Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchies based on the number of cooperating systems of three-dimensional finite automata

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of whether processing three-dimensional digital patterns is much more difficult than two-dimensional ones is of great interest from both theoretical and practical standpoints. Recently, owing to advances in many application areas, such as computer vision, robotics, and so forth, it has become increasingly apparent that the study of three-dimensional pattern processing is of crucial importance. Thus, the study of three-dimensional automata as a computational model of three-dimensional pattern processing has become meaningful. This article introduces a cooperating system of three-dimensional finite automata as one model of three-dimensional automata. A cooperating system of three-dimensional finite automata consists of a finite number of three-dimensional finite automata and a three-dimensional input tape where these finite automata work independently (in parallel). Those finite automata whose input heads scan the same cell of the input tape can communicate with each other, i.e., every finite automaton is allowed to know the internal states of other finite automata on the cell it is scanning at the moment. In this article, we continue the study of cooperating systems of three-dimensional finite automata, and mainly investigate hierarchies based on the number of their cooperating systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blum M, Kozen K (1987) On the power of the compass. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

  2. Blum M, Sakoda WJ (1977) On the capability of finite automata in 2- and 3-dimensional space. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 147–161

  3. Hemmerling A (1978) Normed two-plane traps for finite system of cooperating compass automata. EIK 23(8/9):453–470

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakamoto M (1999) Three-dimensional alternating Turing machines. PhD Thesis, Yamaguchi University

  5. Blum M, Hewitt C (1967) Automata on a two-dimensional tape. IEEE Symposium on Switching Automata Theory, pp 155–160

  6. Inoue K, Takanami I, Taniguchi H (1979) Three-way two-dimensional simple multihead finite automata: hierarchical properties (in Japanese). IECE Jan Trans (D), pp 65–72

  7. Inoue K, Takanami I, Taniguchi H (1979) Three-way twodimensional simple multihead finite automata: closure properties (in Japanese). IECE Jan Trans (D) 62:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Inoue K, Takanami I (1993) Some hierarchy results on multihead automata over a one-letter alphabet. IEICE Trans Info Syst E76-D(6):625–633

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuo Uchida.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 14th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, February 5–7, 2009

About this article

Cite this article

Uchida, Y., Sakamoto, M., Okatani, S. et al. Hierarchies based on the number of cooperating systems of three-dimensional finite automata. Artif Life Robotics 14, 425–428 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-009-0702-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-009-0702-1

Key words

Navigation