Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial living beings and robots: one root, variety of influences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of the robot originated, during the 20th century, and then influenced many areas of human activities in the fields of science, engineering, and economy, but also the arts and culture in general, to a considerable extent. This contribution sketches very briefly the original meaning of the notion of a robot, and then some of the transformations of the original meaning, and some of the influences of the concept of robot during the past century. The currently unreflected fact — the roots of the idea of artificial life as well as the idea of robots in Karel Čapek’s famous play R. U. R. — is also mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horáková J, Kelemen J (2008) The robot story — Why robots were and how they grew up. In: Husbands P, Holland O, Wheeler, M (eds) The mechanical mind in history. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 283–306

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle (1941) The basic works of Aristotle. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Homer (1998) Iliad. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petiška E (1991) Golem. Martin, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapuis A, Droz E (1971) The Jaquet-Droz mechanical puppets. Historical Museum, Neuchatel

    Google Scholar 

  6. Standage T (2002) The Turk. Berkley Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baudrillard J (1989) Videowelt und fraktalen Subjekt. In: Philosophie der neuen Technologie. Merve, Berlin, pp 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  8. Čapek K (1961) R.U.R. and The Insect Play. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961 (translated from Czech by P. Selver and adapted for the English stage by N. Playfair)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turing AM (1936) On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc London Math Soc 42:230–265; corrections in 43:544–546

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59:433–460

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, purpose, and teleology. Phil Sci 10:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sieg W (1999) Church-Turing thesis. In: Wilson RA, Keil FC (eds) MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 116–117

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pfeifer R, Scheier C. (1999) Understanding Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks RA, et al (1999) The Cog project — building a humanoid robot. In: Nehaniv C (ed) Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents. Springer, Berlin, pp 52–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Langton, CG (1996) Artificial life. In: Boden MA (ed) The philosophy of artificial life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–94

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Craig EG (1911) On the art of the theatre. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Man de P (1984) Aesthetic formalisation: Kleist’s Über das Marionettentheater. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kleist H (2004) Puppet theatre. In: Selected writings. Hackett, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tomas D (1995) Feedback and cybernetics — reimaging the body in the age of cybernetics. In: Featherstone M, Burrows R (eds) Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. Sage, London, pp 21–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kac E (1997) Foundation and development of robotic art. Art J 56(3):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Whitelaw M (2004) Metacreation — art and artificial life. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hayles KN (1999) How we became posthuman. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  25. Boden MA (1996) Autonomy and artificiality. In: Boden MA (ed) The philosophy of artificial life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Horáková.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the First European Workshop on Artificial Life and Robotics, Vienna, Austria, July 12–13, 2007

About this article

Cite this article

Horáková, J., Kelemen, J. Artificial living beings and robots: one root, variety of influences. Artif Life Robotics 13, 555–560 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-008-0502-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-008-0502-z

Key words

Navigation