Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abstract

This special section is the outcome of the graph transformation tool contest organised during the Graph-Based Tools (GraBaTs) 2008 workshop, which took place as a satellite event of the International Conference on Graph Transformation (ICGT) 2008. The contest involved two parts: three “off-line case studies” which were published before the contest, and to which solutions were submitted and reviewed; and a “live contest” for which the case description was only handed out during the event, and to which solutions had to be constructed during a single afternoon session. Here we briefly sketch the off-line cases, and the setup and topic of the live contest in somewhat more detail. We also evaluate the results of the workshop, and give some recommendations for future editions. Finally, we introduce the research papers appearing in this special section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biermann, E., Ermel C., Lambers L., Prange U., Runge O., Taentzer G.: Introduction to AGG and EMF Tiger by modeling a conference scheduling system. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  2. Ehrig, K., Ermel, C., Hänsgen, S., Taentzer, G.: Generation of visual editors as eclipse plug-ins. In: ASE’05: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 134–143. ACM, New York (2005)

  3. Ermel C., Rudolf M., Taentzer G. et al.: The AGG approach: Language and environment. In: Ehrig, H. (eds) Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation: Applications, Languages, and Tools, vol. 2., pp. 551–603. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geiger L., Zündorf A.: Fujaba case studies for GraBaTs 2008: Lessons learned. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  5. Gorp, P.V.: GraBaTs 2009 Live Tool Contest (slideset). http://is.ieis.tue.nl/staff/pvgorp/events/grabats2008/GraBaTs-part1.pdf and http://is.ieis.tue.nl/staff/pvgorp/events/grabats2008/GraBaTs-extra.pdf (2008)

  6. Horváth, A., Bergmann, G., Ráth, I., Varró, D.: Experimental assessment of combining pattern matching strategies with VIATRA2. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  7. Jackson, D.: Alloy. http://alloy.mit.edu/ (2009)

  8. Jakumeit, E., Buchwald, S., Kroll, M.: GrGen.NET: The expressive, convenient and fast graph rewrite system. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  9. Mészáros, T., Mezei, G., Levendovszky, T., Asztalos, M.: Manual and automated performance optimization of model transformation systems. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  10. Moha, N., Sen, S., Faucher, C., Barais, O., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Evaluation of Kermeta for solving graph-based problems. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  11. Muliawan, O., Janssens D.: Model refactoring using MoTMoT. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  12. Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst W.M.P.: Pattern-based translation of BPMN process models to BPEL web services. Int. J. Web Services Res. 5(1) (2008)

  13. Pérez, J., Crespo, Y., Hoffmann, B., Mens, T.: A case study to evaluate the suitability of graph transformation tools for program refactoring. Special Section on the Graph Transformation Tools Contest 2008, STTT, in this issue (2010)

  14. Rensink A., Gorp P.V.: Graph-based tools: The contest. In: Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds) ICGT. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5214, pp. 463–466. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rensink A., Taentzer G.: AGTIVE 2007 graph transformation tool contest. In: Schürr, A., Nagl, M., Zündorf, A. (eds) AGTIVE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5088, pp. 487–492. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schürr A., Winter A.J., Zündorf A. et al.: The PROGRES approach: language and environment. In: Ehrig, H. (eds) Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation: Applications, Languages, and Tools, vol. 2, pp. 487–550. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Gorp, P., Grefen, P.: Supporting the evaluation of research software with cloud infrastructure. Software and Systems Modeling, special issue on Model Based Interoperability (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pieter Van Gorp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rensink, A., Van Gorp, P. Graph transformation tool contest 2008. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 12, 171–181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-010-0157-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-010-0157-7

Keywords