in smart mobile communication. In: Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on smart digital environment. ACM, pp 8–13

  11. Zhang XM, Zhang Y, Yan F, Vasilakos AV (2015) Interference-based topology control algorithm for delay-constrained mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 14(4):742–754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2014.2331966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cadger F, Curran K, Santos J et al (2016) Location and Mobility-Aware Routing for Improving Multimedia Streaming Performance in MANETs. Wireless Pers Commun 86:1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3012-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khabbazian M, Blake IF, Bhargava VK (2012) Local broadcast algorithms in wireless ad hoc networks: reducing the number of transmissions. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 11(3):402–413. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2011.67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lou W, Wu J (2003) On reducing broadcast redundancy in ad hoc wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2003. IEEE, p 10

  15. Kitasuka T, Tagashira S (2013) Finding more efficient multipoint relay set to reduce topology control traffic of OLSR. In: 2013 IEEE 14th international symposium and workshops on World of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (woWMom), pp 1–9

  16. Zhang XM, Wang EB, Xia JJ, Sung DK (2013) A neighbor coverage-based probabilistic rebroadcast for reducing routing overhead in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(3):424–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2011.277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruiz P, Bouvry P (2015) Survey on broadcast algorithms for mobile ad hoc networks. ACM Comput Surv 48(1):1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reina DG, Toral SL, Johnson P, Barrero F (2015) A survey on probabilistic broadcast schemes for wireless ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks 25(Part A):263–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu J, Wang N, Wang G, Yu D (2013) Connected dominating sets in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks—a comprehensive survey. Comput Commun 36(2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2012.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blum J, Ding M, Thaeler A, Cheng X (2005) Connected dominating set in sensor networks and MANETs. In: Du D-Z, Pardalos P (eds) Handbook of combinatorial optimization: supplement volume B. Springer, Boston, pp 329–369

  21. Qayyum A, Viennot L, Laouiti A (2000) Multipoint relaying: an efficient technique for flooding in mobile wireless networks INRIA

  22. Liang O, Sekercioglu YA, Mani N (2006) A survey of multipoint relay based broadcast schemes in wireless ad hoc networks. IIEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 8(4):30–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2006.283820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun C, Yin R-R, Hao X-C, Dou J-J, Liu B (2011) Connected dominating set topology control algorithm of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Ruanjian Xuebao/J of Softw 22(9):2137–2148

    Google Scholar 

  24. Akbari Torkestani J, Meybodi MR (2012) Finding minimum weight connected dominating set in stochastic graph based on learning automata. Inf Sci 200:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.02.057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Y, Wu J, Li F, Lu S (2012) On maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks using virtual backbone scheduling. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 23(8):1528–1535. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2011.305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu JY, Chong PHJ (2005) A survey of clustering schemes for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 7(1):32–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2005.1423333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bentaleb A, Boubetra A, Harous S (2013) Survey of clustering schemes in mobile Ad hoc networks. Commun Netw 05(02):8–14. https://doi.org/10.4236/cn.2013.52B002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chinara S, Rath SK (2009) A survey on one-hop clustering algorithms in mobile ad hoc networks. J Netw Syst Manage 17:183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-009-9123-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maihofer C (2004) A survey of geocast routing protocols. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 6(2):32–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2004.5342238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dekar L, Kheddouci H (2008) A cluster based mobility prediction scheme for ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 6(2):168–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2006.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Amis AD, Prakash R, Vuong THP, Huynh DT (2000) Max-min d-cluster formation in wireless ad hoc networks. In: INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies. Proceedings, vol 31. IEEE, pp 32–41

  32. Kumar N, Chilamkurti N, Park JH (2013) ALCA: agent learningbased clustering algorithm in vehicular ad hoc networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17:1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0600-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L, Olariu S (2005) Cluster maintenance in mobile ad-hoc networks. Clust Comput 8(2-3):111–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-005-6176-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Banerjee A, King C-T, Hsiao H-C (2017) On state maintenance in cluster-based mobile ad-hoc networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ko YB, Vaidya NH (2000) Location aided routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks. Wirel Netw 6(4):307–321. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019106118419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hnatyshin V (2013) Improving MANET routing protocols through the use of geographical information. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks 5(2):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Noguchi T, Kobayashi T (2017) Adaptive location-aware routing with directional antennas in mobile adhoc networks. In: 2017 international conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC), pp 1006-1011

  38. Mikki MA (2009) Energy efficient location aided routing protocol for wireless MANETs. arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.0093

  39. Shen H, Zhao L (2013) ALERT: an anonymous location-based efficient routing protocol in MANETs. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(6):1079–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Qayyum A, Viennot L, Laouiti A (2002) Multipoint relaying for flooding broadcast messages in mobile wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2002. HICSS, 7-10 Jan. 2002, pp 3866– 3875

  41. Lu T, Zhu J (2013) Genetic algorithm for energy-efficient QoS multicast routing. IEEE Commun Lett 17(1):31–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2012.112012.121467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. The network simulator NS-3. Available: https://www.nsnam.org/

  43. Carneiro G, Fortuna P, Ricardo M (2009) FlowMonitor: a network monitoring framework for the network simulator 3 (NS-3). In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the fourth international ICST conference on performance evaluation methodologies and tools, Pisa

  44. Aschenbruck N, Ernst R, Gerhards-Padilla E, Schwamborn M (2010) BonnMotion: a mobility scenario generation and analysis tool. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 3rd international ICST conference on simulation tools and techniques, Torremolinos

  45. Hightower J, Borriello G (2001) Location systems for ubiquitous computing. Computer 34(8):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mauve M, Widmer J, Hartenstein H (2001) A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Network, IEEE 15(6):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/65.967595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wei X, Wang Q, Wang T, Fan J (2016) Jammer localization in multi-hop wireless network: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 19(2):765–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Smart Systems Laboratory (SSL) who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. We would also like to show our gratitude to the Universite Mohammed V de Rabat Ecole Nationale Superieure d’Informatique et d’Analyse des Systemes (ENSIAS) that provided facilities and equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SSL Lab, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

    Mohammed Souidi, Ahmed Habbani, Halim Berradi & Fatna El Mahdi

  2. SAMOVAR Lab, ENSIIE, Paris-Evry, France

    Ahmed Habbani

Authors
  1. Mohammed Souidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed Habbani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Halim Berradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatna El Mahdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Souidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souidi, M., Habbani, A., Berradi, H. et al. Geographic forwarding rules to reduce broadcast redundancy in mobile ad hoc wireless networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput 23, 765–775 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1137-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1137-2

Keywords