Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving network efficiency in wireless body area networks using dual forwarder selection technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wearable computing has a great prospect in smart healthcare applications. The emergence of the Internet of Things, Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs), and big data processing open numerous challenges and opportunities. In healthcare, the monitoring is done by placing/implanting sensor nodes (resource-constrained devices) on a patient’s body to communicate data to a resource-rich node called a sink. The data transmission energy consumption is directly proportional to the distance between the sensor and the sink node. Therefore, it is vital to reduce the energy consumption of the sensor node due to data transmission. In this article, a new Dual Forwarder Selection Technique (DFST) has been proposed to prolong the network lifetime by reducing energy consumption and ultimately improving the stability period and throughput of the network. The DFST works by grouping sensor nodes on a body where both forwarder nodes have been selected through a cost function for relaying data to the sink. The proposed scheme’s efficiency has been evaluated using simulation results in terms of network stability, lifetime, and throughput. Energy consumption of sensor nodes minimized, which, as a result, increased residual network energy. The number of dead nodes of the DFST is about 50% less than that of its counterparts RE-ATTEMPT and iM-SIMPLE. The average throughput of the proposed scheme is 51% and 8% higher than the methods. Similarly, the residual energy of the DFST is approximately 200% and 120% more than iM-SIMPLE and RE-ATTEMPT, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D (2008) Wireless sensor network survey. Comput Netw 52 (12):2292–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ari AAA, Gueroui A, Labraoui N, Yenke BO Concepts and evolution of research in the field of wireless sensor networks. arXiv:1502.03561

  3. Charfi Y, Wakamiya N, Murata M (2009) Challenging issues in visual sensor networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 16(2):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alemdar H, Ersoy C (2010) Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2688–2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ullah S, Higgins H, Braem B, Latre B, Blondia C, Moerman I, Saleem S, Rahman Z, Kwak KS (2012) A comprehensive survey of wireless body area networks. J Med Syst 36(3):1065–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen M, Gonzalez S, Vasilakos A, Cao H, Leung VC (2011) Body area networks: a survey. Mobil Netw Appl 16(2):171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandian PS, Safeer KP, Gupta P, Shakunthala DTI, Sundersheshu B, Padaki VC (2008) Wireless sensor network for wearable physiological monitoring. JNW 3(5):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nadeem A, Hussain MA, Owais O, Salam A, Iqbal S, Ahsan K (2015) Application specific study, analysis and classification of body area wireless sensor network applications. Comput Netw 83:363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Badreddine W, Chaudet C, Petruzzi F, Potop-Butucaru M (2020) Broadcast strategies and performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15. 4 in wireless body area networks WBAN. Ad Hoc Netw 97:102006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nadeem Q, Javaid N, Mohammad SN, Khan MY, Sarfraz S, Gull M (2013) SIMPLE: Stable increased-throughput multi-hop protocol for link efficiency in wireless body area networks. In: 2013 Eighth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2013.42. IEEE, Compiegne, pp 221–226

  11. Prasanna S, Rao S (2012) An overview of wireless sensor networks applications and security. Int J Soft Comput Eng (IJSCE) 2231–2307. ISSN

  12. Tauqir A, Javaid N, Akram S, Rao A, Mohammad SN (2013) Distance aware relaying energy-efficient: Dare to monitor patients in multi-hop body area sensor networks. In: 2013 Eighth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications. IEEE, Compiegne, pp 206–213

  13. Akram S, Javaid N, Tauqir A, Rao A, Mohammad SN (2013) The-fame: Threshold based energy-efficient fatigue measurement for wireless body area sensor networks using multiple sinks. In: 2013 Eighth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications. IEEE, pp 214–220

  14. Bilal M, Kang S-G (2017) An authentication protocol for future sensor networks. Sensors 17:979. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17050979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hossain MS (2017) Cloud-supported cyber–physical localization framework for patients monitoring. IEEE Syst J 11(1):118–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2015.2470644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan ZA, Rasheed MB, Javaid N, Robertson B (2014) Effect of packet inter-arrival time on the energy consumption of beacon enabled MAC protocol for body area networks. In: ANT/SEIT, pp 579–586

  17. Khan RA, Mohammadani KH, Soomro AA, Hussain J, Khan S, Arain TH, Zafar H (2018) An energy efficient routing protocol for wireless body area sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 99 (4):1443–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavallari R, Martelli F, Rosini R, Buratti C, Verdone R (2014) A survey on wireless body area networks: Technologies and design challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(3):1635– 1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghani A, Mansoor K, Mehmood S, Chaudhry SA, Rahman AU, Najmus Saqib M (2019) Security and key management in iot-based wireless sensor networks: An authentication protocol using symmetric key. Int J Commun Syst 32(16):e4139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jawad K, Mansoor K, Baig AF, Ghani A, Naseem A (2019). In: 2019 International conference on communication technologies (ComTech) An improved three-factor anonymous authentication protocol for wsn s based iot system using symmetric cryptography. IEEE, pp 53–59

  21. Ghani A, Naqvi HA, Sher M, Khan ZS, Khan I, Saqlain M (2016) Energy efficient communication in body area networks using collaborative communication in rayleigh fading channel. Telecommun Syst 63(3):357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0125-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghani A, Naqvi SHA, Ilyas MU, Khan MK, Hassan A (2019) Energy efficiency in multipath rayleigh faded wireless sensor networks using collaborative communication. IEEE Access 7:26558–26570. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed S, Javaid N, Akbar M, Iqbal A, Khan ZA, Qasim U (2014) LAEEBA: Link aware and energy efficient scheme for body area networks. In: 2014 IEEE 28th International conference on advanced information networking and applications. IEEE, pp 435–440

  24. Javaid N, Ahmad A, Nadeem Q, Imran M, Haider N (2015) iM-SIMPLE: improved stable increased-throughput multi-hop link efficient routing protocol for wireless body area networks. Comput Hum Behav 51:1003–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johny B, Anpalagan A (2014) Body area sensor networks: Requirements, operations, and challenges. IEEE Potentials 33(2):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhanumathi V, Sangeetha C (2017) A guide for the selection of routing protocols in wban for healthcare applications. Human-Cent Comput Inf Sci 7(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Masud M, Hossain MS, Alamri A (2012) Data interoperability and multimedia content management in e-health systems. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(6):1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2012.2202244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khan RA, Mohammadani KH, Soomro AA, Hussain J, Khan S, Arain TH, Zafar H (2018) An energy efficient routing protocol for wireless body area sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 99 (4):1443–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rathee D, Rangi S, Chakarvarti S, Singh V (2014) Recent trends in wireless body area network (wban) research and cognition based adaptive wban architecture for healthcare. Heal Technol 4(3):239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hossain MS, Muhammad G (2014) Cloud-based collaborative media service framework for healthcare. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 10(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/858712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hossain MS, Muhammad G (2018) Emotion-aware connected healthcare big data towards 5g. IEEE Internet Things J 5(4):2399–2406. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2772959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muhammad G, Hossain MS, Kumar N (2020) Eeg-based pathology detection for home health monitoring. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2020.3020654

  33. Akram S, Habib A (2014) Team fitness monitoring for field hockey using in-vivo sensor and multiple sinks. J Space Technol 4(1):39–43

    Google Scholar 

  34. Javaid N, Faisal S, Khan ZA, Nayab D, Zahid M (2013) Measuring fatigue of soldiers in wireless body area sensor networks. In: 2013 Eighth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications. IEEE, pp 227–231

  35. Baig MR, Ullah N, Hadi F, Ahmed S, Hanan A, Ahmed I (2017) Anycasting in dual sink approach (acids) for wbasns. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 8(3):257–263

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ullah Z, Ahmed I, Razzaq K, Naseer MK, Ahmed N (2019) Dscb: Dual sink approach using clustering in body area network. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 12(2):357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amin B, Ullah N, Ahmed S, Taqi M, Hanan A (2017) Path-loss and energy efficient model (PLEEM) for wireless body area networks (WBANs). In: 2017 International symposium on wireless systems and networks (ISWSN). IEEE, pp 1–6

  38. Bahanfar S, Darougaran L, Kousha H, Babaie S Reliable communication in wireless body area sensor network for health monitoring. arXiv:1112.0393

  39. e Hadi F, Minhas AA (2011) EAA: Energy Aware Anycast Routing in wireless sensor netwroks. J Eng Appl Sci 30 (1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yousaf S, Ahmed S, Akbar M, Javaid N, Khan ZA, Qasim U (2014) Incremental relay-based co-cestat protocol for wireless body area networks. In: 2014 Ninth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications. IEEE, pp 113–119

  41. Adhikary S, Choudhury S, Chattopadhyay S (2016) A new routing protocol for wban to enhance energy consumption and network lifetime. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on distributed computing and networking, pp 1–6

  42. Javaid N, Abbas Z, Fareed M, Khan ZA, Alrajeh N (2013) M-ATTEMPT: A new energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless body area sensor networks. Procedia Comput Sci 19:224– 231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the support provided from Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/10), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anwar Ghani or Muhammad Bilal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahman, H.U., Ghani, A., Khan, I. et al. Improving network efficiency in wireless body area networks using dual forwarder selection technique. Pers Ubiquit Comput 26, 11–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01539-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01539-y

Keywords

Navigation