Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The references of references: a method to enrich humanities library catalogs with citation data

  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advent of large-scale citation indexes has greatly impacted the retrieval of scientific information in several domains of research. The humanities have largely remained outside of this shift, despite their increasing reliance on digital means for information seeking. Given that publications in the humanities have a longer than average life-span, mainly due to the importance of monographs for the field, this article proposes to use domain-specific reference monographs to bootstrap the enrichment of library catalogs with citation data. Reference monographs are works considered to be of particular importance in a research library setting, and likely to possess characteristic citation patterns. The article shows how to select a corpus of reference monographs, and proposes a pipeline to extract the network of publications they refer to. Results using a set of reference monographs in the domain of the history of Venice show that only 7% of extracted citations are made to publications already within the initial seed. Furthermore, the resulting citation network suggests the presence of a core set of works in the domain, cited more frequently than average.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://freecite.library.brown.edu/.

  2. Using the Brat annotation environment available at http://brat.nlplab.org/. Cf. Stenetorp et al. [26].

  3. The last version is detailed in SBN [25].

  4. The full list of features is available upon request.

  5. The annotators use the online search interface of the library catalog to retrieve the BIDs. The search interface is available at http://www.sbn.it/opacsbn/opac/iccu/free.jsp.

References

  1. Ahlgren, P., Pagin, P., Persson, O., Svedberg, M.: Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: free will and sorites. Scientometrics 103, 47–73 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951–2010). J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(8), 1751–1755 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett, A.: The information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities. J. Acad. Librariansh. 31(4), 324–331 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan, G., Cunningham, S.J., Blandford, A., Rimmer, J., Warwick, C.: Information seeking by humanities scholars. In: International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. Springer, pp. 218–229 (2005)

  5. Councill, I.G., Giles, C.L., Kan, M.Y.: ParsCit: an open-source CRF Reference String Parsing Package. In: LREC (2008)

  6. Hammarfelt, B.: Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics 86(3), 705–725 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammarfelt, B.: Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics 101(2), 1419–1430 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinzkill, R.: Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals. Libr. Q. 50(3), 352–365 (1980)

  9. Heinzkill, R.: References in scholarly English and American literary journals thirty years later: a citation study. Coll. Res. Libr. 68(2), 141–154 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kellsey, C., Knievel, J.: Overlap between humanities faculty citation and library monograph collections, 2004–2009. Coll. Res. Libr. 73(6), 569–583 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, Y.M., Bellot, P., Faath, E., Dacos, M.: Automatic annotation of bibliographical references in digital humanities books, articles and blogs. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Online books, complementary social media and crowdsourcing, ACM, pp. 41–48 (2011)

  12. Knievel, J.E., Kellsey, C.: Citation analysis for collection development: a comparative study of eight humanities fields. Libr. Q. Inf. Community Policy 75(2), 142–168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of ICML, pp. 282–289 (2001)

  14. LindholmRomantschuk, Y., Warner, J.: The role of monographs in scholarly communication: an empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. J. Doc. 52(4), 389–404 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Linmans, A.J.M.: Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link: indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics 83(2), 337–354 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez, P.: GROBID: combining automatic bibliographic data recognition and term extraction for scholarship publications. In: Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Springer, pp. 473–474 (2009)

  17. Marchi, M.D., Lorenzetti, E.: Measuring the impact of scholarly journals in the humanities field. Scientometrics 106(1), 253–261 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCain, K.W.: Citation patterns in the history of technology. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 9, 41–59 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mingers, J., Leydesdorff, L.: A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246(1), 1–19 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A.: The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106(1), 213–228 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nederhof, A.J.: Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics 66(1), 81–100 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Nolen, D.S., Richardson, H.A.: The search for landmark works in English literary studies: a citation analysis. J. Acad. Libr. 42(4), 453–458 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Okazaki N (2007) CRFsuite: a fast implementation of Conditional Random Fields (CRFs). www.chokkan.org/software/crfsuite

  24. Romanello, M., Colavizza, G.: dhlab-epfl/LinkedBooksMonographs: LinkedBooksMonographs (version 1.0) (2017). doi:10.5281/zenodo.266889

  25. SBN, G.: Reicat—GuidaSBN (2016). http://norme.iccu.sbn.it/index.php?title=Reicat&oldid=3034. Last Accessed 9 Jan 2017

  26. Stenetorp, P., Pyysalo, S., Topić, G., Ohta, T., Ananiadou, S., Tsujii, J.: BRAT: a web-based Tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In: Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL ’12, pp. 102–107 (2012)

  27. Sula, C.A., Miller, M.: Citations, contexts, and humanistic discourse: toward automatic extraction and classification. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 29(3), 452–464 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thelwall, M., Delgado, M.M.: Arts and humanities research evaluation: no metrics please just data. J. Doc. 71(4), 817–833 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson, J.W.: The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship. Libri 52(3), 121–136 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waltman, L.: A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. J. Informetr. 10(2), 365–391 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weingart, S.B.: Finding the history and philosophy of science. Erkenntnis 80(1), 201–213 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiberley, Jr S.E.: Humanities literatures and their users. In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, pp. 2197–2204 (2010)

  33. Williams, P., Stevenson, I., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Rowlands, I.: The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research. Aslib Proc. 61(1), 67–82 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, J., Williams, K., Chen, H.H., Khabsa, M., Caragea, C., Ororbia, A., Jordan, D., Giles, C.L.: Citeseerx: Ai in a digital library search engine. In: Innovative Applications of AI Conference (2014)

  35. Zordan, G.: Repertorio di storiografia veneziana: testi e studi. Il Poligrafo, Padova (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zuccala, A., Guns, R., Cornacchia, R., Bod, R.: Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(7), 1333–1347 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Martina Babetto and Silvia Ferronato for the digitization and annotation of the dataset. The Library of the Ca’ Foscari University of Venice willingly collaborated with bibliographical resources and logistics support. The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) shared its catalog metadata with us. We thank both for their support. Finally, we thank our anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This project is funded by the Swiss National Fund under Division II, project number 205121_159961. Colavizza also benefits from a separate Swiss National Fund grant, number P1ELP2_168489.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digital Humanities Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Station 14, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Giovanni Colavizza, Matteo Romanello & Frédéric Kaplan

Authors
  1. Giovanni Colavizza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Romanello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frédéric Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Colavizza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colavizza, G., Romanello, M. & Kaplan, F. The references of references: a method to enrich humanities library catalogs with citation data. Int J Digit Libr 19, 151–161 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-017-0210-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-017-0210-1

Keywords