Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitating hikers’ mobility in protected areas through smartphone app: a case of the Hoge Kempen National Park, Belgium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visitor mobility in protected areas is often a challenge as manual map reading and finding a route consume the time. This paper presents a digital tool that provides valuable information for both the visitors and the managers of protected areas. The app provides assistance to users to generate, access, and record hiking routes within the protected area. A route planner was created to generate user-specific alternative routes taking into account the user’s preferences in terms of distance, preferred landscape, level of accessibility, etc. The app also provides the users with basic information on the park, including captivating points, typical flora, and fauna. Moreover, visitors and park management can communicate with each other through exchanging messages and suggestions. The pilot validation test performed with 20 participants and real-time test from 68 park visitors revealed that all the functionality of the app is in order and the app enhances the mobility experience of the user within Hoge Kempen National Park. Furthermore, regular use of the app from users will generate rich data that is valuable for visitor management purposes, for example, the number of trips per day, the average duration of visits and popular segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blaser, M. (2015). Opportunities of an Interpretive Application for Self-guided Tourism within the National Park System. Professional Projects from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismprojects/6

  2. Gretzel U, Sigala M, Xiang Z, Koo C (2015) Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electron Mark 25(3):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong S-J, Tam KY (2006) Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Inf Syst Res 17(2):162–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeanloz S, Lizin S, Beenaerts N, Brouwer R, Van Passel S, Witters N (2016) Towards a more structured selection process for attributes and levels in choice experiments: a study in a Belgian protected area. Retrieved from https://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/handle/1942/21168

  5. Koo C, Shin S, Gretzel U, Hunter WC, Chung N (2016) Conceptualization of smart tourism destination competitiveness. Asia Pac J Inf Syst 26(4):561–576

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leask A (2016) Visitor attraction management: a critical review of research 2009–2014. Tour Manag 57:334–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung Y-F, Spenceley A, Hvenegaard G, Buckley R (2015) Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: guidelines towards sustainability. In: Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No XX. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu S, Cheng I, Cheung L (2017) The roles of formal and informal institutions in small tourism business development in rural areas of South China. Sustainability 9(7):1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manning R, Lawson S, Newman P, Hallo J, Monz C (2014) Principles of sustainable transportation in the national parks. George Wright Forum 31:345–358 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43598389

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCool SF (2009) Constructing partnerships for protected area tourism planning in an era of change and messiness. J Sustain Tour 17(2):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monz C, D’Antonio A, Lawson S, Barber J, Newman P (2016) The ecological implications of visitor transportation in parks and protected areas: examples from research in US National Parks. J Transp Geogr 51:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moscardo G, Murphy L (2014) There is no such thing as sustainable tourism: re-conceptualizing tourism as a tool for sustainability. Sustainability 6(5):2538–2561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Parc Hoge Kempen (2019) Retrieved July 4, 2019, from National Parc Hoge Kempen website: https://www.nationaalparkhogekempen.be/en. Accessed 4 July 2019

  14. Pettebone D, Newman P, Lawson SR, Hunt L, Monz C, Zwiefka J (2011) Estimating visitors’ travel mode choices along the bear lake road in Rocky Mountain National Park. J Transp Geogr 19(6):1210–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivera M, Gregory A, Cobos L (2015) Mobile application for the timeshare industry: the influence of technology experience, usefulness, and attitude on behavioral intentions. J Hosp Tour Technol 6(3):242–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2015-0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spenceley A, Snyman S (2017) Protected area tourism: progress, innovation and sustainability. SAGE Publications Sage UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai C-Y (2010) An analysis of usage intentions for mobile travel guide systems. Afr J Bus Manag 4(14):2962

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Truong N, Shimizu T (2017) The effect of transportation on tourism promotion: literature review on application of the computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Transp Res Procedia 25:3096–3115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borrie WT (1998) Impacts of technology on the meaning of wilderness. Personal, Societal, and Ecological Values of Wilderness: Sixth World Wilderness Congress Proceedings on Recreation, Management, and Allocation 2:87–88

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eagles PF (2003) International trends in park tourism: The emerging role of finance. The George Wright Forum 20:25–57

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halpenny E, Priebe R (2014) An app in the park: A phenomenological study of park visitors’ use of mobile digital applications in Canadian park. The 7th Internafional Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreafional and Protected Areas (MMV):276–277

  22. Martin DR, Pracheil BM, DeBoer JA, Wilde GR, Pope KL (2012) Using the Internet to understand angler behavior in the information age. Fisheries 37(10):458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moscardo G (2011) Exploring social representations of tourism planning: Issues for governance. J Sustain Tour 19(4–5):423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oh HC, Uysal M, Weaver PA (1995) Product bundles and market segments based on travel motivations: A canonical correlation approach. Int J Hosp Manag 14(2):123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Root, J. D., & Knapik, L. J. (1972). Trail conditions along a portion of the Great Divide trail route, Alberta and British Columbia Rocky Mountains (Vol. 72). Research Council of Alberta

  26. Shultis J (2012) The impact of technology on the wilderness experience: A review of common themes and approaches in three bodies of literature. In: Cole DN (ed) Comp. Wilderness Visitor Experiences: Progress in Research and Management; 2011 April 4–7; Missoula, MT. Proc. RMRS-P-66. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station p. 110–118, vol 66, pp 110–118

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smallwood CB, Beckley LE, Moore SA (2012) An analysis of visitor movement patterns using travel networks in a large marine park, north-western Australia. Tour Manag 33(3):517–528

    Google Scholar 

  28. Transport for NSW, C. E. D. (2019). TripGo. Transportnsw.Info. Retrieved May 5, 2019, from http://transportnsw.info/apps/tripgo

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), UHasselt – Universiteit Hasselt, Agoralaan, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium

    Muhammad Shaker, Elke Hermans, Veerle Cops, Yves Vanrompay, Muhammad Adnan, Roeland Maes & Ansar-ul-Haque Yasar

Authors
  1. Muhammad Shaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elke Hermans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veerle Cops
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yves Vanrompay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Adnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roeland Maes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ansar-ul-Haque Yasar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Shaker.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaker, M., Hermans, E., Cops, V. et al. Facilitating hikers’ mobility in protected areas through smartphone app: a case of the Hoge Kempen National Park, Belgium. Pers Ubiquit Comput 25, 219–236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01367-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01367-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation