Skip to main content
Log in

The emergence of cooperation in the random asynchronous prisoner’s dilemma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The iterated prisoners dilemma (IPD) is a simple model for the study of the emergence of cooperative behavior in populations of selfish individuals. In this work, we challenge the assumption that players move in synchrony, and develop a general Markovian model that allows the study of a wide spectrum of scenarios. Simulations show that the relative timing of player moves, and the reward for mutual cooperation, influences the strategy that eventually dominates the final population. For a synchronous environment, reciprocal behavior appears to be the key to the evolution of cooperation, while in an asynchronous environment, guarded generosity may be a route to the evolution of cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Axelrod R, Hamilton W (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489):1390–1396

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Milinski M (1987) Tit-for-tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325:434–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dugatkin LA (1988) Do guppies play tit-for-tat during predator inspection visits? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:395–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Godard R (1993) Tit-for-tat amongst neighbouring hooded warblers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Packer C (1977) Reciprocal altruism in Papio anubis. Nature 265: 441–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molander P (1985) The optimal level of generosity in a selfish uncertain environment. J Conflict Resolution 29:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1990) The evolution of stochastic strategies in the prisoner’s dilemma. Acta Appl Math 20:247–265

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cornforth D, Green DG, Newth D (2005) Ordered asynchronous processes in natural and artificial systems. Physica D 204:70–82

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Nowak M, Sigmund K (1992) The alternating prisoner’s dilemma. J Theor Biol 168:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1993) A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in prisoner’s dilemma. Nature 364: 56–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. May RM (1987) More evolution of cooperation. Nature 327: 15–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maynard-Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Frean M (1994) The prisoner’s dilemma without synchrony. Proc R Soc Ser B London 257:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nowak MA, Bonhoeffer S, May RM (1994) Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 91:4877–4881

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Huberman BA, Glance NS (1993) Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:7716–771

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Newth.

About this article

Cite this article

Newth, D., Cornforth, D. The emergence of cooperation in the random asynchronous prisoner’s dilemma. Artif Life Robotics 12, 329–334 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-007-0487-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-007-0487-z

Key words

Navigation