Skip to main content
Log in

The impacts of personal traits on knowledge discovery behaviors via mobile SNS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the psychological factors that motivate the mobile SNS users for the purpose of knowledge discovery. Based on the literature reviews, the authors selected sense of self-worth, knowledge self-efficacy, altruism, and self-verification as the motivating factors and attitude toward knowledge discovery and knowledge discovery behaviors as the dependent variables. The results show that only sense of self-worth was not significantly related to attitude toward knowledge discovery. The rest of the motivating factors are in conformance with what we predicted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park ST, Li G, Hong JC (2018) A study on smart factory-based ambient intelligence context-aware intrusion detection system using machine learning. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0998-6

  2. Park ST, Oh MR (2017) An empirical study on the influential factors affecting continuous usage of mobile cloud service. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1518-8

  3. Cui X, Yang N, Wang Z, Hu C, Zhu W, Li H, Liu C (2015) Chinese social media analysis for disease surveillance. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(7):1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karahasanović A, Heim J (2015) Understanding the behaviour of online TV users. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(5–6):839–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li G, Jung JR, Park ST (2018) Factors enhancing mobile social networking friendship maintenance: a study of alumni community on Wechat. Clust Comput 21(1):1127–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergman O, Yanai N (2018) Personal information retrieval: smartphones vs. computers, emails vs. files. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22(4):621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song GY, Cheon Y, Lee K, Lim H, Chung KY, Rim HC (2014) Multiple categorizations of products: cognitive modeling of customers through social media data mining. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18(6):1387–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Statista (2019) Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2019, ranked by number of active users, https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/. Accessed 6 Feb 2019

  9. Guo M (2018) Kantar China social media impact report 2018. https://cn-en.kantar.com/media/social/2018/kantar-china-social-media-impact-report-2018/. Accessed 6 Feb 2019

  10. iResearch (2019) http://report.iresearch.cn/content/2019/01/282673.shtml. Accessed 6 Feb 2019

  11. CAICT (2018) Build an innovative community of shared ecosystem and foster new drivers of economic growth. WeChat Economic and Social Impact Report 2017. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/ztbg/201805/P020180529380481819634.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2019

  12. Mruk C (1995) Self-esteem: research, theory, and practice

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin L, Wei S (2006) The investigation on managers’ time management disposition and self-worth [J]. Psychol Sci 1:015

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hater S (1985) The self-perception profile for children: revision of the Perceived Competence Scale for children manual. University of Denver, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gray-Little B, Hafdahl AR (2000) Factors influencing racial comparisons of self-esteem: a quantitative review. Psychol Bull 126(1):26–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keefe K, Berndt TJ (1996) Relations of friendship quality to self-esteem in early adolescence. J Early Adolesc 16(1):110–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bacro F (2012) Perceived attachment security to father, academic self-concept and school performance in language mastery. J Child Fam Stud 21(6):992–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marsh HW, Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Köller O, Baumert J (2005) Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Dev 76(2):397–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bandura A (1986) Social foundation of thought and action: a social-cognitive view, Englewood Cliffs

  20. Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R (1999) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M (eds) Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON, Windsor, pp 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Shi X, Dang J (2014) Online communication and subjective well-being in Chinese college students: the mediating role of shyness and social self-efficacy. Comput Hum Behav 34:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q 29(1):87–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Condon P, DeSteno D (2011) Compassion for one reduces punishment for another. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(3):698–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rand DG, Peysakhovich A, Kraft-Todd GT, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O, Nowak MA, Greene JD (2014) Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nat Commun 5:3677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zahra SA (2003) International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement. J Bus Ventur 18(4):495–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Constant D, Kiesler S, Sproull L (1994) What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Inf Syst Res 5(4):400–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wasko MM, Faraj S (2000) “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(2–3):155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J Econ Perspect 14(3):159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barclay P (2012) Harnessing the power of reputation: strengths and limits for promoting cooperative behaviors. Evol Psychol 10(5):868–883

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Swann Jr WB (1990) To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification

  33. Swann WB, Hill CA (1982) When our identities are mistaken: reaffirming self-conceptions through social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 43(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1967) Psychometric theory, vol 226. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chin WW, Todd PA (1995) On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Q 19(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press, Akron

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hoyle RH, Kenny DA (1999) Statistical power and tests of mediation. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  40. Subramani M (2004) How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Q 28(1):45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shun-Ji Jin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Park, EM. & Jin, SJ. The impacts of personal traits on knowledge discovery behaviors via mobile SNS. Pers Ubiquit Comput 26, 395–406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01240-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01240-1

Keywords

Navigation