Skip to main content
Log in

SemWebDL: A privacy-preserving Semantic Web infrastructure for digital libraries

  • Regular contribution
  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent advances in digital libraries have been closely intertwined with advances in Internet technologies. With the advent of the Web, digital libraries have been able to reach constituencies previously unanticipated. Because of the wide deployability of Web-accessible digital libraries, the potential for privacy violations has also grown tremendously. The much touted Semantic Web, with its agent, service, and ontology technologies, is slated to take the Web to another qualitative level in advances. Unfortunately, these advances may also open doors for privacy violations in ways never seen before. We propose a Semantic Web infrastructure, called SemWebDL, that enables the dynamic composition of disparate and autonomous digital libraries while preserving user privacy. In the proposed infrastructure, users will be able to pose more qualitative queries that may require the ad hoc collaboration of multiple digital libraries. In addition to the Semantic Web-based infrastructure, the quality of the response would rest on extraneous information in the form of a profile. We introduce the concept of communities to enable subject-based cooperation and search speedup. Further, digital libraries’ heterogeneity and autonomy are transcended by a layered Web-service-based infrastructure. Semantic Web-based digital library providers would advertise to Web services, which in turn are organized in communities accessed by users. For the purpose of privacy preservation, we devise a three-tier privacy model consisting of user privacy, Web service privacy, and digital library privacy that offers autonomy of perspectives for privacy definition and violation. We propose an approach that seamlessly interoperates with potentially conflicting privacy definitions and policies at the different levels of the Semantic Web-based infrastructure. A key aspect in the approach is the use of reputations for outsourcing Web services. A Web service reputation is associated with its behavior with regard to privacy preservation. We developed a technique that uses attribute ontologies and information flow difference to collect, evaluate, and disseminate the reputation of Web services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson WL (1997) Digital libraries: a brief introduction. SIGGROUP Bull 18(2):4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arms WY (2001) Digital libraries and electronic publishing, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  3. American Library Association (1948) Library Bill of Rights, June 1948

  4. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web. Sci Am 284(5):34–43, May

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Damiani E, De Capitani di Vimercati S, Paraboschi S, Samarati P (2003) Managing and sharing servents’ reputations in P2P systems. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15(4):840–854

  6. Dingledine R, Mathewson N, Syverson P (2003) Reputation in P2P anonymity systems. In: Workshop on economics of peer-to-peer systems, June 2003

  7. Ekstrom MA, Bjornsson HC, Nass CI (2002) A reputation mechanism for B2B electronic commerce that accounts for rater credibility. J Electron Commerce Organizat Comput (in press)

  8. Fensel D, van Harmelen F, Horrocks I, McGuinness D, Patel-Schneider P (2001) OIL: An ontology infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intell Syst 16(2):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Finin TW, Joshi A (2002) Agents, turst, and information access on the Semantic Web. ACM SIGMOD Rec 31(4):30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox EA, Marchionini G (1998) Toward a worldwide digital library. Commun ACM 41(4):29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gertz M (2000) Achieving semantic interoperability through controlled annotations. In: Position paper, US-Korea joint workshop on digital libraries, Sand Diego, 10–11 August 2000

  12. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquisit 5:199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta M, Judge P, Ammar M (2003) A reputation system for P2P networks. In: Proc. 13th international workshop on network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, Monterey, CA, pp 144–152

  14. Huhns MN, Buell DA (2002) Trusted autonomy. IEEE Internet Comput 6(3):92–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jurca R, Faltings B (2003) An incentive compatible reputation mechanism. In: ACM AAMAS’03, 14–18 July 2003

  16. Kamvar SD, Schlosser MT, Garcia-Molina H (2003) The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In: Proc. 12th international World Wide Web conference (WWW)

  17. Keast G, Toms EG, Cherry J (2001) Measuring the reputation of Web sites: a preliminary exploration. In: Proc. 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, 24–28 June 2001, pp 77–78

  18. Lesk M (1997) Practical digital libraries: books, bytes and bucks. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

  19. Lyman P, Varian H (2000) How much storage is enough? ACM Queue 1(4)

  20. Maximilien EM, Singh MP (2002) Conceptual model of Web service reputation. ACM SIGMOD Rec 31(4):36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller E (2003) Enabling the Semantic Web for scientific research and collaboration. In: Proc. NSF Post Digital Library Futures Workshop, 15–17 June 2003

  22. NSF (2003) In: Proc. NSF workshop on digital library futures, 15–17 June 2003

  23. NSF Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure (2003) Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. January 2003

  24. Ouzzani M, Bouguettaya A (2004) Efficient Access to Web Services. IEEE Internet Computing 8(2):34–44, March/April

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rezgui A, Ouzzani M, Bouguettaya A, Medjahed B (2002) Preserving Privacy in Web Services. In: Proc. of the 4th ACM Workshop on Information and Data Management (WIDM’02), McLean, VA, pp 56–62, November 2002

  26. Rezgui A, Bouguettaya A, Eltoweissy M (2003) Preserving privacy in the Web: facts, challenges and solutions. IEEE Secur Privacy 1(6):40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh MP (2002) Trustworthy service composition: challenges and research questions. In: Proc. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, workshop on deception, fraud and trust in agent societies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  28. Panel on Digital Libraries US President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (2001) Digital libraries: universal access to human knowledge. Report to the President, February 2001

  29. Wang Y, Vassileva J (2003) Trust and reputation model for P2P networks. In: 3rd international conference on peer-to-peer computing (P2P’03), 1–3 September 2003

  30. Xiong L, Liu L (2003) A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer ecommerce communities. In: Proc. 2003 IEEE conference on e-commerce (CEC’03)

  31. Yu B, Singh MP (2003) Detecting deception in reputation management. In: ACM AAMAS’03, 14–18 July 2003

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelmounaam Rezgui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rezgui, A., Bouguettaya, A. & Eltoweissy, M. SemWebDL: A privacy-preserving Semantic Web infrastructure for digital libraries. Int J Digit Libr 4, 171–184 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-004-0081-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-004-0081-0

Keywords