Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of online digital resources and educational digital libraries in higher education

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarizes results from a national survey of 4,678 respondents, representing 119 institutions of higher education in the United States regarding their use of digital resources for scholarly purposes. This paper presents the following results: (1) demographics commonly used in higher education to categorize populations such as institution type or level of teaching experience could not reliably predict use of online digital resources, (2) valuing online digital resources corresponds with only higher levels of use for certain types of digital resources, (3) lack of time was a significant barrier to use of materials while, paradoxically, respondents indicated that they used them because they save time, (4) respondents did not tend to intentionally look to the Internet as a trusted resource for learning about teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Association of University Professors: Background facts on contingent faculty. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/contingent/contingentfacts.htm (2007)

  2. Bargozzi R., Davis R. and Warsha P. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Hum. Relations 45(7): 660–686

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bates, M.S., Loddington, S.P., et al.: Rights and rewards project academic survey, final report. http://rightsandrewards.lboro.ac.uk/files/resourcesmodule/@random43cbae8b0d0ad/1150709518_Final_Report_of_Survey.pdf (2006)

  4. Bates M.S. and Loddington S.P. (2006). Rights and rewards in blended institutional repositories project. ALISS Q. 1(2): 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartolo, L., Diekema, A., Khoo, M., McMartin, F.: Survey of Evaluation Projects in the National Science Digital Library, final report. NSDL PI Meeting, Washington D.C., October (2006)

  6. Bayard, J.P., Ehrmann, S., et al.: Learning through technology: LT2. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/ilt/default.asp (2000)

  7. Bell, V., Rothery, A.: E-Sharing: Developing Use of E-repositories and E-libraries for Learning and Teaching. West Midlands Share Project: University of Worcester (2006)

  8. Bishop A., Van House N. and Buttenfield B. (2003). Digital Library Use: Social Practices in Design and Evaluation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borgman, C.L., Leazer, G.H. et al.: How geography professors select materials for classroom lectures: implications for the design of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital libraries, ACM Press, Tuscon, Arizona (2004)

  10. Perez-Quinones M.A. and Capra R.G. (2005). Using web search engines to find and refind information. Computer 38(10): 36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carson S.: 2005 program evaluation findings report. MITOpenCourseWare. http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/about/stats/index.htm (2007)

  12. Chang, A., Matyas, M. et al.: I came, I found it, I used it, and it made a difference. Washington, D.C., American Society for Microbiology: 8 (2004)

  13. Chism N. (2004). Using a framework to engage faculty in instructional technologies. Educause Q. 27(2): 39–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1): 155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3): 319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duval, E.: The technology of open education. Presentation at Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content, Logan Utah (2006)

  17. Gibbs E.J. and Major C.H. (2004). Faculty perception of the costs and benefits of instructional technology: implications for faculty work. J. Faculty Dev. 19(2): 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giersch, S., Klotz, E.A., et al.: If you build it, will they come? Participant involvement in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine 10(7/8) (2004)

  19. Gilbert, S.: The Beauty of Low Threshold Applications. Syllabus Magazine. http://campustechnology.com/articles/38981/ (2002)

  20. Glaser B. and Strauss A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  21. Green, D.: Using digital images in teaching and learning: perspectives from liberal arts institutions. http://www.academiccommons.org/imagereport (2006)

  22. Hagner P. (2000). Faculty engagement and support in the new learning environment. Educause Rev. 35(5): 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harley D. (2004). The Use of Digital Resources in Humanities and Social Science Undergraduate Education. Center for Studies in Higher Education, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harley, D.: Why understanding the use and users of OERs matters. In: Iiuoshi, T., Kumar, V. (eds.) Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content and Open Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008, Forthcoming)

  25. IES National Center for Education Statistics: Digest of Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d06/tables/dt06_237.asp (2003)

  26. Khoo, M., Donahue, R.: Evaluating digital libraries with Webmetrics. In: Proceedings from the ACM IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (2007)

  27. Koppi T. and Bogle L. (2004). Institutional use of learning objects: lessons learned and future directions. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia 13(4): 449–463

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lean J. and Moizer J. (2006). Simulations and games: use and barriers in higher education. Active Learn Higher Educ. 7(3): 227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lerman, S., Miyagawa, S., et al.: OpenCourseWare: Building a culture of sharing. In: Iiuoshi, T., Kumar, V. (eds.) Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content and Open Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008, forthcoming)

  30. Lossau, N.: Search engine technology and digital libraries: libraries need to discover the academic internet. D-Lib Magazine 10(6) (2004)

  31. Lynch, C., Garcia-Molina, H.: Interoperability, scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda. http://www.hpcc.gov/reports/reports-nco-iita-dlw/main.html (1995)

  32. Macdonald R.H. and Manduca C.A. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of US faculty. J. Geosci. Educ. 53(3): 237

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manduca, C.A., Iverson, E.R., et al.: Influencing user behavior through digital library design: an example from the geosciences. D-Lib 11(5) (2005)

  34. Manduca, C.A., Fox, S., et al.: Digital library as network and community center. D-Lib 12(12) (2006)

  35. Marchioni G. (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications 49(4): 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mason B. (2006). Omniture and other evaluation tools for ComPADRE. NSDL 2006 Annual PI Meeting, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  37. Matkin G. (2002). Learning Object Repositories: Problems and Promise. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  38. McMartin, F., Iverson, E., et al.: Factors motivating use of digital libraries. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, ACM Press, Tuscon (2006) NSDL: About NSDL. http://nsdl.org/about/ (2007)

  39. Russell, D.M.: What are they thinking? Searching for the mind of the searcher. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (2007)

  40. Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D., Tansley, R., Walker, J.H.: DSPACE: an open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine 9(1) (2003)

  41. Spotts T. and Bowman M. (1995). Faculty use of instructional technologies in higher education. Educ. Technol. 35(2): 56–64

    Google Scholar 

  42. Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., et al.: The Perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In: Proceedings, SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, ACM Press, Tuscon (2004)

  43. Thomas, A., Rothery, A.: Online repositories for learning materials. Ariadne 45 (2005)

  44. Thong J.Y.L. and Hong W.Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context and individual differences?. International J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 57(3): 215–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Uijtdehaage S.H.J. and Contini J. (2003). Sharing digital teaching resources: breaking down barriers by addressing the concerns of the faculty members. Acad. Med. 78(3): 286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Van House, N.A., Butler, M.H., et al.: User-centered iterative design for digital libraries: the cypress experience. D-Lib Magazine 2(2) (1996)

  47. Wolcott L. and Betts K. (1999). What’s in it for me? incentives for faculty participation in distance education. J. Dist. Educ. 14(2): 34–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flora McMartin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMartin, F., Iverson, E., Wolf, A. et al. The use of online digital resources and educational digital libraries in higher education. Int J Digit Libr 9, 65–79 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-008-0036-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-008-0036-y

Keywords

Navigation