Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhanced fault identification and optimal task prediction (EFIOTP) algorithm during multi-resource utilization in cloud-based knowledge and personal computing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtualization technology is playing an important role in cloud computing for efficient task scheduling and application deployment. Cloud computing offers a platform to store and retrieve a large volume of information without any restriction on time or location. The system optimizes the available resource based on the user application requirement. Server and data storage devices can access distributed data residing in remote places via virtualization mechanism, where cloud applications are easily migrated from one server to another. Issues related to fault identification and resource optimization problems often occur in a cloud environment. To resolve these issues, an enhanced fault identification and optimal task prediction (EFIOTP) algorithm are proposed for finding and preventing faults during task execution with multiple resources. The research work objective is to design a deadline-determined resource allocation model with the VM resource isolation method in a cloud. The proposed work evaluates the maximum amount of task execution by considering different types of resources to identify and predict the faults at various levels and to minimize the occurrence of faults and task execution time. Based on the experiment evaluation, the proposed EFIOTP algorithm reduces 775 task completions (TCT), 0.237 datacenter server utilization (DCSU), 2% virtual machine cost (VMC), and improves the 0.39 hypervolumes (HV) on several parameters and scientific workflow application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandeep M, Harsh KV, Sangal AL (2017) Simulation modelling of cloud computing for smart grid using CloudSim. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 4(1):159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohamed AE, Hosam ER (2017) A proposed fault tolerance model for cloud system based on the distributed shared memory. Egypt Comput Sci J 41(1):1110–2586

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alim UG, Rayhanur R, Asif I, Kazi S (2013) The performance evaluation of proactive fault-tolerant scheme over cloud using CloudSim simulator.Int J Web Appl 5(4):176–186

  4. Ghamdan MQ, Madhu BK (2017) Proactive fault tolerance in cloud data centers for performance efficiency. Int J Pure Appl Math 117(22):325–329

    Google Scholar 

  5. William V, Rajkumar B (2012) Reliable provisioning of spot instances for compute-intensive applications. In 2012 IEEE 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp 542–549

  6. Kalanirnika GR, Sivagami VM (2015) Fault tolerance in cloud using reactive and proactive techniques. Int J Comput Sci Eng Commun 3(3):1159–1164

    Google Scholar 

  7. Padmakumari P, Umamakeswari A, Akshaya M (2016) Hybrid fault-tolerant scheme to manage VM failure in the cloud. Indian J Sci Technol 9(48):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Indirani S, Jothi VC (2016) Implementation of LMMC and SBA algorithms in cloud infrastructure using Cloudsim. Int J Control Theory Appl 9(10):4285–4291

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marc B, Ulf L (2015) DynamicCloudSim: simulating heterogeneity in computational clouds. Futur Gener Comput Syst 46:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Najuka S, Nikitha K, Nimisha SM (2014) Task scheduling for efficient resource utilization in cloud. A Project Report for course COEN 241, pp 1–25

  11. Anusha B, Sharmini E (2017) Optimization of resource allocation parameters in cloud environment using design of experiments. Int J Pure Appl Math 116(22):217–232

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael B, Stefan S, Christoph H (2016) Predicting cloud resource utilization,” 2016 IEEE/ACM 9th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), Shanghai, pp 37–42

  13. Manvi SS, Shyam GK (2014) Resource management for infrastructure as a service (IaaS) in cloud computing: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 41:424–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajkumar B, Kotagiri R, Chris L, Rodrigo N, Calheiros AVD, Steve V (2015) Big data analytics-enhanced cloud computing: challenges, architectural elements, and future directions. IEEE 21st International Conference on In Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp 75–84

  15. Xu CZ, Rao J, Bu X (2012) URL: a unified reinforcement learning approach for autonomic cloud management. J Parallel Distrib Comput 72(2):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Lyu MR (2011) Exploring latent features for memory-based QoS prediction in cloud computing. 2011 30th IEEE Symposium on In Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), pp 1–10

  17. Wu JH (2015) Research of resource allocation in cloud computing based on improved dual bee colony algorithm. Int J Grid Distrib Comput 8(5):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Calheiros RN, Ranjan R, Beloglazov A, De Rose CA, Buyya R (2010) CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw Pract Exp 41(1):23–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng Z, Zhou TC, Lyu MR, King I (2010) FTCloud: a component-ranking framework for fault-tolerant cloud applications. IEEE 21st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), pp 398–407

  20. Zheng Z, Lyu MR (2015) Selecting an optimal fault tolerance strategy for reliable service-oriented systems with local and global constraints. IEEE Trans Comput 64(1):219–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Giorgio LV, Samee UK, Pascal B (2013) Energy-efficient resource utilization in cloud computing. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. Noha H, Amal EA, Nahla E, Mostafa-Sami MM (2017) Resource allocation strategies in cloud computing: overview. Int J Comput Appl 177(4):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang B, Sconyers C, Byington C, Patrick R, Orchard ME, Vachtsevanos G (2010) A probabilistic fault detection approach: application to bearing fault detection. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(5):2011–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Litke A, Skoutas D, Tserpes K, Varvarigou T (2007) Efficient task replication, and management for adaptive fault tolerance in mobile grid environments. Futur Gener Comput Syst 23(2):163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anwar N, Deng H (2018) A hybrid metaheuristic for multi-objective scientific workflow scheduling in a cloud environment. Appl Sci 8(4):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. He G, Yang J, Behnke S (2018) Research on geometric features and point cloud properties for tree skeleton extraction. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22(5–6):903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jin M, Wang H, Song L, Li, Zeng Y (2018) Man-machine dialogue system optimization based on cloud computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22(5–6):937–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chandra I, Prabha KH, Sivakumar N (2018) Optimization of QoS parameters using scheduling techniques in heterogeneous network. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22(5–6):943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    J. M. Nandhini

  2. Sri Sai Ram Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    J. M. Nandhini

  3. R.M.K Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    T. Gnanasekaran

Authors
  1. J. M. Nandhini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Gnanasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Nandhini.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nandhini, J.M., Gnanasekaran, T. Enhanced fault identification and optimal task prediction (EFIOTP) algorithm during multi-resource utilization in cloud-based knowledge and personal computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 26, 285–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01265-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01265-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation