Abstract
This paper presents a solution to the ABZ-2018 case study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrial, J.-R., Butler, M., Hallerstede, S.T.S., Hoang, F.Mehta, Voisin, L.: Rodin: an open toolset for modelling and reasoning in Event-B. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 12, 447–466 (2010)
Abrial, J.-R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering (chapter 17). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Butler, M.: A system-based approach to the formal development of embedded controllers for a railway. Des. Autom. Embed. Syst. 6, 355–366 (2002)
Haxthausen, A.E., Peleska, J.: Formal development and verification of a distributed railway control system. In: FM’99, LNCS Vol. 1709. Springer (1999)
EEIG ERTMS Users Group. Hybrid ERTMS/ETCS Level 3: principles. July 2017 Ref. 16E042 Version 1A (2017)
Hoang, T.S., Butler, M., Reichl, K.: The Hybrid ERTMS/ETCS Level 3 Case Study. ECS University of Southampton, Southampton (2018)
http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/asf08r/ABZ_Case_2018. To some (but not all) MAC readers: after loading this file, you may have to compress it (zip) before importation in the Rodin toolset. To all readers: after importing, it might be the case that some proof obligations are not discharged. In this case, click on ’Proof Replay on Undischarged POs’ under ’Proof Obligations’
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Asieh Salehi and Dominique Cansell for their help in preparing this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abrial, JR. The ABZ-2018 case study with Event-B. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 22, 257–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-019-00525-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-019-00525-3