Abstract
In this paper we investigate portfolio optimization in the Black–Scholes continuous-time setting under quantile based risk measures: value at risk, capital at risk and relative value at risk. We show that the optimization results are consistent with Merton’s two-fund separation theorem, i.e., that every optimal strategy is a weighted average of the bond and Merton’s portfolio. We present optimization results for constrained portfolios with respect to these risk measures, showing for instance that under value at risk, in better markets and during longer time horizons, it is optimal to invest less into the risky assets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dmitrašinović-Vidović, G.: Portfolio selection under downside risk measures. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Calgary (2004)
Dmitrašinović-Vidović, G., Lari-Lavassani, A., Li, X., Ware, A.: Dynamic portfolio selection under Capital at Risk. University of Calgary Yellow Series, Report 833 (2003)
Dmitrašinović-Vidović, G., Lari-Lavassani, A., Li, X.: Continuous time portfolio selection under conditional Capital at Risk. University of Calgary Yellow Series, Report 837 (2004)
Emmer S., Klüppelberg C., Korn R. (2001) Optimal portfolios with bounded Capital at Risk. Math. Financ. 11, 365–384
Jorion P. (1997) All about Value at Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York
Lari-Lavassani, A., Sadeghi, A., Ware, A.: Modeling and implementing mean reverting price processes in energy markets. In: Electronic Publications of the International Energy Credit Association, pp. 30., (www.ieca.net) (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was partially supported by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems (MITACS) Network of Centres of Excellence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dmitrašinović-Vidović, G., Ware, A. Asymptotic behaviour of mean-quantile efficient portfolios. Finance Stoch 10, 529–551 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-006-0018-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-006-0018-0