Skip to main content
Log in

ADASYN and ABC-optimized RBF convergence network for classification of electroencephalograph signal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electroencephalograph (EEG) is supposed to be a major challenge in the area of biomedical signal processing. Being one of the widely used invasive techniques, it is capable to find many cases of brain disorder problems like epileptic seizures and sleep disorder. This work follows the procedure of convergence computing where there are different computing techniques have been combined together to achieve our final goal with much perfection. radial basis function (RBF) being one of the simplest forms of neural network (NN) can be used for the purpose of EEG signal classification, where the network uses the radial basis function as an activation function. In this study, artificial bee colony (ABC) technique was applied for optimizing the parameters that were required in the RBF network for the EEG signal classification. Adaptive synthetic oversampling (ADASYN) process was considered for improving the learning method of managing the class imbalance problem in the EEG dataset. An EEG dataset for normal and epileptic person is typically seen and is processed where five datasets are combined together in three different ways. The new datasets were grouped and were created as set 1 (A+D & E), set 2 (B+D & E), and set 3 (C+D & E). The ABC optimized RBF classifier is applied along with ADASYN method where the resolution for the above stated datasets states that the classification accuracy for set 1 and set 3 were increasing significantly as compared to the standard RBF classifier network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niedermeyer E, Da Silva FL (2005) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. In: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 5th edn, London

  2. Karaboga D, Gorkemli B, Ozturk C, Karaboga N (2012) A comprehensive survey: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artif Intell Rev:1–37

  3. Wang Q, Fang H (2018) Reliability analysis of tunnels using an adaptive RBF and a first-order reliability method. Comput Geotech 98:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mannan MM, Jeong MY, Kamran MA (2016) Hybrid ICA-regression: automatic identification and removal of ocular artifacts from electroencephalographic signals. Front Hum Neurosci 10:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kline JE, Huang HJ, Snyder KL (2015) Isolating gait-related movement artifacts in electroencephalography during human walking. J Neural Eng 12:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sameni R, Gouy-Pailler C (2014) An iterative subspace de-noising algorithm for removing electroencephalogram ocular artifacts. Journal of Neuroscientific Methods 225:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoon LJ, Min LS, Jin BH (2014) CNT/PDMS-based canal-typed ear electrodes for inconspicuous EEG recording. J Neural Eng 11:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Megiddo I, Colson A, Chisholm D, Dua T, Nandi A, Laxminarayan R (2016) Health and economic benefits of public financing of epilepsy treatment in India: an agent-based simulation model. Epilepsia 57(3):464–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martis RJ, Acharya UR, Tan JH et al (2013) Application of intrinsic time-scale decomposition (ITD) to EEG signals for auto- mated seizure prediction. International Journal of Neural Systems 23(5):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balys V, Rudzkis R (2010) Statistical classification of scientific publications. Informatics 21(4):471–486

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ballabio D, Grisoni F, Todeschini R (2018) Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 174:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agor J, Ozaltin Y (2018) Feature selection for classification models via bilevel optimization. Comput Oper Res (In Press)

  13. Cortes C, Vapnik VN (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenblatt F (1961) Principles of neurodynamics: perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Spartan Books

  15. Russell S, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall

  16. Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A (2006) An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proc. 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCulloch W, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65(6):386–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss GM (2005) Mining Rare Cases. In: Maimon O, Rokach L (eds) Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook: a complete guide for practitioners and researchers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 765–776

  20. Chawla NV, Hall LO, Bowyer KW et al (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority oversampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo H and Viktor HL (2004) Learning from imbalanced data sets with boosting and data generation: the data boost-IM approach. In: SIGKDD Explorations: Special issue on Learning from Imbalanced Datasets 6(1): 30-39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ullah I, Hussain M, Qazi E et al (2018) An automated system for epilepsy detection using EEG brain signals based on deep learning approach. Expert Syst Appl 107:61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao S, Wang J, Yu R et al (2017) CNN for situations understanding based on sentiment analysis of twitter data. Procedia Computer Science 111:376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Varela I, Peraira W, Estevez D, Bonillo V (2017) Combining machine learning models for the automatic detection of EEG arousals. Neurocomputing 268:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng Y, Lu B (2016) Discriminative manifold extreme learning machine and applications to image and EEG signal classification. Neurocomputing 174:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Richhariya B, Tanveer M (2018) EEG signal classification using universum support vector machine. Expert Syst Appl 106:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhou G, Jin J, Wang B, Wang X, Cichocki A (2018) Multi-kernel extreme learning machine for EEG classification in brain-computer interfaces. Expert Syst Appl 96:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chatelle C, Spencer C, Cash S et al (2018) Feasibility of an EEG-based brain-computer interface in the intensive care unit. Clin Neurophysiol (In Press) 129:1519–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Husein R, Elgendi M, Wang ZJ, Ward RK (2018) Robust detection of epileptic seizures based on L1-penalized robust regression of EEG signals. Expert Syst Appl 104:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang B, Duan K, Fan C, Hu C, Wang J (2018) Automatic ocular artifacts removal in EEG using deep learning. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 43:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahirwal MK, Kumar A and Singh GK (2014) Adaptive filtering of EEG/ERP through Bounded Range Artificial Bee Colony (BR-ABC) algorithm. Digital Signal Processing25: 164–172.

  32. Mishra S, Mishra D (2016) SNR-TR gene ranking method: a signal-to-noise ratio based gene selection algorithm using trace ratio for gene expression data. International Journal of Pharm Bio Science 7(3):967–978

    Google Scholar 

  33. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems IFSA 2007. LNAI 4529:789–798

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. He H, Bai Y, Garcia EA, Li S (2008) ADASYN: adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp 1322–1328

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ertekin S Adaptive oversampling for imbalanced data classification, pp 1–9

  36. Schuyler R, White A, Staley K, Krzysztof JC (2007) Identification of ictal and pre-ictal states using RBF networks with wavelet-decomposed EEG data. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine:74–81

  37. Karthika AP, Vijayanand RS (2016) Detection and classification of epileptic seizure using RBF neural network. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Computer Science & Electronics 2(3):56–60

    Google Scholar 

  38. Andrzejak RG, Lehnertz K, Rieke C et al (2001) Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity dependence on recording region and brain state. Phys Rev Lett 64:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  39. Haddadi R, Abdelmounim E, Hanine ME, Belaguid A (2014) Discrete wavelet transform based algorithm for recognition of QRS complexes. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT) 4(9):127–132

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li M, Chen W, Zhang T (2017) Automatic epileptic EEG detection using DT- CWT based non-linear feature. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 34:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multi-resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans PAMI 11:674–693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Guo Y, Wang A, Wang W (2018) Multi-source phase retrieval from multi-channel phaseless STFT measurements, Short communication. Signal Process 144:36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Blagus R, Lusa (2013) SMOTE for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data. BlagusandLusaBMC Bioinformatics 14:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  44. Satapathy SK, Dehuri S, Jagadev AK (2017) ABC optimized RBF network for classification of EEG signal for epileptic seizure identification. Egyptian informatics Journal 8(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Satapathy SK, Dehuri S, Jagadev AK (2017) EEG Signal Classification using PSO trained RBF neural network for epilepsy identification. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 6:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bhoi AK (2017) Classification and clustering of Parkinson’s and healthy control gait dynamics using LDA and K-means. International Journal Bioautomation 21(1)

  47. Mallick PK, Balas VE, Bhoi AK, Zobaa AF (2018) Cognitive informatics and soft computing: Proceeding of CISC 2017, vol 768. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bhoi AK, Sherpa KS, Khandelwal B (2018) Arrhythmia and ischemia classification and clustering using QRS-ST-T (QT) analysis of electrocardiogram. Clust Comput 21(1):1033–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The DST, FIST lab of KL University, Vijayawada, supported this work. The authors are grateful for this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Kumar Satapathy.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satapathy, S.K., Mishra, S., Mallick, P.K. et al. ADASYN and ABC-optimized RBF convergence network for classification of electroencephalograph signal. Pers Ubiquit Comput 27, 1161–1177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01533-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01533-4

Keywords

Navigation