Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evolution of communication through differentiation of communicative and goal-directed behaviors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have focused on the evolution of communication in artificial life, often presupposing dedicated communication channels such as voices or pheromones. However, it is plausible that only behavior existed when communication began and that some behaviors gradually evolved as a mean of communication. A study by Quinn has shown that communication can evolve purely through the behavior for two agents in a simulated environment. We extend this study to a more complex communication using three agents. In the simulation, the agents are equipped with two wheels and eight IR sensors and are controlled by identical neural networks. This network evolved by applying a genetic algorithm to a single population. After evolution, the agents’ behaviors had differentiated into communicative and goal-directed types. We analyze the differences between these two types of behavior quantitatively, and show that the evolved behaviors have communication properties such as mutuality, information flow, and invariance of the motion gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Nolfi S, Floreano D (2000) Evolutionary robotics: the biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pfeifer R, Scheier C (2001) Understanding intelligence. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harvey I, Di Paolo E, Wood R, Quinn M, Tuci E (2005) Evolutionary robotics: a new scientific tool for studying cognition. Artif Life 11(1–2):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawamura H, Yamamoto M, Suzuki K, Ohuchi A (1999) Ants war with evolutive pheromone style communication. In: Floreano D, Nicoud JD, Mondada F (eds) Proceedings of 5th European conference on artificial life, vol 1674. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 639–643

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marocco D, Cangelosi A, Nolfi S (2002) The role of social and cognitive abilities in the emergence of communication: experiments in evolutionary robotics. In: Proceedings of EPSRC/BBSRC international workshop biologically-inspired robotics, pp 174–181

  6. Saunders GM, Pollack JB (1996) The evolution of communication schemes over continuous channels. From Anim Animat 4:580–589

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marocco D, Nolfi S (2005) Emergence of communication in embodied agents: co-adapting communicative and non-communicative behaviours. In: Modeling language, cognition and action: proceedings of the ninth neural computation and psychology workshop. World Scientific, pp 165–174

  8. Cangelosi A (2001) Evolution of communication and language using signals, symbols, and words. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 5(2):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galantucci B (2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cogn Sci 29(5):737–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirby S, Cornish H, Smith K (2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: an experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(31):10681–10686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ikegami T, Iizuka H (2003) Joint attention and dynamics repertoire in coupled dynamical recognizers. Proc Imit Anim Artifacts II:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott-Phillips TC, Kirby S, Ritchie GRS (2009) Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition 113(2):226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iizuka H, Marocco D, Ando H, Maeda T (2013) Experimental study on co-evolution of categorical perception and communication systems in humans. Psychol Res 77(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinn M (2001) Evolving communication without dedicated communication channels. In: Kelemen J, Sosík P (eds) Proceedings of 6th European conference on artificial life, vol 2159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 357–366

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quinn M (2000) Evolving co-operative homogeneous multi-robot teams. In: Proceedings of 2000 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, (IROS 2000), vol 3, pp 1798–1803

  16. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. U Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Iizuka H, Ikegami T (2004) Adaptability and diversity in simulated turn-taking behavior. Artif Life 10(4):361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomasello M (2009) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uno R, Ikegami T (2003) Joint attention/prediction and language: a mechanism to align intentionalities. Pap Cogn Linguist 2:231–274

    Google Scholar 

  20. Treverthen C, Murray L (1985) Emotional regulations of interactions between 2-month-oldsand their mothers. In: Field TM, Fox NA (eds) Social perception in infants. Ablex, Norwood

  21. Marocco D, Nolfi S (2007) Emergence of communication in embodied agents evolved for the ability to solve a collective navigation problem. Connect Sci 19(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uno R, Marocco D, Nolfi S, Ikegami T (2011) Emergence of protosentences in artificial communicating systems. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev 3(2):146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nadel J, Carchon I, Kervella C, Marcelli D, Réserbat-Plantey D (1999) Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Dev Sci 2(2):164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schreiber T (2000) Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett 85(2):461

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Kita 14, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0814, Japan

    Naohiro Shibuya, Hiroyuki Iizuka & Masahito Yamamoto

Authors
  1. Naohiro Shibuya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroyuki Iizuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masahito Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naohiro Shibuya.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 22nd International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Beppu, Oita, January 19–21, 2017.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shibuya, N., Iizuka, H. & Yamamoto, M. Evolution of communication through differentiation of communicative and goal-directed behaviors. Artif Life Robotics 23, 225–234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-017-0417-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-017-0417-7

Keywords