Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal of resilience assessment by focusing on pliability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resilience is a concept which presents the strength of mind necessary to adopt the difficulties and to recover from negative psychological state. The assessment for resilience has been assessed by using interview and questionnaire which depend on subjectivity of participants. Though the objective assessment for resilience is expected to advance the biofeedback treatment, neither effective method nor instrument have been developed. Then this study focuses on the pliability as one of aspects of resilience and experimentally verifies whether it becomes a novel index for resilience or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Grotberg EH (1999) Tapping your inner strength; How to find the resilience to deal with anything. New Harbinger Pubns, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masten AS, Best KM, Germezy N (1990) Resilience and development: contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Dev Psychopathol 2:425–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oshio A, Nakaya M, Kaneko H, Nagamine S (2002) Development and validation of an adolescent resilience scale. Jpn J Couns Sci 35:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tsuno K, Oshima K, Kubota K, Kawakami N (2014) Personal resilience and post-traumatic stress symptoms of local government employees: six months after the 2011 Magnitude 9.0 East Japan Earthquake. Sangyo Eisegaku Zasshi 56(6):245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasrin I, Mohsen A, Reza GJ, Shabnam H (2010) A study of relationship between suicidal ideas, depression, anxiety, resiliency, daily stresses and mental health among Tehran university students. Proc Soc Behav Sci 5:1515–1519

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corner KM, Davidson JRT, Lee LC (2003) Spirituality, resilience and anger in survivors of violent trauma: a community survey. J Trauma Stress 16(5):487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Otabe T, Kato K, Shunichi M (2009) How does dispositional resiliency affect psychological processes followed by hurtful experience? Jpn J Stress Manag 6(1):11–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ihaya K, Nakamura T (2008) Four aspects of resilience: understanding and utilization of intra- and inter-personal resources. Jpn J Pers 17(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corner KM, Davidson JRT (2003) Development of a new resilience scale: the Corner–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression Anxeity 18:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida T, Ohmoto S, Kanamura S (1991) 1/f frequency-fluctuation of human EEG and emotional changes. In: Proceedings of the International conference on noise in physical systems and 1/f fluctuations ICNF-91, pp 719–722

  11. Oku T, Watanabe E, Fukuda S, Shirakawa T (2002) Effects of Imagery on an electroencephalogram and pulse waves. J Int Soc Inf Sci 20(2):616–621

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rotter JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr: Gen Appl 80(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirano M (2010) A study of the classification of resilience factors: development of the Bidimensional Resilience Scale (BRS). Jpn J Pers 19(2):94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tasedale JD, Moore RG, Hayhurst H, Pope M, Williams S, Segal ZV (2002) Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. J Consult Clin Psychol 70(2):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elise S, Dan-Glauser K, Scherer R (2011) The Geneva affective picture database (GAPED): a new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. Behav Res Methods 43:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsumoto Y, Mori N, Mitajiri R, Jiang Z (2010) Study of mental stress evaluation based on analysis of heart rate variability. J Life Support Eng 22(3):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Otabe T, Kaneda T, Yoshikai M, Tokuyasu T (2015) Efforts for assessing psychological resilience using EEG. In: Proceedings of internal symposium on artificial life and robotics 2015, pp 88–91

  18. Otabe T, Kaneda T, Yoshikai M, Tokuyasu T (2014) An Objective assessment of mental condition based on EEG and ECG T. In: Proceedings of broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications 2014, pp 509–513

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takako Otabe.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otabe, T., Kaneda, T., Yoshikai, M. et al. Proposal of resilience assessment by focusing on pliability. Artif Life Robotics 21, 79–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-015-0257-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-015-0257-2

Keywords