Abstract
This paper focuses on analysis and synthesis methods of continuous-time dynamic quantizers for LFT type quantized control systems. Our aim is to propose a numerical optimization design method of multiple (decentralized) quantizers such that a given linear system is optimally approximated by the given linear system with the multiple quantizers. Our method is based on the invariant set analysis and the LMI technique. In addition, we clarify that our proposed method naturally extends to multiobjective control problems similar to linear control. For implementation, this paper presents an analysis condition of the applicable interval of switching process of quantizer. Finally, it is pointed out that the proposed method is helpful through a numerical example.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Wong WS, Brockett RW (1999) Systems with finite communication bandwidth constraints-Part II: stabilization with limited information feedback. IEEE Trans Autom Control 44(5):1049–1053
Elia N, Mitter SK (2001) Stabilization of linear systems with limited information. IEEE Trans Autom Control 46(9):1384–1400
Fu M, Xie L (2005) The sector bound approach to quantized feedback control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50(11):1698–1711
Antsaklis PJ, Baillieul J, Guest Editors (2007) Special Issue on the Technology of Networked Control Systems. Proc IEEE 95(1):5–8
Azuma S, Sugie T (2008) Optimal dynamic quantizer for discrete-valued input control. Automatica 44(12):396–406
Azuma S, Sugie T (2008) Stability analysis of quantized feedback systems including optimal dynamic quantizers. In: Proceedings of 47th IEEE CDC, pp 3392–3397
Azuma S, Sugie T (2008) Synthesis of optimal dynamic quantizers for discrete-valued input control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(9):2064–2075
Sawada K, Shin S (2011) Synthesis of dynamic quantizers for quantized feedback systems within invariant set analysis framework. In: Proceedings of ACC, pp 1662–1667
Sawada K, Shin S (2011) Synthesis of decentralized dynamic quantizer within invariant set analysis framework. In: Proceedings of IFAC world congress, pp 11284–11289
Okajima H, Sawada K, Matsunaga N, Minami Y (2011) Dynamic quantizer design for MIMO systems based on communication rate constraint. In: Proceedings of IECON, pp 2497–2502
Yashiro D, Tian D, Yakoh T (2011) Optimal dynamic quantizer based acceleration control with narrow bandwidth. In: Proceedings of IECON, pp 2612–2617
Reddy K, Pavan S (2007) Fundamental limitations of continuous-time delta-sigma modulators due to clock jitter. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I 54(10):2184–2194
Matsukawa K, Mitani Y, Takayama M, Obata K, Dosho S, Matsuzawa A (2010) A fifth-order continuous-time delta-sigma modulator with single-opamp resonator. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 45(4):697–706
Stankovic JA (2008) When sensor and actuator networks cover the world. ETRI J 30(5):627–633
Boyd S, Ghaoui LE, Feron E, Balakrishnan V (1994) Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. SIAM, Philadelphia
Scherer C, Ghahinet P, Chilali M (1997) Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 42:896–911
Sanchez-Peña R, Sznaier M (1998) Robust systems theory and applications. Wiley, New York
Masubuchi I, Ohara A, Suda N (1998) LMI-based controller synthesis: a unified formulation and solution. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 8(9):669–686
Ishikawa M, Maruta I, Sugie T (2007) Practical controller design for discrete-valued input systems using feedback modulators. In: Proceedings of European Control Conference 2007, WeC05.1, Kos
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was presented in part at the 18th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Daejeon, Korea, January 30–February 1, 2013.
Appendices
A: Derivation of \({\mathsf{G}}(s):\)
For discrete-valued input v,
holds. For continuous-valued output u of G(s), we have
From the non-singularity of I − D 22 (Assumption 1), we have
Along with this, we thus have the realization of \({\mathsf{G}}(s).\)
B: Derivation of (20)
From \({\Upxi_{\mathsf{P}}=\widehat{{\mathcal{Q}}}}\) and \([\widehat{F}\,\widehat{F}]=[0\,C_q]\Upxi_{\mathsf{P}},\) the following relation holds
and we have
for any vector \(\xi\in{\rm I\!R}^n\) where \({{\mathcal{Q}}=\widehat{T}\widehat{{\mathcal{Q}}}\widehat{T}^{\rm T}}\) and \({{\mathcal{P}}={\mathcal{Q}}^{-1}.}\) Applying schur complement for the above inequality yields
For vector \({\xi\in\mathbb{E}({\mathcal{P}})}\) and ξ = [* x T q ]T, we therefore have
About this article
Cite this article
Sawada, K., Shin, S. Synthesis of continuous-time dynamic quantizers for LFT type quantized feedback systems. Artif Life Robotics 18, 117–126 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-013-0108-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-013-0108-y