Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing cultural heritage outdoor experience with augmented-reality smart glasses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technologies such as context-aware mobile augmented reality (MAR) offer new ways of delivering information and creating new experiences for visitors of cultural heritage (CH) sites. Significant progress has been made in MAR for indoor museum visits. However, studies investigating the way that visitors interact with MAR in an open-air museum are lacking, as are studies aimed at identifying major usability and technology acceptance issues. This paper presents a special type of MAR—an augmented reality smart glasses (ARSG)-based mobile guide that served as a testbed for exploring the potential of ARSG to enhance visitor experience at outdoor CH sites. We developed the ARSG-based guide with location and orientation-based functionalities that provided visitors with context-aware information regarding the points of interest (POIs) in their field of view (FOV). We compared it with a more conventional smartphone-based guide (identical application). The results show that visitors are positive towards using ARSG as a tool for exploring cultural heritage (CH) sites and learning about exhibits. The results also highlighted several challenges that must be overcome before an ARSG-based system can be fully implemented for outdoor CH sites. Nonetheless, the visitors’ positive attitude indicates that ARSG technology may soon become an accepted part of CH tourism (and tourism in general).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://everysight.com/product/raptor/

  2. https://everysight.github.io/rdk_docs/

  3. https://developers.google.com/android/reference/com/google/android/gms/location/FusedLocationProviderClient.html

  4. University of Haifa - Faculty of Social Sciences - Ethics Committee for Human Research Studies - Authorization Number: 013/19

References

  1. Angelopoulou A, Economou D, Bouki V, Psarrou A, Jin L, Pritchard C, Kolyda F (2011, June) Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage. In: International conference on mobile wireless middleware, operating systems, and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashkenazi A, Shamir H (2015) Wearable optical display system for unobstructed viewing. U.S. patent application no. 14/632,310

  3. Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4(3):114–123

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bekele MK, Pierdicca R, Frontoni E, Malinverni ES, Gain J (2018) A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J Comput Cult Herit (JOCCH) 11(2):7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brancati N, Caggianese G, De Pietro G, Frucci M, Gallo L, Neroni P (2015) Usability evaluation of a wearable augmented reality system for the enjoyment of the cultural heritage. In 2015 11th international conference on signal-image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS). IEEE. pp 768-774

  6. Brooke J (1996) SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind 189(194):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caggianese G, Neroni P, Gallo L (2014) Natural interaction and wearable augmented reality for the enjoyment of the cultural heritage in outdoor conditions. In: International conference on augmented and virtual reality. Springer, Cham, pp 267–282

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang KE, Chang CT, Hou HT, Sung YT, Chao HL, Lee CM (2014) Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Comput Educ 71:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Damala A (2007) Design principles for mobile museum guides using visitor studies and museum learning theories. In proceedings of the 2007 IADIS M-learn conference (Mobile Learning). Lisbon, pp 277-281

  10. Damala A, Stojanovic N, Schuchert T, Moragues J, Cabrera A, Gilleade K (2012) Adaptive augmented reality for cultural heritage: ARtSENSE project. In: Euro-Mediterranean conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 746–755

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duguleana M, Voinea GD (2018) Enhancing the experience of visiting outdoor heritage sites using handheld AR. In: International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Cham, pp 184–191

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gabbard JL, Swan JE, Hix D, Schulman RS, Lucas J, Gupta D (2005) An empirical user-based study of text drawing styles and outdoor background textures for augmented reality. In IEEE proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual reality. IEEE, pp 11-18

  13. Kamilakis M, Gavalas D, Zaroliagis C (2016) Mobile user experience in augmented reality vs. maps interfaces: a case study in public transportation. In: International conference on augmented reality, virtual reality and computer graphics. Springer, Cham, pp 388–396

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasapakis V, Gavalas D, Galatis P (2016) Augmented reality in cultural heritage: field of view awareness in an archaeological site mobile guide. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 8(5):501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keil J, Pujol L, Roussou M, Engelke T, Schmitt M, Bockholt U, Eleftheratou S (2013) A digital look at physical museum exhibits: designing personalized stories with handheld augmented reality in museums. In digital heritage international congress (DigitalHeritage). IEEE, Vol. 2, pp 685-688

  16. Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2011) Electronic mobile guides: a survey. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15(1):97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerr SJ, Rice MD, Teo Y, Wan M, Cheong YL, Ng J, …, Wren D (2011) Wearable mobile augmented reality: Evaluating outdoor user experience. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry. ACM, pp 209–216

  18. Lee LH, Hui P (2018) Interaction methods for smart glasses: a survey. IEEE Access 6:28712–28732

  19. Leue MC, Han D, Jung T (2014) Google glass creative tourism experience: a case study of Manchester art gallery. WHTF, Seoul, pp 26–29

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leue MC, Jung T, Tom Dieck D (2015) Google glass augmented reality: generic learning outcomes for art galleries. In: Information and communication Technologies in Tourism. Springer, Cham, pp 463–476

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mason M (2016) The MIT Museum glassware prototype: visitor experience exploration for designing smart glasses. J Comput Cult Herit (JOCCH) 9(3):12

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mokatren M, Kuflik T, Shimshoni I (2018) Exploring the potential of a mobile eye tracker as an intuitive indoor pointing device: a case study in cultural heritage. Futur Gener Comput Syst 81:528–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Obeidy WK, Arshad H, Huang JY (2018) TouristicAR: a smart glass augmented reality application for UNESCO world heritage sites in Malaysia. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng (JTEC) 10(3–2):101–108

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ok AE, Basoglu NA, Daim T (2015) Exploring the design factors of smart glasses. In 2015 Portland international conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE, pp. 1657-1664

  25. Pascoal R, Alturas B, de Almeida A, Sofia R (2018) A survey of augmented reality: making technology acceptable in outdoor environments. In 2018 13th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI). IEEE, pp 1-6

  26. Rhodes T, Allen S (2014) Through the looking glass: how Google glass will change the performing arts. Arts Manag Technol Lab:1–12. https://amt-lab.org/engagement-reports. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51d98be2e4b05a25fc200cbc/t/52d331fde4b075f75c5f7243/1389572605768/RhodesAllen_GoogleGlass_1.13.2014.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2019

  27. Romano M, Díaz P, Ignacio A, D’Agostino P (2016, June) Augmenting smart objects for cultural heritage: a usability experiment. In: International conference on augmented reality, virtual reality and computer graphics. Springer, Cham, pp 186–204

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Rzayev R, Woźniak PW, Dingler T, Henze N (2018) Reading on smart glasses: the effect of text position, presentation type and walking. In proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, p 45

  29. tom Dieck MC, Jung T, Han DI (2016) Mapping requirements for the wearable smart glasses augmented reality museum application. J Hosp Tour Technol 7(3):230–253

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tomiuc A (2014) Navigating culture. Enhancing visitor museum experience through mobile technologies. From smartphone to Google Glass. J Med Res 7(3 (20)):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vainstein N, Kuflik T, Lanir J (2016) Towards using mobile, head-worn displays in cultural heritage: user requirements and a research agenda. In proceedings of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, pp 327-331

  32. Vlahakis V, Ioannidis M, Karigiannis J, Tsotros M, Gounaris M, Stricker D, Gleue T, Daehne P, Almeida L (2002) Archeoguide: an augmented reality guide for archaeological sites. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 22(5):52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Eran Litvak & Tsvi Kuflik

Authors
  1. Eran Litvak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tsvi Kuflik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eran Litvak.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Litvak, E., Kuflik, T. Enhancing cultural heritage outdoor experience with augmented-reality smart glasses. Pers Ubiquit Comput 24, 873–886 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01366-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01366-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation